Profile Summary: Andrew (aka hobofries)
Andrew, known in chess circles by his username hobofries, is a relentless tactician with a flair for the dramatic finishes and a remarkable resilience that keeps him bouncing back, even after tough losses. With a career spanning over a decade, Andrew has navigated the intricacies of blitz, rapid, daily, and bullet chess games like a true gladiator of the 64 squares.
His peak ratings reveal a player who steadily climbed the ranks: a blistering 1829 in blitz (April 2023), a formidable 1877 in rapid (March 2022), a sturdy 1801 in daily chess (April 2016), and not forgetting a respectable 1514 in bullet chess (October 2022). Whether he's squeezing out wins in fast-paced blitz or putting in the patient work in daily games, Andrew’s performance is nothing short of dedicated.
Andrew's style is notable for its psychological warfare and stamina. He shows a an 80% comeback rate after setbacks and embraces the endgame like a craftsman, with over 70% frequency in his games, often pushing long battles that last over 70 moves on average before a win or loss is decided. His game is balanced on both white and black pieces, with win rates around 50% regardless of color—clearly, chess treats him as an equal opportunity competitor.
Known for his favorite opening, the Alapin Sicilian Defense, Andrew has engaged in over a thousand blitz games with it, securing a decent win rate of around 48%. He’s also a savvy player of the Sicilian’s many flavors, including the Bowdler Attack and Accelerated Dragon variations, showing a preference for sharp and intricate positions. On the rapid and daily fronts, surprises include his success with strategies labeled “Top Secret,” boasting win rates above 65%—so secret, even castling might be off the table!
Timewise, Andrew seems to thrive in the bright glare of midday, when his win rate peaks, quite possibly fueled by a strong coffee and some fresh brain cells. His most common wins are by the humble resignation, though a healthy number of his victories come by checkmate, proving he’s deadly when he smells blood. Conversely, he's no stranger to the clock beating him down, with a slew of wins and losses decided on timeout—perhaps a testament to his relentless grinding style that sometimes pushes the timer to its limits.
Opponents beware: Andrew has faced a colorful cast of players over the years, boasting perfect win records against some, while against others he has a 0% win rate—because even legends have their nemeses. This rich history hints at an ever-evolving player who adapts but never backs down.
Recent Highlights
- Most recent victory:
Checkmate triumph in a Queen's Gambit Declined Harrwitz Attack, executed with surgical precision in June 2025. Time control: classical 3 minutes plus increment. Review Game - Most recent defeat:
Lost on time in a Queen's Pawn Opening, revealing that even kings sometimes run out of hours to ponder. Review Game
In summary, Andrew aka hobofries is a dedicated chess warrior with a balanced approach, tactical awareness, and a knack for long, strategic engagements. Expect him to outlast you in both time and complexity—a true binge-watcher of the chessboard drama.
What went well in your recent blitz games
You showed good nerve and practical ideas in several blitz moments. In the recent win, you navigated a structured opening plan and kept pressure on your opponent by coordinating your pieces actively. Your willingness to simplify when ahead helped you convert the advantage efficiently. In other games, you demonstrated resilience in complex positions and found ways to create counterplay even when the position was dynamic. Overall, you’re making solid practical choices under time pressure and keeping the board under control in midgame transitions.
Key areas to sharpen for faster, stronger blitz
- Time management and pace: In blitz, you can benefit from a steadier rhythm in the first 15 moves. Aim to complete development and king safety by the time you reach the early middle game, so you’re not scrambling with the clock later on.
- Consistent development: Make a simple development plan for each opening you’re playing. Avoid unnecessary piece moves or queen early sorties that can waste time and invite counterplay.
- Piece coordination in the middle game: Work on keeping your pieces working together rather than chasing material. Ask yourself what the plan is after each exchange and how your pieces will cooperate to pressure key targets.
- Endgame technique under time pressure: Blitz endgames reward clean conversion. Practice basic king-and-pawn endings and a few simple rook endings to convert small advantages quickly.
- Opening familiarity: Focus on mastering a small, two-opening repertoire so you know the typical middlegame plans and common replies. This reduces on-the-fly calculation and saves clock time.
- Tactical awareness and blunder avoidance: Regular puzzles can help spot tactics before they appear in-game. Build a quick habit of scanning for hanging pieces, undefended targets, and forced sequences before each move.
- Post-game review routine: After blitz games, pick one critical moment to study. Identify what you would do differently next time and create a concrete, repeatable adjustment.
Practical, time-friendly training plan
- Daily micro-practice (15–20 minutes): 10 minutes of rapid tactical puzzles (5–7 per minute) and 5–10 minutes reviewing one model game focusing on plans and endgames.
