About Miklos Halak (josiur)
Miklos Halak, known online as josiur, is a titled FIDE Master and a true blitz specialist — the kind of player who treats the 3+0 time control like a high-speed tango. Rising from regular play in 2014 to becoming one of the most feared fast-time opponents, Miklos combines tactical firepower with an uncanny ability to ride out chaotic middlegames.
Title: FIDE Master (awarded by FIDE). Preferred time control: Blitz. Search keywords: Miklos Halak chess, FIDE Master, blitz specialist, chess openings, tactical player.
Career Highlights
- Long, steady climb from club-level blitz to the international arena — with a peak blitz performance recorded as 2674 (2025-11-24).
- Notable streaks: longest winning streak 23 games; longest losing streak 19 games (proof that even masters have bad Mondays).
- Massive practical experience online: thousands of blitz games played, with a heavyweight record that shows dedication to fast chess and constant sharpening of instincts.
- Frequently plays against rivals such as analfabeto, datsfunny, and 2011king — and has special battles with mehdi.
Playing Style & Psychology
Miklos is a comeback artist — a player who often turns worse positions around (high comeback rate). He favors long, decisive games in blitz (average decisive length ~80 moves), so don’t be surprised if a “bullet finish” turns into a dramatic 40-move rollercoaster.
- Tactical awareness: excellent at scrappy, piece-down fights and practical complications.
- Endgame frequency: plays out endgames relatively often for blitz — good technique under pressure.
- Best time of day to challenge him: around 23:00 (beware the late-night surge).
- Psychological quirk: Tilt factor exists — but so does an 85%+ comeback resilience. Laughs in the face of blunders (sometimes literally).
Favorite Openings
Miklos’s repertoire blends solid defenses with eccentric, aggressive setups. He’s comfortable in mainstream theory and also enjoys offbeat traps that punish sleepy opponents.
- Sicilian Defense: Alapin Variation — a staple in his blitz toolkit (Sicilian Defense: Alapin Variation).
- Amazon Attack — surprisingly effective in both bullet and blitz; high win rates in shorter time controls.
- Caro-Kann Defense and Four Knights Game — reliable choices that lead to rich middlegame play.
- Occasional gambit spice: Amar Gambit and Barnes lines when Miklos wants fireworks.
Notable Stats & Tendencies
- Strength-adjusted win rates: consistently strong across Blitz and Bullet (he thrives when the clock is a threat).
- Win rate by day: strongest on Monday; hour-by-hour, late-night play (22–23 and 0:00) shows peak performance.
- Average first capture occurs around move 6–7 — prefers tension and development before opening the position.
- Likes long decisive games in blitz — expect deep fights rather than early flurries of pre-move drama.
Rivals & Memorable Opponents
Miklos has played many frequent opponents online; some of the most-played include analfabeto, datsfunny, and 2011king. For a taste of his top rivalries, check out his matches with mehdi.
Sample Game (playable)
A light illustrative mini-Ruy Lopez zigzag in blitz — try it for a quick look at Miklos’s handling of open tactics:
Where to Watch & Follow Progress
Track Miklos’s rating curve and recent momentum with the embedded chart below. For those who love trends and numbers, this compact view tells the story of a blitz-focused rise.
Personality & Off-Board Notes
Off the board, Miklos likes coffee, clever opening names, and telling opponents they “played the move of the century” only to win on time. He’s approachable, a bit whimsical, and always ready with a joke after a tactical melee.
Quick Facts
- Username: josiur
- Title: FIDE Master
- Preferred: Blitz (hard to argue with the numbers)
- Longest win streak: 23 games
- Peak blitz moment: 2674 (2025-11-24)
Quick summary
Nice work — you’re still finding clean tactics and active piece play in blitz, and your opening choices give you practical chances. Recent wins show good tactical awareness (a decisive knight sacrifice and an exchange sac that unlocked the king). Your losses are mostly time-related or endgame slips, so the biggest easy wins come from cleaning up time management and a few recurring technical weaknesses.
Recent game to review (highlight)
Win vs Rafael Ventura dos Santos — instructive tactical conversion. Open the replay and step through the turning points below.
- Replay:
- Key moments to replay slowly: the knight sacrifice on the kingside (Nxf7) and the exchange sac Rxe6 that cleared lines to the opposing king.
What you did well
- Active piece play — rooks and queen quickly went to invading squares (classic blitz plan: activate heavy pieces and punish a loose king).
- Tactical vision — you spotted and executed decisive combinations (forks and sacrifices) rather than trying to grind in a closed way.
- Opening selection gives practical imbalances — your wins often come from complicated middlegames where you out-tactical opponents (see performance in Sicilian Defense: Alapin Variation and Four Knights Game).
