James Coleman — Candidate Master, Bullet Chess Streamer
James Coleman (JamesColeman) is a FIDE Candidate Master known for fast hands, quicker ideas, and a sense of humor that survives even the wildest Bullet chess scrambles. A staple of the online chess scene and a regular streamer, James built a reputation for fearless attacks, clean technique, and occasional theatrical Flagging that makes chat cheer and clocks cry.
Specializing in Bullet, James turned thousands of games into a laboratory for practical chess: punishing LPDO moments, finding last–second Swindle chances, and summoning “Harry” the h-pawn for a good old-fashioned kingside storm. When the dust settles, it’s usually his opponent who’s wondering where their time, pawns, and sanity went.
Style and Openings
James is an attacking pragmatist: crisp development when it matters, and calculated chaos when it’s time to stretch the position. His favorite weapons include:
- White: Amar Gambit, Amazon Attack, and a “London–but–make–it–spicy” approach with early Pawn Grubber energy.
- Black: Caro-Kann Defense for stability, the Pirc Defense for flexible counterplay, and opportunistic traps like the Blackburne Shilling Gambit.
- Pet lines: the occasional Harry Attack with a ruthless kingside shove.
Strategically, he thrives on initiative, active piece play, and time-management edge. Tactically, expect forks, pins, and the odd “cheap shot” when the position calls for it—followed by a grin and a teachable moment on stream.
Streaming and Community
As a streamer, James blends instruction with entertainment. Viewers get real-time breakdowns of practical decisions, explanations of “why this Human move beats that Computer move here,” and a steady diet of puzzle-rush tactics. Whether demonstrating a tidy Bullet Checkmate or explaining why a “Patzer sees a check…” moment just happened, the goal is clear: make you faster, sharper, and a little more confident in chaotic time scrambles.
Career Highlights
- FIDE title: Candidate Master (CM)
- Preferred time control: Bullet
- Peak Bullet: — peak Blitz: — peak Rapid:
- Signature traits: relentless initiative, clinical conversion, and unapologetic time–scraping when needed
- Longest win streak: 298 games; best results roll in around 04:00 local time
Rivals and Notable Foes
JamesColeman has logged epic streaks and friendly grudge matches across platforms. Notable sparring partners include Rogelio Jr Antonio, the marathon opponent pnf404, and long-time nemesis SomePatzer. Expect theory dumps, prep bluffing, and the occasional “is this a Book win or a Book draw?” debate in chat.
Trajectory
From early online grinds to sustained elite speed-play, James’s rating arc tells a story of persistence, pattern recognition, and a whole lot of premoves:
Miniature to Make You Smile
A classic coffeehouse finish James likes to show viewers—fast, instructive, and perfect for catching a rushed opponent:
Moral of the story: respect checks on f7—or become a meme.
What Viewers Learn
- Practical chances over perfection: how to choose the most annoying move for your opponent.
- Time management: when to switch gears from calculation to clean-up and, yes, ethical Flagging.
- Pattern packs: spotting knight Forks, surprise Skewers, and back-rank motifs on instinct.
- Bullet survival toolkit: premove discipline, avoiding Mouse Slips, and never leaving pieces En prise.
FAQ-ish Fun
- Most “James” opening? The audacious Amar Gambit and the flexible Amazon Attack.
- Most James move? The cool-headed “waiting move,” followed by a decisive tactic—then a smile.
- Favorite endgame theme? Turning small edges into a Technical win while opponents run low on clock.
Recent bullet-game feedback
Your four most recent bullet games against JamesColeman show a strong, dynamic approach under time pressure. You demonstrated sharp attacking instincts in at least one game, converting a difficult position into a decisive attack. In the other quick games, there were moments of high tactical complexity that led to difficult decisions and some material swings that didn’t go your way. The pattern suggests you are comfortable in tactical, double-edged positions, but you can benefit from sharpening decision-making and simplifying when ahead to convert more reliably at bullet pace.
What you do well
- Ability to generate and maintain initiative in sharp positions, often pushing your opponent to defend under pressure.
- Comfort with aggressive, forcing lines that create practical winning chances even when time is tight.
- Resilience in complex tactical scenarios; you keep fighting and look for active pieces and threats rather than shying away from complications.
