Anastasia (aka JLesya)
Woman FIDE Master | Fierce Blitz Battler | Tactician Extraordinaire
Meet Anastasia, a chess warrior armed with the prestigious title of Woman FIDE Master. With a blade-sharp mind and a rating peak soaring to an impressive 2388 in blitz, she’s as comfortable waging war on the clock as she is strategizing complex middle-games. Whether it’s blitz, bullet, or rapid, Anastasia’s victories number in the thousands, proving she's a force to be reckoned with on the 64 squares.
Anastasia’s style? Speedy and sharp! She averages fewer than 4 moves per win, which means when she’s on fire, games end faster than your average coffee break. Known for a high early resignation rate (we’re guessing opponents just can’t handle the storm she brings), she also has a solid ability to mount comebacks with a cool 51.5% win rate after losing a piece. Clearly, she’s not easily rattled.
She’s played tens of thousands of games, mostly blitz, with nearly 8,900 wins and relentless bouts against more than 9,900 losses—because the path to mastery is paved with brave battles and inseparable losses. Her longest winning streak is a striking 20 games, while don’t tell her longest losing streak is a pesky 19—proof of her persistence and grit!
Off-hours chess? Not so much her thing — her best time to play is at 2 AM, which is either genius-level focus or a secret lobby for the chess night owl club. Be warned if you challenge JLesya after midnight, because her tactical prowess peaks around then.
Memorable Moment
One of her latest stunning victories clinched by a timely checkmate on the clock reflects her tactical calm and swiftness — winning the game on time with style.
Fun Facts
- Likes to finish games lightning-fast: average moves per win is under 4.
- Has a penchant for gritty comebacks worth applauding.
- Dominates with the Top Secret opening approach — shhh, don’t ask, it’s a secret!
Whether you’re an aspiring challenger or a casual chess enthusiast, Anastasia’s journey reminds us that chess is not just a game of kings and queens, but a battlefield for resilience, quick wit, and a dash of midnight madness.
So, ready to test your mettle against JLesya? Just beware the 2 AM blitz beast!
Feedback for Anastasia
👍 What you already do well
- Dynamic piece play. In games like your win against mvsatya you consistently seized the initiative with moves such as 16…Nh5! followed by 17…Nxf4, creating concrete threats instead of passive defence.
- Opening creativity. Your willingness to experiment (e.g. 2.f4 against the Sicilian and early g-pawn thrusts in the English) often drags opponents out of book and into complicated positions you handle confidently.
- Tactical awareness. Your conversion of tactical advantages (24…Rb8! and 29…Rc2+ in the same game) shows you can calculate several moves deep under time pressure.
🔍 Biggest improvement areas
- Time management. Five of your last seven losses were on time, frequently in equal or better positions (see the diagram below). Your clock, not the board, is beating you.
- End-game technique. Once pieces come off, your conversion rate drops. In the loss to epicness77 you reached a drawable rook-and-pawn ending but mis-coordinated your king and rook.
- Over-extension of wing pawns. Early h- or g-pawn pushes work well when you can open lines quickly, but in several losses (e.g. 19…Qb4+ vs. dragzor) they created weak squares around your own king.
- Narrow opening repertoire. With Black you rely almost exclusively on off-beat Sicilians and Grünfeld set-ups. Stronger opponents have started steering the game into positional lines you know less well (e.g. 3.Bb5 → 4.Bxc6 in the Rossolimo).
📈 Where to focus next
1. Practical clock handling
- Play three 3 + 2 sessions a week. The small increment forces you to move faster and rewards good technique.
- Adopt a “three-phase” plan:
• Opening: aim to keep ≥ 2:15 on your clock after move 10.
• Middle-game: use your opponent’s time to calculate forcing continuations.
• End-game: switch to “simple moves” mode—no long thinks unless absolutely necessary.
2. End-game fundamentals
Spend 15 minutes daily on rook-and-pawn drills (Lichess trainer or a PDF of 100 basic endings). Target motifs:
- Lucena & Philidor positions
- King activation in minor-piece endings
- Triangulation & zugzwang
3. Solidifying your Black repertoire
Add one mainstream defence against 1.e4 and 1.d4 to complement your dynamic style.
| Against | Suggestion | First step |
|---|---|---|
| 1.e4 | Caro-Kann | Study 15 model games where Black equalises smoothly. |
| 1.d4/c4/Nf3 | Nimzo-/QID complex | Memorise key plans, not moves: dark-square control, …d5 breaks. |
4. Calibrating pawn storms
- Before pushing a wing pawn ask: “Can my opponent open the centre immediately?” If yes, reconsider.
- Annotate two of your recent games where …h-/g-pawn pushes back-fired and write down safer alternatives.
🔬 Illustrative moment
Your time trouble in the loss to epicness77 started much earlier than you realised. Replay the critical phase and notice how a simple consolidation (20…Be5! instead of 20…Be4?!) would have kept the position equal and saved over 40 seconds.
