Jan Karsten: The International Master With a Secret Opening
Known in the chess community as jankarsten, Jan Karsten has earned the prestigious title of International Master from FIDE, proving they’re not just playing checkers with tiny wooden pieces. Jan’s journey to mastery is as calculated and relentless as their 80-move endgames, reflecting a deep understanding of chess where patience meets precision.
When it comes to speed chess, Jan is a force to be reckoned with. Their Bullet rating peaked impressively at 2713 in 2024, showcasing lightning-fast reflexes paired with near-psychic tactical awareness. Funny enough, their “top secret” opening strategy remains just that — a secret — which has netted Jan a winning rate of over 56% in Bullet and a solid 51% in Blitz across thousands of games.
Fun fact: Jan’s win streak record is a remarkable 17 consecutive victories — the chess equivalent of binge-watching a whole season without spoilers. Despite the high stakes and pressure, Jan’s Tilt Factor is remarkably low, meaning they keep their cool even when opponents throw curveballs (or brutal queen sacrifices).
Jan’s style loves the long haul, with an average of 82 moves per game both when winning and losing, showing a fondness for marathon battles over quick skirmishes. This endurance is backed by a phenomenal 88% comeback rate and a 100% win rate after losing a piece — talk about turning lemons into strategic lemonade!
Though their Daily rating dipped in 2024, Jan shines brightest in Rapid and Blitz formats, with a flawless 100% win rate in Rapid across all rated games and a peak Blitz rating touching 2719. Jan prefers the battlefield of fast-paced arenas but isn’t afraid to settle into a slow grind when the occasion demands.
Off the board, Jan’s chessboard buddies include some tough competitors like jd_chess_academy and sniperbishop3, holding impressive win rates against these stalwarts. Jan’s nickname as the "Top Secret" strategist isn’t just about openings — it’s also about keeping the element of surprise alive.
In summary, Jan Karsten is the epitome of a modern chess warrior: speedy, strategic, resilient, and delightfully unpredictable. Whether you’re playing Jan at 3 moves per second or deep into the endgame, expect a battle worthy of a grandmaster novel... just don’t ask for the secret opening—Jan’s lips are sealed!
Quick summary (recent blitz)
Nice work — your last wins show clean conversion of a passed pawn and a precise mating finish; your losses are mostly time-related and from positions where a little extra consolidation or a faster plan would have saved the game. Below I highlight concrete things to keep doing and specific areas to fix.
Highlights — what you did well
- Converted a connected passed pawn very confidently in the a‑file promotion game (excellent endgame vision and patience). Example: you pushed and promoted the a‑pawn decisively and finished with a precise rook checkmate — great technique.
- Good sense for active rook play — you used open files and rook swings to force your opponent into passive king positions (seen in both conversion and tactical wins).
- Tactical alertness in the Qg2# game — you exploited back‑rank and coordination weaknesses quickly to deliver a decisive mating net. (Martin Luis Eliseo Herrera)
- Opening variety and results: you handle many systems (Caro‑Kann, Najdorf, French) and have good practical scoring with dynamic openings — use that as an advantage in blitz.
Main weaknesses to target
- Time management / clock panic: multiple games ended on time despite playable positions. You repeatedly reached sub‑10 seconds in winning or complex positions — this is the biggest leak.
- Occasional passivity after simplifications: when you swap into an endgame or simplify, you're sometimes slow to find the best improving move and the opponent gets counterplay.
- Tactical oversights in crowded positions: while your tactics are strong, there are moments (especially when low on time) where a simple fork/pin is missed or you allow a tactical resource.
- Practical endgame technique under time pressure: you convert well when calm, but when short on clock you make awkward choices — practice speed endgames.
Concrete drills & short training plan (next 2 weeks)
- Daily 15–20 min tactics (mixed puzzles) with a fast cadence — focus on forks, pins, deflections and queen/rook endgame motifs.
