Joshua Posthuma: The International Master with a Tactical Twist
Joshua Posthuma, known in the digital realm as jposthuma, proudly holds the title of International Master, a distinguished honor awarded by FIDE. With a relentless passion for the 64 squares, Joshua’s journey through the ranks is as fascinating as his games.
Beginning from modest Rapid ratings around 1200 in 2013, Joshua's tenacity saw his skill rise dramatically to a Rapid peak above 2280 in 2024. Not content with slow and steady, his Blitz and Bullet ratings dance spectacularly in the mid to high 2700s and even breach the 2800 mark in Bullet play, putting him comfortably in the realm of speed chess aficionados who thrive on adrenaline and lightning-fast calculations.
When it comes to openings, Joshua keeps things intriguingly Top Secret — winning almost 69% of Rapid games and boasting over 57% win rate in Blitz and Bullet alike. Clearly, he’s not just playing to win; he’s playing to mystify and overpower.
Perhaps the most striking fact about Joshua's playstyle is his incredible comeback rate of over 80%, and a jaw-dropping 92.88% win rate after losing a piece. Clearly, don’t count him out when the going gets tough — Joshua’s motto might well be "Lose a piece, gain a psychological edge." However, he also knows when to quit early, resigning about 12% of lost games to save time for the next battle.
His endurance on the board is legendary — with average winning games running nearly 70 moves, Joshua's strategy involves lengthy, complex endgames, as evidenced by his Endgame Frequency of over 74%. This player is less about quick kills and more about the slow dance to domination.
Beyond the numbers, Joshua’s longest winning streak stands impressively at 35 games, and currently riding a hot streak of two consecutive wins. The opponent list includes both friendly rivals and cunning challengers, but win or lose, Joshua brings his characteristic blend of strategy, wit, and a dash of surprise.
Whether grinding through daily puzzles or smashing through bullet games at breakneck speed, Joshua Posthuma’s chess story continues to unfold — with plenty more moves yet to surprise and delight the chess world.
Hi Joshua!
Below is a strength-focused, improvement-oriented review of the recent games in your database. Feel free to skim the bold headers or dive into the move-by-move suggestions.
1 Your Core Strengths
- Opening readiness against 1.e4. Your Caro–Kann & Sicilian repertoires are deep and you often reach the middlegame with at least equality.
• Example: in the B30 win vs roguecalvinist you navigated the Open Sicilian smoothly and punished 19.Nc4? with 19…Qxa2! - Tactical alertness. The games vs Takao2020 and vs Dumitru-Daniel Dinu show clean conversion once a tactic appears (e.g. 23…Nxf3+! and 24…Bxa1).
- Good feel for active rooks in late middlegames. Several wins feature a quick doubling on the c- or b-files followed by invasion on the second rank—keep that up!
2 Key Growth Areas
- Caro-Kann Early Tactics (Two-Knights & Fantasy sidelines)
Your loss to noobspiderman shows how 6.Nxf7! can explode if …h6 is inserted too soon.
• Practical fix: meet 5.Ng5 with 5…Bf5 or 5…e6 instantly; vs 6.Nxf7 Kxf7 7.Nf3 either 7…c5 (critical) or 7…g6 followed by …Kg7.
• Book up on the mini-match (B15) lines for 5.Ng5 & 5.Nc5 so you don’t burn clock or concede the initiative. - Benko / Benko-Type Pawn Sacs as White
In the loss vs Paweł Kowalczyk you accepted material but allowed a typical Benko grip (…bxa6 / …Ra4!).
• General plan after 4.cxb5 a6 5.e3: decline with 6.bxa6? only if you know the theory; otherwise 5.bxa6 or 5.e4 aiming for Be2 / 0-0 and dxe6.
• Study model games by Giri & Aronian where White keeps the extra pawn and neutralises the a- & b-files. - Handling Catalan Endgames down material
Two Catalan games drifted into pawn-down rook endings you could still save.
• Technique tip: adopt an auto-checklist—push the least advanced passer, centralise king, cut the enemy king with the rook, then race pawns.
