Grandmaster gmsakk: The Enigmatic Chess Virtuoso
Meet gmsakk, a Grandmaster whose chess journey reads like a thrilling novel full of ups, downs, and jaw-dropping moves. Awarded the grandest of titles by FIDE, gmsakk’s brain is a battlefield where pawns march and knights dance with tactical flair.
Since 2013, gmsakk has danced through the rapid-fire world of bullet chess with a peak rating of 2761 achieved in 2024—a speed demon who plays as if seconds are tiny dragons to be slain. Not just a sprinter, this Grandmaster thrives in blitz battles too, reaching a staggering 2896 in early 2025, proving that lightning-fast calculation is their playground.
With over a thousand wins in bullet and over three and a half thousand in blitz, gmsakk’s blend of strategic depth and tactical wizardry often forces opponents to resign before the grand finale—though sometimes the black flag waves if time runs out, because either way, the victory is theirs.
This chess maestro has a trick up their sleeve with openings still shrouded in mystery ("Top Secret" is the fitting codename), leaving opponents guessing and scratching their heads. They average 87 moves per win, suggesting patience and precision rather than blazing reckless attacks.
But don’t mistake their calm for meekness. A remarkable comeback rate of 84% and a knack for winning even after losing material shows gmsakk fights fiercely until the very last move. Just ask any opponent who tried to catch them napping—only to find themselves gritting their teeth facing an unstoppable onslaught.
While their psychological "tilt factor" hovers around 14 (a respectable level of human fallibility), gmsakk’s best hours are oddly around 5 AM—proving that they might just be nocturnal grandmasters or night owls who feast on pawns while the world sleeps.
Recent Adventures on the Board
In the heat of March 2025, gmsakk clinched a memorable victory against Mischuk_D in a fierce game featuring the Trompowsky Attack—winning on time but with style, demonstrating their prowess in time management and chess strategy alike.
Losses do happen, but even in defeat, gmsakk shows up with resilience and grace, learning from high-tension fights against strong opponents, always ready for the next battle.
Whether throttling opponents in blitz, racing in bullet, or carefully navigating daily games, gmsakk’s presence is a thunderclap in the chess universe. Prepare to be dazzled, confounded, and inspired—because this Grandmaster plays chess not just as a game, but as an epic saga.
Hi gmsakk — personalised coaching report
1. Snapshot
- Peak blitz rating so far: 2896 (2025-03-03)
- Hourly swing of your form:
- Consistency pattern by weekday:
2. What you already do well
- Initiative-first mindset. Most games start with an early pawn lever (f4/f5, c4/c5 or g-pawn pushes) that forces opponents to solve problems quickly. The attack that began with 22.Nd7+ (see mini-board below) is a textbook example of converting activity into material.
- Piece coordination. In both classical and Chess960 you rarely leave pieces idle. Your bishops usually find useful diagonals before move 10, and rooks reach open files quickly.
- Versatility. Switching between standard and 960 suggests good board vision rather than rote memorisation.
3. Repeated pain points
- Time-trouble losses. Four of your last nine defeats ended on the clock (or immediately after a blitzed blunder made under 10 s).
- Over-extended wing pawns. In both Trompowsky losses against Mischuk_D your g- and h-pawns raced up the board, leaving dark-square holes round the king. The same pattern appeared in the Chess960 loss to MVM2008.
- Converting won positions. The most recent win reached a technically winning rook end by move 34, yet it still required flagging the opponent. Cleaner conversion would save energy.
4. Illustrative positions
a) Strength – coordinated attack
b) Weakness – structural holes after pawn storm
5. Action plan
- Time management drill. Play a daily 15|10 game and force yourself to spend at least 30 seconds on moves 6-15. This trains a habit of budgeting time for the critical early middlegame instead of saving everything for a frantic finish.
- Review pawn-storm triggers. Before pushing a wing pawn, ask “What squares become weak if this pawn disappears?” A checklist: king safety, opposite-colour bishop, and opponent’s half-open files. Practise with annotated master games in the Trompowsky Attack where White keeps the centre intact.
- End-game technique. Set up two-rook-vs-rook pawn endings from your own games and play them against an engine at depth-8. Aim to convert within 25 moves.
- Backup openings with calmer structures. Add one solid queen’s-pawn line (e.g. Colle-Zukertort or London) to balance your high-risk repertoire. This will also reduce prep time in 960 where early tactics are less forcing.
- Post-mortem habit. After each session pick one win and one loss, run a 5-minute engine check, and summarise:
- Biggest ⨉ (blunder) and why it happened.
- One positional theme learnt (e.g. pawn structure or minor-piece outposts).
6. Next milestone
With steadier clock handling and tighter pawn discipline you are on track to stabilise above 2400 blitz within the next 200 games. Let’s revisit the plan after every 50-game block.
Good luck, and enjoy the grind!
