Candidate Master Jamal Adam (Jamaladam12200620)
Meet Jamal Adam, a formidable Candidate Master officially recognized by FIDE, who treats chess like a relentless blitz battle and a dramatic story unfolding 64 squares at a time. Jamal’s journey started in the humble daily chess leagues in 2014 with a modest rating around 1200, but like a stealthy knight sneaking deep into enemy ranks, Jamal quickly escalated to a blitz turbocharger with ratings surging past 2100 at peak moments, making opponents question their life choices every time they face this fierce tactician.
With over 4,800 blitz games under their belt, Jamal boasts a gritty battle record full of epic wins and some tough losses — because every chess warrior knows that defeat is just a fancy way of saying “next game, I’ll crush you.” Their win-loss dance in blitz stands at an almost equal fight: 2186 wins, 2367 losses, and 244 draws — a testament to fearless fighting spirit and occasional spectacular blunders (hey, nobody's perfect, except maybe the chess engine).
Jamal’s playing style is a curious blend of patience and aggression. With an impressive 80% endgame frequency, Jamal refuses to rush, dragging battles deep, proving that the real fun begins after the queens are off the board. Their average moves per win hover around 73, showing their preference for deep, strategic marathons rather than quick skirmishes. Not to mention, their psychological resilience is stellar, with a comeback rate over 85% — when the chips are down, Jamal transforms into the chess equivalent of a superhero, snatching victory from the jaws of defeat.
Not all heroes wear capes; some wield tricky openings like the Alekhine’s Defense Scandinavian Variation, which Jamal plays with a sly 54% win rate over more than 200 battles. This opening gambit is like a secret weapon, repeatedly catching opponents off-guard, much like Jamal’s favorite tactic: blundering a piece but somehow clawing back to victory! Rest assured, this Candidate Master isn’t shy about trying bold lines — even if that risks an occasional tumble down the rating ladder.
When Jamal isn’t unleashing blitz storms, rapid and bullet are also in their arsenal. They peaked at 1944 in rapid and cracked 2024 in bullet ratings, proving that whatever the speed, Jamal’s mind races faster than the clock allows. But their true magic hour is 08:00 AM — bright-eyed and bushy-tailed! Opponents beware: mornings are prime time for Jamal’s tactical fireworks.
Off the board, Jamal is known for demonstrating sportsmanship, bouncing back quickly from tilt (an admirable tilt factor of just 14%) and famously breaking losing streaks. However, every superhero has their kryptonite; Jamal’s longest losing streak stands at a grueling 14 games, a reminder that even legends have their “Monday mornings.”
Most recently, Jamal clinched a sharp victory with the Black pieces in a Slav Defense battle by resignation — a testament to their ability to outmaneuver opponents into throwing in the towel rather than risking an epic downfall. Although losses happen, each is just fuel for the next fiery encounter.
In summary, Candidate Master Jamaladam12200620 is a player who embodies the rollercoaster that chess can be: part strategic grandmaster, part fearless gladiator, and part lovable wildcard. Watch their games for an unpredictable blend of deep strategy, resilient comebacks, and the occasional cheeky surprise. Whether you’re a fan or foe, Jamal’s chess journey is one you won’t want to miss!
Quick recap of the session
You played several fast games against very strong opposition and lost a few sharp, tactical battles. A recurring theme: good piece activity at times, but you allowed enemy queen/major-piece infiltration and suffered tactical blowups in short time controls. Below are targeted points to keep building on and concrete drills to get better, fast.
Highlights — what you did well
- You show confidence in offbeat structures and are willing to play unbalanced positions (this creates practical chances).
- Your piece activity is often good — you bring knights and rooks into the game quickly instead of passively waiting.
- You convert small tactical opportunities when you spot them (several captures and active pawn pushes in the PGNs).
- You aren’t afraid to enter messy middlegames, which is useful in blitz against stronger opponents.
Recurring weaknesses to fix
- King safety / back-rank and infiltration: In the Grob game vs. mohamedsabirelsadig your opponent’s queen got active and finished with checks on the b-file. Practice creating luft and watch for queen invasions before you grab material.
- Time management: several games ended when you were low on the clock. In blitz, quick, safe moves are better than long searches that end in blunders.
- Tactical oversights under pressure: missed simple tactics (double attacks, discovered checks) appear often. Slow down for a second to check “checks, captures, threats”.
