Grandmaster Fidel Corrales Jimenez (gmcorrales)
Fidel Corrales Jimenez is a FIDE Grandmaster and popular chess streamer known for energetic commentary, practical decision-making, and a sense of humor sharp enough to call out a Botez Gambit or an LPDO the moment it appears. A veteran of elite events and online arenas alike, gmcorrales blends classical fundamentals with modern “click-speed” instincts, often turning slightly worse positions into full-on Swindle attempts—then smiling about it on stream.
Although he racks up staggering numbers in fast chess, his preferred time control is Daily chess—a nod to serious preparation, careful endgames, and the occasional long walk with his favorite passer before a tidy Building a bridge.
Style and Approach
Corrales thrives in complex middlegames where initiative, Counterplay, and endgame technique meet. His games frequently go the distance, and he’s comfortable guiding grindy positions to technical wins. When in doubt, he’s not shy about sending Harry up the board, and he appreciates a well-timed Exchange sac if it yields long-term Compensation.
- Endgame leaning: high “endgame frequency” with marathon fights and tenacious defense.
- Tactical radar: alert to forks, Pins, and the occasional Decoy to untangle tough defenses.
- Streamer’s mindset: explains ideas in human terms—why the “second best” may still be the practical best.
Peak online blitz strength: 3062 (2025-10-05). For the data-inclined, here’s a light look at the trend:
.Repertoire Notes
Fidel’s repertoire is pragmatic and battle-tested. As Black he isn’t afraid of heavy theory, and as White he’s happy to steer toward rich, imbalanced play where he can out-calculate in the clutch.
- Caro–Kann Defense: a long-term workhorse—solid, resilient, and endgame-friendly.
- Sicilian Najdorf: enters sharp mainlines with room for a home-cooked TN or two.
- Scotch Game and Scandinavian Defense: straightforward central fights with clear strategic plans.
- Occasional Modern setups: flexible, hypermodern structures that invite dynamic Counterplay.
Frequent Rivals and Sparring Partners
Online, GM Corrales has logged thousands of blitz games against a who’s who of speed-chess specialists and titled grinders. You’ll often see him paired with:
- puckmate99 — marathon matchups and clutch tiebreak energy
- gm_dmitrij — theoretical duels and razor-thin endgames
- baldalbino — defensive resourcefulness meets attacking flair
- roiyeho — drawish walls and sudden breaks through the fortress
- gigaquparadze — sharp openings and mutual time-trouble scrambles
Streamer and Educator
As a streamer, Fidel mixes instructive breakdowns with a healthy dose of humor. Expect live prep, opening experiments, and honest post-mortems—whether it’s a clean squeeze or a last-second Flagging fiesta. He’s equally comfortable demystifying a “quiet” positional squeeze or celebrating a swashbuckling miniature worthy of a Brilliancy prize.
Mini-idea: A Caro–Kann Comfort Zone
A sample line he often steers into—solid development with long-term chances and a late-game pull:
Plans: central control, harmonious development, and a steady hand if the game drifts into a queenless middlegame or pure endgame. Beware the LPDO—“loose pieces drop off”—and keep an eye on those Hanging pawns when the center opens.
Fun Facts
- Preferred online time control: Daily chess—a surprise for a blitz specialist, but perfect for deep prep and clean technique.
- Longest online win heater: 20 games; proof that momentum is real and the Magnus effect has cousins.
- Loves endgames, but never says no to a timely Greek gift or a speculative Queen sac if the practical chances are there.
Legacy in a Line
Grandmaster Fidel Corrales Jimenez is a modern hybrid: a classically grounded attacker, a fearless speed-chess competitor, and a charismatic chessfluencer who can make a “quiet move” feel like a plot twist. Whether he’s guiding a Pawn roller to glory or converting a “dead equal” into a technical win, gmcorrales makes strong chess feel accessible—and fun.
Overview of your recent games
You’ve shown a willingness to engage in sharp, tactical positions in your daily games. In the most recent win, you pressed actively in a Ruy Lopez Marshall-style sequence and used timely piece activity to create decisive chances. In other recent rounds, you’ve experimented with a wide range of openings and responses, which is excellent for practical learning, but some lines demanded precise calculation and quick decisions under pressure. The goal now is to convert that dynamic play into consistent, solid results by refining patterns and avoiding speculative trades in critical moments.
What you’re doing well
- Active piece play and initiative in complex middlegames, especially in sharp openings where you fight for the initiative rather than wait for the opponent to commit errors.
- Willingness to test multiple openings, which helps you understand different pawn structures and plans. This broad exposure can improve your adaptability in practical games.
