JUN NICOLAS (aka gopinoy)
Meet Jun Nicolas, a razor-sharp chess mind navigating the 64 squares with finesse and a dash of humor. Known in the chess circles as gopinoy, Jun has climbed impressively through the ranks, peaking at a rapid rating of 2063 in early 2025, blinding his opponents with a blitz rating that once soared to 2200, and hitting a bullet rating high of 2018.
Jun’s style is a delightful mix of patience and tactical wizardry. With an average game length of approximately 79 moves per win, he's clearly a strategist who enjoys a good mental marathon rather than a quick blitzkrieg. His endgame prowess shines through with an impressive 79% frequency, and he’s not shy about making epic comebacks, boasting a comeback rate over 91% — because who doesn’t like a good underdog story?
Ever the versatile player, Jun has dabbled successfully in many openings. He’s an adept user of the Pirc Defense, the Queen’s Gambit Declined variations, and the Caro-Kann Panov Attack, among others, showing strong winning percentages even in the defense-themed openings. Whether it’s the nuanced Semi-Slav or the tricky Modern Defense, Jun stays unpredictable and dangerous.
He also plays with a fighting spirit: a staggering 9,825 wins in blitz over thousands of battles (and nearly as many losses—because every warrior faces setbacks but keeps fighting). His bullet record is no joke either, with over 2,200 wins displaying lightning-fast decision-making – though he still respects the art of losing gracefully with a tilt factor kept nicely under control at 20%.
Time and time again, Jun excels during the golden hour around 6 PM, when his win rate peaks above 52%, proving that some of us just play better with a little evening magic (and perhaps a cup of coffee). Despite this, his psychological resilience keeps him cool, and he prefers to avoid early resignations, showing a stubborn streak and love for chess’s beautifully complex endgames.
Off the board, Jun might just be the player who laughs off a blunder with a "that didn’t happen" kind of grin and then proceeds to turn the tables on you with a brilliant tactical motif. His most recent games reflect a fierce competitor who knows when to press forward and when to patiently squeeze his opponent, evidenced by wins by resignation and timely timeout victories. Both friends and foes keep an eye on gopinoy – a player who combines skill, tenacity, and a surprisingly generous dose of endearing cheekiness.
Fun fact: Jun once held a 22-game winning streak, undoubtedly fueling the legend that he's part-human, part-chess engine (don’t ask which one!). His longest losing streak of 20, no doubt painful, serves as a reminder that even warriors must take a breather before storming the battlefield again.
Watch out world of chess, gopinoy is here – calculating, plotting, and perhaps chuckling under his breath at the next brilliant move.
(Profile generated from extensive game stats and recent battle logs – because who needs sleep when there’s chess to play?)
Quick summary
Nice work, Jun Nicolas — you showed good tactical instincts and an ability to convert a passed pawn into a decisive advantage in your recent blitz wins. Your overall adjusted win rate (~50.1%) says you’re solid against similarly rated opponents. Recent short-term numbers are encouraging (positive change last 1–3 months), but the 6‑ and 12‑month swings show inconsistency to fix.
What you did well (patterns to keep)
- Creating and advancing a protected passed pawn — you converted a pawn all the way to promotion in your last win. That shows good recognition of a long-term advantage and willingness to push for it.
- Active rooks and piece activity — you used rooks on open files and invaded the enemy camp instead of passive piece shuffling.
- Clean tactical execution in the middlegame — when a tactic appeared you acted decisively rather than hesitating in blitz.
- Varied opening play — you’re comfortable in many d4/c6 and Queen’s-pawn setups which keeps opponents unprepared (your Openings Performance shows breadth).
Recurring issues & where you lose points
- Time management: several games show both clocks dropping low. In blitz the difference between winning and blundering is often the clock — avoid long think-sprints on non-critical moves.
- King safety after pawn thrusts: pawn pushes like early f- and e- advances helped create space but also left holes around your king in a couple of losses — watch for counterplay down open lines near your king.
- Conversion in rook endgames: in the loss vs meliton you reached a late rook-heavy phase and couldn’t hold/improve — practice typical rook endgame themes (active rook, cutting the king, pawn races).
