Grandmaster Raset Ziatdinov
Known across the chessboard like a master biologist knows their specimens, Raset Ziatdinov holds the prestigious title of Grandmaster awarded by FIDE. With a rating evolution more dynamic than a rapidly dividing cell, Raset has demonstrated endurance, skill, and an uncanny tactical awareness that would make Darwin proud.
Career Highlights & Style
From humble beginnings in blitz where Raset's rating blossomed from 1352 in 2018 to a peak of 2634 in 2024, their chess evolution is nothing short of a genetic marvel. This player thrives in fast-paced games, boasting an impressive comeback rate of 81.32%, and wins nearly 96% of battles even after losing a piece — talk about survival of the fittest on the 64 squares!
Raset's endgame frequency is almost instinctual at 71.56%, showing patience worthy of a predator in pursuit. Their average games have just over 70 moves, proving that this Grandmaster loves to fight to the very end, never letting a match go into hibernation early with only a 5.2% early resignation rate.
Playing Tendencies
- White pieces win-rate: 54.23%
- Black pieces win-rate: 50.8%
- Longest Winning Streak: 18 games, quite the evolutionary streak!
- Tilt Factor: 12 — occasionally a twitch in the neural network, but nothing a good queen sacrifice can't fix.
Opening Moves & Opponents
Raset prefers keeping their openings "Top Secret," much like cryptic genetic codes. This secret strategy yields a steady win rate of 55.5% in blitz and 61.8% in rapid games. Facing recurring opponents like gensunasumus and doctorpouliot more than 30 times, Raset shows both consistency and dominance, surviving battles and thriving through natural selection on the virtual battlefield.
Time and Tactical Adaptation
Raset's optimum hours are early morning to noon, with astonishing win rates above 60%, especially shining at 11 AM and 9 AM — clearly when the brain's enzymes are most active. Saturdays may see a bit of genetic drift, but Thursdays boast nearly 63% success, proving that timing is everything in the evolution of a champion.
Conclusion
With tactical awareness sharp enough to bounce back from setbacks and a style that embraces both endurance and rapid adaptability, Raset Ziatdinov is a true chess evolutionary force. Their games are less about random mutations and more about calculating strategy — a grand journey of survival, adaptation, and victory on an 8x8 Petri dish.
Hi Raset!
Great fighting spirit in your recent blitz sessions. Your score against 2500-2600 opposition remains impressive (see 2635 (2025-06-25)), yet a closer look at your games shows clear themes you can polish to push toward the next plateau.
What you’re doing well
- Dynamic piece play. In your win vs Feu2000 (Nimzo-Indian) you uncorked …g5 and …Ne4, seizing the initiative and keeping it all the way to the queen ending. Your judgement when the position calls for activity is excellent.
- Pressure under time scramble. Several victories arrive after opponents collapse with <10 s left. Your mouse-speed and calculation under pressure are clear competitive assets.
- Willingness to complicate. Even as Black in the Najdorf you enter sharp …g5 lines and accept structural ugliness in exchange for piece play. This usually works because you calculate concrete tactics well.
Recurring pain points
- Pawn storms that forget the king. Loss to nohisss (B94) started with 12…g5?! creating a hole on f5 and fixed targets on the kingside — your king never found safety afterwards. Ask yourself before every pawn thrust: “If the attack doesn’t work, what squares have I weakened?”
- Conversion in technical phases. Against Massakru you needed 85 moves to convert a winning rook endgame; several faster wins were missed (e.g. 58…Qe6+!). A few hours of focused rook-ending study will pay instant dividends.
- Blind spots to opponent’s resources. In the loss to darkestdungeon1 you allowed 20.f5 when your queen was offside; the follow-up 27…Rg2+? overlooked a simple perpetual break. Practise prophylactic thinking prophylaxis: “What does my opponent want next move? How do I stop it?”
- Time-outs in winning positions. Two losses on time this month suggest clock management can still improve. You often blitz the opening but slow down later; try to keep at least 30 s for the final 10 moves.
Opening tune-ups
As Black vs 1.e4 — Your Najdorf repertoire is razor-sharp but also energy-draining. Add one solid backup line (e.g. Taïmanov 5…Qc7 or Pych 6…e6/…Qc7) for days when you feel less tactical.
As White — You score well with 1.d4 systems but occasionally drift (game vs Claudio2006: QP → pawn storm). Consider a stable “control” line (e.g. Catalan or London) to diversify positions you face.
Suggested training plan
- Endgame Monday: 30 min on rook-vs-rook+pawn endings (Averbakh & Dvoretsky diagrams).
- Tactics Tuesday-Thursday: 25 difficult puzzles each day, theme = king safety and intermediate move.
- Friday sparring: Two 15|10 games with a training partner; annotate immediately, focusing on missed defensive resources.
- Weekend review: Upload three self-picked games to your database; add one critical comment every three moves. (Short, but forces you to verbalise plans.)
Progress monitors
Check these dashboards monthly to verify that the work sticks:
Quick tactical motif to remember
The missed winner vs Massakru:
Next steps
Pick one weakness above and tackle it this week. Small, focused improvements will stack quickly at your level.
Good luck, keep the pieces flying, and message me any time you’d like a deeper dive into a specific game!
