Chess Player Profile: İbrahim Sevin (iboggi)
Meet İbrahim Sevin, known online as iboggi, a chess enthusiast whose journey through the 64 squares is as unpredictable as a wild Sicilian Defense! By 2025, İbrahim's rapid rating hovers at a respectable 268, proving he's no stranger to outwitting opponents in the heat of classic time controls.
With a gaming history boasting over 600 rapid games, İbrahim’s commitment is legendary. Although his rapid win-loss record is a bit of a seesaw (279 wins to 291 losses), his persistence earns him a comeback rate of an impressive 57.49%. It seems when the chips are down, İbrahim summons his inner chess ninja to turn the tides—a true comeback king!
Not one to just stick with rapid, İbrahim occasionally flirts with blitz and bullet, though his ratings there - 251 in blitz and 194 in bullet - suggest that speed chess might sometimes induce a bead of sweat or two. Still, with a steady 50% win rate in blitz, iboggi’s quick fingers are no joke.
He’s quite the strategist, favoring a “Top Secret” opening repertoire across all formats. And while the exact details are under wraps (or maybe just not yet decoded), opponents know they’re walking into a mystery every time they face him. Maybe one day İbrahim will reveal his secret weapon... or maybe not!
İbrahim’s psychological resilience is notable; with a modest tilt factor of 10, even losing multiple pieces doesn’t faze him—he boasts a 100% win rate after losing material. Take that, chess fate! Early resignations happen about 10% of the time, so he knows when to conserve energy for the next battle.
One quirky fact: İbrahim’s best performances seem timed with the clock, with a peak winning mojo around 10 PM (22:00) boasting a 55.56% win rate. Night owl or just putting opponents to bed early? You decide.
In sum, İbrahim Sevin (iboggi) is a persistent, cunning player with a flair for surprise comebacks and a taste for mystery in his openings. Whether he's methodically outthinking you in rapid or scrambling in bullet, he brings heart and hustle to every game. Just don’t expect to easily crack his secret playbook—or you might find your king in checkmate before you say "Top Secret."
Quick summary
Nice work — your recent games show good opening familiarity and the ability to create dynamic counterplay. Main areas to tighten: time management in blitz, a few tactical oversights in sharp middlegames, and consistent handling of pawn-structure imbalances after castling on opposite sides.
Highlights — what you're doing well
- Comfortable in sharp, opposite-side-castle positions — you play actively (example: your win as Black vs clutchcity1 where you castled long and generated central pawn breaks).
- Good opening variety and preparation (strong results in Vienna Gambit and Petrov in your Openings Performance).
- Practical sense for creating counterplay — you look for pawn breaks and piece activity instead of passive defence, which is the right mindset in blitz.
- Solid overall strength: your Strength Adjusted Win Rate is ~50%, so your instincts work under time pressure.
Recurring mistakes & patterns to fix
- Time management: several games end by flag or abandonment. In blitz a small clock edge becomes decisive — avoid long think on non-critical moves. Use a simple rule: spend >10s only when the position is critical (tactics or forcing continuation).
- Opposite-side castling risks: when you castle opposite sides (or your opponent does) you sometimes allow pawn storms or open files too easily. Before castling long, check: can the opponent open the g- or h-file quickly? Are my queenside pawns safe?
- Tactical accuracy in fireworks: in sharp central exchanges (Scandinavian line you recently played) watch for intermediate checks and recaptures — a one-ply inaccuracy turns a level game into a worse one. Slow your mouse a touch on captures that change the balance.
- Piece placement: knights on the rim / underused bishops — aim to coordinate before engaging in pawn storms. Example theme: when opponent plays e4-e5/e4-e4 breaks, find the best square for knights and stop passive piece trade that helps the opponent equalize.
Concrete practice plan (next 4 weeks)
- Daily (10–15 min): tactics warm-up — focus on forks, pins, and discovered checks. Use short timed sets to simulate blitz pressure.
- 3× week (20 min): blitz-specific drills — play 5–10 3+0 or 3|2 games, but force yourself to practice one thing per game (example: "today I will not castle long unless pawn structure is frozen").
- Weekly (30–45 min): post-mortem of 3 recent losses/wins. Don’t just run the engine — ask “what tactical motif did I miss?” and “what plan was better here?”
- Opening tune-up (2× week, 15 min): pick two openings you want to solidify (for you: Scandinavian Defense and Four Knights Game). Learn typical pawn structures and one tactical motif per line.
- Endgame basics (once a week, 15 min): king+rook vs king technique and essential pawn endgames — useful for converting or defending in time-scrambles.
