Blazej Grot - Candidate Master of the Chess Arena
Meet Blazej Grot, also known in the digital kingdom as GrotBchess, a player whose moves are as sharp as a freshly molted knight and whose strategies evolve faster than a butterfly’s wings in a tempest! Awarded the prestigious title of Candidate Master by FIDE, Blazej embodies the perfect blend of tactical venom and cerebral resilience.
With a peak Bullet rating flirting with 2665 in 2025 and a Blitz max of 2665 too, Blazej zips through rapid-fire games like a queen on a mission. Their gameplay endurance is impressive, with an endgame frequency of 84.44%, proving they’re not just a flash in the pan but thrive in the long haul, where patience and calculated aggression bloom.
Their psyche is especially resilient – boasting a humbling comeback rate of over 90%, and a staggering 99.64% win rate right after losing a piece. Talk about fighting back with the ferocity of a rook defending its territory! Though, like any living organism, Blazej feels the occasional sting of tilt (rated at 9), but quickly rebalances to keep the chess blood flowing.
In their games, average moves per win clock in at 77, while losses stretch a bit longer to 85 moves — showing that when things get sticky, Blazej keeps wriggling through the challenge, never folding too soon. Early resignation is kept to a mere 1.13%, a testament to their tenacious spirit.
The tactical biology of Blazej's style includes a curious affinity for the mysterious "Top Secret" openings, wielded with a win rate north of 50% across Bullet, Blitz, and Rapid. Perhaps their secret weapon is adaptability, adjusting their approach according to the daily rhythm – Friday games bring out their best with nearly 59% win rate, and late-night sessions at 23:00 see them rising to over 62% wins.
Opponents beware: from rook to pawn, every cell of Blazej’s gameboard chemistry is finely tuned. They've triumphed in impressive winning streaks, including a longest run of 28 victorious battles, currently holding a live streak of 1. Whether blitzing through 1746 games in 2024 or taking it daily and steady, Blazej Grot turns every match into a fascinating dance of strategy and survival – a true chess bio-engineer!
Constructive Feedback for Blazej Grot
Snapshot
• Current peak blitz rating:
• Recent score (last 10): 6 wins – 4 losses
• Typical session time: see &
What You Are Doing Well
- Sound opening repertoire. Your main-line Grünfeld and QGD setups consistently gave you healthy positions. In the win vs. you followed theory up to 14…e5 and immediately seized the initiative with 15.Bg5!.
- Pawn-break timing. You regularly unleash thematic ruptures (e4-e5 in D37, d5-d6 in your King’s Indian crush) that convert space advantage into concrete threats.
- Resourceful defence. Even when under pressure you find tactical saves (e.g. 34…Qd7 in the Nimzo vs. ), showing good calculation depth under 20 seconds.
Priority Improvement Areas
-
Clock Management.
• Two losses (, ) came from winning or equal positions that flagged.
• Habit to spend 10–15 seconds on “obvious” recaptures. Train yourself to make the first 15 moves in “pre-move rhythm” unless a concrete tactic exists.
• Drill: play 3-minute games where you must hit 1:50 before move 15; review only the positions where you paused. -
Flank-pawn overextension.
• Early h-pawn pushes (Caro-Kann vs. , Modern vs. ) left dark-square holes and material deficits.
• Guideline: before advancing a wing pawn, count undeveloped minor pieces. If ≥2 pieces are still on the back rank, postpone the pawn thrust. -
Technical Endgames.
• Versus you reached a drawable rook-plus-minor ending but drifted into passivity.
• Key motif you missed: . Enter with Kg4–h5 instead of repeating Kf3–Ke3.
• Weekly drill: 20 rook-vs-rook+pawn table-base positions; aim for instant recognition of Philidor, Lucena and set-ups.
Model Game to Emulate
The following win shows the strategic clarity you should aspire to replicate even under time pressure:
Action Plan (Next 4 Weeks)
| Focus | Method | Metric |
|---|---|---|
| Clock discipline | Daily 3-0 streaks, voice-record “move” before playing to force instinctive decisions | Average time per move <3 s in first 15 moves |
| Endgame technique | Interactive drills on rook endings; annotate endings of your own games | Save / convert rate in ≤5-piece endings ≥70 % |
| Opening hygiene | One repertoire file per colour, max 8 lines each; trim sidelines causing time sinks | No opening think longer than 10 s by move 10 |
Quick Reference
• Tactical patterns to review: , , .
• Endgame themes: , , .
Keep the Momentum!
You already compete toe-to-toe with 2500-level opposition. Refining time handling and cleaning up the few structural weaknesses will push you firmly into the next rating bracket. Good luck, and see you on the leaderboards!