• The 3-check rule: if you can check the opponent’s king three times with your rook you’re seldom worse in blitz. - Clock Management
The timeout vs robertosantiagoh came from spending ~40 s on 16.d5?-(17)…cxd4. Try the 15-second rule: if you calculate & nothing changes, move.
3 Illustrative Snapshot
The critical moment from the Caro-Kann game (position after 6.Nxf7! Kxf7):
Instead of 7…e6?! you can play 7…Be6 or the modern 7…c5! when Black’s pieces spring out and the king finds safety on g8.
4 Targeted Homework
- Opening files to review:
• Caro–Kann Two-Knights (B15) update (short PDF / 10 games).
• “Benko Gambit Declined for White” (watch 2 model games, take notes). - Tactics drill: 30-minute session on knights vs. rook back-rank themes—this pops up in both your wins and losses.
- Endgame mini-task: play the 4-pawn vs. 3-pawn rook endgame vs computer set to 2200; goal is to hold the draw in 5 attempts.
5 Stats & Motivation
Your best rating peaks so far:
• Blitz: 2760 (2021-02-18) • Rapid: 2296 (2022-12-14)
Keep an eye on hourly consistency and day-to-day swing:
6 Next Milestone
Breaking 2300 blitz will likely come not from new openings but from solidifying the problem lines above and trimming 5–10 % of your time off the critical decisions.
Keep the energy and creativity—just add a dose of prophylaxis and clock discipline.
Good luck, and let me know how the next training block goes!
🆚 Opponent Insights
| Most Played Opponents | ||
|---|---|---|
| eugeniusjr | 77W / 31L / 5D | |
| bulletmatetricks | 47W / 43L / 9D | |
| thellamalord | 38W / 51L / 0D | |
| onthe65thsquare | 57W / 21L / 6D | |
| mn79 | 19W / 60L / 0D | |
Rating
| Year | Bullet | Blitz | Rapid | Daily |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 2801 | 2273 | ||
| 2024 | 2814 | 2704 | 2284 | |
| 2023 | 2657 | 2278 | 1846 | |
| 2022 | 2805 | 1810 | 2278 | |
| 2021 | 2739 | 1722 | 2237 | 1846 |
| 2020 | 2712 | 2724 | 2264 | 1846 |
| 2019 | 2412 | 2530 | 1867 | |
| 2018 | 2306 | 2407 | 1938 | 1789 |
| 2017 | 2365 | 2359 | 1908 | 1735 |
| 2016 | 2287 | 1696 | 1804 | |
| 2015 | 2061 | 1867 | 1764 | 1889 |
| 2014 | 2091 | 1921 | 1894 | 1845 |
| 2013 | 1867 | 1705 | 1761 | 1849 |
| 2012 | 1458 | 1583 | 1695 |
Stats by Year
| Year | White | Black | Moves |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 27W / 13L / 5D | 27W / 13L / 3D | 91.3 |
| 2024 | 7W / 2L / 0D | 7W / 2L / 1D | 97.6 |
| 2023 | 16W / 8L / 3D | 14W / 9L / 0D | 41.7 |
| 2022 | 122W / 51L / 6D | 134W / 49L / 5D | 49.0 |
| 2021 | 157W / 116L / 20D | 150W / 121L / 25D | 62.1 |
| 2020 | 152W / 83L / 12D | 147W / 82L / 19D | 78.6 |
| 2019 | 150W / 59L / 17D | 144W / 63L / 18D | 74.7 |
| 2018 | 189W / 98L / 18D | 174W / 106L / 18D | 83.0 |
| 2017 | 202W / 111L / 27D | 185W / 147L / 24D | 76.6 |
| 2016 | 148W / 148L / 20D | 166W / 142L / 16D | 60.0 |
| 2015 | 214W / 141L / 28D | 212W / 152L / 19D | 78.6 |
| 2014 | 638W / 499L / 77D | 630W / 513L / 79D | 77.0 |
| 2013 | 560W / 350L / 55D | 531W / 371L / 50D | 76.3 |
