Profile Summary: Jmimanuchess
Meet Jmimanuchess, a seasoned battle-hardened warrior of the 64 squares whose blitz skills could probably give Magnus a run for his money... if Magnus played online at 3 AM. With a peak blitz rating soaring to an impressive 2655 in May 2025, Jmimanuchess has demonstrated a lethal combination of speed, precision, and a generous dose of chess wizardry.
This player thrives in fast-paced formats — boasting peak ratings across all major time controls: Blitz (2655), Bullet (2585), Rapid (2416), and even a solid Daily (2105). A tactical magician on the board, Jmimanuchess has mastered the art of comeback, pulling wins from seemingly lost positions with an impressive 81.27% comeback rate. It's safe to say this chess player doesn't like to give up… unless it's pizza time.
When it comes to openings, Jmimanuchess favors a varied repertoire with a penchant for classic and aggressive lines. The Closed Sicilian Defense and French Defense Exchange Variation are among the personal favorites, with win rates hovering nicely above 56%. The infamous King’s Indian Attack Yugoslav Variation appears as a quirky wildcard, with a less stellar but respectable outcome—because even masters have their “crazy days.”
With over 2200 wins in blitz alone and a total of around 3000 wins across all game types, this user clearly knows how to put opponents under pressure. Opponents beware: Jmimanuchess has even managed 100% win rates against several foes including "adrian_delacruz" and "shmuel9999," making quick work of their hopes and dreams.
On a psychological note, 06:00 AM seems to be Jmimanuchess’s golden hour for peak performance. A tilt factor of 10 shows the rare signs of shaken nerves — but given the blistering average moves per win (about 74) and love for endgames (over 76% frequency), this player prefers meticulous control to impulsive scraps.
Jmimanuchess's recent games show a confident attacker who’s not afraid of sharp openings, efficiently winning both on time and by resignation. Sometimes games end so quickly, it’s almost like the opponent’s clock is just a prop in a magician's act.
In summary, Jmimanuchess is a fearless battler of the chessboard, blending speed and strategy with a hint of playful unpredictability. A grandmaster of the blitz realm and a persistent endgame tactician — armed with a mouse and unstoppable ambition. Prepare for checkmate, or at least a very entertaining struggle!
“In chess, as in life, sometimes you need to move fast, sometimes to patiently outwit, but always with a bit of style—and Jmimanuchess has plenty of it.”
Quick summary
Nice work — you've been playing active, piece-oriented blitz and your recent wins show good tactical awareness and positional pressure. A couple of your most recent losses were decided by time management and tactical slips rather than a complete strategic collapse. Below I break down what’s working, the recurring problems, and a compact improvement plan you can follow over the next 2–6 weeks.
Recent game highlights (examples)
- Win vs abobkr02 — you built pressure on the kingside/center, advanced the d‑pawn to a dangerous passed pawn and used piece activity to force concessions. (Game ended when opponent flagged.)
- Loss vs Matt Nicholson — the game slipped into heavy piece activity/rook endgame where your opponent created counterplay and you ran low on time.
- Tactical loss vs amsterdammosquitoes — you got checkmated after a sharp middlegame sequence; watch for opponent counterchecks on the kingside and undefended pieces when launching attacks.
Re-run the win below to review the key ideas on the board:
What you do well
- Active piece play — you consistently bring rooks and bishops into the game and punish passive setups from opponents.
- Opening familiarity — your repertoire (Sicilian Closed, Italian Two Knights, Caro‑Kann, etc.) is a strength: you win more than you lose in those lines and get playable middlegames. Example strong lines: Sicilian Defense: Closed and Italian Game: Two Knights Defense.
- Tactical vision — many wins show clean tactical conversions (forks, pins and exploitation of weak back ranks).
- Endgame instincts — when low on material you tend to keep active pieces and generate counterplay instead of passively defending.
Recurring issues to fix
- Time management / flagging — several games ended because you or the opponent flagged. In blitz you must balance calculation with speed. Try using small time‑checks (2–3 seconds) at critical turns, then speed up on forced lines.
- Tactical oversights in complicated positions — in sharp middlegames (especially with opposite‑side castling or open files) you're sometimes one inaccuracy away from a large tactical refutation.
- Allowing counterplay on the queenside — when you attack the king, watch for opponent rook/knight infiltration and pawn breaks that create passed pawns (seen in your losses where rooks penetrated on the second rank).
- Transition choices — sometimes you simplify into a technical endgame where the opponent gets tricky play. Consider whether trading down helps or hands the initiative to them.
Concrete, short drills (daily/weekly)
- Tactics: 10–20 mixed tactics a day (focus: forks, pins, back‑rank, and discovered checks). Time yourself — 5–8 minutes per 10 puzzles.