🆚 Opponent Insights
| Recent Opponents | ||
|---|---|---|
| Marton Foldes | 1W / 0L / 0D | |
| Gasan Guliev | 1W / 0L / 1D | |
| Roberto Junio Brito Molina | 2W / 2L / 0D | |
| battery_chess | 1W / 1L / 0D | |
| elchechereche | 0W / 2L / 0D | |
| iwanyu | 2W / 3L / 0D | |
| nexoknight11 | 1W / 0L / 0D | |
| niedoryskowany | 1W / 0L / 0D | |
| fimaz01 | 1W / 0L / 0D | |
| defrownik | 1W / 0L / 0D | |
| Most Played Opponents | ||
|---|---|---|
| NEBRA | 5W / 7L / 1D | |
| Maksym Dubnevych | 5W / 6L / 1D | |
| flawian2008 | 4W / 5L / 2D | |
| Hernan Ramon Filgueira | 4W / 7L / 0D | |
| Radoslav Genov | 2W / 8L / 1D | |
Rating
| Year | Bullet | Blitz | Rapid | Daily |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 2616 | 2705 | 2316 | 1861 |
| 2024 | 2559 | 2551 | 2308 | 1851 |
| 2023 | 2233 | 2174 | 2101 | |
| 2022 | 2009 |
Stats by Year
| Year | White | Black | Moves |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 361W / 229L / 49D | 348W / 237L / 58D | 86.5 |
| 2024 | 718W / 486L / 125D | 667W / 533L / 139D | 84.9 |
| 2023 | 336W / 246L / 48D | 308W / 268L / 48D | 78.6 |
| 2022 | 9W / 2L / 1D | 7W / 3L / 1D | 80.6 |
Openings: Most Played
| Blitz Opening | Games | Wins | Losses | Draws | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sicilian Defense: Alapin Variation, Sherzer Variation | 86 | 45 | 33 | 8 | 52.3% |
| Sicilian Defense: Alapin Variation | 79 | 32 | 39 | 8 | 40.5% |
| Sicilian Defense: Taimanov Variation, American Attack | 56 | 33 | 19 | 4 | 58.9% |
| Caro-Kann Defense | 53 | 21 | 22 | 10 | 39.6% |
| Amar Gambit | 51 | 30 | 16 | 5 | 58.8% |
| Amazon Attack: Siberian Attack | 48 | 29 | 15 | 4 | 60.4% |
| English Opening: Agincourt Defense | 45 | 20 | 18 | 7 | 44.4% |
| French Defense: Burn Variation | 42 | 21 | 19 | 2 | 50.0% |
| London System: Poisoned Pawn Variation | 41 | 18 | 21 | 2 | 43.9% |
| Sicilian Defense: Moscow Variation | 38 | 17 | 15 | 6 | 44.7% |
| Bullet Opening | Games | Wins | Losses | Draws | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Amar Gambit | 248 | 140 | 92 | 16 | 56.5% |
| Nimzo-Larsen Attack | 181 | 80 | 87 | 14 | 44.2% |
| Colle System: Rhamphorhynchus Variation | 169 | 93 | 64 | 12 | 55.0% |
| Alekhine Defense | 158 | 84 | 60 | 14 | 53.2% |
| French Defense | 137 | 65 | 60 | 12 | 47.5% |
| Australian Defense | 102 | 56 | 43 | 3 | 54.9% |
| Modern | 98 | 51 | 37 | 10 | 52.0% |
| French Defense: Exchange Variation | 71 | 37 | 25 | 9 | 52.1% |
| London System: Poisoned Pawn Variation | 63 | 31 | 25 | 7 | 49.2% |
| Amazon Attack: Siberian Attack | 60 | 25 | 31 | 4 | 41.7% |
| Rapid Opening | Games | Wins | Losses | Draws | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Scandinavian Defense | 11 | 9 | 0 | 2 | 81.8% |
| Sicilian Defense: Alapin Variation, Sherzer Variation | 9 | 7 | 2 | 0 | 77.8% |
| Caro-Kann Defense | 7 | 5 | 2 | 0 | 71.4% |
| Sicilian Defense: Alapin Variation | 6 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 33.3% |
| French Defense: Burn Variation | 6 | 5 | 0 | 1 | 83.3% |
| Sicilian Defense: Taimanov Variation, American Attack | 6 | 4 | 1 | 1 | 66.7% |
| Amar Gambit | 5 | 3 | 2 | 0 | 60.0% |
| French Defense: Winawer Variation, Advance Variation | 4 | 2 | 0 | 2 | 50.0% |
| QGD: 3.Nc3 Nf6 4.e3 | 4 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 25.0% |
| Sicilian Defense: Moscow Variation, Haag Gambit | 4 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 75.0% |
| Daily Opening | Games | Wins | Losses | Draws | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| English Opening: Mikenas-Carls Variation | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| Sicilian Defense | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
🔥 Streaks
| Streak | Longest | Current |
|---|---|---|
| Winning | 28 | 4 |
| Losing | 9 | 0 |