- Two openings to master (2 weeks): Pick two openings you encounter most often and learn the main plan, typical pawn structures, and common middlegame ideas. Create a simple one-page cheat sheet with key ideas.
- Endgame drill (1–2 times per week): Practice 5–10 rook endings or king+pawn endings against a simple engine or on a board, focusing on active king placement and passers.
- Blitz game review (weekly): Revisit one recent blitz game. Note one decision you’d repeat differently and one small improvement to apply in the next game.
- Pre-game routine: 1–2 minutes before each blitz game to set a tiny plan (e.g., “develop and castle safely, watch for tactical shots, keep a clock-friendly pace”).
Quick, actionable next steps for this week
- Choose two openings you’ll play exclusively for blitz this week and write down the core plan for each.
- Do 3 short tactical sessions daily (5–7 puzzles each) to sharpen pattern recognition and reduce time spent calculating in the moment.
- After every blitz game, spend 3 minutes to identify and write one improvement: either a better developing move, a safer king placement, or a more precise endgame plan.
- Keep the board’s balance in mind: when ahead, look for clean trades to simplify; when behind, look for ways to complicate and create practical chances instead of chasing material.
Optional reflections you can use in future reviews
When you’re analyzing your games, focus on: (1) where time pressure first started affecting decisions, (2) moments where you could have chosen a simpler development plan, (3) endgames that felt winnable but required more precise technique. If you keep a brief log of these three areas after each blitz session, you’ll build faster, cleaner decision-making over time.
🆚 Opponent Insights
| Recent Opponents | ||
|---|---|---|
| parthik911 | 1W / 0L / 0D | View |
| jugepenitent | 1W / 0L / 0D | View |
| ymerkong | 0W / 2L / 0D | View |
| flippening | 1W / 0L / 0D | View |
| bpk0 | 0W / 1L / 0D | View |
| score1387 | 0W / 1L / 0D | View |
| sacredgeodude | 1W / 0L / 0D | View |
| kalbin01 | 1W / 0L / 0D | View |
| ronaldmagbanua | 0W / 1L / 0D | View |
| shmooptyboop | 5W / 0L / 0D | View |
| Most Played Opponents | ||
|---|---|---|
| player55328 | 75W / 42L / 4D | View Games |
| grawfin | 55W / 13L / 1D | View Games |
| petersbj | 38W / 7L / 1D | View Games |
| arreat_ | 26W / 0L / 0D | View Games |
| heatmiser42 | 23W / 0L / 1D | View Games |
Rating
| Year | Bullet | Blitz | Rapid | Daily |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 1695 | 2011 | 1327 | |
| 2024 | 1363 | 1559 | 1806 | 1317 |
| 2023 | 1434 | 1572 | 1473 | 1493 |
| 2022 | 1514 | 1612 | 1825 | 1320 |
| 2021 | 1599 | 1877 | 1544 | |
| 2020 | 1472 | 1638 | 1695 | 1603 |
| 2019 | 1583 | 1689 | 1647 | |
| 2018 | 1353 | 1647 | 1618 | 1524 |
| 2017 | 1299 | 1487 | 1777 | 1638 |
| 2016 | 1272 | 1560 | 1688 | |
| 2015 | 1465 | 1707 | 1731 | |
| 2014 | 1644 | 1777 | 1713 | |
| 2013 | 1190 | 1378 | 1665 | |
| 2012 | 1331 | 1472 | 1518 | |
| 2011 | 1048 | 1415 | 1530 |
Stats by Year
| Year | White | Black | Moves |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 185W / 156L / 15D | 178W / 145L / 26D | 80.3 |
| 2024 | 54W / 48L / 12D | 54W / 53L / 7D | 73.8 |
| 2023 | 395W / 320L / 43D | 362W / 360L / 39D | 72.9 |
| 2022 | 462W / 462L / 63D | 490W / 425L / 67D | 73.6 |
| 2021 | 370W / 351L / 41D | 375W / 361L / 46D | 71.2 |
