Dmitry Gordievsky - Grandmaster of the Chessboard
Meet Dmitry Gordievsky, also known in the chess world as Gordima, a Grandmaster who has cracked the genetic code of tactical genius. With a chess IQ that could rival a neural network, Dmitry’s playing style evolves like a well-adapted species, boasting an astounding comeback rate of 92.56% and a perfect 100% win rate after losing a piece – talk about survival of the fittest!
Since 2016, Dmitry’s Bullet rating has soared from a rookie 1943 to a microscopic 3004 by 2025, proving that rapid metabolic shifts (and some rapid moves) keep Gordievsky at the top of the food chain. His blitz skills are equally cunning, peaking above 3000, showcasing a predatory instinct for fast-paced skirmishes.
Known for long, strategic endgames with an average of nearly 83 moves per win, Dmitry’s ability to patiently navigate complex positions is as precise as a cell dividing perfectly. His 'early resignation rate' is low, only 0.66%, indicating the tenacity of a king cobra in clutch situations.
Outside the biology lab of the 64 squares, Gordievsky’s social DNA reveals strong winning connections, boasting impressive win rates against familiar opponents like quizden37 (86%), clydehillkid (82%), and a flawless record against swiss_fighter. Even his psychological resilience shows evolutionary finesse, with a modest 'tilt factor' of 15 – hardly a meltdown in sight.
Whether making precise moves during peak hours or adapting strategies across different game tempos, Dmitry’s prowess is a spectacle of natural chess selection. Keep an eye on this Grandmaster – he's definitely a specimen you don’t want to let out of your sights!
Constructive feedback for Dmitry Gordievsky
Your current profile at a glance
- Latest peak: 3036 (2024-10-03)
- Typical session rhythm:
- Streak patterns:
What you are already doing very well
- Dynamic pawn breaks. In your most-recent win against Ethan Sheehan you used the thrusts
b4–b5and laterh4–h5to keep the initiative. These energetic advances force your opponents to solve concrete problems instead of quietly improving their pieces. - Tactical alertness. The combination
22.Rxf7! Kxf7 23.Bxg6+in your game with Daniel Quizon shows you spot forcing continuations quickly, even under severe time pressure. - Piece activity in the English. When you reach structures with space advantage, your minor pieces are almost always posted on optimal squares (e.g., Nb5/d5, Bf1–b5).
Main improvement areas
-
Time management.
Two of your last five losses (vs Matías Pérez Gormaz and vs Daniel Quizon) came from winning or equal positions that were simply flagged.
- Adopt a “30-second rule”: whenever your clock dips below 0:30, simplify immediately or force a perpetual.
- Use the opening phase to build a reserve bank of at least +10 s; you already know the setups, so move instantly on the first 8–10 moves.
-
Prophylaxis in the Closed Sicilian as Black.
Early …
h5 g5gains space but leaves the kingside dark squares undefended. In your loss to chesterreyes you never regained control of f5 and h6.- Insert …
Bd7before …h5so the queen can later swing to e8/h5 for defense. - Study model games of Gelfand and Karjakin, who keep the pawn on h7 until the center is closed.
- Insert …
-
End-game conversion.
Against ClydeHillKid you reached a technically won rook + pawns ending but allowed counterplay and were mated. Work on:
- Lucena and Philidor positions—including side pawns.
- Expanding with the king before pushing passed pawns (avoid self-zugzwang).
Opening-specific recommendations
| Colour | Current choice | Suggested tweak |
|---|---|---|
| White | English with early e4 | Add 3.g3 lines to vary pawn structures and reduce prep-depth of opponents. |
| Black vs e4 | Closed Sicilian setups | Mix in one solid line (e.g., Sveshnikov or Taimanov) to become less predictable. |
| Black vs d4/c4 | King’s Indian (…g6) | Keep but learn the Aronian pet line 6…Na6 to avoid early Bf4 systems. |
Concrete study plan (next 4 weeks)
- Week 1: 30 min/day solving end-game studies; annotate them briefly.
- Week 2: Create a one-page opening file “Black vs e4” with only critical positions and typical plans.
- Week 3: Play 20 games with 5 + 3 time control to practise fast but accurate decision making.
- Week 4: Review losses; for every move that changed the eval by ≥ 1.0 use the question “What was the threat?” to build prophylactic thinking.
Annotated snapshot of your latest win
Replaying this miniature once a week will remind you how strong your play looks when your clock is healthy and your pieces cooperate:
Final mindset tip
In positions where you already feel the win, slow down for one extra second and verify your opponent’s only threats. That single second has the power to convert near-wins into full points and will boost both rating and confidence.
Good luck, and keep up the creative chess!
