Melikset Khachiyan: The Grandmaster with a Tactical Twist
Known in the chess realm as GMMelik, Melikset Khachiyan is a Grandmaster who has made quite a mark on the chessboard and in the hearts of fans who love a mix of strategic depth and occasional bravado. With a career spanning over a decade, Melikset has experienced the exhilarating highs and the humbling lows of a chess journey, always with that unmistakable GM flair.
Ratings & Style: Melikset's peak blitz rating soared to an impressive 2836, showcasing a sharp and fearless style in rapid-fire conditions. Known for his patience and endgame mastery (with endgames making up over 80% of his play), he averages over 73 moves in his wins—clearly, patience is a virtue in his kitchen! His comeback rate is a staggering 86.65%, proving that giving up is simply not in his vocabulary. Even after losing a piece, his win rate nearly touches perfection at 99.97%, marking him as a chess fighter who thrives under pressure.
Winning Streaks & Records: Showing flashes of unstoppable brilliance, Melikset boasts an impressive longest winning streak of 24 games, a testament to his ability to keep opponents on their toes. Daily chess fans admire his dominant 71.7% win rate on his favorite "Top Secret" opening, though when it comes to blitz or bullet, he's comfortable shaking things up with more daring approaches.
Melikset's psychological resilience is admirable; with a low tilt factor and an almost zenlike approach to setbacks, he manages to stay cool when others crack. However, casual observers might chuckle knowing even grandmasters have their off days — his win rate dips by about 15% when switching from rated to casual games, proof that even chess nobility sometimes enjoys a relaxed throwdown!
Beyond stats, Melikset faces some of the fiercest online opponents, often sparring with warriors like mohammed-rezk and thebraincrusher. His strategic acumen combined with a dash of humor and panache makes him a favorite not just to win, but to entertain.
Whether you catch him grinding in bullet at lightning speeds or plotting a 70+ move masterpiece in daily chess, Melikset Khachiyan remains a gladiator of the 64 squares — a Grandmaster whose game is as deep as his love for the sport.
Overview of your recent play
You show strong willingness to seek active play and keep pressure on opponents. Your opening choices tend to lead to dynamic middlegames where you coordinate pieces well and look for forcing lines. The wins demonstrate you can convert initiative into tangible advantages, and you often keep rooks and minor pieces actively placed. In losses and draws, the games highlight opportunities to improve your decision making in sharp middlegames and to finish with cleaner conversion or more precise defense. The path forward is about sharpening pattern recognition in complex positions and strengthening a consistent plan after the opening phase.
What you’re doing well
- Active piece play: you tend to keep pieces on aggressive squares and coordinate threats actively, which puts pressure on opponents early in the middlegame.
- Tactical readiness: you look for tactical chances and are not afraid to complicate when the position invites it.
- Resourceful endgame mindset: when white pieces are active, you try to press for a decisive result rather than shuffling into passive setups.
- Opening flexibility: you’re comfortable with a range of Sicilian structures and adjust plans based on how the opponent responds.
Key areas to improve
- Plan after the opening: in many sharp middlegames, having a clear, long-term plan (not just chasing immediate tactics) helps you avoid unnecessary material swings and aligns your pieces toward a common goal.
- Decision making in complex positions: when the board opens up, take a moment to explicitly evaluate candidate plans (active attack vs. simplification vs. defense) before committing to a line.
- Endgame conversion: practice converting advantages in rook endings and simplified middlegame endings, focusing on king activity and creating practical winning chances rather than relying on material alone.
- Time management in critical moments: allocate a consistent portion of thinking time to formulate a plan, especially in the middlegame where a single misstep can cascade into a difficult endgame.
Phase-by-phase guidance
- Opening phase: pick a compact, repeatable plan against common Black responses in your preferred openings. Build a simple set of middle-game ideas tied to your chosen lines so you’re not guessing after 15–20 moves. If you want, consider studying a focused line in the Sicilian Defense: Najdorf or Closed variants to solidify a coherent plan.
- Middlegame: prioritize piece activity and pawn structure. Look for ways to expand on the kingside or center in a controlled manner, and avoid overextending if your opponent has a clear tactical counter
- Endgame: practice rook endings and king activity. Work on scenarios where you convert a small material edge into a win, or hold a draw with precise defense when you’re briefly worse.
Practice plan to implement
- Daily tactical puzzles (10–15 minutes) focused on motifs that showed up in your games (forks, discovered attacks, rook alignments on open files).
- Two focused endgame sessions per week: rook endings and king activity drills, using common rook endgame setups as templates.
