Overview — Jose Sande, FIDE Master and Blitz specialist
Jose Sande (username: josesande) is a FIDE Master known for a fast, practical approach to chess—especially at Blitz time controls. A longtime adherent of the English Opening and a fearless tester of the Modern Defense (Pterodactyl), Jose mixes deep preparation with quick intuition. This biography captures playing style, signature openings, notable streaks, and a short sample game for fans and opponents alike.
Career highlights & profile summary
- Title: FIDE Master — competes primarily online and excels in rapid-decisions at Blitz.
- Preferred time control: Blitz (speed, tactics, and imperfect miracles).
- Lifetime Blitz record (summary): Wins 3,690 • Losses 3,561 • Draws 503 — a workhorse with a near-even ledger and an appetite for long events.
- Peak Blitz figure (for display): 2547 (2025-12-17)
- Favorite first move: c4 — the English dominates Jose’s move choices year after year.
- Handy chart of recent rating history:
Playing style & tendencies
Jose blends positional patience with tactical alertness. The numbers tell the tale:
- Endgame frequency is high (games often go deep)—Jose enjoys grinding in long, technical wins.
- Average moves per win: ~71; per loss: ~80 — games are decisive but rarely short.
- Early resignation rate ~42% — if the position collapses, Jose spares both players the agony (or the comedy).
- Strong comeback ability: high comeback rate and respectable win rate after losing material—never count Jose out.
- Psychology: Tilt factor ≈10 (keeps emotions in check most of the time), best playing hours around 08:00 local for clarity, but produces some late-night masterpieces as well.
Openings & repertoire
Jose’s repertoire tilts toward c4 systems and flexible setups that invite both maneuvering and tactical shots. Highlights from Blitz practice:
- English Opening (overall) — a core system; strong performance across many sub-variations. English Opening
- English Opening: Agincourt Defense — frequent and successful choice, consistently high win rates.
- English Opening: Drill Variation and Symmetrical/Botvinnik systems — practical and tested in hundreds of games.
- Modern Defense: Pterodactyl Variation — used often as a counterpunch; many razor-close battles here.
- Sicilian Defense (Closed & Accelerated Dragon/Maróczy Bind) — secondary but well-practiced weapons.
Notable streaks, opponents & anecdotes
- Longest winning streak: 28 games — a run that probably included coffee and a small parade.
- Longest losing streak: 10 games; current losing streak: 1 — Jose bounces back quickly.
- Most-played opponent: kenjim-upc — 125 games; Jose leads the match: 73–46–6. (Profile link: kenjim-upc)
- Special mention: against tommy-salami Jose is a perfect 18–0 — either perfect preparation or unbeatable snack timing.
- Best days/hours: Sunday win rate slightly lower; killer hours include midnight and early morning in some months—an unpredictable clockwork player.
Notable stats & season trends
- Strength-adjusted win rates (recent): Blitz ≈ 50.47% — solid against similarly rated fields.
- Yearly trends show sustained growth and deep activity: c4 remains the dominant first move in 2023–2025.
- Termination pattern: many decisive games go the distance (long average lengths), reflecting battle-hardened endgame skills.
Sample game (illustrative)
Below is a short illustrative Blitz game (moves only). Use the embedded viewer to step through it.
Quick commentary: a familiar Ruy‑Lopez-ish structure played in a hurry; Jose often reaches middlegames like this and converts with patient piece play.
Final notes — how to follow Jose Sande
If you’re studying Blitz technique, Jose is a great model for consistent practice, deep endgames, and a reliable English repertoire. Expect long fights, clever maneuvering, and occasional tactical fireworks. For opponents, prepare for c4, don’t underestimate the Pterodactyl, and keep your snacks within arm’s reach.
Quick summary
Nice set of recent games — you show strong tactical awareness and aggressive play in the middlegame, and you convert advantages well. Your main leak is time management in 3|0 blitz and some endgame technique / prophylaxis when opponents generate counterplay. Below I highlight concrete things you did well, where you can improve, and a short practice plan you can apply over the next 2–6 weeks.