- Blitz time control drills: play three 5+3 games focusing solely on time use — force yourself to reach move 15 with ≥1:30 remaining. If you fail, analyze where the extra time was spent.
- Endgame mini‑sessions (3× per week): 10 minutes on rook endgames and basic pawn endgames (Lucena, Philidor). Convert won rook endgames quickly — that reduces time pressure late.
- Opening review (2× per week): drill the main lines and 2 common sidelines for your favored setups (especially the Kings-Indian-Attack structures you play). Use 10 minutes to review one critical position and the typical plan.
Practical advice to apply in your next 20 blitz games
- Early game plan: in the opening aim to finish development by move 10 and pick one pawn break / plan — this reduces time spent on move 12–18 when blitz clocks bite.
- When ahead materially: simplify with safe trades (remove opponent's active pieces) and avoid speculative complications; trade queens into a clear win if it reduces tactical risk.
- If you’re attacking: always check for back‑rank or knight forks before committing to a sacrificial idea. A 5‑second tactical checklist helps (checks, captures, threats).
- Use increment: if you can, prefer +3 increment games; your playstyle converts better with a little increment to calculate key tactics.
- Post‑game habit: after each loss, flag or mate, write one line: (a) why did I lose time / get mated? (b) one tactical motif I missed. This trains metacognition and speeds learning.
Mini training plan — 4 weeks
- Week 1: Focus on time control and tactics — 5 blitz (5+3) + 15 minutes tactics/day.
- Week 2: Add endgame drills (20 minutes, 3× this week) and review 2 key opening lines for positions that appear most often in your repertoire.
- Week 3: Play 15 rated blitz games applying simplified conversion rules (trade when +exchange and ahead in king safety) and track flagged games.
- Week 4: Analyze your worst 3 losses from the month — identify a recurring pattern and create 1 practice rule to avoid it next month.
Small checklist to use during games
- Before each move: "Checks, captures, threats?" (2–3 second scan)
- If you have less than 30 seconds left: switch to practical mode — play safe active moves, avoid long forcing calculations.
- When ahead materially: exchange pieces (not pawns) to reduce tactical risk and pressure the opponent to solve problems on the clock.
Notes based on your numbers
- Your openings performance is a major asset — keep the repertoire but polish critical sidelines that drop you into trouble. For example, your Sicilian Closed and Italian lines have excellent win rates — keep studying typical endgames from those lines.
- Strength adjusted win rate ~0.499 indicates you score about as expected vs similar strength — small improvements in time management and cleaner tactics will push that above 0.52, a meaningful jump.
- Recent rating change small negative — your trend slope shows mixed medium‑term form. The plan above targets quick, high‑ROI gains (tactics + time control).
Next steps / quick tasks for today
- Do a 10‑minute tactics set and mark two positions you solved slowly — study the motif.
- Play one 5+3 and one 3+2 game. In the 3+2, force yourself to use the 5‑second checklist every move.
- Pick one recent loss and find the single move that changed the evaluation — write down the refutation and memorize it.
If you want, I can...
- Review any one of the games above move‑by‑move and annotate tactical turning points — tell me which game and I’ll annotate it.
- Create a tailored 2‑week training schedule (daily tasks with exact puzzle sets and opening lines).
- Set up a short quiz from positions that gave you trouble (I’ll pick 6 positions from your losses).
Closing
You're already playing high‑quality, active chess. Tighten time management, run a focused tactics and endgame routine, and you’ll convert many of those close losses into wins. Tell me which game you want annotated first — I’ll produce a short, move‑by‑move coachable version focused on the key moments.
