Isik Can - Grandmaster of the Chessboard
In the grand ecosystem of chess, IsikCan05 is a true apex predator. Awarded the prestigious title of Grandmaster by FIDE, Isik has been thriving in the competitive wild since 2021, showing remarkable adaptability and a tactical prowess that would make even the most cunning biological hunters blush.
Isik's blitz and bullet ratings have evolved like a well-adapted species, peaking at 2849 in blitz and breaking the 2800-mark in bullet formats. Not one to shy away from rapid contests either, Isik holds a perfect win rate in rapid chess – talk about a specimen in peak condition!
With an overall blitz record featuring 205 wins against 95 losses and a blitz win rate of approximately 62.5%, Isik’s approach is both patient and deadly - like the perfect predator stalking its prey through a dense theoretical forest. Their average winning game length (~56 moves) suggests a blend of strategic endurance and execution precision – no rush, but no mercy.
Interestingly, Isik has a knack for comebacks, boasting a comeback rate near 69% and a win rate above 77% even after losing a piece. In biology, this might be akin to regenerative abilities or a survival trait honed by evolution. In chess, it’s pure grit and calculation.
But even apex predators have weaknesses – Isik’s early resignation rate stands at just over 20%, a small chink in an otherwise armored neural network that means sometimes, the game ends before the queen’s gambit pays off.
Psychologically, Isik keeps calm with a low tilt factor (4), proving that in the jungle of chess emotions, self-control is a vital survival mechanism. Their tempo varies, with lightning strikes during the early morning hours (up to 100% win rate at 2 AM!) and steady dominance during prime-time hours.
The battlefield of chess openings remains shrouded in mystery – classified under “Top Secret” with dominant win rates across blitz, bullet, and rapid. One can only speculate if these openings are evolutionary adaptations or clever biological mechanisms in disguise.
Hi Isik Can!
Congratulations on maintaining a 2919 (2025-07-02) above the 2800 mark. Your results show that you can out-calculate most opponents and convert complex middlegames into wins. Below is some targeted feedback drawn from your most recent games.
What’s working well
- Opening creativity. 1.b3 and early pawn storms (g- and h-pawns) often take opponents out of book and create tactical chances.
- Piece activity. In your win against spraggs05, every piece joined the attack (Ng5, Bxh7+, Qh5) before Black could organise defence.
- Conversion with material edge. Several wins (e.g. vs B18) show clean technique once you reach a winning ending.
Recurring problems
- Premature pawn advances. Twice in the Nimzo-Larsen (loss to FarewellToKings2112) the sequence
g4-g5created dark-square holes and a weak king. Ask “What will this pawn no longer protect?” before pushing. - King safety during flank attacks. In several b3 games your king stayed in the centre until move 30+. Consider delaying pawn storms until you have castled.
- Time management. The flag loss to “ymflb8hj…” came from spending 55 seconds between moves 20-30. Try the “40-20-20 rule”: opening 40 %, middlegame 20 %, ending 20 % of clock.
- Endgame rook technique. Both losses to Aryan Chopra and “ymflb8hj…” featured passive rooks. Study side-rook cutting off king and rook behind passed pawn principles (Lucena position, Philidor position).
Key moment to review
From your loss to FarewellToKings2112 (move 37):
Action plan for the next two weeks
- Safe Larsen structure. Replace 8.g4 with 8.Ngf3 followed by 9.O-O and only then consider g-pawn pushes. Play at least 20 blitz games with this rule to build the habit.
- Rook-and-pawn endings. 15-minute drill: set up 10 Lucena and 10 Philidor positions vs engine; convert/defend within 60 seconds each.
- Clock discipline drill. During three blitz sessions enable a visible “time spent per move” widget. Abort any game where you spend >10 s before move 15.
- Post-game questions. After every loss, write down (i) first move that weakened your king, (ii) first move that cost >10 s, (iii) first rook move that became passive.
Progress trackers
Final thoughts
You already have the tactical sharpness of a titled player; adding a layer of prophylaxis and better clock control will push your blitz rating even higher. Keep the creativity—just anchor it with solid king safety, and the results will follow.
Good luck at the board!
