Jaime González - The Chess Conqueror
From timid beginnings to blitz king, Jaime González (known online as jaimeaglezm) is a chess player whose journey reads like a thriller — with pawns, knights, and occasional knightly blunders. Starting out in 2017 with a modest Bullet rating around 1036, Jaime quickly climbed the ranks, peaking near 2188 in 2024, proving there’s always hope for a comeback even if you drop to 902 at some point!
Jaime shines brightest in Bullet and Blitz formats, having played tens of thousands of Bullet games with a robust winning record, and blitzing his way to a peak blitz rating of 2278. The rare Rapid and Daily games are like hidden treasures in his repertoire, though when Jaime does show up for Rapid, watch out — he once hit a rapid rating peak of 2440, making it clear he’s not just fast but also formidable in longer time controls.
Playing Style & Personality
With an average of about 75 moves per win and an impressive 83% endgame frequency, Jaime is clearly not one to give up early — except when the Early Resignation Rate hits about 1.3%, revealing he knows when the ship has sailed (or when the queen has jumped off the board). Always fighting back with a fantastic 92.7% comeback rate and even a perfect 100% win rate after losing a piece, Jaime embodies the spirit of never say die.
Known for a slight tilt factor of 12 (chess players, you get it), Jaime’s games are full of spicy moments, but also a psychological balance as indicated by a slightly negative difference between rated and casual wins — maybe the pressure is real, or maybe casual modes are just way more fun!
Favorite Openings
- Old Benoni Defense: 54.6% win rate in bullets where Jaime battles fiercely in over 3,300 games.
- French Defense (Knight Variation, Two Knights Variation): Jaime flexes his tactical muscles with an impressive 56.8% win rate across thousands of games.
- Caro-Kann Defense (Two Knights Attack): One of Jaime’s trump cards with a striking 58.7% win rate, showing love for solid, strategic play.
- Sicilian Defense (various variations): Shuffle those Sicilians and prepare for the storm, as Jaime holds decent win rates, showcasing versatility.
Opponents and Rivalries
Jaime’s most frequent tag team includes 3betlight64, maklai1, and kkamau — some of his fiercest competitors who make every game a challenge. A mixed bag of opponents with winrates tipping slightly above 50%, Jaime has a balanced battlefield where no victory is taken for granted.
Behind the Scenes
Who is Jaime González beyond the chessboard? A chosen warrior of the 64 squares with an unyielding love for openings complexity, and an entertaining blend of resilience and humor. When not calculating the next dusty fork or queen sac, Jaime probably enjoys chuckling over a blunder he swore he wouldn’t make again – after all, everyone loves a comeback story!
Keep an eye on Jaimeaglezm - the one who dances with knights and reigns in the chaos of speed chess, proving daily that the game is as wild and wonderful as the player behind it.
Overview of your recent blitz play
You demonstrated willingness to enter dynamic, tactical positions with several strong openings. Your sense of initiative and willingness to complicate the position paid off in several games. At the same time, time pressure and some risky calculation choices led to tough spots or losses on the clock. The goal is to convert your sharp, fighting instinct into more consistent results by tightening the plan and reducing avoidable mistakes under time pressure.
What you do well
- You seek activity and create practical chances in sharp, unbalanced positions, especially in openings you favor.
- Your middlegame plans often revolve around piece activity and open lines, which keeps games interesting and gives you chances to outplay your opponent.
- You show resilience in complex positions and are not afraid to enter tactical sequences that test both sides’ accuracy.
Key areas to improve
- Time management in blitz: allocate a clear thinking plan for each phase of the game. Try to avoid getting into long, speculative lines when the clock is ticking; aim to prune lines that are not forcing.
- Calculation discipline: in tactical middlegames, look for forcing moves (checks, captures with a purpose, and threats) first, then verify a short list of candidate continuations before committing.
- Endgame technique: practice converting even small material or positional advantages into a win. Train rook endings and minor piece endgames to avoid drawn-out fights or losses on time.
