Avatar of jumpman1998

jumpman1998 NM

Playing Since: 2015-10-23 (Active)

Wow Factor: ♟♟♟♟♟♟

Chess.com

Daily: 1889
87W / 50L / 15D
Rapid: 2428
445W / 435L / 99D
Blitz: 2516
8087W / 9197L / 1308D
Bullet: 2337
1389W / 1387L / 80D

Biography

jumpman1998 is a National Master who climbed the online ranks with a mix of stubborn endgame technique and sudden tactical fireworks. First appearing in games around 2015, jumpman1998 cut their teeth in Blitz before settling into Rapid as their preferred battlefield — a format that lets calculation breathe without surrendering the thrill.

On a good day they look like a well-oiled opening book; on a bad day they blame the mouse. Titles, long tournaments and a healthy appetite for complicated middlegames have made them a familiar handle on many leaderboards.

Style & strengths

If you like long games, puzzles and comeback stories, this is your player:

  • Preferred time control: Rapid — steady, strategic, and where jumpman1998 does their best work.
  • Endgame-oriented: High endgame frequency (many wins grind out late) and long avg moves per win (~76 moves).
  • Tactical resilience: Comeback rate ≈ 81% — not a player who quits after a scare.
  • Win-after-losing-piece: ~42.5% — famously dangerous in chaotic positions.
  • Psych profile: Tilt factor 22 (they laugh it off, then queue another game).

Notable openings & repertoire

jumpman1998 favors solid, classical setups with a willingness to mix in sharper lines when the position calls for fireworks.

  • QGD: 3.Nc3 Bb4 — a go-to setup in both Rapid and Blitz (QGD: 3.Nc3 Bb4). Strong Rapid win rate and heavy usage.
  • Slav Defense — reliable counterplay and a staple of the black repertoire (Slav Defense).
  • French Defense family — used often, with variations that swing from positional to double-edged (Winawer, Exchange, Advance).
  • King’s Indian: Exchange Variation — used as a practical weapon when early simplifications are desired.
  • Bullet/Surprise: Amar Gambit and Australian Defense appear in faster games — ready to mix things up under time pressure.

Career highlights & records

  • Longest winning streak: 17 games — a run that turned skeptics into believers.
  • Longest losing streak: 22 games — followed by a dramatic recovery (typical jumpman1998 narrative arc).
  • Most-played opponent: unagiandrice — a rivalry of hundreds of games that reads like a soap opera in moves.
  • Peak competitive form: see peak performance markers inline — jumpman1998 has hit elite highs in multiple time classes during 2020–2025.
  • Streak today: currently riding a short winning streak (2) and already plotting the next marathon session.

Tactical tastes & psychology

jumpman1998 is happiest in positions where calculation and patience meet. They revisit lost material, love complex endgames, and often outlast opponents in long, technical fights.

  • Average first capture: about move 6–7 — comfortable letting tension build.
  • Strong at morning play — best time of day: 09:00 (but will happily grind at any hour).
  • Known for high comeback ability and a pragmatic approach to “tilt”: laugh, study, rematch.

Fun facts & viewer

  • Has played thousands of online games; Blitz is where many of the heroic wins (and losses) happened.
  • Likes to experiment: from QGD mainlines to oddballs like the Amar Gambit in Bullet.
  • Play a sample opening:
    — a tiny teaser for the repertoire.
  • See a recent Rapid trend:
    Rapid Rating201920202021202220232024202524281746YearRapid Rating
    to follow their trajectory over recent seasons.
  • Peak marking: top achievements are captured in platform stats (e.g., 2672 (2025-06-07)).

Quick links

Final note

In short: jumpman1998 is a hungry National Master who prefers Rapid, thrives in long fights, and keeps opponents on their toes with a mix of deep endgames and sudden tactics. Expect solid preparation, occasional trickery, and an entertaining post-game chat — sometimes apologetic, often triumphant.


Coach Chesswick's Profile Photo
Coach Chesswick

Quick recap of the recent rapid games

Nice work — you finished a clean tactical win recently and showed the kind of attacking instincts that win quick games. Below I’ll highlight concrete strengths, recurring problems from the loss, and a short plan you can use in the next week to convert more of your chances into wins.

Game viewer — most recent win

Replay the final tactical sequence and the mating idea to make sure the pattern is locked in your head.