📊 At-a-glance stats
Peak Blitz rating: 2388 (2020-07-10)
Activity overview:
🗺️ 30-day action map
- Week 1: Finalise study material for Caro-Kann & Nimzo; daily 15-min end-game drills.
- Week 2: Play 20 games of 3 + 2; after each loss, tag the moment you fell below 40 seconds.
- Week 3: Annotate three of your own games focusing on pawn-storm decisions; share one with a peer for feedback.
- Week 4: Mix in ten 15 + 10 games to practise deeper calculation without clock panic; review with engine afterwards.
🚀 Final thought
Your tactical flair already matches 2300-level players. Combine it with sharper time management and a sturdier opening backbone, and breaking the next rating barrier is simply a matter of consistency. You’ve got this, Anastasia—good luck!
🆚 Opponent Insights
| Most Played Opponents | ||
|---|---|---|
| Angelina Kali | 191W / 183L / 2D | |
| gusmcclain | 89W / 182L / 0D | |
| vectorveld | 107W / 139L / 1D | |
| Marco Dieleman | 110W / 119L / 0D | |
| Dieblauesau | 75W / 128L / 0D | |
Rating
| Year | Bullet | Blitz | Rapid | Daily |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2023 | 2121 | |||
| 2022 | 2085 | |||
| 2021 | 2119 | 2348 | ||
| 2020 | 2072 | 2272 | 1387 | |
| 2019 | 2125 | 2213 | ||
| 2018 | 1996 | 2180 |
Stats by Year
| Year | White | Black | Moves |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023 | 0W / 0L / 0D | 0W / 1L / 0D | 131.0 |
| 2022 | 5W / 3L / 0D | 3W / 6L / 0D | 18.3 |
| 2021 | 124W / 120L / 6D | 122W / 121L / 2D | 5.4 |
| 2020 | 1772W / 1759L / 25D | 1663W / 1830L / 23D | 4.0 |
| 2019 | 1403W / 1754L / 16D | 1324W / 1788L / 14D | 1.2 |
| 2018 | 1395W / 1353L / 8D | 1281W / 1384L / 6D | 4.4 |
Openings: Most Played
| Blitz Opening | Games | Wins | Losses | Draws | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 18364 | 8586 | 9710 | 68 | 46.8% |
| London System: Poisoned Pawn Variation | 43 | 30 | 13 | 0 | 69.8% |
| Barnes Defense | 37 | 13 | 24 | 0 | 35.1% |
| Döry Defense | 37 | 22 | 15 | 0 | 59.5% |
| Australian Defense | 34 | 23 | 11 | 0 | 67.7% |
| French Defense | 31 | 19 | 12 | 0 | 61.3% |
| Queen's Pawn Game: Torre Attack | 29 | 20 | 9 | 0 | 69.0% |
| Blackburne Shilling Gambit | 18 | 12 | 6 | 0 | 66.7% |
| Sicilian Defense: Taimanov Variation, American Attack | 16 | 7 | 8 | 1 | 43.8% |
| Amazon Attack | 14 | 10 | 4 | 0 | 71.4% |
| Rapid Opening | Games | Wins | Losses | Draws | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Grünfeld Defense: Counterthrust Variation | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| English Opening | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| Sicilian Defense: Taimanov Variation, American Attack | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| English Opening: Anglo-Indian Defense | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| English Opening: Closed, Taimanov Variation | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| English Opening: Anglo-Grünfeld Defense | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| Gruenfeld: 5.Bg5 c6 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| Bullet Opening | Games | Wins | Losses | Draws | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| French Defense | 45 | 13 | 32 | 0 | 28.9% |
| Australian Defense | 43 | 18 | 25 | 0 | 41.9% |
| English Opening: Agincourt Defense | 27 | 16 | 11 | 0 | 59.3% |
| Amar Gambit | 23 | 14 | 9 | 0 | 60.9% |
| English Opening | 19 | 10 | 8 | 1 | 52.6% |
| Unknown | 14 | 5 | 9 | 0 | 35.7% |
| Colle System: Rhamphorhynchus Variation | 13 | 8 | 4 | 1 | 61.5% |
| Barnes Defense | 12 | 3 | 9 | 0 | 25.0% |
| Döry Defense | 12 | 3 | 9 | 0 | 25.0% |
| Four Knights Game | 9 | 4 | 5 | 0 | 44.4% |
| Daily Opening | Games | Wins | Losses | Draws | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| English Opening: King's English Variation | 2 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 50.0% |
| Sicilian Defense | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| Amazon Attack: Siberian Attack | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| English Opening: Drill Variation | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| English Opening | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| Amar Gambit | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| Caro-Kann Defense | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| English Opening: King's English Variation, Two Knights Variation, Fianchetto Line | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| Barnes Defense | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
🔥 Streaks
| Streak | Longest | Current |
|---|---|---|
| Winning | 20 | 0 |
| Losing | 19 | 1 |