What you did well (concrete examples)
- Spotting and executing tactical finishing blows — in your win as Black vs tacticaldeep you played a calm sequence that ended with Rxc2 followed by a decisive check (Qe1) that forced resignation. That shows good tactical calculation and courage to simplify into a winning line.
- Active piece play and exchange decisions — in your other win you traded into a favorable endgame where your rooks and queen worked well to create decisive threats and win material. You convert small advantages instead of letting them slip.
- Opening variety and understanding — your repertoire (lots of English and Modern lines) is consistent with your strengths: you get playable middlegames and chances to outmaneuver opponents.
Biggest weaknesses to fix (prioritized)
- Time management in 3|0 blitz: multiple games end with you on single-digit seconds. 3 minutes with no increment punishes deep thinking on each move. Loss vs tjcmhh was decided by clock — you had long fights but ran out of time. Learn to trade some accuracy for speed and use simple heuristics in time trouble.
- Endgame technique and prophylaxis: in the loss(s) you allowed pawn breaks and piece activity from the opponent that eventually decided the game. Work on basic king-and-pawn and rook endgames and on preventing opponent counterplay (stop their pawn breaks, restrict knight outposts).
- Handling counterplay: when you win material or create pressure you sometimes allow the opponent one tactical chance or passed pawn. Before simplifying, check opponent counterplay options (rook lifts, freeing pawn pushes).
Concrete training plan (2–6 weeks)
- Daily tactics: 10–20 puzzles/day focused on mates and exchanges. Emphasize patterns you miss (skewers, sacrifices, back-rank motifs). Short sessions, high frequency.
- Blitz-specific clock work (3|0): 3 sessions/week of 20 games at 3|0 with these rules:
- Use the “30-second rule”: if you need more than 30s to find the move, play the most reasonable, practical move and save time for critical moments.
- Practice premoves only when material is equal and safe (avoid premoving into tactics).
- Endgame drills: 3× week, 15–25 minutes:
- King + pawn basics (opposition, outside passed pawn).
- Simple rook endgames: Lucena and Philidor ideas and active king play.
- Opening sharpening: choose 2 main lines you play most (e.g., your English Symmetrical / Botvinnik lines and a Modern Defense line). Memorize 6–8 typical plans and one key pawn break for each side (what to do if opponent plays a sideline). Spend 2× 30-minute sessions/week.
Practical blitz tips you can apply immediately
- Early move checklist (first 6 moves): complete development, king safety, central control. If you’re low on time later you’ll have a solid structure to play from.
- Before an exchange ask: does this reduce my opponent’s counterplay or give them a target? If yes, exchange. If it gives them a passed pawn or active piece, pause.
- In time trouble simplify when you’re ahead; complicate when you’re behind (but only when it increases your winning chances realistically).
- Use short, recurring plans rather than looking for the perfect move (e.g., “double rooks on the open file” or “fix opponent pawn and attack from flank”).
Study resources & micro-goals (suggested)
- Micro-goal 1 (2 weeks): reduce time losses — finish 20 3|0 games and have at least 60% of them with >10s remaining on the clock after move 30.
- Micro-goal 2 (4 weeks): endgame basics — be able to convert a simple rook+king vs rook within 15 moves from the Lucena position.
- Micro-goal 3 (ongoing): raise tactics accuracy by 10% — track puzzle success rate and focus on missed patterns.
Follow-ups
- If you want, send me one game where you lost on time but felt winning — I’ll do a short annotated post-mortem and mark the critical decision moments and a simple clock plan for that position.
- Want a 2-week blitz training schedule tailored to your openings? I can build a day-by-day checklist (tactics, opening, endgame, practice games).
Opponent references (recent games)
- Win vs tacticaldeep — great tactical finish and calm conversion.
- Loss vs tjcmhh — instructive on time management and handling counterplay.