- Opening handling vs odd lines: when opponents play unusual systems (Grob, early flank advances), you sometimes overreach to win material rather than neutralize their activity. Prioritize development and central control first.
- Trade selection: sometimes you exchanged into positions that left your king exposed or gave the opponent a permanent outpost — choose trades that improve your king safety or simplify when behind on time.
Concrete, actionable improvements
- Tactics routine: 15 minutes daily on tactics puzzles (forks, pins, skewers, mating nets). Focus on puzzles with a 10–30 second solve time to simulate blitz pressure.
- Blunder checklist (use every move, blitz or not): before you finish a move, ask A) Is my king checked next? B) Did I leave a piece hanging? C) Are there captures or forks? This simple 3-question habit cuts many losses.
- Back-rank defense: quick drill — when your rook(s) are on the back rank and the opponent has a heavy piece nearby, create luft (pawn move or rook lift) or trade queens. Practice basic back-rank mates and defence for 10 minutes.
- Time control practice: play training sessions at 5+2 or 3+2 focusing on using the increment — try to keep at least 15–20 seconds per move on average. If you often drop below 20 seconds, switch to slightly slower blitz for a week to reset your clock habits.
- Opening policy vs offbeat moves: against flank-gambits (like Grob), aim for classical development — develop knights, fight for center, and avoid grabbing pawns that open lines toward your king. If you want, add a single reliable “anti-odd” reply to your repertoire and study typical plans for one week.
- Postgame review: after each loss, spend 3–5 minutes to find the one decisive mistake. Save those positions and review them once a week — repetition is the fastest way to stop repeating the same error.
Short checklist to use during your next blitz session
- First 10 seconds: complete development and decide king safety (can I castle? do I need luft?).
- Before every move: checks / captures / threats — one quick sweep.
- If opponent offers complications and you have < 30s: simplify (trade queens or exchange down) unless the tactic is obvious.
- When you see the opponent’s queen heading to your back rank or 2nd rank, force a trade or make luft immediately.
Targeted micro-drills (15–30 minute sessions)
- Tactics sprint: 20 rapid puzzles (10–30s each).
- Back-rank practice: 10 positions where you must create luft or hold mate threats.
- Endgame mini-set: 10 rook endgames and basic king-and-pawn versus king — these save half points in blitz.
- Opening tidy-up: 2 short sessions (20 minutes each) this week on how to meet the Grob and one other offbeat system you face often.
Example position — study this one from your most recent loss
Replay the final sequence to see how queen infiltration decided the game. Use the viewer below and step through the moves while asking “what would I do as Black to stop the queen?”.
Where to focus first week (plan)
- Days 1–2: Tactics sprint + 10 minutes back-rank drills.
- Days 3–4: Play 10 blitz games at 5+2 focusing on the checklist; review only decisive mistakes.
- Day 5: 20-minute opening review: how to meet Grob and one other offbeat line.
- Weekend: longer review — go over 5 recent losses, find the single recurring cause and make a short note to fix it.
Encouragement & next step
You're clearly comfortable in messy, practical positions — that's a big advantage in blitz. Improve the small habits (three-question blunder check, minimal luft, time management) and those losses will turn into wins or safe draws. If you want, I can: analyze one specific loss move-by-move, produce a tailored 2-week training plan, or generate 50 timed tactics tuned to your weak motifs. Which would you like next?