- Opening review: pick 1–2 Sicilian structures you like and build a concise plan for each, including typical pawn breaks and key piece maneuvers. Add a short post-game note about which plan you actually used and how it worked.
- Post-game reflection: after each game, write a 3-point takeaway (one thing you did well, one area to improve, one concrete target for the next game).
Study suggestions with placeholders
To deepen understanding of the Sicilian structures you frequently encounter, you might explore focused resources on the following concepts. See the opening terms for quick reference: Sicilian Defense: Najdorf Variation, Sicilian Defense: Closed Variations, and Sicilian Defense: Dragon Variation.
Optional next steps
If you want, I can provide a concise, move-by-move annotated recap of your last few games (in PGN form) highlighting where plans drifted and where you made strong decisions. I can also tailor a 2-week mini-camp focusing on the three areas above and give you a printable checklist for quick daily use.
Want a quick starter plan?
Plan A: 15 minutes of tactics, 15 minutes of endgame drills (rook endings), 15 minutes of opening notes with a 3-mly post-game review. Repeat for two weeks and compare progress in your next coaching session.
🆚 Opponent Insights
| Recent Opponents | ||
|---|---|---|
| Tchebytchev | 4W / 0L / 0D | View |
| William Olsson | 0W / 3L / 0D | View |
| yanxz_7 | 0W / 0L / 1D | View |
| themagni13 | 21W / 10L / 5D | View |
| Angel Jesus Marquez Ruiz | 4W / 3L / 1D | View |
| bra1n_r0t | 0W / 1L / 0D | View |
| letmewinbroplz | 0W / 1L / 0D | View |
| tarkovog | 1W / 0L / 0D | View |
| h4a410 | 0W / 1L / 0D | View |
| pawnpatrol8 | 9W / 0L / 1D | View |
| Most Played Opponents | ||
|---|---|---|
| Rogelio Jr Antonio | 153W / 162L / 18D | View Games |
| Evan Ju | 56W / 107L / 20D | View Games |
| jperrone | 157W / 1L / 3D | View Games |
| ErnestoGuevaraLynch | 78W / 45L / 19D | View Games |
| Khatanbaatar Bazar | 61W / 36L / 15D | View Games |
Rating
| Year | Bullet | Blitz | Rapid | Daily |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 2501 | 2679 | 2589 | |
| 2024 | 2501 | 2658 | 2553 | |
| 2023 | 2507 | 2650 | 2588 | 1796 |
| 2022 | 2517 | 2552 | 2588 | 1737 |
| 2021 | 2470 | 2614 | 2572 | 1686 |
| 2020 | 2470 | 2603 | 2458 | 1686 |
| 2019 | 2440 | 2533 | 2526 | 1686 |
| 2018 | 2403 | 2499 | 2526 | 1686 |
| 2017 | 2403 | 2376 | 2530 | 1686 |
| 2016 | 2408 | 2402 | 2166 | 1695 |
| 2015 | 2344 | 2389 | 1817 | |
| 2014 | 2441 | 2355 | 1872 | |
| 2013 | 2451 | 2317 | 1362 | 2123 |
| 2012 | 2408 | 2350 | 1200 | 2071 |
| 2011 | 2276 | 2084 | ||
| 2010 | 1941 | 2277 | ||
| 2009 | 2314 |
Stats by Year
| Year | White | Black | Moves |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 699W / 532L / 144D | 600W / 637L / 164D | 79.4 |
| 2024 | 783W / 620L / 178D | 664W / 716L / 198D | 79.8 |
| 2023 | 774W / 661L / 192D | 657W / 751L / 206D | 81.6 |
| 2022 | 838W / 733L / 199D | 696W / 852L / 218D | 78.6 |
| 2021 | 856W / 697L / 194D | 666W / 846L / 224D | 79.3 |
| 2020 | 763W / 641L / 174D | 641W / 735L / 200D | 79.8 |
| 2019 | 417W / 356L / 85D | 374W / 405L / 86D | 77.3 |
| 2018 | 596W / 379L / 109D | 512W / 458L / 111D | 78.9 |
| 2017 | 212W / 140L / 43D | 188W / 161L / 38D | 75.9 |
| 2016 | 342W / 204L / 30D | 309W / 209L / 55D | 75.2 |