Key areas to improve
- Time management and move ordering in bullet games: aim to identify 2–3 forcing moves early in the position and prioritize them. If no clear forcing line appears, opt for a simplifying plan or repeat a safe move to avoid getting trapped in over-complication.
- Endgame and conversion technique: when you gain material or block your opponent’s counterplay, steer the game toward simpler, clear plans to maximize your advantage and reduce the chance of a slip under time pressure.
- Defense against quick, mate-in-1 nets and back-rank threats: practice recognizing common mating motifs and back-rank weaknesses so you can neutralize threats faster and avoid sudden losses.
- Opening choice discipline for bullet: build a small, reliable repertoire that you know well in practice. The openings data suggests several lines with solid win rates; focusing on a couple of them can raise your consistency and reduce early mistakes.
Openings to consider focusing on
Several openings in your dataset show strong performance. Consider prioritizing a couple of them to gain confidence and improve results in bullet games:
- A solid, flexible system such as the Australian Defense or Caro-Kann style setups, which show high win rates in the data.
- Tactical, dynamic lines such as the Amar Gambit or similar aggressive setups to maintain your aggressive edge when you want to pressure opponents from the start.
- For a more balanced approach, the London System family and related lines offer practical ways to reach playable positions quickly, which can be valuable in fast games.
Actionable plan for the next sessions
- Adopt a focused two-opening plan: pick one solid, one dynamic line from the suggestions above. Learn 2–3 core plans for typical replies to each, and practice them in short, focused sessions.
- Do 15 minutes of tactical drills daily, emphasizing forcing moves (checks, captures, threats) and common mating nets. Pair this with 15 minutes of simple endgame practice to improve conversion under pressure.
- Review each recent bullet game afterward and write down 2–3 concrete improvements. Use those notes to guide your next training block.
- Work with a coach or use a self-review routine to confirm you’re choosing simplifying lines when ahead and avoiding unnecessary complications when time is short.
Notes and optional enrichment
If you’d like, I can attach a compact annotated PGN excerpt from one of your recent wins to illustrate a successful line and point out the exact decision moments where you kept the pressure or chose a cleaner continuation.
🆚 Opponent Insights
| Most Played Opponents | ||
|---|---|---|
| pnf404 | 2531W / 6L / 5D | View Games |
| Rogelio Jr Antonio | 172W / 410L / 12D | View Games |
| SomePatzer | 54W / 257L / 15D | View Games |
| burping | 252W / 34L / 5D | View Games |
| Evan Ju | 39W / 140L / 8D | View Games |
Rating
| Year | Bullet | Blitz | Rapid | Daily |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 2533 | 2507 | 2430 | 2153 |
| 2024 | 2523 | 2507 | 2151 | |
| 2023 | 2409 | 2434 | 2430 | 2147 |
| 2022 | 2410 | 2342 | 2430 | 2125 |
| 2021 | 2456 | 2396 | 1832 | 2110 |
| 2020 | 2445 | 2373 | 2358 | 2156 |
| 2019 | 2312 | 2322 | 2028 | 2143 |
| 2018 | 2455 | 2296 | 2143 | 2113 |
| 2017 | 2432 | 2328 | 2123 | 2140 |
| 2016 | 2404 | 2340 | 2376 | 2141 |
| 2015 | 2401 | 2366 | 1933 | |
| 2014 | 2267 | 2289 | 1864 | 1855 |
| 2013 | 2253 | 2207 | 1362 | 1288 |
| 2012 | 2187 | 2216 |
Stats by Year
| Year | White | Black | Moves |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 197W / 0L / 6D | 195W / 0L / 2D | 61.0 |