🆚 Opponent Insights
| Recent Opponents | ||
|---|---|---|
| rakitic2010 | 0W / 6L / 1D | View |
| Laurin Jahnz | 2W / 2L / 1D | View |
| rodgy | 1W / 0L / 0D | View |
| hs03935 | 0W / 1L / 0D | View |
| Sergei Ljukin | 1W / 3L / 0D | View |
| Jval Saurin Patel | 0W / 1L / 0D | View |
| miss_feya16 | 4W / 3L / 0D | View |
| eldinary | 0W / 1L / 0D | View |
| nazar_matviiienko | 1W / 0L / 0D | View |
| haleemabd | 1W / 0L / 0D | View |
| Most Played Opponents | ||
|---|---|---|
| Will Moorhouse | 17W / 12L / 3D | View Games |
| DoctorPouliot | 16W / 13L / 2D | View Games |
| GraciousLeader | 20W / 6L / 0D | View Games |
| Egor Baskakov | 3W / 20L / 1D | View Games |
| Santiago Pinon | 4W / 13L / 2D | View Games |
Rating
| Year | Bullet | Blitz | Rapid | Daily |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 2567 | 2687 | 2113 | |
| 2024 | 2702 | 2583 | 2097 | |
| 2023 | 2408 | 2532 | ||
| 2022 | 2161 | 2422 | 2098 | |
| 2021 | 2229 | 2117 | 2173 | |
| 2020 | 2292 | |||
| 2019 | 2258 | |||
| 2018 | 2028 |
Stats by Year
| Year | White | Black | Moves |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 356W / 392L / 42D | 325W / 438L / 29D | 76.3 |
| 2024 | 424W / 462L / 56D | 413W / 481L / 51D | 81.2 |
| 2023 | 91W / 117L / 16D | 76W / 135L / 13D | 82.3 |
| 2022 | 813W / 335L / 70D | 753W / 407L / 75D | 65.8 |
| 2021 | 145W / 102L / 14D | 145W / 111L / 18D | 67.2 |
| 2020 | 63W / 32L / 1D | 60W / 33L / 7D | 68.6 |
| 2019 | 40W / 25L / 2D | 45W / 16L / 0D | 63.8 |
| 2018 | 25W / 16L / 2D | 25W / 15L / 0D | 59.7 |
Openings: Most Played
| Blitz Opening | Games | Wins | Losses | Draws | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 277 | 172 | 103 | 2 | 62.1% |
| Amazon Attack: Siberian Attack | 141 | 74 | 59 | 8 | 52.5% |
| London System: Poisoned Pawn Variation | 97 | 62 | 32 | 3 | 63.9% |
| Sicilian Defense: Alapin Variation | 95 | 57 | 33 | 5 | 60.0% |
| Amazon Attack | 93 | 66 | 23 | 4 | 71.0% |
| Caro-Kann Defense: Exchange Variation | 80 | 51 | 25 | 4 | 63.8% |
| Sicilian Defense | 73 | 42 | 28 | 3 | 57.5% |
| Sicilian Defense: Najdorf Variation | 69 | 30 | 36 | 3 | 43.5% |
| Sicilian Defense: Closed | 68 | 35 | 29 | 4 | 51.5% |
| Modern | 67 | 33 | 31 | 3 | 49.2% |
| Bullet Opening | Games | Wins | Losses | Draws | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Amar Gambit | 301 | 180 | 107 | 14 | 59.8% |
| Modern | 163 | 63 | 90 | 10 | 38.6% |
| Australian Defense | 145 | 88 | 51 | 6 | 60.7% |
| Colle System: Rhamphorhynchus Variation | 143 | 63 | 71 | 9 | 44.1% |
| Caro-Kann Defense | 136 | 56 | 71 | 9 | 41.2% |
| Amazon Attack: Siberian Attack | 116 | 46 | 63 | 7 | 39.7% |
| Alekhine Defense | 107 | 48 | 56 | 3 | 44.9% |
| London System: Poisoned Pawn Variation | 100 | 49 | 45 | 6 | 49.0% |
| Hungarian Opening: Wiedenhagen-Beta Gambit | 87 | 54 | 30 | 3 | 62.1% |
| Amazon Attack | 85 | 40 | 40 | 5 | 47.1% |
| Rapid Opening | Games | Wins | Losses | Draws | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Amazon Attack | 9 | 6 | 3 | 0 | 66.7% |
| Caro-Kann Defense: Exchange Variation | 7 | 6 | 0 | 1 | 85.7% |
| Sicilian Defense: Alapin Variation | 5 | 2 | 1 | 2 | 40.0% |
| Sicilian Defense: Closed | 5 | 5 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| Dresden Opening: The Goblin | 5 | 3 | 2 | 0 | 60.0% |
| Amazon Attack: Siberian Attack | 5 | 5 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| Sicilian Defense: Accelerated Dragon, Exchange Variation | 5 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 40.0% |
| Sicilian Defense: Closed, Anti-Sveshnikov Variation, Kharlov-Kramnik Line | 5 | 3 | 2 | 0 | 60.0% |
| Sicilian Defense: Accelerated Dragon, Maróczy Bind | 4 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 75.0% |
| French Defense: Tarrasch Variation, Botvinnik Variation | 4 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
🔥 Streaks
| Streak | Longest | Current |
|---|---|---|
| Winning | 18 | 0 |
| Losing | 12 | 2 |