Jarmo Hartikainen (aka JiiHart)
Title: Candidate Master (CM) - FIDE
Jarmo Hartikainen, or simply JiiHart to the chess aficionados, is a battle-hardened tactician with a flair for both the bullet and blitz arenas. Holding the prestigious Candidate Master title, JiiHart has been dancing with the 64 squares through thick and thin, proving time and again that resilience and comeback are their middle names—boasting a whopping 84.15% rate of bouncing back after setbacks and an impressive 100% win rate after losing a piece. Yes, giving away material just means JiiHart is setting the stage for a theatrical comeback!
Playing Style and Strengths
A lover of long, grueling endgames (81.53% endgame frequency), JiiHart is patient, strategic, and definitely not one to resign early (only 19% early resignation rate). With an average of about 70 moves per win, matches are never a quick rush but a cerebral marathon. A slight edge when playing with the white pieces shows (33.35% white win rate vs 26.69% black win rate), hinting at a confident approach when starting first.
Rating Peaks & Trends
- Blitz Peak Rating: 2254 in 2022, maintaining a solid 2200+ range through 2024 before a surprising dip in 2025.
- Bullet Peak Rating: 2347 reached in 2020 - zooming fast and furious!
- Rapid Peak Rating: 2126 in 2022 – a respectable balance between speed and strategy.
The rollercoaster ride in ratings is nothing new for a fierce competitor; fluctuations are part of the fun, after all!
Fun Facts & Quirks
- Longest winning streak: 12 games. Imagine trying to catch JiiHart on a hot streak—blink and you might miss it!
- Currently holding a 2-game winning streak, because what’s life without a little momentum?
- Has played over 2,200 blitz games under the cryptically named "Top Secret" opening – a true master of mysterious play.
- Despite a tilt factor of 17 (hey, even champs get frustrated!), JiiHart manages to keep their cool on the board.
Psychological Insights
Though a noticeable 10% gap in performance exists between rated and casual play—perhaps casual games sneak in more distractions than anticipated—the relentless comeback rate proves no defeat sticks for too long.
Golden Hours and Lucky Days
If you want to challenge JiiHart, avoid Sunday mornings and late evenings, where their win rate spikes to around 48%. Strategically plotting your attack? Beware of 10-11 AM, when their 50-58% win chances peak – they're clearly a morning coffee and chess combo genius!
In Summary
Jarmo “JiiHart” Hartikainen is the embodiment of a resilient and strategic chess warrior: fast, fearless, sometimes mysterious, and always ready to turn the tide even when down a pawn or two. A Candidate Master with a penchant for thrilling comebacks and long, thoughtful battles — a player who reminds us that in chess, as in life, it’s never over until the queen says so!
What’s going well in your bullet play
Your games show a readiness to engage in sharp, tactical play and to create practical chances under time pressure. You’re comfortable navigating open positions and you often keep fighting for the initiative even when material balance is uneven. This willingness to complicate can pay off in bullet where quick, dynamic decisions can decide games in a few moves.
- You handle tactical skirmishes with confidence and keep lines of attack active.
- You adapt to a range of openings, which helps you stay unpredictable for opponents who rely on memory-based prep.
- You tend to press in middlegame transitions, which can convert small advantages into decisive chances.
Key improvements to prioritize
- Stabilize the early game: focus on safe development, quick king safety, and avoiding unnecessary complications in the first 6–8 moves. This reduces risky blunders under pressure.
- Consolidate your opening repertoire: choose 2–3 openings you like and study them deeply. A compact repertoire helps you recognize typical middlegame plans and avoid getting overwhelmed in fast time controls.
- Time management under pressure: practice budgets for each phase of the game (opening, middlegame, endgame). For example, aim to decide on candidate moves quickly and reserve some time for critical moments or checks that could swing the game.
- Strengthen defensive patterns: bullet games reward quick defensive resources. Train common motifs like back-rank safety, recognizing threats, and converting defensive resources into counterplay.
- Endgame technique: in many bullet endings, accurate rook and king activity decides the result. Set aside regular practice for rook endings and simple pawn endgames.
- Post-game reflection: after each game, note two moments where a different choice could have limited risk or increased your winning chances. This solidifies learning from both wins and losses.
Practical plan for the next 4 weeks
- Opening focus: pick two black defenses and two white setups that align with where you’ve had solid results. Study a small set of model games for each and extract typical plans, piece placement, and common tactics you'll see in bullet.
- Tactics routine: complete 15–20 minutes of daily tactical puzzles, emphasizing motifs that appear often in quick games (forks, pins, skewers, discovered attacks, and back-rank themes).
- Endgame practice: dedicate two short sessions per week (15–20 minutes) to rook endings and king activity drills, using simple, repeatable patterns to build confidence under time pressure.
- Game review discipline: after each game, write a short note on one or two critical moments and what you would change next time. For losses, identify the exact mistake and a concrete corrective idea; for wins, note a safe path you could repeat in similar positions.
- Play cadence and mindset: in online bullet, aim to maintain consistent development and avoid overvaluing speculative attacks when the position is unclear. If you’re unsure, shift to solid development and keep your king safe.
