Overview
Dan Shapiro — FIDE Master and consummate Rapid specialist — is a sharp, resourceful chess player known for grinding wins in faster time controls and turning chaotic middlegames into practical victories. A prolific competitor across Rapid and Blitz, Dan combines deep opening preparation with a knack for comebacks that keeps opponents on their toes.
Keywords: Dan Shapiro FM, FIDE Master, rapid chess, blitz specialist, Catalan, Slav, Scandinavian.
Style & Strengths
Dan plays like someone who reads the position twice: once to see the tactics, and again to punish your blunder. Strengths highlighted in his games include rapid recovery after material losses, long decisive games (frequently reaching complex endgames), and a surprisingly high comeback rate.
- Title: FIDE Master (FM)
- Preferred time control: Rapid — a clear favorite for Dan's thoughtful but practical approach.
- Notable traits: high ComebackRate (2459 (2021-08-18)), strong endgame play, low early-resignation tolerance.
Career Highlights
Dan's career is a steady climb of memorable months and striking peaks. He has recorded career-best peaks in both Rapid and Blitz, demonstrating elite-level form in faster formats.
- Rapid peak: 2459 (2021-08-18) — a milestone that showcases Dan's mastery of longer quick games.
- Blitz peak: 2439 (2025-07-29) — raw speed and tactical sharpness on display.
- Consistency: long streaks of high-level play with many multi-month stretches of elite Rapid/Blitz performance. See a visual trend: .
Favorite Openings & Repertoire
Dan favors dynamic, fighting systems that lead to practical play — both as White and Black. He’s comfortable in gambits and classical structures alike.
- Scandinavian Defense — a go-to for direct play and asymmetry.
- Slav Defense: Bonet Gambit — an unusually successful weapon for Dan (excellent win rate in Rapid).
- Catalan systems — flexible and strategically rich positions.
- Benko Gambit and Dőry Defense — frequent choices that produce imbalanced middlegames.
Explore an opening term: Catalan Opening • Slav Defense: Bonet Gambit • Scandinavian Defense
Rivalries & Memorable Opponents
Dan has several repeat opponents who have become familiar adversaries over many games — sometimes charming, sometimes brutally efficient.
- Most-played opponents include vukcev, dosto07 and ze-pequeno — a mix of tit-for-tat battles and long scorelines.
- One-sided streaks: a spotless record against shirovin (16–0) — an amusing brag in Dan’s repertoire.
- Profile example: Marcel Winkels
Fun Facts & Extras
- Average decisive game length is long — Dan enjoys fighting until the last pawn.
- Exceptional resilience: a very high ComebackRate and strong WinRateAfterLosingPiece.
- Sample opening sequence (try it in the viewer):
- Want to see a timeline? Try the rapid rating chart above: .
Whether you’re studying the Catalan or hunting for a stubborn endgame opponent, Dan Shapiro FM is a modern example of fighting chess at speed — equal parts craft, stubbornness, and the occasional cheeky sacrifice.
Quick summary
Nice run lately — your games show a reliable, practical style: steady opening prep, good piece activity, and a habit of converting small advantages into decisive pressure. Below I highlight the concrete things you're doing well, the recurring weaknesses to fix, and a short training plan you can apply in the next 2–6 weeks.
What you're doing well
- Reliable opening choices — you get playable middlegames most of the time (your Slav / Catalan / Scandinavian lines repeatedly reach comfortable structures). If you like the Slav, keep using it and deepen the typical plans. See Slav Defense: Bonet Gambit and Catalan Opening: Closed.
- Active piece play — you win a lot by improving piece activity (good bishop placements, rook lifts and infiltration). In your most recent win you used a rook invasion and a timely rook lift to deliver the knockout (example below).
- Converting small advantages — you don’t require a huge material advantage; you press small structural or activity edges and your opponents crack under coordination problems.
- Good time handling in rapid — you generally keep enough time to find critical moves, which is a strong practical skill.