Practical blitz tips (quick wins)
- Premoves: use them selectively. Don’t premove into captures or checks unless forced — that’s where mouse slips cost games.
- When ahead on time but not clearly winning on board: simplify with safe trades and reduce the opponent’s counterplay — flagging is easier with fewer pieces.
- When behind on time: look for forcing moves (checks, captures, threats). Force the opponent to think or make a defensive error.
- Use a 3-move rule: if you’re under 30 seconds, limit decision branches to at most three candidate moves — pick the most practical one.
Short annotated example — recent win (useful motifs)
Below is your most recent win (opponent clutchcity1). Look at how central breaks and piece activity created problems — even though the win came on time, the plan and pawn breaks were effective.
Suggested next steps
- Pick one opening to clean up (where your WinRate is middling) — e.g., Four Knights Game — and learn the key plans rather than long variations.
- Set a simple time-control goal for each session (example: “Today: no move >15s unless tactical”). Track how often you violate it.
- Keep the confidence: your long-term trend shows improvement (3– and 6–month gains). Focus on small, repeatable habits — they compound quickly in blitz.
Want Ibrahim-specific drills I can export into a practice schedule (daily/weekly calendar)? Say “yes” and I’ll build one tailored to your openings and time-management profile.
Opponent study placeholders / references
- Review the Scandinavian lines you recently played: Scandinavian Defense.
- Re-check the Four Knights middlegame plans: Four Knights Game.
- Useful opponents to review from your last batch: checkmatein104.
🆚 Opponent Insights
| Recent Opponents | ||
|---|---|---|
| checkmatein104 | 0W / 1L / 0D | View |
| Most Played Opponents | ||
|---|---|---|
| annefedas | 1W / 6L / 0D | View Games |
| doctorrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrr | 1W / 4L / 1D | View Games |
| tth_tatoo | 0W / 2L / 3D | View Games |
| 1levn11 | 3W / 1L / 0D | View Games |
| shubhendrra | 2W / 2L / 0D | View Games |
Rating
| Year | Bullet | Blitz | Rapid | Daily |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 177 | 294 | 283 | 546 |
Stats by Year
| Year | White | Black | Moves |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 805W / 717L / 132D | 719W / 822L / 108D | 57.6 |
Openings: Most Played
| Blitz Opening | Games | Wins | Losses | Draws | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Barnes Defense | 353 | 156 | 169 | 28 | 44.2% |
| Four Knights Game | 339 | 152 | 156 | 31 | 44.8% |
| Vienna Gambit, with Max Lange Defense | 255 | 153 | 85 | 17 | 60.0% |
| Amar Gambit | 161 | 63 | 87 | 11 | 39.1% |
| Scandinavian Defense | 158 | 77 | 69 | 12 | 48.7% |
| Three Knights Opening | 135 | 58 | 66 | 11 | 43.0% |
| Petrov's Defense | 124 | 67 | 51 | 6 | 54.0% |
| Amazon Attack | 119 | 53 | 54 | 12 | 44.5% |
| French Defense | 88 | 42 | 39 | 7 | 47.7% |
| Four Knights Game: Spanish Variation | 74 | 39 | 30 | 5 | 52.7% |
| Daily Opening | Games | Wins | Losses | Draws | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Four Knights Game | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| Sicilian Defense: O'Kelly Variation | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0.0% |
| Bullet Opening | Games | Wins | Losses | Draws | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Scandinavian Defense | 3 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 33.3% |
| Barnes Defense | 2 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0.0% |
| Elephant Gambit | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| Amazon Attack | 2 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 50.0% |
| Four Knights Game | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0.0% |
| Three Knights Opening | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0.0% |
| Rapid Opening | Games | Wins | Losses | Draws | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Barnes Defense | 126 | 57 | 61 | 8 | 45.2% |
| Four Knights Game | 85 | 39 | 43 | 3 | 45.9% |
| Elephant Gambit | 37 | 20 | 12 | 5 | 54.0% |
| Amazon Attack | 33 | 8 | 24 | 1 | 24.2% |
| Three Knights Opening | 27 | 15 | 11 | 1 | 55.6% |
| Amar Gambit | 27 | 10 | 15 | 2 | 37.0% |
| Petrov's Defense | 25 | 11 | 13 | 1 | 44.0% |
| French Defense | 22 | 7 | 12 | 3 | 31.8% |
| Scandinavian Defense | 21 | 11 | 8 | 2 | 52.4% |
| Vienna Gambit, with Max Lange Defense | 19 | 9 | 9 | 1 | 47.4% |
🔥 Streaks
| Streak | Longest | Current |
|---|---|---|
| Winning | 8 | 0 |
| Losing | 10 | 1 |