| 2015 | 183W / 114L / 21D | 166W / 126L / 40D | 73.6 |
| 2014 | 440W / 281L / 69D | 395W / 329L / 58D | 75.8 |
| 2013 | 769W / 447L / 73D | 751W / 446L / 82D | 74.6 |
| 2012 | 663W / 334L / 66D | 601W / 356L / 85D | 75.8 |
| 2011 | 12W / 3L / 2D | 10W / 5L / 4D | 74.3 |
| 2010 | 13W / 4L / 5D | 13W / 4L / 4D | 64.3 |
| 2009 | 5W / 2L / 2D | 6W / 2L / 1D | 54.3 |
Openings: Most Played
| Blitz Opening | Games | Wins | Losses | Draws | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Amazon Attack | 2857 | 1359 | 1194 | 304 | 47.6% |
| Amazon Attack: Siberian Attack | 1977 | 966 | 796 | 215 | 48.9% |
| Ruy Lopez: Schliemann Defense | 1462 | 712 | 536 | 214 | 48.7% |
| Blackburne Shilling Gambit | 866 | 386 | 399 | 81 | 44.6% |
| French Defense: Burn Variation | 716 | 377 | 249 | 90 | 52.6% |
| Czech Defense | 640 | 337 | 241 | 62 | 52.7% |
| London System: Poisoned Pawn Variation | 407 | 194 | 176 | 37 | 47.7% |
| Modern | 390 | 200 | 144 | 46 | 51.3% |
| East Indian Defense | 389 | 143 | 190 | 56 | 36.8% |
| Four Knights Game | 350 | 130 | 147 | 73 | 37.1% |
| Bullet Opening | Games | Wins | Losses | Draws | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Amazon Attack | 712 | 406 | 266 | 40 | 57.0% |
| Amazon Attack: Siberian Attack | 567 | 337 | 196 | 34 | 59.4% |
| Czech Defense | 437 | 251 | 159 | 27 | 57.4% |
| Modern | 275 | 144 | 113 | 18 | 52.4% |
| Australian Defense | 254 | 165 | 81 | 8 | 65.0% |
| Ruy Lopez: Schliemann Defense | 238 | 159 | 64 | 15 | 66.8% |
| French Defense: Burn Variation | 235 | 146 | 77 | 12 | 62.1% |
| Benoni Defense: Benoni Gambit Accepted | 228 | 128 | 87 | 13 | 56.1% |
| Rapport-Jobava System | 215 | 111 | 90 | 14 | 51.6% |
| Caro-Kann Defense | 196 | 105 | 78 | 13 | 53.6% |
| Rapid Opening | Games | Wins | Losses | Draws | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sicilian Defense: Closed | 21 | 13 | 5 | 3 | 61.9% |
| Amazon Attack: Siberian Attack | 16 | 10 | 4 | 2 | 62.5% |
| Blackburne Shilling Gambit | 10 | 5 | 4 | 1 | 50.0% |
| London System: Poisoned Pawn Variation | 7 | 7 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| English Opening: Four Knights System, Nimzowitsch Variation | 5 | 2 | 1 | 2 | 40.0% |
| Ruy Lopez: Schliemann Defense | 5 | 2 | 1 | 2 | 40.0% |
| Italian Game: Two Knights Defense | 5 | 2 | 3 | 0 | 40.0% |
| Gruenfeld: Exchange Variation | 5 | 0 | 3 | 2 | 0.0% |
| Sicilian Defense: Najdorf Variation | 5 | 4 | 1 | 0 | 80.0% |
| Slav Defense: Czech Variation, Classical System, Main Line | 4 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 25.0% |
| Daily Opening | Games | Wins | Losses | Draws | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Blackburne Shilling Gambit | 30 | 22 | 4 | 4 | 73.3% |
| Sicilian Defense: Closed | 30 | 19 | 4 | 7 | 63.3% |
| Sicilian Defense: Dragon Variation, Yugoslav Attack | 26 | 20 | 3 | 3 | 76.9% |
| Sicilian Defense: Najdorf Variation | 20 | 14 | 4 | 2 | 70.0% |
| Gruenfeld: Exchange Variation | 16 | 7 | 5 | 4 | 43.8% |
| Caro-Kann Defense | 14 | 13 | 1 | 0 | 92.9% |
| Scotch Game | 14 | 13 | 1 | 0 | 92.9% |
| Slav Defense | 14 | 7 | 4 | 3 | 50.0% |
| French Defense: Winawer Variation, Advance Variation | 13 | 7 | 3 | 3 | 53.9% |
| Caro-Kann Defense: Exchange Variation | 12 | 10 | 2 | 0 | 83.3% |
🔥 Streaks
| Streak | Longest | Current |
|---|---|---|
| Winning | 24 | 2 |
| Losing | 11 | 0 |