| 2012 | 66W / 52L / 4D | 63W / 56L / 4D | 64.1 |
Openings: Most Played
| Blitz Opening | Games | Wins | Losses | Draws | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 745 | 375 | 368 | 2 | 50.3% |
| Caro-Kann Defense | 380 | 220 | 136 | 24 | 57.9% |
| Nimzo-Larsen Attack | 148 | 93 | 42 | 13 | 62.8% |
| Caro-Kann Defense: Exchange Variation | 124 | 78 | 34 | 12 | 62.9% |
| Benko Gambit | 92 | 53 | 35 | 4 | 57.6% |
| Döry Defense | 92 | 58 | 27 | 7 | 63.0% |
| Catalan Opening: Closed | 75 | 42 | 32 | 1 | 56.0% |
| Caro-Kann Defense: Bronstein-Larsen Variation | 75 | 37 | 26 | 12 | 49.3% |
| London System: Poisoned Pawn Variation | 72 | 36 | 32 | 4 | 50.0% |
| Amazon Attack: Siberian Attack | 68 | 46 | 16 | 6 | 67.7% |
| Rapid Opening | Games | Wins | Losses | Draws | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Caro-Kann Defense | 8 | 3 | 4 | 1 | 37.5% |
| Caro-Kann Defense: Exchange Variation | 3 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| Benko Gambit | 3 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 66.7% |
| Amazon Attack | 3 | 0 | 3 | 0 | 0.0% |
| Catalan Opening: Closed | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| London System: Poisoned Pawn Variation | 2 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 50.0% |
| Czech Defense | 2 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 50.0% |
| Nimzo-Larsen Attack | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| QGD: Chigorin, 3.cxd5 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| Döry Defense | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| Bullet Opening | Games | Wins | Losses | Draws | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Caro-Kann Defense | 629 | 361 | 241 | 27 | 57.4% |
| Australian Defense | 449 | 250 | 174 | 25 | 55.7% |
| Amar Gambit | 246 | 136 | 103 | 7 | 55.3% |
| Nimzo-Larsen Attack | 209 | 114 | 75 | 20 | 54.5% |
| Caro-Kann Defense: Exchange Variation | 208 | 111 | 83 | 14 | 53.4% |
| Amazon Attack | 195 | 99 | 82 | 14 | 50.8% |
| Benoni Defense: Benoni Gambit Accepted | 163 | 80 | 70 | 13 | 49.1% |
| London System: Poisoned Pawn Variation | 130 | 71 | 51 | 8 | 54.6% |
| Amazon Attack: Siberian Attack | 127 | 64 | 56 | 7 | 50.4% |
| Slav Defense | 123 | 63 | 53 | 7 | 51.2% |
| Daily Opening | Games | Wins | Losses | Draws | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Caro-Kann Defense | 29 | 13 | 15 | 1 | 44.8% |
| Caro-Kann Defense: Bronstein-Larsen Variation | 15 | 6 | 8 | 1 | 40.0% |
| Caro-Kann Defense: Exchange Variation | 14 | 8 | 6 | 0 | 57.1% |
| London System: Poisoned Pawn Variation | 12 | 8 | 4 | 0 | 66.7% |
| Catalan Opening: Closed | 9 | 3 | 6 | 0 | 33.3% |
| Queen's Gambit Declined: Hastings Variation | 8 | 2 | 6 | 0 | 25.0% |
| QGD: 2...Bf5 3.cxd5 | 7 | 3 | 4 | 0 | 42.9% |
| Australian Defense | 6 | 5 | 1 | 0 | 83.3% |
| QGA: 3.e3 c5 | 6 | 4 | 2 | 0 | 66.7% |
| Slav Defense: Bonet Gambit | 5 | 3 | 2 | 0 | 60.0% |
🔥 Streaks
| Streak | Longest | Current |
|---|---|---|
| Winning | 35 | 4 |
| Losing | 23 | 0 |