Recurring weaknesses to fix
- Tactical slips in sharp sidelines — openings and gambit lines (some Diemer / Alapin games) produce sharp, tactical positions where you sometimes miscalculate. Prioritize short tactical drills focused on forks, pins and discovered attacks.
- Endgame technique — when games simplify to rook + pawn endgames or minor-piece endings you occasionally let activity slip away. A focused routine on basic rook endgames (Lucena, Philidor, rook vs. pawn) will pay big dividends.
- Move-order / opening nuance in lower-performing lines — some specific lines (e.g., the Alapin and a couple of gambits) show a lower conversion rate. These are either theoretical or tactical lines where remembering one or two key sidelines will save you trouble.
- Counterplay against queenside pressure and knight outposts — a few lost games show the opponent seizing an outpost or creating queenside targets. Watch for timely pawn breaks and piece exchanges that neutralize opponent outposts.
Concrete next steps (2–6 week plan)
- Daily — 15–20 minutes of tactics (mixed puzzles; emphasize forks, skewers, pins and mating nets). Use short timed sessions to simulate rapid pressure.
- Weekly — 2 annotated reviews of losses: pick the last two rapid games you lost, annotate the critical 5–10 moves (who lost the thread, why the tactic worked), then redo the line and write a short note on the root cause (calculation, opening choice, time trouble).
- Endgame micro-sessions — 2× per week, 20–30 minutes: study Lucena/Philidor, basic king and pawn races, and simple rook against pawn positions. Practice key technique until you convert those positions without engine dependency.
- Opening focus — pick 1 underperforming opening you want to keep (for example the Alapin or your chosen gambit). Study 3 typical model games and memorize 2–3 critical responses. That often fixes the majority of “surprise” losses.
- Playback + opponent check — when you win or lose, look one move deeper: would your opponent have resisted differently? Add the opponent link for reference when reviewing: dowajichess.
Short drills & study suggestions
- Tactics: 10–15 problems/day. After solving, write the tactic type (fork/pin/deflection) so you train pattern recognition.
- Endgames: 3 positions each session — one pawn endgame, one rook endgame, one minor-piece endgame. Play them out vs. engine at low depth and then practice without the engine.
- Opening reinforcement: for your best-performing setups (Slav/Catalan), build 10–12 typical middlegame plans in a short checklist (ideal pawn breaks, where to park the knight, which file to target).
- Practical: Play 5 rapid training games with the explicit goal "no blunders in the last 10 moves" — practice finishing technique and avoid premature simplifications.
Example from your most recent win
Below is the finish of your recent game where the rook lift / infiltration decided the game. Rewind to the exchange and look for the moment you could improve elsewhere (move-order or piece improvement earlier).
Viewer (tap to open):
Final notes — keep it practical
- Your trend shows steady improvement — that’s often more valuable than short-term spikes. Stick to the small routine and the gains will compound.
- If you want, send two recent losses and I’ll annotate them with one short checklist per game (tactical miss, opening gap, endgame mistake). That gives actionable fixes you can apply immediately.
Good work so far — with small, targeted drilling (tactics + rook endgames + one opening tweak) you should see clearer conversions and fewer tactical surprises in your next block of rapid games.