🆚 Opponent Insights
| Recent Opponents | ||
|---|---|---|
| piotrek855 | 0W / 2L / 0D | View |
| hrach_hovhannisyan2023 | 0W / 2L / 0D | View |
| dan_ciox | 0W / 2L / 0D | View |
| higuys423 | 1W / 1L / 0D | View |
| hbt20 | 0W / 2L / 0D | View |
| dacmaizeblue | 0W / 2L / 0D | View |
| kirkpicard | 0W / 2L / 0D | View |
| johnnyb80 | 0W / 2L / 0D | View |
| nicodc60530 | 0W / 2L / 0D | View |
| egornikol | 0W / 2L / 0D | View |
| Most Played Opponents | ||
|---|---|---|
| Ali Ekber Doğan | 25W / 22L / 6D | View Games |
| Daniel Lowinger | 25W / 14L / 7D | View Games |
| valdesuti | 15W / 11L / 3D | View Games |
| viberchess | 8W / 17L / 2D | View Games |
| Rasan04 | 12W / 10L / 2D | View Games |
Rating
| Year | Bullet | Blitz | Rapid | Daily |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 2429 | 2528 | 2392 | 876 |
| 2024 | 2498 | 2407 | ||
| 2023 | 2501 | 2506 | ||
| 2022 | 2548 | 2482 | 2394 | |
| 2021 | 2499 | 2540 | 2326 | |
| 2020 | 2486 | 2483 | 1980 | |
| 2019 | 2144 |
Stats by Year
| Year | White | Black | Moves |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 442W / 374L / 47D | 440W / 377L / 46D | 55.6 |
| 2024 | 6W / 0L / 0D | 4W / 2L / 1D | 87.5 |
| 2023 | 192W / 117L / 35D | 161W / 146L / 28D | 82.8 |
| 2022 | 249W / 169L / 56D | 248W / 187L / 39D | 82.4 |
| 2021 | 374W / 231L / 51D | 330W / 280L / 42D | 81.8 |
| 2020 | 329W / 193L / 50D | 295W / 238L / 46D | 80.1 |
| 2019 | 4W / 0L / 0D | 2W / 2L / 0D | 80.5 |
Openings: Most Played
| Blitz Opening | Games | Wins | Losses | Draws | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sicilian Defense: Closed | 410 | 244 | 139 | 27 | 59.5% |
| Italian Game: Two Knights Defense | 214 | 132 | 66 | 16 | 61.7% |
| French Defense: Exchange Variation | 186 | 106 | 52 | 28 | 57.0% |
| Blackburne Shilling Gambit | 162 | 84 | 61 | 17 | 51.9% |
| Sicilian Defense | 160 | 89 | 61 | 10 | 55.6% |
| Ruy Lopez | 140 | 67 | 58 | 15 | 47.9% |
| Caro-Kann Defense | 130 | 74 | 45 | 11 | 56.9% |
| Ruy Lopez: Schliemann Defense | 123 | 69 | 44 | 10 | 56.1% |
| Czech Defense | 116 | 70 | 37 | 9 | 60.3% |
| Modern | 112 | 60 | 39 | 13 | 53.6% |
| Daily Opening | Games | Wins | Losses | Draws | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 190 | 91 | 99 | 0 | 47.9% |
| Barnes Defense | 73 | 14 | 59 | 0 | 19.2% |
| Hungarian Opening: Wiedenhagen-Beta Gambit | 67 | 42 | 25 | 0 | 62.7% |
| Czech Defense | 61 | 38 | 23 | 0 | 62.3% |
| Colle System: Rhamphorhynchus Variation | 58 | 50 | 8 | 0 | 86.2% |
| Australian Defense | 30 | 14 | 16 | 0 | 46.7% |
| Pirc Defense: Classical Variation | 26 | 10 | 16 | 0 | 38.5% |
| Modern Defense | 22 | 13 | 9 | 0 | 59.1% |
| Amar Gambit | 17 | 12 | 5 | 0 | 70.6% |
| King's Indian Attack | 10 | 8 | 2 | 0 | 80.0% |
| Bullet Opening | Games | Wins | Losses | Draws | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Amar Gambit | 164 | 101 | 51 | 12 | 61.6% |
| Colle System: Rhamphorhynchus Variation | 40 | 18 | 21 | 1 | 45.0% |
| Modern | 36 | 16 | 17 | 3 | 44.4% |
| Australian Defense | 33 | 16 | 14 | 3 | 48.5% |
| Hungarian Opening: Wiedenhagen-Beta Gambit | 32 | 20 | 10 | 2 | 62.5% |
| Barnes Defense | 30 | 17 | 12 | 1 | 56.7% |
| Nimzo-Larsen Attack | 23 | 12 | 11 | 0 | 52.2% |
| Sicilian Defense: Closed | 14 | 8 | 5 | 1 | 57.1% |
| Döry Defense | 12 | 7 | 4 | 1 | 58.3% |
| English Opening | 10 | 5 | 5 | 0 | 50.0% |
| Rapid Opening | Games | Wins | Losses | Draws | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Colle System: Rhamphorhynchus Variation | 5 | 5 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| Nimzo-Larsen Attack: Classical Variation | 4 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 75.0% |
| Amar Gambit | 4 | 3 | 0 | 1 | 75.0% |
| Barnes Defense | 4 | 1 | 3 | 0 | 25.0% |
| Döry Defense | 3 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 33.3% |
| Modern | 2 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0.0% |
| Nimzo-Larsen Attack | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| Indian Defense: Przepiorka Variation | 2 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 50.0% |
| Australian Defense | 2 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 50.0% |
| Italian Game: Two Knights Defense | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
🔥 Streaks
| Streak | Longest | Current |
|---|---|---|
| Winning | 78 | 0 |
| Losing | 70 | 3 |