Nick De Firmian
Grandmaster of the Chessboard
Nick De Firmian is a Grandmaster titleholder awarded by FIDE, wielding his chess prowess with a precision earned through countless battles. With a Blitz maximum rating peaking at an impressive 2670 in 2024, Nick has proven his tactical and strategic sharpness in the fast-paced arena where every second counts and every move pulses with potential energy.
Known for his calculated endgames, Nick's playing style is a study in patience and perseverance—boasting an endgame frequency above 83%, he thrives when the board is bare but the stakes are high. His average win spans over 67 moves, proving he’s not one to bolt early; after all, patience is a virtue and chess is no exception, making each match a slow dance to checkmate rather than a quick sprint.
With a comeback rate nearing 88%, Nick exhibits the resilience of a knight dodging capture on the battlefield of black and white. Even after losing a piece, he claims a perfect win rate of 100%, showing that he's not a player prone to throwing in the towel or breaking a sweat under pressure—his tilt factor remains impressively low at just 13, making him a rock-solid competitor in the psychological war of chess.
Nick's win rates are slightly higher when playing White (54.76%) versus Black (51.55%), showing his preference (and skill) at moving first and setting the pace. A black bishop or white queen might be no match for his strategic mind, and he boasts a longest winning streak of 19 games—enough to convince you that he's got the stamina of a marathoner, albeit one sprinting on 64 squares.
Besides his exploits in Blitz, Nick dabbles in Rapid and Bullet chess, with Rapid boasting a flawless win rate in the couple matches recorded, and Bullet games peppered with his quick-footed decisions that clock max ratings near the 1970 mark. Chess is his ecosystem, and like a cunning predator in the wild, Nick adapts fluidly to every time format, thriving across the spectrum from glacial deep-thinkers to lightning-fast gambits.
Off the board, Nick’s extensive experience and sharp insight make him an invaluable resource for many aspiring players. As a Grandmaster who has navigated the many forks and pins of competitive chess, Nick De Firmian continues to study the game’s evolution, always ready to shed light on the mysteries of the black-and-white DNA that make chess the noble, endlessly fascinating game it is.
Hi Nick, here is a data-driven review of your recent blitz form.
What you’re doing well
- Opening repertoire is coherent and ambitious. In your wins you handled the Najdorf (as Black) and the 6.Bg5/English Attack (as White) with confidence, regularly grabbing space with g- and h-pawns to attack the king.
- Tactical alertness under pressure. In the win vs akaPeikeda17 you spotted 16.Rxg7! and later converted the
b7passer smoothly. Your combinations rarely miss forcing resources. - Piece activity awareness. You routinely place rooks on the seventh rank and double them on open files; e.g. the …Rc8–c1+ motif against Garde1989.
Recurring issues
- Time-management. Four of the last five losses ended by flag, often from clearly drawable or winning positions (e.g. vs FoamySea). You are spending 30–40 s on non-critical moves then racing in dead-lost time scrambles.
- Converting technical positions. Versus aykm (Najdorf) you reached an equal rook ending but drifted after 33.h4 and allowed the passed
c-pawn to decide. Endgames withR + PvsR + Pare a bleeding point. - Over-extension of wing pawns. Several losses feature pawn storms (…f5, …g5) that created weaknesses you couldn’t cover once the attack fizzled—see the Owens/1…b6 game against KonstantinB_1983.
- Ignoring prophylaxis. After 18.Qxd6!! in the loss to aykm you had no good reply; the queen infiltration was foreseeable. Building a habit of asking “what does my opponent want?” each move will help. Prophylaxis
Targeted training plan
- Clock discipline drill. Play 10 games at 3 + 2 where you must move before your clock dips below 2 minutes in the first 15 moves. The goal is to internalise opening patterns and save at least 30 s for the conversion phase.
- Endgame refresh. Spend one week on rook-and-pawn endings: the Lucena, Philidor, 4 vs 3 same-side. Solve 20 studies and play out the side-to-move positions vs engine until you score 80 %.
- “Quiet move” puzzles. Your tactical strength is fine, but you miss defensive resources. Do 10 puzzles/day filtered for Difficulty > 2300 and Theme = Quiet.
- Opening hygiene.
- Najdorf: add the 17…h5 antidote to the English Attack; prepare it with illustrative games by Vachier-Lagrave.
