Alfonso Hernández - The Chess Connoisseur
Alfonso Hernández, known in the chess circles as a resilient and crafty player, has been making serious waves on the board since 2019. With a blitz rating peaking at an impressive 2417 and a bullet peak just shy of 2406, Alfonso is a force to be reckoned with in the rapid and lightning-fast formats. Though his daily games rating hovers in the mid-1600s to high 1600s, his true magic shines in blitz and bullet, where speed and tactics reign supreme.
Career Highlights & Style
- Longest winning streak: 9 games (because who stops at 8?)
- Current winning streak: 2 games - the grind never stops!
- Known for high tactical awareness: His comeback rate is a staggering 88.87%, and he wins 100% of the time after losing a piece. Basically, don't be the one to take his piece.
- Plays with a psychological tilt factor of 12 - champions handle pressure with style!
- Average moves per win/loss is about 80 - Alfonso enjoys the long, strategic grind rather than quick skirmishes.
Opening Peculiarities
Alfonso keeps his opening secrets locked tight with a mysterious "Top Secret" category dominating his repertoire in blitz and other formats. However, he does dabble successfully in the Nimzowitsch Defense and some fantasy variations, proving he's not afraid to mix classic solidity with a pinch of creativity and spice.
Opponent Chronicles
Alfonso never shies away from tough competition and has played thousands of games against a galaxy of opponents. His statistical nemeses include maestros he’s repeatedly met at the board, yet his win rates suggest he’s much better at math than luck:
- Favorites to play against: acrawford28, asztrik, purpleberry22, alex_zapata, stefanbusch
- His win rate varies but proves he's as irritating as a mosquito in summer to many players, with rates swinging from 0% against a few to a perfect 100% against some unlucky souls.
Fun Facts
- Alfonso has logged over 17,863 blitz games - sometimes it’s less chess, more “chess-marathon”.
- He averages near 2,300 in bullet and blitz over recent years, which means he moves pieces faster than most people can say “checkmate!”
- When Alfonso plays after 5 am or around 11 am and 8 pm, his win rate hits a perfect 100%. Maybe those are his magic hours... or he’s just got a time machine.
In Summary
Alfonso Hernández is not just a chess player, he's a battlefield tactician and a grinder, who thrives in blitz crowds but still values long-term strategic battles. A player who laughs in the face of losing pieces and turns disadvantages into dazzling victories. If chess were a TV show, Alfonso's would be that unpredictable plot twist that keeps you on edge – and laughing at the unexpected.
Warning for opponents: If you think you can rattle this player, think again. He’s got a comeback rate that says, “I lost a piece? Hold my rook!”
Strengths and what you’re doing well
You show strong practical sense in blitz, especially in dynamic, complex positions. The most recent win demonstrates your ability to keep the initiative in the middlegame and convert pressure into a decisive endgame, including a timely pawn promotion. You also handle time pressure reasonably well and can generate practical chances even when the position is unclear.
- Good tactical awareness: you often find forcing moves that create concrete problems for your opponent.
- Endgame resourcefulness: you convert advantages in the late phase, turning activity into material gains and winning chances.
- Resilience under time pressure: you stay focused and keep generating threats when the clock becomes tight.
Key areas to improve
- Time management in blitz: aim to pace yourself so you don’t end up with large time deficits in the middlegame. Consider setting small time budgets per phase (opening, middlegame, endgame) and sticking to them.
- Opening consistency: develop a compact, personally chosen repertoire for both colors. Rely on solid plans rather than long theoretical lines in every game to save thinking time.
- Tactical pattern recognition: dedicate a short daily puzzle routine (10–15 minutes) to reinforce common motifs (forks, pins, skewers, discovered attacks) so you spot them faster in games.
- Endgame practice: strengthen rook-and-pawn endings and simple king activity patterns so you can convert small advantages cleanly when fewer pieces remain.
- Defensive resilience: when you’re ahead, be mindful of overextending or trades that simplify into drawing chances for your opponent. Look for solid cleanup moves that keep your material edge.