🆚 Opponent Insights
| Most Played Opponents | ||
|---|---|---|
| Cemil Aghamaliyev | 60W / 52L / 6D | |
| Kevin Bordi | 55W / 52L / 11D | |
| Hoang Thong Tu | 32W / 65L / 3D | |
| Epic Chess Pwner | 42W / 53L / 4D | |
| Dmitry Tatarinov | 44W / 44L / 3D | |
Rating
| Year | Bullet | Blitz | Rapid | Daily |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 2904 | |||
| 2024 | 2686 | 1927 | ||
| 2023 | 2732 | 2000 | ||
| 2022 | 2734 | 2000 | ||
| 2021 | 2756 | 2755 | ||
| 2020 | 2547 | 2733 | ||
| 2019 | 2555 | 2789 | ||
| 2018 | 2580 | 2667 | ||
| 2017 | 2597 | 2547 | ||
| 2016 | 2582 | 2456 | ||
| 2015 | 2566 | 2410 | ||
| 2014 | 2527 | 2363 | ||
| 2013 | 1800 | 2120 |
Stats by Year
| Year | White | Black | Moves |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 7W / 2L / 2D | 8W / 3L / 2D | 83.0 |
| 2024 | 172W / 165L / 43D | 163W / 180L / 35D | 83.8 |
| 2023 | 241W / 265L / 81D | 223W / 301L / 65D | 83.5 |
| 2022 | 228W / 220L / 51D | 180W / 263L / 50D | 84.1 |
| 2021 | 290W / 277L / 84D | 236W / 342L / 58D | 83.0 |
| 2020 | 339W / 366L / 94D | 313W / 425L / 73D | 83.2 |
| 2019 | 178W / 217L / 56D | 189W / 214L / 36D | 82.7 |
| 2018 | 352W / 383L / 60D | 346W / 415L / 53D | 80.5 |
| 2017 | 232W / 242L / 43D | 205W / 270L / 38D | 80.0 |
| 2016 | 256W / 227L / 34D | 193W / 275L / 42D | 80.0 |
| 2015 | 101W / 101L / 19D | 91W / 116L / 11D | 81.9 |
| 2014 | 83W / 65L / 9D | 68W / 78L / 11D | 80.4 |
| 2013 | 4W / 2L / 0D | 3W / 1L / 0D | 38.8 |
Openings: Most Played
| Blitz Opening | Games | Wins | Losses | Draws | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Amazon Attack: Siberian Attack | 1344 | 611 | 592 | 141 | 45.5% |
| Slav Defense | 492 | 202 | 236 | 54 | 41.1% |
| Sicilian Defense: Najdorf Variation | 328 | 130 | 170 | 28 | 39.6% |
| London System: Poisoned Pawn Variation | 228 | 101 | 104 | 23 | 44.3% |
| Slav Defense: Alekhine Variation | 206 | 79 | 109 | 18 | 38.4% |
| English Opening: Caro-Kann Defensive System | 197 | 88 | 96 | 13 | 44.7% |
| Slav Defense: Bonet Gambit | 195 | 90 | 87 | 18 | 46.1% |
| Sicilian Defense | 186 | 88 | 86 | 12 | 47.3% |
| Sicilian Defense: Closed | 183 | 60 | 103 | 20 | 32.8% |
| Australian Defense | 164 | 74 | 81 | 9 | 45.1% |
| Bullet Opening | Games | Wins | Losses | Draws | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| London System: Poisoned Pawn Variation | 173 | 68 | 93 | 12 | 39.3% |
| Australian Defense | 129 | 61 | 61 | 7 | 47.3% |
| Amazon Attack: Siberian Attack | 126 | 52 | 59 | 15 | 41.3% |
| Hungarian Opening: Wiedenhagen-Beta Gambit | 115 | 41 | 70 | 4 | 35.6% |
| Nimzo-Larsen Attack | 114 | 45 | 62 | 7 | 39.5% |
| Döry Defense | 94 | 40 | 49 | 5 | 42.5% |
| Slav Defense: Bonet Gambit | 91 | 36 | 48 | 7 | 39.6% |
| English Opening: Caro-Kann Defensive System | 79 | 31 | 43 | 5 | 39.2% |
| Slav Defense | 77 | 26 | 47 | 4 | 33.8% |
| Colle System: Rhamphorhynchus Variation | 75 | 27 | 43 | 5 | 36.0% |
| Rapid Opening | Games | Wins | Losses | Draws | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Italian Game: Classical Variation, Ghulam-Kassim Variation | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| Four Knights Game: Spanish Variation | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| Daily Opening | Games | Wins | Losses | Draws | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 3 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 66.7% |
| London System: Poisoned Pawn Variation | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0.0% |
| Amar Gambit | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| Australian Defense | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| Sicilian Defense: Classical Variation | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| Diemer-Duhm Gambit (DDG): 4...f5 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| QGA: 3.Nf3 Bg4 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
🔥 Streaks
| Streak | Longest | Current |
|---|---|---|
| Winning | 17 | 2 |
| Losing | 14 | 0 |