| 2020 | 535W / 470L / 66D | 555W / 463L / 53D | 71.1 |
| 2019 | 344W / 292L / 22D | 315W / 309L / 34D | 70.4 |
| 2018 | 445W / 390L / 22D | 462W / 368L / 37D | 71.2 |
| 2017 | 672W / 602L / 30D | 653W / 589L / 53D | 71.6 |
| 2016 | 292W / 251L / 30D | 277W / 243L / 20D | 69.2 |
| 2015 | 88W / 67L / 10D | 82W / 75L / 6D | 67.2 |
| 2014 | 100W / 53L / 6D | 114W / 50L / 7D | 67.7 |
| 2013 | 29W / 25L / 4D | 25W / 32L / 3D | 54.4 |
| 2012 | 92W / 72L / 12D | 96W / 73L / 6D | 68.7 |
| 2011 | 37W / 31L / 7D | 43W / 30L / 4D | 66.3 |
Openings: Most Played
| Blitz Opening | Games | Wins | Losses | Draws | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sicilian Defense: Alapin Variation | 1397 | 683 | 620 | 94 | 48.9% |
| Sicilian Defense: Accelerated Dragon, Exchange Variation | 546 | 279 | 235 | 32 | 51.1% |
| Sicilian Defense | 368 | 201 | 149 | 18 | 54.6% |
| Caro-Kann Defense | 327 | 164 | 141 | 22 | 50.1% |
| Sicilian Defense: Closed, Anti-Sveshnikov Variation, Kharlov-Kramnik Line | 320 | 160 | 148 | 12 | 50.0% |
| Amazon Attack | 317 | 159 | 140 | 18 | 50.2% |
| Scandinavian Defense | 285 | 128 | 144 | 13 | 44.9% |
| Sicilian Defense: Closed | 278 | 129 | 133 | 16 | 46.4% |
| Blackburne Shilling Gambit | 263 | 134 | 118 | 11 | 51.0% |
| London System: Poisoned Pawn Variation | 254 | 117 | 116 | 21 | 46.1% |
| Daily Opening | Games | Wins | Losses | Draws | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Caro-Kann Defense | 32 | 21 | 11 | 0 | 65.6% |
| Sicilian Defense: Alapin Variation | 21 | 12 | 8 | 1 | 57.1% |
| Amar Gambit | 14 | 13 | 1 | 0 | 92.9% |
| Sicilian Defense: Closed | 10 | 7 | 3 | 0 | 70.0% |
| Caro-Kann Defense: Classical Variation | 10 | 8 | 1 | 1 | 80.0% |
| QGA: 3.e3 c5 | 9 | 5 | 4 | 0 | 55.6% |
| Slav Defense | 8 | 4 | 4 | 0 | 50.0% |
| Amazon Attack | 8 | 4 | 4 | 0 | 50.0% |
| Blackburne Shilling Gambit | 8 | 6 | 2 | 0 | 75.0% |
| Unknown | 8 | 4 | 4 | 0 | 50.0% |
| Rapid Opening | Games | Wins | Losses | Draws | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Caro-Kann Defense | 111 | 64 | 38 | 9 | 57.7% |
| Barnes Defense | 52 | 38 | 10 | 4 | 73.1% |
| Amar Gambit | 50 | 30 | 16 | 4 | 60.0% |
| Amazon Attack | 48 | 31 | 15 | 2 | 64.6% |
| QGA: 3.e3 c5 | 37 | 24 | 12 | 1 | 64.9% |
| Australian Defense | 37 | 17 | 16 | 4 | 46.0% |
| Sicilian Defense: Alapin Variation | 30 | 13 | 15 | 2 | 43.3% |
| Slav Defense | 29 | 19 | 9 | 1 | 65.5% |
| Caro-Kann Defense: Classical Variation | 26 | 14 | 10 | 2 | 53.9% |
| Caro-Kann Defense: Exchange Variation | 23 | 14 | 8 | 1 | 60.9% |
| Bullet Opening | Games | Wins | Losses | Draws | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sicilian Defense: Alapin Variation | 610 | 336 | 257 | 17 | 55.1% |
| Sicilian Defense: Accelerated Dragon, Exchange Variation | 331 | 177 | 135 | 19 | 53.5% |
| Sicilian Defense | 230 | 119 | 102 | 9 | 51.7% |
| Sicilian Defense: Closed, Anti-Sveshnikov Variation, Kharlov-Kramnik Line | 212 | 124 | 85 | 3 | 58.5% |
| Scandinavian Defense | 184 | 105 | 75 | 4 | 57.1% |
| Blackburne Shilling Gambit | 151 | 79 | 69 | 3 | 52.3% |
| Amar Gambit | 146 | 72 | 73 | 1 | 49.3% |
| Bird Opening: Dutch Variation, Batavo Gambit | 145 | 74 | 67 | 4 | 51.0% |
| Philidor Defense | 144 | 67 | 75 | 2 | 46.5% |
| Sicilian Defense: Closed | 140 | 70 | 66 | 4 | 50.0% |
🔥 Streaks
| Streak | Longest | Current |
|---|---|---|
| Winning | 16 | 2 |
| Losing | 13 | 0 |