Openings strategy for blitz
Your openings show solid results with a mix of lines. In blitz, a focused repertoire helps reduce decision time and keeps you in familiar middlegame plans. Consider the following concrete steps:
- Focus on a pair of reliable openings for Black against 1.e4 and 1.d4. The Caro-Kann Defense, in particular, is a solid choice with a respectable win rate in your data, and it often leads to clear, manageable plans in the middlegame.
- For White, select a compact system against common Black setups (for example a solid development scheme after 1.d4 or 1.e4) to limit surprise and maintain consistent middlegame ideas.
- Learn 2–3 critical middlegame plans for each chosen opening so you can move from opening to plan quickly in most games.
- Review a few recent blitz games to identify where opening choice cost you time or left you with unclear plans, and target those gaps in your next practice.
Practical training plan to elevate blitz
- Weekly schedule (repeat for the next 4 weeks):
- Two blitz practice sessions (30–40 minutes each): pick one opening you want to improve, study 2–3 key lines, and play three quick games focusing on sticking to your plan.
- Daily tactical puzzle routine (10–15 minutes): aim for pattern recognition and fast calculation in common blitz motifs.
- Endgame focus (1 session per week, 20–25 minutes): practice rook endings and simple pawn endgames with a timer, focusing on activity and accurate promotion technique.
- Game review and notes (20–25 minutes): after each session, write down your top 3 mistakes, the correct idea, and one improvement to apply in the next games.
- Time management drill: use a simple timer during practice. Allocate roughly equal thinking time per move in the opening phase, and set a micro-goal to not exceed a threshold (for example, 20–25 seconds per move on average in the first 15 moves). If you find yourself spending more, switch to a simpler plan or a safe, structural move.
- Repertoire refinement: commit to 2–3 core openings for White and 2–3 for Black. Memorize the key ideas, typical pawn structures, and the main middlegame plans so you can play fluently without heavy calculation on every move.
Next steps and quick check-ins
Track your progress with a simple weekly log: note one tactical motif you mastered, one opening improvement, and one endgame pattern you can confidently execute. Reassess in four weeks and adjust the plan if needed. Keep focusing on consistency over flashy tactics—steady improvement in blitz comes from solid fundamentals and disciplined practice.
🆚 Opponent Insights
| Recent Opponents | ||
|---|---|---|
| bbmbbm | 2W / 1L / 0D | View |
| mathnerd55 | 0W / 3L / 0D | View |
| dariote3 | 0W / 1L / 0D | View |
| abobkr02 | 2W / 0L / 0D | View |
| wonderful_ville | 1W / 0L / 0D | View |
| Rick GC | 3W / 4L / 0D | View |
| kayakguy | 2W / 3L / 0D | View |
| Kevin Cupid | 1W / 0L / 0D | View |
| smotherhubbard | 1W / 1L / 0D | View |
| johndoe698 | 0W / 3L / 1D | View |
| Most Played Opponents | ||
|---|---|---|
| Ariel Crawford | 23W / 19L / 2D | View Games |
| asztrik | 25W / 6L / 4D | View Games |
| Jhon Alexander Zapata Hincapie | 16W / 12L / 2D | View Games |
| purpleberry22 | 13W / 16L / 1D | View Games |
| Stefan Busch | 18W / 9L / 2D | View Games |
Rating
| Year | Bullet | Blitz | Rapid | Daily |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 2405 | 1639 | ||
| 2024 | 2406 | 2335 | 2129 | 1657 |
| 2023 | 2339 | 2332 | 2129 | 1644 |
| 2022 | 2311 | 2324 | 2129 | 1707 |
| 2021 | 2252 | 2243 | 2012 | 1688 |
| 2020 | 2013 | 2151 | 1358 | 1751 |
| 2019 | 2000 | 2205 |