- 3x per week: 20 minutes of 5|0 or 3|2 blitz with the explicit goal of keeping 10+ seconds on the clock at move 20. Practice simple, fast moves and avoid long calculation unless the position requires it.
- Endgame sprint: 10 minutes, 3× per week — practice king + pawn vs king, rook+pawn endgames, and basic queen vs rook tactics (promotions, perpetuals). Do these with a 5s increment if possible to simulate time trouble.
- Post‑game habit: after every loss, spend 3–5 minutes and find the one moment you should have played faster or simplified earlier. Make it a checklist item: "clock + objective".
- One engine‑assisted post‑mortem per day: try to find the mistake yourself first, then confirm with the engine. Focus on reasoning behind the fix (why it’s better), not just the move.
Practical tips for tournament blitz
- When low on time but ahead on the board: trade down when safe. Simplify to a winning technical endgame rather than hunting for flashy tactics that cost time.
- If behind on time but equal or better on the board: create practical complications that require human judgment (not long forced refutations). Use checks and direct threats to keep the opponent thinking.
- Use premoves sparingly. Premoves are great in clear recaptures or forced pawn moves — avoid in complicated positions.
- Set mental time checkpoints: by move 10 have ≥2:30, by move 20 ≥1:30. If you fail to meet checkpoints, switch to speed mode (play sensible, non‑ambitious moves until time recovers).
Game‑specific notes & links
- Promotion win vs Menua Hakobyan — model conversion of a connected passed pawn, good rook activity and finish. Study idea: similar pawn‑end conversions and queen promotion tactics (play 10 quick endgames where you must promote under opposition/rook harassment).
- Qg2# victory vs Martin Luis Eliseo Herrera — excellent exploitation of coordination and back‑rank weaknesses; keep drilling mating patterns and moves that force the king into the corner.
- Losses to Pablo Salinas Herrera and strong opponents — most ended on time. Your play was often sound; the fix is speed. Drill: do 10×3|2 games with the explicit rule “if position is equal or better, exchange pieces to reach a simple winning plan.”
Short weekly plan you can start now
- Monday–Friday: 15 min tactics, 15 min endgames, 1 rapid (10|0) or 2 blitz (3|2) focusing on clock checkpoints.
- Weekend: 1 hour game review — pick the worst loss and the best win of the week; find the turning point and the practical clock decision.
- Monthly goal: reduce "loss on time" rate by 50% and convert two won positions under <0:20 remaining into wins.
Small checklist to follow during games
- Do I have a passed pawn or open file? If yes — prioritize piece activity to support it.
- Is my clock below 30s? If yes — switch to safe, quick moves and avoid long calculations.
- Can I trade to a clearly winning technical endgame? If yes — do it and simplify.
Want me to dig deeper?
I can do a move‑by‑move annotated post‑mortem for any of these games (one at a time). Pick the game you want — e.g. the promotion win vs Menua Hakobyan or the time loss vs Pablo Salinas Herrera — and I’ll produce a short annotated analysis with candidate moves and alternative plans.