- King safety and back-rank awareness: in some blitz games, quick tactical skirmishes can overlook back-rank ideas. Prioritize king safety and ensure rooks are connected when you can.
Opening choices and repertoire guidance
You perform well with dynamic openings that lead to imbalanced, tactical games. Consider consolidating a compact, two- to three-opening repertoire to reduce decision fatigue in blitz. For example, you have shown strength in:
- French Defense-style structures, where you can leverage space and counterplay.
- Sicilian paths that lead to sharp middlegames with many tactical motifs.
- Bird’s Opening family lines that create unbalanced positions and chances to seize the initiative.
Tips: - Choose two primary Black responses (one for solid, one for aggressive lines) and stick to the general plan of those lines when you face the same types of setups. - If you prefer White, pick one aggressive setup (like a Bird’s Opening or similar) and one solid, position-based system to balance quick decisions with solid structure.
Further reading and typical lines to study can be found in your openings参考, for example: Sicilian Defense: Najdorf Variation and Bird Opening.
Training plan to boost results
- Weekly focus 1 — Tactics and pattern recognition: complete 15 quick tactical puzzles daily and review missed motifs to build automatic recognition.
- Weekly focus 2 — Opening refinement: pick two openings you like and study 6 representative lines each, paying attention to typical middlegame plans and common traps.
- Weekly focus 3 — Endgames: practice rook endings and king activity in simple rook-and-pawn endgames to improve conversion in blitz.
- Weekly focus 4 — Game review routine: after each blitz session, review your two games with a focus on where you spent the most time and where you could have chosen safer, sharper plans.
- Before every move in a blitz game, quickly check: material balance, immediate threats, and any forcing moves. If no strong forcing line is available, pick a safe, developing move that preserves your structure.
Mini action plan for your next blitz sessions
- Limit deep tactical line exploration to 2-3 concrete candidate moves per critical moment; choose the most forcing option and verify it briefly.
- Aim to finish the opening phase with clear development and a safe king; avoid overextending in the first 15-20 moves unless you have a concrete tactical line.
- Copy-paste a quick post-game note for each game: “What was the winning plan? Where did I miss a better forcing line? Where did time pressure bite me?”
- Use a two-opening approach: one solid, one dynamic. For Black, consider reinforcing the French/Najdorf family; for White, practice a consistent, aggressive setup that leads to a clear plan after early fights.
Open to a quick warm-up
To keep this tailored to you, I can align suggested puzzles and drills with your preferred openings. If you’d like, I can tailor a focused plan around particular openings you want to deepen. For quick reference, you might explore resources on the French Defense and the Najdorf lines, or Bird’s Opening patterns, depending on which direction you prefer.
Profile quick link: Jaime González
🆚 Opponent Insights
| Recent Opponents | ||
|---|---|---|
| persianmanifold | 3W / 0L / 0D | |
| cahiporro | 0W / 1L / 0D | |
| dr_khaledghareeb | 4W / 0L / 0D | |
| rajaqpink | 1W / 0L / 0D | |
| gm_cargo | 0W / 1L / 0D | |
| amr2013 | 13W / 24L / 1D | |
