Haman Mottaghi (hamanm12) - The Blitz Battle Maestro
Meet Haman Mottaghi, also known by the chessboard as hamanm12, a formidable force in the wild world of blitz chess. With a peak blitz rating soaring over 2300, Haman has danced through tens of thousands of lightning-fast games, wielding a sharp tactical blade and a mysterious aura that leaves opponents pondering, "Did I really just blunder that? Or was it Haman's genius?"
Starting humbly around 1340 in 2020, Haman rapidly climbed the rating ladder like a knight on a sleek horse galloping across the ranks, achieving the 2300+ blitz territory by 2025 — a feat that makes mere mortals sweat under their chess clocks. His average moves per win hover around a marathon-esque 71 moves, proving that he’s not only quick but also enjoys savoring the sweet fruits of victory.
Haman’s preferred battleground? The Nimzowitsch Larsen Attack in various flavors, a favorite opening repertoire that boasts a win rate north of 50%. Be it the Modern, Classical, or Indian Variation, he handles this line with a flair that turns pawns into poetic assaults and bishops into mischievous spies.
Known to have a comeback rate near 77%, Haman has a knack for snatching victory from the jaws of defeat — because giving up early is just not in his playbook (only a 0.27% early resignation rate, thank you very much). Yet, with a tilt factor of 19, even this chess warrior admits there are moments when the brain throws a hissy fit. Luckily, his best battles take place when the clock strikes dawn around 5 AM — proving that he’s either very disciplined or enjoys dispatching rivals before the caffeine kicks in.
Over 13,000 wins in blitz speak volumes about endurance and passion, but watch out, because Haman also has a streak of 13 consecutive wins — a streak long enough to make challengers consider quitting and taking up checkers instead.
In his recent triumphs, Haman masterfully routed opponents with the subtle finesse of the Nimzowitsch Larsen Modern Variation, delivering clean checkmates and sneaky time wins that would make grandmasters nod in approval. Even in defeat, those losses read like lessons in humility to opponents, always fought with honor (and occasionally a surprising pawn sacrifice).
One things is clear: Haman Mottaghi is not just a chess player — he’s a blitz chess raconteur, spinning stories of battles fought at breakneck speeds, where every second counts and every move could ignite a wildfire of tactics.
What’s going well in your blitz play
You regularly choose active, flexible openings and push for dynamic middlegames. In recent games you’ve shown willingness to seize the initiative and create pressure through piece activity, especially when your rooks and minor pieces coordinate on open files and diagonals. Your openness to trying slightly offbeat setups (for example, Nimzo-Larsen style ideas) indicates a healthy curiosity and a readiness to keep opponents off balance in the blitz format.
- Creative opening choices that lead to sharp, tactical chances where you can press for mistakes.
- Good initiative in several middlegames, using piece activity to compensate for any material imbalance.
- Solid handling of straightforward development in quieter positions, which helps you avoid early structural concessions.
Areas to focus on for improvement
- Improve time management in critical middlegame moments. Blitz games reward fast, accurate decisions in sharp positions; build a habit of identifying forcing moves and key tactical threats quickly.
- Enhance tactical pattern recognition and calculation depth. Regular puzzles focusing on forks, pins, skewers, and back-rank motifs will help you spot winning ideas more reliably in blitz.
- Strengthen endgame technique. When positions simplify, converting small advantages into a win becomes crucial. Practice common rook endgames and king activity in simplified endings to improve conversion rates.
- Solidify a compact opening repertoire. You’ve shown strength with Nimzo-Larsen Attack and Owens-Defense-like structures, but some lines lead to tough middlegames. Pick 1–2 lines for White and 1–2 for Black to study deeply, focusing on typical middlegame plans and pawn structures instead of memorizing moves alone.
- Review and learn from your losses with a structured post-game process. Identify the turning point, check for missed tactical shots, and note one improvement you’ll apply in the next game.
Opening performance and plan
Your data shows a robust engagement with a Nimzo-Larsen Attack family and related structures. This style tends to lead to flexible middlegames where quick, active play and solid development are key. You also experimented with other lines (such as Owens-Defense variants) that can become risky in blitz if you are not precise in the early middlegame.
- Recommendation: narrow your opening choices to 1–2 White plans and 1–2 Black replies that fit your natural style (calculated risk, piece activity, and clear middlegame plans).