🆚 Opponent Insights
| Recent Opponents | ||
|---|---|---|
| Cécile Haussernot | 1W / 0L / 0D | |
| Baku1963 | 0W / 1L / 0D | |
| Maxim Matlakov | 0W / 1L / 0D | |
| deadonkey2 | 0W / 2L / 0D | |
| JamyTheSaint | 1W / 0L / 0D | |
| nestorvive | 1W / 0L / 0D | |
| wise_guyyy | 1W / 0L / 0D | |
| Pablo Salinas Herrera | 0W / 1L / 0D | |
| piqueso | 0W / 0L / 1D | |
| Most Played Opponents | ||
|---|---|---|
| jd_chess_academy | 23W / 16L / 3D | |
| sniperbishop3 | 32W / 1L / 1D | |
| KFCwow | 18W / 12L / 2D | |
| seasidesunset | 19W / 8L / 2D | |
| przemekpiotrowski | 12W / 9L / 3D | |
Rating
| Year | Bullet | Blitz | Rapid | Daily |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 2655 | 2715 | ||
| 2024 | 2659 | 2719 | 2114 | 838 |
| 2023 | 2618 | 2613 | 2100 | 1899 |
| 2017 | 1433 |
Stats by Year
| Year | White | Black | Moves |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 9W / 4L / 0D | 4W / 5L / 1D | 81.0 |
| 2024 | 273W / 200L / 47D | 255W / 224L / 48D | 86.3 |
| 2023 | 898W / 603L / 161D | 843W / 672L / 144D | 85.0 |
| 2017 | 0W / 2L / 0D | 0W / 1L / 0D | 27.0 |
Openings: Most Played
| Blitz Opening | Games | Wins | Losses | Draws | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Amazon Attack | 354 | 185 | 130 | 39 | 52.3% |
| Alekhine Defense | 265 | 119 | 119 | 27 | 44.9% |
| Amazon Attack: Siberian Attack | 150 | 71 | 64 | 15 | 47.3% |
| Sicilian Defense: Najdorf Variation | 143 | 82 | 54 | 7 | 57.3% |
| Caro-Kann Defense | 114 | 68 | 42 | 4 | 59.6% |
| Barnes Defense | 101 | 49 | 44 | 8 | 48.5% |
| Sicilian Defense: Closed | 85 | 42 | 39 | 4 | 49.4% |
| Sicilian Defense | 80 | 37 | 40 | 3 | 46.2% |
| East Indian Defense | 78 | 41 | 30 | 7 | 52.6% |
| French Defense: Burn Variation | 77 | 50 | 23 | 4 | 64.9% |
| Bullet Opening | Games | Wins | Losses | Draws | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Alekhine Defense | 65 | 34 | 25 | 6 | 52.3% |
| Amar Gambit | 22 | 10 | 10 | 2 | 45.5% |
| Caro-Kann Defense | 22 | 19 | 3 | 0 | 86.4% |
| Amazon Attack | 20 | 8 | 10 | 2 | 40.0% |
| Colle System: Rhamphorhynchus Variation | 18 | 12 | 6 | 0 | 66.7% |
| King's Indian Attack | 13 | 8 | 4 | 1 | 61.5% |
| Hungarian Opening: Wiedenhagen-Beta Gambit | 12 | 8 | 4 | 0 | 66.7% |
| French Defense: Burn Variation | 12 | 8 | 4 | 0 | 66.7% |
| Modern | 11 | 4 | 4 | 3 | 36.4% |
| Barnes Defense | 11 | 4 | 6 | 1 | 36.4% |
| Daily Opening | Games | Wins | Losses | Draws | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sicilian Defense: Four Knights Variation, Cobra Variation | 2 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0.0% |
| Sicilian Defense: Alapin Variation | 2 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 50.0% |
| Amazon Attack: Siberian Attack | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0.0% |
| Nimzo-Indian Defense: Normal Variation, Classical Defense | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0.0% |
| Sicilian Defense: Nyezhmetdinov-Rossolimo Attack, Fianchetto Variation | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0.0% |
| English Defense: Blumenfeld-Hiva Gambit | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0.0% |
| Caro-Kann Defense | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0.0% |
| Scandinavian Defense | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0.0% |
| East Indian Defense | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0.0% |
| Bishop's Opening: Urusov Gambit | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0.0% |
| Rapid Opening | Games | Wins | Losses | Draws | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Alekhine Defense | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| Caro-Kann Defense | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| Sicilian Defense: Moscow Variation | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| Sicilian Defense | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| Sicilian Defense: Scheveningen Variation, Keres Attack | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| Blackburne Shilling Gambit | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| Amazon Attack | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| Sicilian Defense: Najdorf Variation | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
🔥 Streaks
| Streak | Longest | Current |
|---|---|---|
| Winning | 17 | 0 |
| Losing | 10 | 1 |