| idler_idler | 10W / 3L / 2D | |
| dazzydee | 29W / 8L / 2D | |
| huschdie | 3W / 0L / 1D | |
| albertolr62 | 0W / 2L / 1D | |
| Most Played Opponents | ||
|---|---|---|
| sahel torres | 126W / 96L / 25D | |
| maklai1 | 112W / 88L / 8D | |
| kkamau | 106W / 55L / 5D | |
| bill pennucci | 75W / 80L / 10D | |
| redhawkbull | 109W / 53L / 2D | |
Rating
| Year | Bullet | Blitz | Rapid | Daily |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 2023 | 2098 | ||
| 2024 | 2142 | 2092 | 2426 | |
| 2023 | 1958 | 2223 | 2440 | |
| 2022 | 1979 | 2199 | ||
| 2021 | 1968 | 2054 | ||
| 2020 | 2034 | |||
| 2019 | 1701 | 2213 | ||
| 2018 | 1824 | 2139 | 1418 | |
| 2017 | 1855 | 1942 |
Stats by Year
| Year | White | Black | Moves |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 754W / 564L / 99D | 761W / 574L / 81D | 78.4 |
| 2024 | 2660W / 1769L / 314D | 2646W / 1824L / 263D | 79.6 |
| 2023 | 2101W / 1523L / 224D | 2072W / 1577L / 222D | 78.2 |
| 2022 | 878W / 636L / 100D | 856W / 646L / 111D | 77.9 |
| 2021 | 2904W / 2122L / 293D | 2873W / 2173L / 275D | 76.4 |
| 2020 | 3636W / 2417L / 331D | 3512W / 2642L / 285D | 74.1 |
| 2019 | 2460W / 1819L / 223D | 2324W / 2009L / 197D | 72.0 |
| 2018 | 2283W / 1652L / 185D | 2129W / 1797L / 170D | 73.0 |
| 2017 | 1127W / 798L / 89D | 1073W / 867L / 95D | 72.4 |
Openings: Most Played
| Bullet Opening | Games | Wins | Losses | Draws | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Benoni Defense: Benoni Gambit Accepted | 6387 | 3530 | 2574 | 283 | 55.3% |
| Sicilian Defense | 4681 | 2520 | 1952 | 209 | 53.8% |
| Sicilian Defense: Najdorf Variation | 4220 | 2389 | 1662 | 169 | 56.6% |
| French Defense | 3690 | 2088 | 1349 | 253 | 56.6% |
| Sicilian Defense: Closed | 2673 | 1504 | 1047 | 122 | 56.3% |
| Caro-Kann Defense | 2359 | 1348 | 869 | 142 | 57.1% |
| Sicilian Defense: Alapin Variation, Sherzer Variation | 2238 | 1270 | 861 | 107 | 56.8% |
| Scandinavian Defense | 2004 | 1154 | 729 | 121 | 57.6% |
| Sicilian Defense: Closed, Anti-Sveshnikov Variation, Kharlov-Kramnik Line | 1821 | 1027 | 708 | 86 | 56.4% |
| Bird Opening: Dutch Variation, Batavo Gambit | 1763 | 964 | 718 | 81 | 54.7% |
| Blitz Opening | Games | Wins | Losses | Draws | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Benoni Defense: Benoni Gambit Accepted | 251 | 127 | 99 | 25 | 50.6% |
| Sicilian Defense | 173 | 96 | 66 | 11 | 55.5% |
| Sicilian Defense: Najdorf Variation | 170 | 90 | 65 | 15 | 52.9% |
| French Defense | 169 | 103 | 52 | 14 | 61.0% |
| Sicilian Defense: Closed | 108 | 49 | 52 | 7 | 45.4% |
| Sicilian Defense: Alapin Variation, Sherzer Variation | 90 | 49 | 30 | 11 | 54.4% |
| Caro-Kann Defense | 81 | 44 | 28 | 9 | 54.3% |
| Bird Opening: Dutch Variation, Batavo Gambit | 70 | 35 | 31 | 4 | 50.0% |
| Scandinavian Defense | 68 | 41 | 21 | 6 | 60.3% |
| Sicilian Defense: Closed, Anti-Sveshnikov Variation, Kharlov-Kramnik Line | 65 | 43 | 20 | 2 | 66.2% |
| Rapid Opening | Games | Wins | Losses | Draws | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| French Defense | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| Sicilian Defense: Moscow Variation, Haag Gambit | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0.0% |
| Daily Opening | Games | Wins | Losses | Draws | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Döry Defense | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
🔥 Streaks
| Streak | Longest | Current |
|---|---|---|
| Winning | 21 | 1 |
| Losing | 12 | 0 |