Grandmaster Asghar Golizadeh (aka Grandmaster1369)
Meet Asghar Golizadeh, a chess Grandmaster whose strategic prowess has evolved over the years like a finely-tuned neuron network firing at critical chess junctures. From a modest beginning with a Bullet rating of 1200 in 2015, Asghar's chess cells have multiplied in strength, peaking impressively in Bullet at 2746 in 2024 and maintaining a fierce presence in Blitz with a top rating of 2969 in 2019.
Asghar’s gameplay style shows a deep biological rhythm: a remarkable comeback rate of 83% and an almost immune response to setbacks with a win rate of 93% after losing a piece. Their endgame strategy is like a master cell division process—thorough, systematic, and highly effective, reflected by a frequent foray into endgames in over 75% of their games. The games tend to be marathons rather than sprints with an average of 72 moves per win, proving this grandmaster enjoys toying with the synapses of their opponents well into the late stages of the match.
Asghar’s chess genome is balanced, with a slight preference for White pieces (winning 46.96% of games) but equally dangerous when playing Black (45.82%). Their psychological resilience keeps tilt factors low at 24%, maintaining tactical precision and keeping the mental cells firing without burnout. Even under pressure, Asghar’s decision-making remains sharp—manifesting as a disciplined early resignation rate of just 7.24%.
When studied over time, Asghar’s rating history charts a fascinating evolution, like observing gene expression across years. From sporadic appearances in Daily chess to dominating Blitz and Bullet ratings, their growth is nothing short of legendary. This grandmaster's "Top Secret" opening strategy has been played over 3,000 times in Blitz with a nearly 47% win rate, indicating a highly specialized and well-evolved opening repertoire that's as mysterious as DNA sequencing.
Not just a tactical beast, Asghar has a social chess cell culture too: their most played opponents include notable challengers like “dontresign3k” (46 games) and “gmgamil” (26 games), creating a vibrant ecosystem of rivalry and growth. And despite the heavy battles, this grandmaster keeps the fun alive with a current winning streak of 1 and a longest streak at an electrifying 20 games—chess stamina worthy of a champion neuron firing mere milliseconds to outwit a foe.
In short, Asghar Golizadeh is a chess organism finely adapted to the complex environment of competitive play: ever-evolving, highly resilient, and always ready to checkmate with a clever twist of the genetic code of chess strategy. Prepare to be synaptically dazzled!
Hi Asghar, here’s your personalised post-session report
Key take-aways at a glance
- Your current bullet peak is 2746 (2024-05-02). That already puts you in the top fraction of Chess.com bullet, yet most of your recent games are still decided by the clock rather than the board.
- You win quickly when you get dynamic positions (see the miniature against ESultanov below), but several losses (e.g. to Marcel Petersen) occurred from equal or better positions that ran out of time.
- Openings are sound and flexible, but mid-game conversion and clock-handling can be streamlined.
Your strengths
- Opening versatility. In the six-game sample you used the Rétí, Closed Sicilian, French-style setups vs. the Modern, and two different Sicilian sidelines as Black. This makes you hard to prepare for.
- Tactical alertness. Moves such as 24.Nc6+!! against BuGMonster show you sense when to cash in tactically.
- Piece activity over material. You often sacrifice pawns for open lines (e.g. 13.c4!? vs. the Modern) and get practical chances.
Most urgent improvements
- Bullet time management.
• In three of the five recent losses you flagged with material equality or advantage.
• Adopt a “time buffer” rule: never let your clock drop below 10 s until move 20.
• Use safe pre-moves in forcing sequences and instantly recapture with the most obvious piece when nothing else changes the evaluation. - Converting technical endings.
• The K+R+2P vs. K+R ending against volvo333 was winning but drifted into time scramble. Practise the basic winning technique (cut-off, bridge-building, shoulder-checks).
• When ahead, trade queens earlier; playing on with queens gives the opponent perpetual-check chances and forces you to spend more clock. - Simplify your king-side pawn storms.
• In the Modern loss to Wotgenie you advanced h-pawns aggressively but weakened g3/f3 squares, leading to counterplay.
• General rule: in bullet, only launch a pawn storm when your king is already safe and pieces are harmonised.
Illustrative moments
A model game to imitate
Notice how early central tension (…d5) allowed you to seize the initiative and finish the game with a neat queen switchback. Replicating this direct style will also save you clock.
A critical endgame slip
(vs. Marcel Petersen)You were up a rook but still flagged. Once the a-pawn fell you only needed to give perpetual checks with the rook; instead, you spent time looking for mate. Memorise the basic winning method: check from behind, push passer when the king is cut.
Training plan for the next two weeks
- Daily 10-minute “bullet drill”: play one 1-minute game starting with 15-second handicap to practise ultra-fast moves.
- Endgame flash cards: K+R vs. K+R+p and Lucena/Philidor positions; 15 positions, 3 repetitions each.
- Review each session’s worst time-trouble moment, ask “Could I have pre-moved?”.
- Watch for Zugzwang motifs in rook endings; they often allow winning on increment without calculation.
When should you play?
Your best results come late evenings UTC – see
. Combine this with the consistency data in to schedule rated sessions when focus is highest.Keep sharpening the tactics, but let the clock be your ally rather than your opponent. Good luck!