- Willingness to simplify when ahead — you convert material/tactical edges instead of letting complications linger.
Where you should focus (high impact)
These are the recurring themes from the recent games and your stats:
- Time management / Zeitnot: multiple games ended with time losses. In blitz, keep an eye on the clock — slow moves that are “only okay” cost you more than a small inaccuracy. Practice quick decision rules (see drills below).
- Endgame technique: when the middlegame simplifies you sometimes miss a safe conversion route or let counterplay develop. Drill basic rook endgames and queen vs rook endings — these return often in blitz.
- Opening consistency: your WinRate in the Caro-Kann Defense is lower relative to other lines. If you play it often, refresh the typical pawn breaks and target plans rather than memorizing only move orders.
- Avoid unnecessary exchanges when you need attacking chances — sometimes you liquidate into passive positions against active opponents.
Concrete, short-term plan (2–4 weeks)
- Daily (15–20 min): tactics trainer — focus on pattern recognition (forks, pins, discovered attacks). Aim for 30 mixed puzzles per day with increasing speed.
- 3× per week (20–30 min): endgame drills — rook vs rook basics, lucena/phalanx ideas, and simple queen vs rook defense. Use very short drills and repeat the same positions until automatic.
- 2× per week (30–40 min): game review — pick your last 6 losses and wins. For each, write down the one moment where the evaluation swung and what alternative you would play next time.
- Weekly (one session): opening tune-up — pick 1 weakness (start with Caro-Kann Defense). Study 5 model games or 10 key positions and the typical pawn breaks and piece placements.
Practical blitz tips (apply in next 10 games)
- When below 30 seconds: simplify decision tree — choose safe developing moves rather than searching for the “perfect” refutation.
- Set small benchmarks on the clock (e.g., by move 10 you should have >1:40). If you fall behind, switch to a faster but safer mode of play.
- Use checks, captures, threats checklist: before each move ask “Does opponent have a forcing tactic?” That one question prevents many hanging pieces or oversights.
- Pre-move sensibly: only pre-move when captures are forced or when you’re sure there’s no tactic. Pre-moves can win time but lose games in complicated positions (avoid in tactical middlegames).
Game-specific notes (from the recent set)
- Win vs Rafael_Ventura — excellent exploitation of a king left in the center; the exchange sac Rxe6 and follow-up showed good calculation. Keep practicing similar attacker patterns (battery, back-rank motifs).
- Loss vs KesOdy — ended on time. The position showed you were fighting for counterplay but ran out of clock. Work on finishing technique under severe time pressure: practice 3|0 and 1|0 with the focus on simple plans.
- Loss vs really65 — also a time loss. Your middlegame was fine but the clock lost you the last phase. Make the clock part of your routine (glance at it with every move).
Short drill list (do these today)
- 10 tactics (3 minutes) — focus on forks and discovered attacks.
- 5 rook endgame positions — win/hold exercises (10 minutes).
- Analyze one lost game: identify the single better move you missed and why.
Checklist before you queue for blitz
- Set a concrete clock goal (e.g., keep >50% of starting time until move 20).
- Decide which opening you’ll use and a one-line anti-surprise plan.
- Plan to spend less than 10s per move in quiet positions; save time for tactics and endgames.
Notes on long-term trends
Your Strength Adjusted Win Rate (~0.494) and recent rating trend (small ups and downs) show you’re at a high level where small improvements (time management + endgames) will give outsized gains. With a focused 4‑week plan you should see a measurable uptick in blitz consistency.
Want me to do a deeper post‑mortem?
Send 2–3 game links (losses you felt confused about or wins you want to understand more). I can produce a short annotated analysis with 3 critical positions and suggested alternatives.
- Example opponents from this batch: Rafael Ventura dos Santos, kesody, really65.