🆚 Opponent Insights
| Recent Opponents | ||
|---|---|---|
| PracticeMakesOK | 16W / 3L / 0D | View |
| Bu11et_Pr00f | 8W / 6L / 1D | View |
| Davit_Tiraturyan | 19W / 5L / 2D | View |
| Lucas Liascovich | 1W / 0L / 0D | View |
| TaeKwondoKing | 9W / 7L / 3D | View |
| Savva Vetokhin | 0W / 1L / 0D | View |
| Robert Stein | 0W / 1L / 0D | View |
| Melika Mohammadi | 7W / 6L / 1D | View |
| David Haydon | 6W / 8L / 2D | View |
| zavutandruha | 1W / 0L / 0D | View |
| Most Played Opponents | ||
|---|---|---|
| Petros Trimitzios | 46W / 39L / 1D | View Games |
| NowayJosey | 28W / 44L / 12D | View Games |
| Hoang Thong Tu | 32W / 46L / 2D | View Games |
| kikissgwene | 37W / 16L / 4D | View Games |
| ... .... | 38W / 17L / 1D | View Games |
Rating
| Year | Bullet | Blitz | Rapid | Daily |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 2952 | 2957 | ||
| 2024 | 2995 | 3019 | ||
| 2023 | 2865 | 2881 | 2478 | |
| 2022 | 2904 | 2493 | ||
| 2021 | 2406 | |||
| 2020 | 2736 | 2828 | 2319 | |
| 2019 | 2725 | 2866 | ||
| 2018 | 2638 | |||
| 2017 | 2679 | 2595 | ||
| 2016 | 2753 | 2489 |
Stats by Year
| Year | White | Black | Moves |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 250W / 165L / 30D | 229W / 188L / 31D | 84.9 |
| 2024 | 121W / 70L / 17D | 121W / 69L / 17D | 87.2 |
| 2023 | 55W / 43L / 8D | 51W / 45L / 7D | 87.9 |
| 2022 | 12W / 4L / 2D | 10W / 6L / 2D | 92.0 |
| 2021 | 1W / 2L / 1D | 4W / 1L / 0D | 95.0 |
| 2020 | 444W / 327L / 80D | 399W / 366L / 75D | 86.6 |
| 2019 | 219W / 130L / 28D | 186W / 170L / 33D | 85.8 |
| 2018 | 0W / 1L / 0D | 0W / 0L / 0D | 52.0 |
| 2017 | 299W / 183L / 53D | 257W / 222L / 55D | 87.4 |
| 2016 | 368W / 243L / 50D | 349W / 259L / 57D | 85.8 |
Openings: Most Played
| Bullet Opening | Games | Wins | Losses | Draws | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Colle System: Rhamphorhynchus Variation | 196 | 105 | 74 | 17 | 53.6% |
| Amar Gambit | 156 | 78 | 70 | 8 | 50.0% |
| Australian Defense | 96 | 54 | 37 | 5 | 56.2% |
| Sicilian Defense: Closed | 85 | 39 | 40 | 6 | 45.9% |
| Sicilian Defense | 81 | 37 | 37 | 7 | 45.7% |
| Dutch Defense | 81 | 42 | 34 | 5 | 51.9% |
| Modern | 65 | 38 | 27 | 0 | 58.5% |
| English Opening | 64 | 39 | 20 | 5 | 60.9% |
| Hungarian Opening: Wiedenhagen-Beta Gambit | 63 | 30 | 27 | 6 | 47.6% |
| Amazon Attack: Siberian Attack | 60 | 40 | 16 | 4 | 66.7% |
| Blitz Opening | Games | Wins | Losses | Draws | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Amazon Attack: Siberian Attack | 96 | 57 | 34 | 5 | 59.4% |
| Sicilian Defense: Najdorf Variation | 96 | 43 | 45 | 8 | 44.8% |
| English Opening: Agincourt Defense | 66 | 31 | 30 | 5 | 47.0% |
| Caro-Kann Defense | 64 | 36 | 19 | 9 | 56.2% |
| Colle System: Rhamphorhynchus Variation | 61 | 34 | 22 | 5 | 55.7% |
| East Indian Defense | 59 | 36 | 15 | 8 | 61.0% |
| Australian Defense | 56 | 25 | 24 | 7 | 44.6% |
| Sicilian Defense: Alapin Variation | 53 | 25 | 23 | 5 | 47.2% |
| English Opening: Anglo-Indian Defense | 52 | 21 | 20 | 11 | 40.4% |
| Döry Defense | 51 | 24 | 25 | 2 | 47.1% |
| Rapid Opening | Games | Wins | Losses | Draws | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| QGD: Ragozin | 5 | 0 | 5 | 0 | 0.0% |
| Petrov's Defense | 5 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 40.0% |
| Sicilian Defense: Alapin Variation | 3 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| Modern | 3 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 66.7% |
| Blackburne Shilling Gambit | 3 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 0.0% |
| English Defense: Blumenfeld-Hiva Gambit | 2 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 50.0% |
| Sicilian Defense: Taimanov Variation, American Attack | 2 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0.0% |
| Catalan Opening: Open Defense | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| Sicilian Defense: Moscow Variation, Haag Gambit | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| Sicilian Defense: Closed, Anti-Sveshnikov Variation, Kharlov-Kramnik Line | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
🔥 Streaks
| Streak | Longest | Current |
|---|---|---|
| Winning | 19 | 1 |
| Losing | 15 | 0 |