Stats by Year
| Year | White | Black | Moves |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 338W / 370L / 65D | 337W / 402L / 31D | 83.3 |
| 2024 | 763W / 886L / 116D | 727W / 914L / 125D | 82.7 |
| 2023 | 967W / 1107L / 162D | 894W / 1168L / 154D | 83.3 |
| 2022 | 1041W / 1185L / 164D | 958W / 1252L / 154D | 82.2 |
| 2021 | 585W / 643L / 70D | 557W / 647L / 92D | 81.4 |
| 2020 | 417W / 445L / 46D | 355W / 478L / 60D | 77.6 |
| 2019 | 150W / 126L / 16D | 143W / 139L / 13D | 77.6 |
Openings: Most Played
| Blitz Opening | Games | Wins | Losses | Draws | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Barnes Defense | 3634 | 1479 | 1938 | 217 | 40.7% |
| English Defense: Blumenfeld-Hiva Gambit | 1344 | 595 | 653 | 96 | 44.3% |
| Caro-Kann Defense | 1045 | 478 | 513 | 54 | 45.7% |
| French Defense | 982 | 430 | 504 | 48 | 43.8% |
| Vienna Gambit, with Max Lange Defense | 823 | 346 | 422 | 55 | 42.0% |
| Sicilian Defense: Alapin Variation, Sherzer Variation | 652 | 290 | 322 | 40 | 44.5% |
| Czech Defense | 628 | 274 | 315 | 39 | 43.6% |
| Sicilian Defense: Moscow Variation, Haag Gambit | 611 | 282 | 281 | 48 | 46.1% |
| Amazon Attack: Siberian Attack | 602 | 235 | 333 | 34 | 39.0% |
| Sicilian Defense: Closed, Anti-Sveshnikov Variation, Kharlov-Kramnik Line | 563 | 248 | 270 | 45 | 44.0% |
| Bullet Opening | Games | Wins | Losses | Draws | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Barnes Defense | 92 | 47 | 45 | 0 | 51.1% |
| English Defense: Blumenfeld-Hiva Gambit | 30 | 17 | 10 | 3 | 56.7% |
| French Defense | 28 | 15 | 11 | 2 | 53.6% |
| Scandinavian Defense | 21 | 12 | 8 | 1 | 57.1% |
| Caro-Kann Defense | 20 | 6 | 12 | 2 | 30.0% |
| Czech Defense | 18 | 9 | 8 | 1 | 50.0% |
| Scotch Game | 17 | 10 | 7 | 0 | 58.8% |
| Alekhine Defense | 16 | 7 | 8 | 1 | 43.8% |
| Amar Gambit | 16 | 10 | 5 | 1 | 62.5% |
| Amazon Attack: Siberian Attack | 16 | 12 | 4 | 0 | 75.0% |
| Daily Opening | Games | Wins | Losses | Draws | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sicilian Defense: Alapin Variation, Sherzer Variation | 28 | 15 | 10 | 3 | 53.6% |
| Vienna Gambit, with Max Lange Defense | 16 | 11 | 5 | 0 | 68.8% |
| Sicilian Defense: Closed, Anti-Sveshnikov Variation, Kharlov-Kramnik Line | 12 | 5 | 4 | 3 | 41.7% |
| English Defense: Blumenfeld-Hiva Gambit | 12 | 9 | 1 | 2 | 75.0% |
| Sicilian Defense: Closed | 8 | 6 | 1 | 1 | 75.0% |
| Sicilian Defense | 8 | 6 | 1 | 1 | 75.0% |
| Barnes Defense | 8 | 7 | 0 | 1 | 87.5% |
| French Defense | 8 | 5 | 3 | 0 | 62.5% |
| Sicilian Defense: Moscow Variation, Haag Gambit | 7 | 5 | 2 | 0 | 71.4% |
| Döry Defense | 7 | 4 | 3 | 0 | 57.1% |
| Rapid Opening | Games | Wins | Losses | Draws | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Barnes Defense | 13 | 12 | 0 | 1 | 92.3% |
| Vienna Gambit, with Max Lange Defense | 7 | 3 | 3 | 1 | 42.9% |
| Döry Defense | 5 | 5 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| English Defense: Blumenfeld-Hiva Gambit | 4 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| Bishop's Opening: Horwitz Gambit | 3 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| Scotch Game | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| Three Knights Opening | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| Modern | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| Australian Defense | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| Sicilian Defense: Moscow Variation | 2 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 50.0% |
🔥 Streaks
| Streak | Longest | Current |
|---|---|---|
| Winning | 11 | 1 |
| Losing | 12 | 0 |