- For the chosen lines, write a short “middlegame blueprint” listing typical piece placements, pawn structures, and common strategic ideas. This helps you navigate the transition from opening to middlegame under time pressure.
- When studying, pair each line with a few representative pawn structures and typical tactical themes so you have ready-made plans instead of memory-only play.
How this could look in practice: select Nimzo-Larsen Attack as your White choice and a compact, solid Black setup (inspired by Owens-Defense ideas) to ensure you have a reliable, understandable path in most positions. haman mottaghi
Practical training plan
- Daily tactical practice: 15–20 minutes of short, targeted puzzles focusing on common blitz motifs (forks, pins, skewers, back-rank ideas).
- Opening study: 2–3 sessions per week, 30–45 minutes each, focusing on 1–2 White lines and 1–2 Black replies. Build a simple reference with typical middlegame plans and key pawn structures.
- Post-game reviews: after each blitz session, review 1–2 critical moments from your games. Identify the turning points and write down one concrete improvement to apply next time.
- Endgame practice: spend 15–20 minutes weekly on basic rook and king endings, plus simple minor piece endgames to improve conversion and save-draw chances.
- Time-management drill: in training games, set a personal rule to identify at least one forcing candidate move within the first 20–25 seconds of thinking in each critical position.
Next steps and goals
Short-term (2–4 weeks): consolidate 1–2 opening lines, improve calculation depth in tactical positions, and establish a simple post-game review routine. Aim to reduce unforced mistakes in the middlegame and to keep a consistent, manageable pace in the later stages of blitz games.
Medium-term (1–3 months): broaden your practical understanding of the chosen openings by linking typical middlegame plans to common pawn structures. Practice endgame conversion more regularly to convert advantages into wins rather than settling for draws.
Optional quick references
For a quick glance at your profile and recent opening choices, you can use the placeholder link: haman mottaghi.
🆚 Opponent Insights
| Most Played Opponents | ||
|---|---|---|
| oleksandrkyiv | 39W / 31L / 3D | View Games |
| RaphaelGilles | 37W / 35L / 0D | View Games |
| Capricorn9 | 36W / 25L / 4D | View Games |
| ivan alonso | 32W / 27L / 2D | View Games |
| deano70 | 23W / 31L / 2D | View Games |
Rating
| Year | Bullet | Blitz | Rapid | Daily |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 2261 | |||
| 2024 | 2203 | 2050 | ||
| 2023 | 2163 | 2050 | ||
| 2022 | 2070 | |||
| 2021 | 2112 | |||
| 2020 | 2043 |
Stats by Year
| Year | White | Black | Moves |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 1561W / 1275L / 173D | 1464W / 1400L / 150D | 76.3 |
| 2024 | 2398W / 1889L / 279D | 2160W / 2164L / 255D | 76.3 |
| 2023 | 1264W / 1168L / 165D | 1175W / 1266L / 149D | 76.8 |
| 2022 | 487W / 397L / 42D | 407W / 467L / 33D | 76.2 |
| 2021 | 1510W / 1343L / 180D | 1419W / 1463L / 170D | 78.1 |
| 2020 | 654W / 510L / 53D | 599W / 571L / 51D | 75.3 |
Openings: Most Played
| Blitz Opening | Games | Wins | Losses | Draws | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nimzo-Larsen Attack | 14770 | 7620 | 6296 | 854 | 51.6% |
| Barnes Defense | 8997 | 4224 | 4323 | 450 | 47.0% |
| Australian Defense | 3010 | 1547 | 1293 | 170 | 51.4% |
| Colle System: Rhamphorhynchus Variation | 1118 | 460 | 599 | 59 | 41.1% |
| English Opening | 646 | 292 | 316 | 38 | 45.2% |
| English Opening: Agincourt Defense | 640 | 278 | 323 | 39 | 43.4% |
| Amar Gambit | 333 | 149 | 167 | 17 | 44.7% |
| Bird Opening: Dutch Variation | 187 | 78 | 96 | 13 | 41.7% |
| Bird Opening | 130 | 65 | 57 | 8 | 50.0% |
| Hungarian Opening: Wiedenhagen-Beta Gambit | 125 | 56 | 61 | 8 | 44.8% |
| Rapid Opening | Games | Wins | Losses | Draws | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Barnes Defense | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0.0% |
| Nimzo-Larsen Attack | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
🔥 Streaks
| Streak | Longest | Current |
|---|---|---|
| Winning | 13 | 0 |
| Losing | 19 | 1 |