- Occasional loose pieces / hanging tactics — clean up checks for undefended pieces before you move, especially when you’re low on time (LPDO — loose pieces drop off).
Concrete, short-term plan (next 2–4 weeks)
- Tactics daily: 10–15 minutes of mixed tactics puzzles (focus on forks, pins, promotion tactics and back-rank themes). Blitz games reward sharp pattern recognition.
- Endgame drills: 3× week, 15–20 minutes focused on rook vs rook + pawn, Lucena/Philidor basics and pawn‑racing conversion — these will turn close losses into draws/wins.
- Opening simplification: pick 2 reliable setups with c6/d4 and learn 3 typical plans each (one attacking plan, one safe equalizing plan, one simple endgame/transition). Use your best scoring systems (your data shows good results in some c6 systems and the Modern/Czech family).
- Blitz clock habits: practice playing 10 games with the goal “think 5–10s per move unless a concrete tactic/critical decision” — avoid burning time on quiet moves. Practice using the increment effectively (2s+ increment).
Technical tips to apply immediately
- Before every move, ask two quick questions: “Is my king safe?” and “Is any of my pieces hanging?” If yes to either, spend the extra seconds.
- When you see a passed pawn, calculate only the key pawn-race lines first — check opponent checks and rook infiltration squares — then decide to push or escort the pawn.
- In rook endgames look for activity first: cut the opposing king off before chasing pawns. If your rook can get to the seventh or lift to the 3rd rank, consider it.
- Against c6/d6 systems, aim for straightforward plans — trade one minor piece if you’re unsure and push the central majority — clarity beats memorized theory in blitz.
Game highlight — study this win
Replay the game where you promoted a pawn and pressured the enemy king: it’s a great model of turning a middlegame advantage into a decisive passed pawn. Watch how you:
- Converted central space into a passed pawn.
- Used rooks and queens to support promotion threats.
- Forced simplifications that made the promotion unstoppable.
Open the game below and step through the critical moments.
Opponent: luzganoem
Weekly micro-plan (easy to follow)
- Mon/Wed/Fri: 15m tactics + 10m endgame (rook basics)
- Tues/Thu: 20m opening work (pick plans, not long lines)
- Sat: 5 blitz warmup games with focus on time management
- Sun: Review 2 recent games (one win, one loss) — annotate the turning point and one thing to improve.
Next steps & short goals
- Goal 1 (2 weeks): stop blundering in the last 5 moves — aim to reduce hang/loss rate by slowing 5 extra seconds per critical phase.
- Goal 2 (1 month): +50% success in converting pawn promotions in training positions (set up 10 pawn-promotion exercises).
- Goal 3 (6 weeks): solidify 2 opening lines so you reach comfortable middlegames without guessing.
If you want, I can produce a tailored 4-week workout (daily tasks + example exercises) and analyze 1 of your losses in depth. Which loss should I annotate first — the long rook game vs meliton or the earlier abandoned game?
🆚 Opponent Insights
| Recent Opponents | ||
|---|---|---|
| agmreycurbz | 0W / 1L / 0D | View |
| meliton | 0W / 2L / 0D | View |
| yol_anres | 1W / 0L / 1D | View |
| luzganoem | 2W / 1L / 0D | View |
| fdutertem_albuera | 1W / 0L / 0D | View |
| eladiolimiii_pcap | 0W / 2L / 0D | View |
| elyacas | 0W / 1L / 0D | View |
| metrolirot | 2W / 0L / 1D | View |