🆚 Opponent Insights
| Recent Opponents | ||
|---|---|---|
| MusashiStyle | 1W / 0L / 0D | View |
| sausau2010 | 0W / 1L / 0D | View |
| i_fink_u_freeky | 1W / 2L / 0D | View |
| Shamil Arslanov | 1W / 0L / 0D | View |
| Dmitry MIschuk | 0W / 1L / 0D | View |
| Xiao Tong | 0W / 1L / 0D | View |
| Ruslan Gadzhiev | 1W / 0L / 0D | View |
| epjdcdu86 | 1W / 0L / 0D | View |
| Austin Jacob Literatus | 2W / 0L / 0D | View |
| Narek Ghimoyan | 1W / 0L / 0D | View |
| Most Played Opponents | ||
|---|---|---|
| Emirhan Tarlabasi | 20W / 11L / 0D | View Games |
| Luka Budisavljevic | 15W / 4L / 1D | View Games |
| Ediz Gürel | 5W / 13L / 0D | View Games |
| Nikoloz Kumsiashvili | 11W / 3L / 1D | View Games |
| Vladimir Bilic | 7W / 2L / 1D | View Games |
Rating
| Year | Bullet | Blitz | Rapid | Daily |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 2857 | 2936 | 2715 | |
| 2024 | 2807 | 2817 | 2715 | |
| 2023 | 2785 | 2768 | 2715 | |
| 2022 | 2739 | 2732 | ||
| 2021 | 2777 | 2481 |
Stats by Year
| Year | White | Black | Moves |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 85W / 47L / 8D | 80W / 47L / 16D | 87.2 |
| 2024 | 57W / 20L / 3D | 55W / 28L / 5D | 36.2 |
| 2023 | 14W / 3L / 3D | 14W / 6L / 4D | 72.4 |
| 2022 | 58W / 26L / 4D | 49W / 28L / 11D | 86.2 |
| 2021 | 14W / 5L / 0D | 12W / 8L / 0D | 81.4 |
Openings: Most Played
| Bullet Opening | Games | Wins | Losses | Draws | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nimzo-Larsen Attack | 26 | 14 | 11 | 1 | 53.9% |
| Nimzo-Larsen Attack: Classical Variation | 16 | 5 | 11 | 0 | 31.2% |
| Caro-Kann Defense | 10 | 6 | 4 | 0 | 60.0% |
| Colle System: Rhamphorhynchus Variation | 9 | 7 | 1 | 1 | 77.8% |
| Amar Gambit | 5 | 3 | 2 | 0 | 60.0% |
| Barnes Defense | 5 | 2 | 3 | 0 | 40.0% |
| English Opening: Agincourt Defense | 5 | 3 | 2 | 0 | 60.0% |
| Amazon Attack | 4 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 50.0% |
| Gruenfeld: 5.e3 O-O | 4 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 50.0% |
| London System: Poisoned Pawn Variation | 4 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| Blitz Opening | Games | Wins | Losses | Draws | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 94 | 66 | 28 | 0 | 70.2% |
| Caro-Kann Defense | 63 | 36 | 17 | 10 | 57.1% |
| Nimzo-Larsen Attack | 22 | 16 | 5 | 1 | 72.7% |
| Caro-Kann Defense: Classical Variation | 16 | 9 | 6 | 1 | 56.2% |
| Colle System: Rhamphorhynchus Variation | 15 | 9 | 4 | 2 | 60.0% |
| Scandinavian Defense | 14 | 7 | 6 | 1 | 50.0% |
| Ruy Lopez: Exchange Variation, Alapin Gambit | 13 | 9 | 3 | 1 | 69.2% |
| Amazon Attack | 12 | 8 | 3 | 1 | 66.7% |
| Hungarian Opening: Wiedenhagen-Beta Gambit | 12 | 7 | 5 | 0 | 58.3% |
| Sicilian Defense: Najdorf Variation | 11 | 6 | 5 | 0 | 54.5% |
| Rapid Opening | Games | Wins | Losses | Draws | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Australian Defense | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| Ruy Lopez | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| Ruy Lopez: Berlin Defense | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| Center Game: Berger Variation | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| Barnes Opening: Walkerling | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| Modern | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| Nimzo-Larsen Attack | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| Amar Gambit | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
🔥 Streaks
| Streak | Longest | Current |
|---|---|---|
| Winning | 11 | 1 |
| Losing | 6 | 0 |