- Black vs 1.d4: your Owens/B00 sideline gives you dynamic play but yields chronic dark-square gaps. Consider the solid 1…d5/QGD set-up you used successfully vs Garde1989.
Key moment to revisit
Progress tracker
• Peak blitz rating: 2706 (2025-06-25) • Next checkpoint: +40 Elo in 30 days with <20 % time-losses.Keep the energy, tighten the technique, and let the scoresheet reflect your true GM strength!
🆚 Opponent Insights
| Recent Opponents | ||
|---|---|---|
| Elshad Orujov | 3W / 1L / 0D | |
| Magi Karpov | 2W / 2L / 0D | |
| Wojtek Sochacki | 2W / 0L / 0D | |
| simplyabeginner | 0W / 1L / 0D | |
| kenlonecarson | 1W / 0L / 0D | |
| iltis5 | 2W / 0L / 0D | |
| lindisey_l | 0W / 1L / 1D | |
| mihirkotbagi | 6W / 3L / 0D | |
| jabed27 | 1W / 1L / 0D | |
| jec222222 | 0W / 1L / 0D | |
| Most Played Opponents | ||
|---|---|---|
| Nejmeddine Dhaouadi | 44W / 29L / 4D | |
| Scatman 5000 | 36W / 28L / 2D | |
| Bruce Monson | 28W / 34L / 2D | |
| fastfaun | 39W / 23L / 0D | |
| Jura Ochkoos | 35W / 25L / 2D | |
Rating
| Year | Bullet | Blitz | Rapid | Daily |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 2456 | |||
| 2024 | 2510 | |||
| 2023 | 2395 | |||
| 2022 | 2498 | |||
| 2021 | 2204 | 2128 | ||
| 2020 | 2400 | |||
| 2019 | 2300 | |||
| 2018 | 1974 | 2398 | ||
| 2017 | 1877 | 2258 |
Stats by Year
| Year | White | Black | Moves |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 1088W / 745L / 121D | 938W / 878L / 149D | 77.5 |
| 2024 | 1666W / 1265L / 194D | 1616W / 1304L / 199D | 75.4 |
| 2023 | 1499W / 1132L / 159D | 1458W / 1182L / 171D | 74.5 |
| 2022 | 1385W / 1043L / 148D | 1348W / 1073L / 160D | 72.4 |
| 2021 | 786W / 626L / 75D | 743W / 678L / 59D | 71.0 |
| 2020 | 812W / 697L / 84D | 729W / 795L / 98D | 74.0 |
| 2019 | 1076W / 787L / 89D | 967W / 846L / 109D | 75.1 |
| 2018 | 1594W / 1016L / 166D | 1461W / 1121L / 182D | 76.5 |
| 2017 | 904W / 503L / 61D | 865W / 515L / 77D | 75.5 |
Openings: Most Played
| Blitz Opening | Games | Wins | Losses | Draws | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Barnes Defense | 6666 | 3589 | 2727 | 350 | 53.8% |
| King's Indian Defense: Averbakh Variation | 1822 | 1054 | 681 | 87 | 57.9% |
| Australian Defense | 1393 | 705 | 596 | 92 | 50.6% |
| Nimzo-Indian Defense: Three Knights Variation | 1349 | 768 | 508 | 73 | 56.9% |
| Colle System: Rhamphorhynchus Variation | 987 | 528 | 391 | 68 | 53.5% |
| Semi-Slav Defense: Accelerated Meran Variation | 863 | 493 | 319 | 51 | 57.1% |
| Indian Defense: Schnepper Gambit | 755 | 386 | 314 | 55 | 51.1% |
| Döry Defense | 592 | 310 | 244 | 38 | 52.4% |
| Sicilian Defense | 572 | 295 | 248 | 29 | 51.6% |
| English Opening: Symmetrical Variation | 535 | 282 | 212 | 41 | 52.7% |
| Rapid Opening | Games | Wins | Losses | Draws | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| QGD: 6.Nf3 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| Sicilian Defense: Closed, Anti-Sveshnikov Variation, Kharlov-Kramnik Line | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| Bullet Opening | Games | Wins | Losses | Draws | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Modern Defense: Averbakh System | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| Barnes Defense | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
🔥 Streaks
| Streak | Longest | Current |
|---|---|---|
| Winning | 19 | 1 |
| Losing | 13 | 0 |