Opening performance snapshot and suggestions
You’ve experimented with a broad set of openings. To improve consistency, consider leaning into the openings that show relatively steadier results and fit your playing style: Scandinavian Defense and Giuoco Piano variants are options to intensify focus on. Reducing the number of distinct lines can help you think more clearly in the moment. If you’d like, I can map out a compact 6–8 game repertoire with concrete lines and typical middlegame ideas to study.
Next steps
If you want, tell me which two openings you’d most like to strengthen, and I’ll prepare a short, practical study plan (sample games, typical middlegame motifs, and quick-review prompts) tailored to your upcoming bullet sessions.
🆚 Opponent Insights
| Most Played Opponents | ||
|---|---|---|
| Marcel Winkels | 3W / 9L / 0D | |
| nitpicker | 2W / 9L / 0D | |
| Justin Sarkar | 0W / 11L / 0D | |
| kidagent | 2W / 8L / 1D | |
| Michael Buscar | 0W / 10L / 1D | |
Rating
| Year | Bullet | Blitz | Rapid | Daily |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 2041 | 1520 | 1962 | |
| 2024 | 2026 | 2243 | 1961 | |
| 2023 | 1874 | 2144 | 1975 | |
| 2022 | 2249 | 1987 | ||
| 2021 | 2135 | |||
| 2020 | 2116 | 2061 | 1371 |
Stats by Year
| Year | White | Black | Moves |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 90W / 144L / 15D | 79W / 154L / 16D | 71.3 |
| 2024 | 93W / 105L / 17D | 78W / 139L / 13D | 79.2 |
| 2023 | 100W / 273L / 24D | 77W / 308L / 26D | 77.2 |
| 2022 | 64W / 164L / 20D | 48W / 184L / 21D | 81.0 |
| 2021 | 60W / 165L / 27D | 53W / 192L / 25D | 79.8 |
| 2020 | 156W / 151L / 18D | 138W / 165L / 21D | 74.1 |
Openings: Most Played
| Bullet Opening | Games | Wins | Losses | Draws | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sicilian Defense: Alapin Variation | 172 | 75 | 87 | 10 | 43.6% |
| Scandinavian Defense | 43 | 22 | 19 | 2 | 51.2% |
| London System: Poisoned Pawn Variation | 40 | 13 | 27 | 0 | 32.5% |
| Sicilian Defense: Closed, Anti-Sveshnikov Variation, Kharlov-Kramnik Line | 38 | 14 | 22 | 2 | 36.8% |
| Sicilian Defense: Closed | 37 | 13 | 24 | 0 | 35.1% |
| Caro-Kann Defense | 33 | 13 | 20 | 0 | 39.4% |
| Sicilian Defense | 29 | 10 | 17 | 2 | 34.5% |
| QGD: 2...Bf5 3.cxd5 | 26 | 8 | 16 | 2 | 30.8% |
| Sicilian Defense: Classical Variation | 25 | 11 | 14 | 0 | 44.0% |
| Giuoco Piano: Tarrasch Variation | 25 | 12 | 13 | 0 | 48.0% |
| Blitz Opening | Games | Wins | Losses | Draws | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sicilian Defense: Alapin Variation | 308 | 88 | 194 | 26 | 28.6% |
| Sicilian Defense: Closed | 81 | 25 | 50 | 6 | 30.9% |
| Caro-Kann Defense | 71 | 20 | 51 | 0 | 28.2% |
| Sicilian Defense: Richter-Rauzer Variation, Neo-Modern Variation | 70 | 12 | 51 | 7 | 17.1% |
| Sicilian Defense: Classical Variation | 55 | 10 | 41 | 4 | 18.2% |
| Giuoco Piano: Tarrasch Variation | 51 | 11 | 35 | 5 | 21.6% |
| Sicilian Defense | 51 | 15 | 32 | 4 | 29.4% |
| Sicilian Defense: Nyezhmetdinov-Rossolimo Attack, Fianchetto Variation | 51 | 5 | 41 | 5 | 9.8% |
| Italian Game: Two Knights Defense | 46 | 13 | 27 | 6 | 28.3% |
| Sicilian Defense: Closed, Anti-Sveshnikov Variation, Kharlov-Kramnik Line | 45 | 7 | 33 | 5 | 15.6% |
| Rapid Opening | Games | Wins | Losses | Draws | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sicilian Defense: Alapin Variation | 19 | 4 | 10 | 5 | 21.1% |
| Sicilian Defense: Closed, Anti-Sveshnikov Variation, Kharlov-Kramnik Line | 5 | 0 | 4 | 1 | 0.0% |
| Giuoco Piano: Tarrasch Variation | 4 | 0 | 3 | 1 | 0.0% |
| Sicilian Defense: Closed | 3 | 0 | 3 | 0 | 0.0% |
| Gruenfeld: 5.Bf4 O-O 6.e3 c5 | 3 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 33.3% |
| Czech Defense | 3 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| French Defense: Classical Variation, Svenonius Variation | 3 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 33.3% |
| Italian Game: Two Knights Defense | 2 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 50.0% |
| Amazon Attack | 2 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0.0% |
| Gruenfeld: Exchange Variation | 2 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0.0% |
🔥 Streaks
| Streak | Longest | Current |
|---|---|---|
| Winning | 12 | 3 |
| Losing | 17 | 0 |