- Resourcefulness in pressing difficult positions and exploiting missteps by your opponents when you maintain pressure and coordinate your major pieces effectively.
Opening trends to build on
Your openings show comfort with aggressive, dynamic lines such as Ruy Lopez variants and other sharp setups. To convert this strength into more consistent results, consider the following:
- Deepen a small set of 2-3 openings you enjoy and study the typical middlegame plans, common pawn breaks, and standard piece maneuvers for those lines. This helps you anticipate opponent ideas and pick stronger continuations under time pressure.
- When choosing lines with quick piece activity (like Marshall Attack or other tactical branches), pair your thirst for initiative with a clear plan for how you intend to convert pressure into a material or positional advantage.
- For more positional openings (such as Queen’s Pawn families or Gruenfeld-related structures), focus on solid development, king safety, and a clear idea of where your pieces will operate in the middlegame.
Areas to improve
- Decision quality in sharp, tactical sequences. When to sacrifice material, when to simplify, and how to calculate forcing lines without getting overconfident in unvalidated tactical flashes.
- Endgame conversion in mixed-material positions. Practice maintaining activity for the winning side and seeking practical chances even if the material balance is even or unclear.
- Time management and pace in longer, theoretical games. Allocate thinking time effectively in critical middlegame transitions to avoid rushed, low-confidence moves late in the game.
- Pattern recognition for typical middlegame plans in your chosen openings. Build a checklist of 3-4 common ideas for each line so you can quickly identify promising plans during a game.
Practice plan for the next steps
- Pick 2 openings you enjoy most (for example, a Ruy Lopez Marshall Attack and one Gruenfeld/Grunfeld-adjacent setup) and study their typical middlegame ideas for 20–30 minutes daily this week.
- Do 5 tactical puzzles daily centered on middle-game motifs you’ve encountered in those openings (pins, skewers, overloaded pieces, and queen-rook coordination).
- Review 2 recent games with a coach or a strong tool, focusing on the critical turning points (where you could have simplified safely, or where you might have activated a piece more effectively).
- Practice endgames that often arise from your openings (rook and minor piece endgames, or rook endgames with opposite sides) to improve conversion chances.
- Implement a simple pre-move checklist: ensure king safety, complete development, connect rooks, and consider a concrete plan within 2–3 moves after the opening phase.
Recommended quick-start goals
- Master the core ideas of 2 openings you select and be able to state the main differences in plans between them.
- Resolve 3 common tactical motifs you’ve faced in your games this month, with 2 concrete examples of how to apply them in your next game.
- Improve endgame technique by practicing conversion drills: convert slight advantages in rook endgames 70% of the time in training positions.
Optional notes
Placeholder for future annotations, including a quick link to your latest win or a sample game to review together. If you’d like, I can insert a concise Pgn excerpt of your most recent win for targeted critique.
🆚 Opponent Insights
| Recent Opponents | ||
|---|---|---|
| Pranav Anand | 6W / 6L / 0D | |
| Anthony Wirig | 3W / 6L / 1D | |
| Konstantin Popov | 2W / 2L / 0D | |
| eagle_2019 | 3W / 1L / 0D | |
| Khalil Mousavi | 4W / 5L / 0D | |
| Jan Klimkowski | 4W / 8L / 0D | |
| sadykov_ramil | 4W / 2L / 0D | |
| Seo Jungmin | 16W / 21L / 2D | |
| Umut Ata Akbas | 4W / 2L / 0D | |
| mawrld0 | 1W / 1L / 1D | |
| Most Played Opponents | ||
|---|---|---|
| puckmate99 | 145W / 12L / 431D | |
| Dmitrij Kollars | 226W / 292L / 37D | |
| baldalbino | 156W / 2L / 359D | |
| Roi Yehoshua | 28W / 3L / 324D | |
| Giga Quparadze | 112W / 141L / 26D | |
Rating
| Year | Bullet | Blitz | Rapid | Daily |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 2836 | 3013 | 2506 | 1263 |