🆚 Opponent Insights
| Most Played Opponents | ||
|---|---|---|
| hashimabo | 292W / 190L / 28D | View Games |
| Hamid Mohammed12200948 | 153W / 220L / 16D | View Games |
| Tarig Mosa | 123W / 226L / 24D | View Games |
| alalim | 137W / 92L / 15D | View Games |
| faiezco | 119W / 112L / 10D | View Games |
Rating
| Year | Bullet | Blitz | Rapid | Daily |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 1856 | |||
| 2023 | 2066 | |||
| 2022 | 2003 | |||
| 2021 | 1965 | 1471 | ||
| 2020 | 1691 | 2050 | ||
| 2019 | 1753 | 2025 | ||
| 2018 | 1796 | 2067 | ||
| 2017 | 1811 | 2000 | 1817 | 1200 |
| 2016 | 1763 | 2005 | 1835 | 1533 |
| 2015 | 1573 | 1763 | 1071 | 1238 |
| 2014 | 1688 | 1122 | 1200 |
Stats by Year
| Year | White | Black | Moves |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 1W / 6L / 0D | 1W / 5L / 0D | 71.9 |
| 2023 | 5W / 4L / 0D | 5W / 3L / 0D | 64.8 |
| 2022 | 8W / 5L / 2D | 10W / 8L / 0D | 76.2 |
| 2021 | 10W / 13L / 3D | 10W / 14L / 3D | 77.6 |
| 2020 | 117W / 133L / 17D | 99W / 158L / 17D | 76.0 |
| 2019 | 115W / 127L / 16D | 105W / 144L / 12D | 76.0 |
| 2018 | 145W / 156L / 11D | 145W / 157L / 10D | 76.2 |
| 2017 | 228W / 220L / 23D | 184W / 265L / 20D | 78.3 |
| 2016 | 379W / 308L / 30D | 316W / 371L / 39D | 77.5 |
| 2015 | 85W / 89L / 11D | 80W / 91L / 13D | 74.3 |
| 2014 | 92W / 88L / 8D | 96W / 84L / 10D | 66.4 |
Openings: Most Played
| Blitz Opening | Games | Wins | Losses | Draws | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Alekhine Defense | 703 | 310 | 356 | 37 | 44.1% |
| Bird Opening: Dutch Variation, Batavo Gambit | 498 | 234 | 236 | 28 | 47.0% |
| Czech Defense | 186 | 101 | 81 | 4 | 54.3% |
| Scandinavian Defense | 180 | 74 | 99 | 7 | 41.1% |
| Blackburne Shilling Gambit | 159 | 72 | 77 | 10 | 45.3% |
| Italian Game: Two Knights Defense | 130 | 56 | 66 | 8 | 43.1% |
| Scotch Game | 123 | 57 | 63 | 3 | 46.3% |
| French Defense: Advance Variation | 114 | 54 | 58 | 2 | 47.4% |
| Modern | 112 | 61 | 44 | 7 | 54.5% |
| Barnes Defense | 108 | 55 | 47 | 6 | 50.9% |
| Rapid Opening | Games | Wins | Losses | Draws | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| QGD: Albin, 3.dxe5 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| QGD: Albin, 5.g3 Be6 6.b3 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 50.0% |
| Ruy Lopez: Berlin Defense | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0.0% |
| Pirc Defense: Classical Variation | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| Alekhine Defense | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0.0% |
| French Defense: Advance Variation | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| Evans Gambit: 5...Ba5 6.d4 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0.0% |
| QGA: 3.e3 c5 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| Philidor Defense | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0.0% |
| Modern | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0.0% |
| Bullet Opening | Games | Wins | Losses | Draws | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pirc Defense: Austrian Attack | 13 | 6 | 7 | 0 | 46.1% |
| Alekhine Defense | 6 | 2 | 4 | 0 | 33.3% |
| Scotch Game | 6 | 1 | 5 | 0 | 16.7% |
| Alekhine Defense: Modern Variation, Alekhine Variation | 6 | 0 | 6 | 0 | 0.0% |
| Bird Opening: Dutch Variation, Batavo Gambit | 5 | 4 | 1 | 0 | 80.0% |
| Czech Defense | 5 | 1 | 4 | 0 | 20.0% |
| Scandinavian Defense | 5 | 3 | 2 | 0 | 60.0% |
| French Defense: Burn Variation | 4 | 1 | 3 | 0 | 25.0% |
| Modern | 2 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 50.0% |
| Italian Game: Two Knights Defense | 2 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0.0% |
| Daily Opening | Games | Wins | Losses | Draws | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Catalan Opening | 7 | 7 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| Unknown | 4 | 0 | 4 | 0 | 0.0% |
| Alekhine Defense | 3 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 66.7% |
| Australian Defense | 2 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0.0% |
| English Opening | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0.0% |
| QGD Tarrasch: 7.Bg2 Be7 8.O-O | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0.0% |
| Italian Game: Two Knights Defense | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| English Defense: Blumenfeld-Hiva Gambit | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0.0% |
| Catalan Opening: Closed | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| Amar Gambit | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0.0% |
🔥 Streaks
| Streak | Longest | Current |
|---|---|---|
| Winning | 16 | 0 |
| Losing | 14 | 5 |