| fiela | 1W / 0L / 0D | View |
| natangw | 0W / 1L / 0D | View |
| Most Played Opponents | ||
|---|---|---|
| antema | 38W / 64L / 2D | View Games |
| kolabyaw | 37W / 66L / 1D | View Games |
| zirk24 | 30W / 56L / 2D | View Games |
| hermawan777 | 25W / 55L / 0D | View Games |
| raulov51 | 27W / 40L / 0D | View Games |
Rating
| Year | Bullet | Blitz | Rapid | Daily |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 1714 | 1598 | 2007 | |
| 2024 | 1897 | 1947 | 2029 | |
| 2023 | 1989 | |||
| 2022 | 1990 | |||
| 2021 | 2004 | |||
| 2020 | 2097 | |||
| 2019 | 2048 | |||
| 2018 | 1777 | 2074 | 1047 | |
| 2017 | 1818 | 1851 | ||
| 2016 | 1907 | 1942 |
Stats by Year
| Year | White | Black | Moves |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 19W / 34L / 1D | 24W / 30L / 2D | 64.7 |
| 2024 | 90W / 82L / 7D | 70W / 102L / 9D | 72.5 |
| 2023 | 4W / 0L / 0D | 3W / 2L / 0D | 62.9 |
| 2022 | 1W / 0L / 0D | 0W / 1L / 0D | 51.0 |
| 2021 | 0W / 2L / 0D | 0W / 1L / 0D | 27.7 |
| 2020 | 900W / 940L / 75D | 911W / 897L / 81D | 74.4 |
| 2019 | 91W / 119L / 6D | 98W / 118L / 12D | 75.1 |
| 2018 | 1758W / 1789L / 101D | 1791W / 1732L / 124D | 74.8 |
| 2017 | 1835W / 1909L / 121D | 1827W / 1968L / 100D | 73.8 |
| 2016 | 1312W / 1241L / 86D | 1385W / 1235L / 54D | 74.6 |
Openings: Most Played
| Blitz Opening | Games | Wins | Losses | Draws | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Czech Defense | 4117 | 2036 | 1937 | 144 | 49.5% |
| Modern Defense | 2319 | 1157 | 1080 | 82 | 49.9% |
| Amazon Attack: Siberian Attack | 1381 | 658 | 671 | 52 | 47.6% |
| Alekhine Defense | 1194 | 593 | 568 | 33 | 49.7% |
| Australian Defense | 1160 | 551 | 573 | 36 | 47.5% |
| Amazon Attack | 724 | 384 | 319 | 21 | 53.0% |
| Slav Defense | 593 | 279 | 291 | 23 | 47.0% |
| Amar Gambit | 513 | 237 | 257 | 19 | 46.2% |
| English Opening | 431 | 209 | 211 | 11 | 48.5% |
| Semi-Slav Defense: Accelerated Meran Variation | 389 | 196 | 180 | 13 | 50.4% |
| Bullet Opening | Games | Wins | Losses | Draws | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Czech Defense | 1010 | 524 | 470 | 16 | 51.9% |
| Modern Defense | 614 | 302 | 302 | 10 | 49.2% |
| Australian Defense | 406 | 192 | 203 | 11 | 47.3% |
| Amar Gambit | 341 | 191 | 148 | 2 | 56.0% |
| Amazon Attack | 264 | 128 | 132 | 4 | 48.5% |
| Amazon Attack: Siberian Attack | 134 | 58 | 74 | 2 | 43.3% |
| London System: Poisoned Pawn Variation | 122 | 74 | 44 | 4 | 60.7% |
| Slav Defense | 105 | 60 | 41 | 4 | 57.1% |
| English Opening | 98 | 60 | 38 | 0 | 61.2% |
| Caro-Kann Defense: Exchange Variation | 79 | 43 | 35 | 1 | 54.4% |
| Rapid Opening | Games | Wins | Losses | Draws | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Czech Defense | 13 | 6 | 5 | 2 | 46.1% |
| Australian Defense | 9 | 6 | 2 | 1 | 66.7% |
| Amazon Attack: Siberian Attack | 6 | 2 | 4 | 0 | 33.3% |
| Modern Defense | 5 | 3 | 2 | 0 | 60.0% |
| Amazon Attack | 5 | 3 | 2 | 0 | 60.0% |
| Sicilian Defense: Closed, Anti-Sveshnikov Variation, Kharlov-Kramnik Line | 5 | 3 | 2 | 0 | 60.0% |
| Slav Defense | 4 | 1 | 3 | 0 | 25.0% |
| QGD: 3.Nc3 Bb4 | 4 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 75.0% |
| QGD: 4.Nf3 | 4 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 50.0% |
| Amar Gambit | 4 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 75.0% |
🔥 Streaks
| Streak | Longest | Current |
|---|---|---|
| Winning | 22 | 0 |
| Losing | 20 | 2 |