Short checklist to use before each blitz game
- Are my development and king safety OK after move 8? If yes, play faster; if no, spend time fixing it.
- If you must think >30s, mark the move as critical mentally and play the best practical move.
- When ahead in material: trade down to reduce the need for precision (especially on 3|0).
🆚 Opponent Insights
| Recent Opponents | ||
|---|---|---|
| tjcmhh | 0W / 1L / 0D | View |
| tacticaldeep | 2W / 0L / 0D | View |
| gmlchess7 | 0W / 1L / 0D | View |
| serbinator_dominator | 1W / 1L / 1D | View |
| ablunderman | 1W / 0L / 0D | View |
| mateusz_bronowicki | 0W / 2L / 0D | View |
| sweetchinmusic04 | 0W / 2L / 0D | View |
| aylvax | 3W / 1L / 0D | View |
| Ivan Kalajzic | 0W / 1L / 0D | View |
| enitlavoruoyknird | 0W / 1L / 0D | View |
| Most Played Opponents | ||
|---|---|---|
| kenjim-upc | 73W / 46L / 6D | View Games |
| Ryan Young | 11W / 15L / 3D | View Games |
| Cam Ho | 17W / 6L / 1D | View Games |
| klopp141516 | 11W / 10L / 2D | View Games |
| Nenad Purić | 9W / 11L / 2D | View Games |
Rating
| Year | Bullet | Blitz | Rapid | Daily |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 2055 | 2521 | ||
| 2024 | 2054 | 2495 | ||
| 2023 | 2015 | 2294 |
Stats by Year
| Year | White | Black | Moves |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 852W / 683L / 95D | 677W / 864L / 93D | 77.7 |
| 2024 | 723W / 660L / 91D | 666W / 711L / 99D | 77.5 |
| 2023 | 540W / 391L / 73D | 475W / 463L / 70D | 77.8 |
Openings: Most Played
| Blitz Opening | Games | Wins | Losses | Draws | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Modern Defense: Pterodactyl Variation | 753 | 354 | 352 | 47 | 47.0% |
| English Opening: Agincourt Defense | 662 | 342 | 272 | 48 | 51.7% |
| English Opening | 487 | 232 | 225 | 30 | 47.6% |
| English Opening: Drill Variation | 474 | 252 | 185 | 37 | 53.2% |
| English Opening: Symmetrical Variation, Botvinnik System | 437 | 239 | 175 | 23 | 54.7% |
| English Opening: Anglo-Indian Defense | 424 | 214 | 195 | 15 | 50.5% |
| Sicilian Defense: Closed | 262 | 105 | 144 | 13 | 40.1% |
| English Opening: Symmetrical Variation | 251 | 130 | 104 | 17 | 51.8% |
| Sicilian Defense | 249 | 120 | 113 | 16 | 48.2% |
| Sicilian Defense: Accelerated Dragon, Maróczy Bind | 247 | 107 | 115 | 25 | 43.3% |
| Bullet Opening | Games | Wins | Losses | Draws | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| English Opening | 54 | 38 | 14 | 2 | 70.4% |
| English Opening: Agincourt Defense | 45 | 30 | 14 | 1 | 66.7% |
| Australian Defense | 44 | 19 | 22 | 3 | 43.2% |
| English Opening: Anglo-Indian Defense | 27 | 16 | 9 | 2 | 59.3% |
| Modern Defense: Pterodactyl Variation | 22 | 6 | 16 | 0 | 27.3% |
| Sicilian Defense: Closed | 21 | 11 | 10 | 0 | 52.4% |
| English Opening: Drill Variation | 20 | 14 | 6 | 0 | 70.0% |
| Amar Gambit | 18 | 9 | 9 | 0 | 50.0% |
| East Indian Defense | 17 | 3 | 13 | 1 | 17.6% |
| Sicilian Defense | 15 | 7 | 8 | 0 | 46.7% |
🔥 Streaks
| Streak | Longest | Current |
|---|---|---|
| Winning | 28 | 0 |
| Losing | 10 | 1 |