| 2024 | 330W / 20L / 7D | 338W / 14L / 6D | 65.1 |
| 2023 | 960W / 245L / 75D | 885W / 304L / 75D | 72.6 |
| 2022 | 910W / 510L / 116D | 808W / 610L / 89D | 76.5 |
| 2021 | 1284W / 691L / 128D | 1109W / 769L / 142D | 73.2 |
| 2020 | 1980W / 876L / 210D | 1849W / 950L / 201D | 75.4 |
| 2019 | 2130W / 850L / 169D | 1968W / 887L / 215D | 75.9 |
| 2018 | 2709W / 1122L / 251D | 2410W / 1312L / 264D | 78.0 |
| 2017 | 2574W / 1173L / 212D | 2310W / 1401L / 190D | 75.6 |
| 2016 | 1077W / 423L / 80D | 1025W / 465L / 96D | 72.4 |
| 2015 | 1163W / 384L / 51D | 1204W / 438L / 61D | 68.0 |
| 2014 | 2937W / 1191L / 193D | 2975W / 1307L / 230D | 75.7 |
| 2013 | 2330W / 980L / 170D | 2289W / 1096L / 164D | 77.8 |
| 2012 | 4527W / 2171L / 335D | 4299W / 2361L / 317D | 77.6 |
Openings: Most Played
| Bullet Opening | Games | Wins | Losses | Draws | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| London System: Poisoned Pawn Variation | 3734 | 2235 | 1247 | 252 | 59.9% |
| Döry Defense | 3427 | 2028 | 1198 | 201 | 59.2% |
| Australian Defense | 3373 | 2281 | 931 | 161 | 67.6% |
| Amar Gambit | 3091 | 2083 | 851 | 157 | 67.4% |
| Amazon Attack | 3000 | 1952 | 893 | 155 | 65.1% |
| Queen's Pawn Game: Torre Attack | 2715 | 1646 | 889 | 180 | 60.6% |
| Pirc Defense: Classical Variation | 2041 | 1279 | 646 | 116 | 62.7% |
| Scotch Game | 1745 | 1080 | 565 | 100 | 61.9% |
| Caro-Kann Defense | 1654 | 1084 | 486 | 84 | 65.5% |
| Amazon Attack: Siberian Attack | 1562 | 864 | 590 | 108 | 55.3% |
| Daily Opening | Games | Wins | Losses | Draws | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Amar Gambit | 207 | 206 | 0 | 1 | 99.5% |
| Amazon Attack | 153 | 152 | 1 | 0 | 99.3% |
| Four Knights Game | 116 | 113 | 1 | 2 | 97.4% |
| Bird Opening | 77 | 76 | 0 | 1 | 98.7% |
| Slav Defense: Alekhine Variation | 76 | 74 | 2 | 0 | 97.4% |
| Blackburne Shilling Gambit | 75 | 72 | 1 | 2 | 96.0% |
| Barnes Defense | 73 | 72 | 1 | 0 | 98.6% |
| Nimzo-Larsen Attack | 70 | 70 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| Australian Defense | 68 | 68 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| London System: Poisoned Pawn Variation | 66 | 64 | 0 | 2 | 97.0% |
| Blitz Opening | Games | Wins | Losses | Draws | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Amar Gambit | 206 | 184 | 17 | 5 | 89.3% |
| Amazon Attack | 165 | 131 | 27 | 7 | 79.4% |
| London System: Poisoned Pawn Variation | 144 | 111 | 25 | 8 | 77.1% |
| Döry Defense | 133 | 92 | 31 | 10 | 69.2% |
| Blackburne Shilling Gambit | 119 | 100 | 15 | 4 | 84.0% |
| Sicilian Defense: Closed | 115 | 95 | 19 | 1 | 82.6% |
| Queen's Pawn Game: Torre Attack | 109 | 75 | 27 | 7 | 68.8% |
| Pirc Defense: Classical Variation | 100 | 84 | 9 | 7 | 84.0% |
| French Defense | 92 | 76 | 13 | 3 | 82.6% |
| Four Knights Game | 88 | 79 | 4 | 5 | 89.8% |
| Rapid Opening | Games | Wins | Losses | Draws | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Amar Gambit | 58 | 55 | 1 | 2 | 94.8% |
| Blackburne Shilling Gambit | 56 | 37 | 0 | 19 | 66.1% |
| Four Knights Game | 51 | 33 | 1 | 17 | 64.7% |
| Italian Game: Two Knights Defense | 36 | 30 | 0 | 6 | 83.3% |
| Scotch Game | 35 | 19 | 0 | 16 | 54.3% |
| Four Knights Game: Spanish Variation | 22 | 22 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| Amazon Attack | 22 | 16 | 1 | 5 | 72.7% |
| Barnes Defense | 19 | 14 | 0 | 5 | 73.7% |
| Amazon Attack: Siberian Attack | 18 | 10 | 0 | 8 | 55.6% |
| London System: Poisoned Pawn Variation | 17 | 15 | 0 | 2 | 88.2% |
🔥 Streaks
| Streak | Longest | Current |
|---|---|---|
| Winning | 298 | 87 |
| Losing | 20 | 0 |