🆚 Opponent Insights
| Recent Opponents | ||
|---|---|---|
| talcrifice | 3W / 5L / 0D | View |
| ESultanov | 1W / 0L / 0D | View |
| number9 | 5W / 14L / 4D | View |
| nvardanyan | 1W / 0L / 0D | View |
| lyushin9494 | 1W / 0L / 0D | View |
| fidiascyprus | 2W / 1L / 1D | View |
| Hans Rath | 2W / 1L / 0D | View |
| gorisela4 | 2W / 3L / 0D | View |
| stuffystuffy | 0W / 2L / 0D | View |
| lepolatupukki | 2W / 1L / 0D | View |
| Most Played Opponents | ||
|---|---|---|
| analfabeto | 84W / 81L / 12D | View Games |
| datsfunny | 33W / 69L / 11D | View Games |
| 2011KING | 35W / 56L / 11D | View Games |
| mind_move | 49W / 27L / 2D | View Games |
| Adegboyega Joel ADEBAYO | 24W / 42L / 4D | View Games |
Rating
| Year | Bullet | Blitz | Rapid | Daily |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 2634 | |||
| 2024 | 2518 | 2515 | ||
| 2023 | 2495 | |||
| 2022 | 2533 | 2417 | ||
| 2021 | 2421 | |||
| 2020 | 2367 | 1792 | ||
| 2019 | 2407 | 2117 | ||
| 2018 | 2327 | |||
| 2017 | 2304 | |||
| 2016 | 2327 | 2293 | ||
| 2015 | 2218 | 2207 | ||
| 2014 | 2173 | 2193 |
Stats by Year
| Year | White | Black | Moves |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 330W / 360L / 65D | 302W / 389L / 58D | 85.7 |
| 2024 | 270W / 279L / 51D | 227W / 319L / 58D | 84.1 |
| 2023 | 170W / 166L / 26D | 140W / 197L / 24D | 84.0 |
| 2022 | 454W / 345L / 63D | 445W / 383L / 63D | 80.1 |
| 2021 | 7W / 10L / 0D | 11W / 9L / 0D | 83.2 |
| 2020 | 11W / 11L / 2D | 12W / 12L / 0D | 70.8 |
| 2019 | 73W / 74L / 25D | 73W / 92L / 12D | 86.0 |
| 2018 | 2W / 1L / 0D | 1W / 2L / 0D | 92.3 |
| 2017 | 5W / 9L / 1D | 6W / 7L / 0D | 84.3 |
| 2016 | 554W / 570L / 102D | 489W / 663L / 86D | 85.6 |
| 2015 | 290W / 277L / 45D | 281W / 288L / 41D | 84.1 |
| 2014 | 796W / 867L / 111D | 743W / 946L / 107D | 83.2 |
Openings: Most Played
| Blitz Opening | Games | Wins | Losses | Draws | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sicilian Defense: Alapin Variation | 1032 | 455 | 486 | 91 | 44.1% |
| Caro-Kann Defense | 862 | 347 | 445 | 70 | 40.3% |
| Amazon Attack | 556 | 259 | 265 | 32 | 46.6% |
| Four Knights Game | 441 | 216 | 187 | 38 | 49.0% |
| Modern | 355 | 151 | 182 | 22 | 42.5% |
| London System: Poisoned Pawn Variation | 340 | 144 | 157 | 39 | 42.4% |
| Czech Defense | 318 | 139 | 160 | 19 | 43.7% |
| QGD: 3.Nc3 Bb4 | 267 | 109 | 135 | 23 | 40.8% |
| Amazon Attack: Siberian Attack | 253 | 111 | 129 | 13 | 43.9% |
| Diemer-Duhm Gambit (DDG): 4...f5 | 218 | 84 | 121 | 13 | 38.5% |
| Bullet Opening | Games | Wins | Losses | Draws | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Amar Gambit | 195 | 93 | 94 | 8 | 47.7% |
| Amazon Attack | 141 | 78 | 56 | 7 | 55.3% |
| Amazon Attack: Siberian Attack | 128 | 55 | 63 | 10 | 43.0% |
| London System: Poisoned Pawn Variation | 110 | 54 | 53 | 3 | 49.1% |
| Australian Defense | 110 | 59 | 45 | 6 | 53.6% |
| KGD: Classical, 3.Bc4 | 97 | 44 | 51 | 2 | 45.4% |
| Barnes Defense | 84 | 43 | 38 | 3 | 51.2% |
| Sicilian Defense: Alapin Variation | 83 | 40 | 40 | 3 | 48.2% |
| Caro-Kann Defense | 75 | 33 | 41 | 1 | 44.0% |
| East Indian Defense | 72 | 42 | 30 | 0 | 58.3% |
| Rapid Opening | Games | Wins | Losses | Draws | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Amar Gambit | 15 | 7 | 6 | 2 | 46.7% |
| Barnes Opening: Walkerling | 10 | 4 | 6 | 0 | 40.0% |
| Nimzo-Larsen Attack | 6 | 5 | 1 | 0 | 83.3% |
| Barnes Defense | 6 | 3 | 2 | 1 | 50.0% |
| Australian Defense | 6 | 4 | 1 | 1 | 66.7% |
| Bird Opening | 5 | 2 | 3 | 0 | 40.0% |
| Modern | 4 | 2 | 0 | 2 | 50.0% |
| English Opening: Symmetrical Variation | 3 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 0.0% |
| Caro-Kann Defense | 2 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0.0% |
| Bird Opening: Dutch Variation | 2 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 50.0% |
🔥 Streaks
| Streak | Longest | Current |
|---|---|---|
| Winning | 23 | 0 |
| Losing | 19 | 1 |