| 2024 | 2830 | 2780 | 2506 | |
| 2023 | 2752 | 2842 | 2028 | |
| 2022 | 2824 | 2790 | 2158 | 1385 |
| 2021 | 2781 | 2789 | 2230 | |
| 2020 | 2827 | 2753 | 2230 | 1385 |
| 2019 | 2639 | 2931 | 2227 | 1385 |
| 2018 | 2702 | 2768 | 2412 | 1321 |
| 2017 | 2658 | 2715 | 2412 | 800 |
| 2016 | 2533 | |||
| 2015 | 2313 |
Stats by Year
| Year | White | Black | Moves |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 165W / 139L / 18D | 153W / 157L / 23D | 88.2 |
| 2024 | 689W / 564L / 142D | 601W / 648L / 149D | 86.3 |
| 2023 | 1017W / 817L / 166D | 915W / 921L / 184D | 89.9 |
| 2022 | 457W / 339L / 250D | 425W / 373L / 254D | 74.6 |
| 2021 | 304W / 255L / 331D | 282W / 260L / 330D | 61.5 |
| 2020 | 767W / 643L / 297D | 682W / 698L / 311D | 81.2 |
| 2019 | 1554W / 1242L / 282D | 1400W / 1415L / 276D | 85.8 |
| 2018 | 742W / 592L / 142D | 700W / 646L / 138D | 80.8 |
| 2017 | 1130W / 949L / 193D | 1020W / 1059L / 209D | 89.5 |
| 2016 | 22W / 12L / 0D | 22W / 8L / 4D | 84.0 |
| 2015 | 16W / 3L / 0D | 16W / 1L / 0D | 77.5 |
Openings: Most Played
| Blitz Opening | Games | Wins | Losses | Draws | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Caro-Kann Defense | 1255 | 599 | 503 | 153 | 47.7% |
| Sicilian Defense: Najdorf Variation | 1253 | 569 | 526 | 158 | 45.4% |
| Scotch Game | 993 | 461 | 374 | 158 | 46.4% |
| Scandinavian Defense | 660 | 335 | 244 | 81 | 50.8% |
| Sicilian Defense | 632 | 290 | 258 | 84 | 45.9% |
| Amazon Attack: Siberian Attack | 578 | 271 | 225 | 82 | 46.9% |
| Modern | 559 | 277 | 242 | 40 | 49.5% |
| French Defense: Advance Variation | 555 | 247 | 226 | 82 | 44.5% |
| Sicilian Defense: Dragon Variation, Yugoslav Attack | 531 | 246 | 201 | 84 | 46.3% |
| Sicilian Defense: Closed | 428 | 195 | 183 | 50 | 45.6% |
| Daily Opening | Games | Wins | Losses | Draws | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gruenfeld: 5.Bg5 c6 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 50.0% |
| Ruy Lopez: Marshall Attack | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| Czech Defense | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| Sicilian Defense: Dragon Variation | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| Australian Defense | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0.0% |
| Italian Game: Two Knights Defense | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| Unknown | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0.0% |
| English Opening: King's English Variation | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0.0% |
| Scotch Game | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| Sicilian Defense: Najdorf Variation | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| Rapid Opening | Games | Wins | Losses | Draws | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 24 | 0 | 0 | 24 | 0.0% |
| Caro-Kann Defense | 20 | 3 | 2 | 15 | 15.0% |
| Sicilian Defense: Najdorf Variation | 18 | 3 | 2 | 13 | 16.7% |
| Italian Game: Two Knights Defense, Fegatello Attack, Leonhardt Variation | 18 | 2 | 3 | 13 | 11.1% |
| Scandinavian Defense | 16 | 3 | 0 | 13 | 18.8% |
| Petrov's Defense | 15 | 1 | 0 | 14 | 6.7% |
| Blackburne Shilling Gambit | 14 | 8 | 0 | 6 | 57.1% |
| Amazon Attack: Siberian Attack | 13 | 2 | 2 | 9 | 15.4% |
| Bird Opening: Dutch Variation, Batavo Gambit | 10 | 4 | 0 | 6 | 40.0% |
| Gruenfeld: Exchange Variation | 10 | 1 | 1 | 8 | 10.0% |
| Bullet Opening | Games | Wins | Losses | Draws | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Caro-Kann Defense | 210 | 94 | 108 | 8 | 44.8% |
| Amar Gambit | 195 | 87 | 102 | 6 | 44.6% |
| Colle System: Rhamphorhynchus Variation | 172 | 85 | 76 | 11 | 49.4% |
| Nimzo-Larsen Attack | 153 | 73 | 71 | 9 | 47.7% |
| Modern | 146 | 65 | 73 | 8 | 44.5% |
| Scandinavian Defense | 122 | 61 | 57 | 4 | 50.0% |
| Sicilian Defense | 111 | 49 | 55 | 7 | 44.1% |
| Czech Defense | 93 | 44 | 47 | 2 | 47.3% |
| Australian Defense | 88 | 45 | 38 | 5 | 51.1% |
| Alekhine Defense | 87 | 37 | 45 | 5 | 42.5% |
🔥 Streaks
| Streak | Longest | Current |
|---|---|---|
| Winning | 20 | 1 |
| Losing | 16 | 0 |