Player Profile: I-have-not-defense
I-have-not-defense is an avid chess competitor who has played thousands of games across multiple time controls, with a preference for Blitz. Their Blitz rating began around the high 1700s in 2024 and has fluctuated in the 1500–1800 range over subsequent seasons. They also made a brief foray into Rapid, peaking at 1840 but settling at 1566.
Across all Blitz appearances, they have contested over 12,800 games, winning roughly 4,900. Despite a relatively modest win rate in many openings labeled as “Undefined,” they have displayed positive results with lines such as the French Defense Knight Variation and exhibits a clear fondness for London System setups. Their repertoire also features rarer choices like the Nimzowitsch Defense Kennedy Linksspringer Variation and the Englund Gambit.
In terms of in-game performance, I-have-not-defense’s longest winning streak spans 16 consecutive victories, highlighting their resilience and ability to maintain focus. However, a high early resignation rate (over 99%) suggests they concede quickly when positions turn dire. Attraction to the opening phases is particularly strong, while endgames occupy a small fraction of their games.
I-have-not-defense often plays at varied hours, with performance tending to peak around 7 AM. Their day-of-week record shows Monday slightly above their overall average, while Saturday presents more consistent challenges. Psychologically, a Tilt Factor of 32 and a notable swing in Rated vs. Casual encounters signal that mood and stakes can influence results.
Despite the ups and downs, I-have-not-defense’s enthusiasm for chess remains unshaken. Whether trying rare gambits or refining staple setups like the French and London, they continue to expand their knowledge in pursuit of higher ratings and stronger play.
What you’re doing well
You’re actively playing blitz and have shown willingness to try a wide range of openings. This curiosity can help you learn patterns and avoid getting stuck in familiar setups. You also have a positive longer-term trend, which shows momentum over multiple timeframes despite short-term fluctuations. Your readiness to analyze your play and look for improvements will serve you well as you tighten your blitz game.
Strengths to build on
- Commitment to blitz practice through regular games, which accelerates pattern recognition and decision speed.
- Openness to exploring different openings, a good foundation for finding a robust, repeatable repertoire.
- Ability to generate opportunities in complex positions; with focused study, you can convert more of those chances.
Areas to improve
- Opening discipline: blitz often suffers when choices become too varied. Consolidating a compact, repeatable opening repertoire will reduce first-muse hesitation and time trouble.
- Tactical sharpness: blitz heavily rewards quick, accurate tactical calculation. Regular puzzle practice can help you spot winning ideas and avoid blunders.
- Time management: balance speed with accuracy. Learn to allocate a small, fixed amount of time to the opening phase and stick to it.
- Endgame technique: many blitz games reach endings when time is tight. Strengthening king activity and basic rook endgames will save drawn or lost games.
- Post-game reviews: systematically classify mistakes (blunders, missed tactics, plan errors) to target practice more effectively.
Action plan to implement
- Consolidate a simple white repertoire: pick two solid setups (for example, a London System–style structure and a straightforward Italian/IX setup) and learn the typical plans, piece placements, and common responses. Pick two black responses that suit those white setups.
- Daily tactical training: complete 15–20 minutes of puzzles focused on common blitz themes (forks, pins, skewers, discovered attacks) to improve pattern recognition and calculational confidence.
- Endgame basics: study simple rook endings and king-and-pawn endings. Practice a few endgame drills weekly to finish more games with confidence.
- Post-game review ritual: after each blitz session, write down 3 concrete takeaways per game (one opening decision, one tactic/calculation moment, one endgame concept).
- Time-management drills: in the opening, set a 1–2 minute target for the first 10 moves and enforce a quick check of a plan at move 5, then decide if you can accelerate or slow down to consolidate.
Opening suggestions to start with
- White: London System or Italian Game for a solid, easy-to-learn plan with clear middlegame ideas.
- Black: French Defense or Caro-Kann for sturdy, principled structures that keep the game simple to navigate in blitz.
Today’s quick wins
Pick two safe openings to play for the next 10–15 blitz games. Practice a focused 15-minute puzzle session and set a strict two-minute limit for the first 12 moves of each game to build a reliable opening habit.
Profile aids
Review recent games and positions to target improvements. I-have-not-defense
🆚 Opponent Insights
| Recent Opponents | ||
|---|---|---|
| urojona | 2W / 4L / 0D | View |
| xzxxxxxzxzz | 0W / 1L / 0D | View |
| 1916b | 0W / 8L / 0D | View |
| juniorgasparotto | 0W / 1L / 0D | View |
| li1777 | 0W / 1L / 0D | View |
| sookoboos | 1W / 3L / 0D | View |
| l1ch3ssus3r | 7W / 15L / 0D | View |
| bughousemonk | 1W / 3L / 0D | View |
| lamadestrbudda | 22W / 19L / 0D | View |
| zab8888 | 1W / 1L / 0D | View |
| Most Played Opponents | ||
|---|---|---|
| rodin_mikl | 184W / 265L / 1D | View Games |
| iddd99 | 129W / 167L / 0D | View Games |
| phillip | 92W / 175L / 3D | View Games |
| awawawwwwww | 100W / 158L / 1D | View Games |
| readchattandem | 99W / 151L / 0D | View Games |
Rating
| Year | Bullet | Blitz | Rapid | Daily |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 1540 | |||
| 2024 | 1679 | 1566 |
Stats by Year
| Year | White | Black | Moves |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 3548W / 5985L / 41D | 3534W / 5979L / 30D | 0.0 |
| 2024 | 1257W / 1867L / 14D | 1226W / 1902L / 14D | 0.2 |
Openings: Most Played
| Blitz Opening | Games | Wins | Losses | Draws | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 25381 | 9559 | 15725 | 97 | 37.7% |
| French Defense | 4 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 50.0% |
| Amazon Attack | 2 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 50.0% |
| Australian Defense | 2 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 50.0% |
| English Opening: Mikenas-Carls Variation | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| English Opening: Agincourt Defense | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0.0% |
| Sicilian Defense: Alapin Variation | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0.0% |
| London System: Poisoned Pawn Variation | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0.0% |
| Barnes Defense | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0.0% |
| Rapid Opening | Games | Wins | Losses | Draws | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| London System: Poisoned Pawn Variation | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0.0% |
| Catalan Opening | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0.0% |
| French Defense | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
🔥 Streaks
| Streak | Longest | Current |
|---|---|---|
| Winning | 16 | 0 |
| Losing | 32 | 13 |