🆚 Opponent Insights
| Recent Opponents | ||
|---|---|---|
| fearless_king2 | 3W / 1L / 0D | View |
| portugalskaya-raketa | 1W / 2L / 1D | View |
| Minh Tran Tuan | 1W / 2L / 0D | View |
| richuanggoat | 0W / 1L / 0D | View |
| Most Played Opponents | ||
|---|---|---|
| dontresign3k | 29W / 16L / 1D | View Games |
| Cemil Aghamaliyev | 12W / 12L / 2D | View Games |
| Gerasimenyuk Mikhail | 10W / 15L / 0D | View Games |
| Jaloliddin Ilkhomi | 1W / 24L / 0D | View Games |
| Evgenios Ioannidis | 10W / 11L / 0D | View Games |
Rating
| Year | Bullet | Blitz | Rapid | Daily |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 2744 | 2891 | 2053 | 100 |
| 2024 | 2694 | 2683 | ||
| 2023 | 2709 | 2803 | ||
| 2022 | 2684 | 2381 | 1939 | |
| 2021 | 2560 | 2401 | 1800 | 100 |
| 2020 | 2287 | 2172 | 1756 | |
| 2019 | 2440 | 2690 | 800 | |
| 2018 | 2121 | 2715 | ||
| 2017 | 2566 | |||
| 2016 | 2333 | |||
| 2015 | 1864 |
Stats by Year
| Year | White | Black | Moves |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 81W / 60L / 7D | 82W / 61L / 7D | 82.3 |
| 2024 | 62W / 57L / 10D | 57W / 66L / 8D | 89.0 |
| 2023 | 116W / 110L / 19D | 120W / 108L / 16D | 85.0 |
| 2022 | 170W / 163L / 19D | 142W / 170L / 23D | 81.3 |
| 2021 | 330W / 326L / 50D | 305W / 362L / 35D | 80.2 |
| 2020 | 66W / 116L / 4D | 72W / 111L / 6D | 71.2 |
| 2019 | 125W / 147L / 10D | 148W / 124L / 13D | 46.1 |
| 2018 | 32W / 16L / 1D | 31W / 18L / 3D | 79.5 |
| 2017 | 25W / 9L / 1D | 22W / 19L / 0D | 83.9 |
| 2016 | 17W / 7L / 2D | 19W / 5L / 1D | 73.8 |
| 2015 | 2W / 0L / 0D | 4W / 0L / 0D | 60.7 |
Openings: Most Played
| Bullet Opening | Games | Wins | Losses | Draws | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sicilian Defense: Closed | 71 | 47 | 19 | 5 | 66.2% |
| Amar Gambit | 50 | 18 | 29 | 3 | 36.0% |
| Caro-Kann Defense | 41 | 19 | 22 | 0 | 46.3% |
| Modern | 40 | 21 | 17 | 2 | 52.5% |
| Modern Defense: Pterodactyl Variation | 36 | 22 | 13 | 1 | 61.1% |
| Nimzo-Larsen Attack | 35 | 17 | 17 | 1 | 48.6% |
| Scandinavian Defense | 28 | 12 | 15 | 1 | 42.9% |
| Czech Defense | 26 | 7 | 18 | 1 | 26.9% |
| French Defense | 24 | 7 | 17 | 0 | 29.2% |
| Colle System: Rhamphorhynchus Variation | 23 | 11 | 11 | 1 | 47.8% |
| Blitz Opening | Games | Wins | Losses | Draws | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sicilian Defense: Closed | 239 | 122 | 101 | 16 | 51.0% |
| Unknown | 234 | 130 | 104 | 0 | 55.6% |
| Sicilian Defense: Alapin Variation | 103 | 41 | 56 | 6 | 39.8% |
| Caro-Kann Defense | 94 | 36 | 51 | 7 | 38.3% |
| Sicilian Defense: Moscow Variation | 89 | 42 | 43 | 4 | 47.2% |
| Sicilian Defense: Alapin Variation, Sherzer Variation | 83 | 40 | 38 | 5 | 48.2% |
| Bishop's Opening: Vienna Hybrid, Hromádka Variation | 82 | 37 | 42 | 3 | 45.1% |
| Sicilian Defense: Najdorf Variation | 73 | 33 | 38 | 2 | 45.2% |
| Modern Defense: Pterodactyl Variation | 72 | 35 | 34 | 3 | 48.6% |
| Bogo-Indian Defense | 66 | 27 | 33 | 6 | 40.9% |
| Rapid Opening | Games | Wins | Losses | Draws | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 2 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0.0% |
| Bishop's Opening: Boden-Kieseritzky Gambit | 2 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 50.0% |
| Caro-Kann Defense: Exchange Variation | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| Scandinavian Defense | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| French Defense: Classical Variation, Svenonius Variation | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| Bird Opening: Dutch Variation, Batavo Gambit | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| French Defense | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0.0% |
| Australian Defense | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| Amazon Attack: Siberian Attack | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| Catalan Opening | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| Daily Opening | Games | Wins | Losses | Draws | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Vienna Gambit, with Max Lange Defense | 2 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0.0% |
| Sicilian Defense: Closed | 2 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0.0% |
| Four Knights Game | 2 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0.0% |
| Sicilian Defense | 2 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0.0% |
| London System: Poisoned Pawn Variation | 2 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0.0% |
| Australian Defense | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| Barnes Opening: Walkerling | 2 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 50.0% |
| Hungarian Opening: Wiedenhagen-Beta Gambit | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0.0% |
| Modern Defense: Pterodactyl Variation | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0.0% |
| Four Knights Game: Spanish Variation | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0.0% |
🔥 Streaks
| Streak | Longest | Current |
|---|---|---|
| Winning | 20 | 0 |
| Losing | 24 | 1 |