🆚 Opponent Insights
| Recent Opponents | ||
|---|---|---|
| weshallwin | 0W / 0L / 1D | View |
| Olga Yushko | 2W / 1L / 0D | View |
| Amani Alazmi | 3W / 0L / 0D | View |
| Craig Clawitter | 0W / 2L / 2D | View |
| Jan Enrique Zepeda | 1W / 1L / 0D | View |
| Jack Mizzi | 1W / 1L / 0D | View |
| matinghaffarifar | 1W / 0L / 0D | View |
| cocosiukas | 0W / 2L / 1D | View |
| Aleksandr Devaev | 1W / 4L / 0D | View |
| Oliver Wartiovaara | 2W / 3L / 0D | View |
| Most Played Opponents | ||
|---|---|---|
| Mil Vuk | 12W / 8L / 0D | View Games |
| Julian Estrada | 3W / 13L / 3D | View Games |
| ze-pequeno | 9W / 6L / 2D | View Games |
| Marcel Winkels | 16W / 0L / 0D | View Games |
| Nikolai Vlassov | 2W / 14L / 0D | View Games |
Rating
| Year | Bullet | Blitz | Rapid | Daily |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 2359 | |||
| 2024 | 2343 | 2440 | ||
| 2023 | 2277 | 2438 | ||
| 2022 | 2355 | 2404 | ||
| 2021 | 2329 | 2316 | 2000 | |
| 2020 | 2208 | |||
| 2019 | 2296 | |||
| 2018 | 2198 |
Stats by Year
| Year | White | Black | Moves |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 92W / 111L / 17D | 71W / 136L / 14D | 80.7 |
| 2024 | 165W / 220L / 39D | 160W / 267L / 23D | 81.2 |
| 2023 | 149W / 196L / 30D | 152W / 212L / 32D | 79.7 |
| 2022 | 265W / 272L / 56D | 254W / 309L / 31D | 79.4 |
| 2021 | 336W / 220L / 42D | 281W / 265L / 50D | 78.8 |
| 2020 | 416W / 310L / 68D | 397W / 337L / 54D | 78.3 |
| 2019 | 24W / 21L / 0D | 17W / 24L / 4D | 80.0 |
| 2018 | 36W / 26L / 4D | 31W / 24L / 5D | 74.5 |
Openings: Most Played
| Blitz Opening | Games | Wins | Losses | Draws | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Scandinavian Defense | 256 | 132 | 106 | 18 | 51.6% |
| Slav Defense: Bonet Gambit | 218 | 127 | 79 | 12 | 58.3% |
| Catalan Opening | 207 | 94 | 89 | 24 | 45.4% |
| Diemer-Duhm Gambit (DDG): 4...f5 | 185 | 74 | 100 | 11 | 40.0% |
| Catalan Opening: Closed | 150 | 60 | 76 | 14 | 40.0% |
| Catalan Opening: Open Defense, Classical Line | 148 | 49 | 76 | 23 | 33.1% |
| Benko Gambit | 135 | 72 | 48 | 15 | 53.3% |
| Catalan Opening: Open Defense | 121 | 55 | 57 | 9 | 45.5% |
| Döry Defense | 117 | 62 | 51 | 4 | 53.0% |
| Sicilian Defense: Closed | 115 | 52 | 57 | 6 | 45.2% |
| Rapid Opening | Games | Wins | Losses | Draws | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Slav Defense: Bonet Gambit | 11 | 10 | 1 | 0 | 90.9% |
| Döry Defense | 9 | 8 | 1 | 0 | 88.9% |
| Diemer-Duhm Gambit (DDG): 4...f5 | 9 | 4 | 4 | 1 | 44.4% |
| Sicilian Defense: Alapin Variation | 9 | 4 | 5 | 0 | 44.4% |
| Catalan Opening: Closed | 8 | 7 | 1 | 0 | 87.5% |
| Scandinavian Defense | 6 | 5 | 1 | 0 | 83.3% |
| Sicilian Defense: Kan Variation, Gipslis Variation | 6 | 3 | 2 | 1 | 50.0% |
| Sicilian Defense: Kan Variation, Knight Variation | 6 | 4 | 2 | 0 | 66.7% |
| Czech Defense | 5 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 40.0% |
| Benoni Defense: Classical Variation | 5 | 3 | 2 | 0 | 60.0% |
| Daily Opening | Games | Wins | Losses | Draws | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 19 | 0 | 19 | 0 | 0.0% |
| Australian Defense | 2 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0.0% |
| English Opening | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0.0% |
🔥 Streaks
| Streak | Longest | Current |
|---|---|---|
| Winning | 9 | 0 |
| Losing | 22 | 0 |