  • Opponent: meetingmarmot13
  • Opening used: Scotch Game
  • Quick replay:

What you did well (patterns to keep)

These are repeatable strengths from the games you shared — lean into them.

  • Active attacking play: you push pawns and pieces forward (e5, Bg5, Re1+) to keep the initiative. That earned you decisive tactics in the win.
  • Tactical awareness and calculation: you spotted combinations that led to material gain and a mating net — the final Nd6 mate shows you can calculate forcing lines to the end.
  • Opening ambition: you play for central space and quick piece activity rather than passive setups. That is often what creates the tactical chances you convert.
  • Willingness to simplify when it helps convert (in the resignation win you kept pressure rather than chasing every small gain).

Key areas to improve (from the loss and older games)

Addressing these will reduce avoidable losses and make your wins more reliable.

  • Time management: clocks in the loss show heavy time pressure late. In several critical junctures you had under a minute — try to keep a 10–20 second buffer and avoid long think-outs on obvious developing moves.
  • Endgame/coordination under simplification: the loss demonstrates trouble when positions simplify and knights become dominant. Work on knight vs. knight endgame fundamentals and how to trade into favorable minor-piece endgames.
  • Avoiding tactical oversights in closed/complicated positions — the opponent got strong centralized knights and you allowed tactical forks and penetrations (watch moves that create knight outposts on d5/d6/e4).
  • Opening-specific refines: in some lines your structure (d- and c-pawns) got fixed in ways that handed opponents outposts. Review short plans for the lines you play so you recognize the right pawn breaks and piece exchanges.

Concrete drills and study plan (2 weeks)

Short, focused practice you can do in 30–45 minutes per day.

  • Tactics (15–20 min/day): target forks, skewers, discovered checks and mating nets — do mixed puzzles but emphasize patterns that appeared in your win (knight forks, queen+knight mating motifs).
  • 10 rapid practice games with increment (10+5 or 10+3): force yourself to keep a 10–15s buffer. After each loss, write one sentence on what cost you time and one tactical theme missed.
  • Endgames (2×15 min sessions per week): basic knight endgames, king activity, and how to convert when you have a rook and minor piece vs rook. Work on blockades and how to neutralize an opponent knight on d5/d6.
  • Opening review (2×20 min sessions per week): pick the main branches you play (Scotch/1.e4 lines and your main d4 systems). Learn the typical pawn breaks, where your minor pieces belong, and 1–2 move order traps to avoid. Use a short notebook: write the strategic plan vs typical responses.
  • Blitz for pattern recognition (optional): 5–10 games of 5+3 focusing on speed and pattern recognition, not rating — try to spot immediate tactics quickly and trade when ahead.

Practical tips for your next rapid session

  • Early clock discipline: spend most of your time on the first 8–12 moves only when there are real branching points. If a move develops a piece or keeps the center, play it quickly.
  • When ahead in material or position, simplify carefully — trades reduce opponent counterplay and your chance to blunder under time pressure.
  • If you face a knight jump into d5/d6, evaluate trades: exchanging one knight often removes opponent outpost pressure. If you can’t exchange, aim for pawn breaks to dislodge it.
  • Before offering or accepting complications, do a 3-move tactical check in your head: are there forks, skewers, direct mating checks? That simple habit avoids many blunders.

Follow-ups & resources (short list)

Use these until the next review — they’re short and effective.

  • Daily 10–15 tactics on your puzzle trainer (focus on forks and discovered checks).
  • One annotated game per week: pick a lost or close game and write a 3–5 line comment explaining the turning point.
  • Two 10+5 games with increment per session — force better clock habits.

Small checklist before each game

  • Set a target: “play solid opening, avoid time trouble” (not “win at all costs”).
  • Keep at least 10 seconds on the clock until move 15.
  • Three-second tactical scan before every move in complicated positions.
  • If opponent is rated much lower/higher, treat the position the same — focus on candidate moves, not the rating.

Examples to review from your recent games

  • Winning finish vs meetingmarmot13 — study the forcing sequence that led to Nd6 mate (pattern: remove defender, land outpost, final knight fork/mate).
  • Resignation win vs Nicholas Bruha (2024-12-25) — replay how aggressive play (h4, fast centralizing) created practical pressure.
  • Loss vs Nicholas Bruha (2024-12-24) — replay the phase where the knights became dominant and you ran low on time; identify 2 moves where trading or simplifying would have improved your position.

Closing — short encouragement

You’re clearly strong tactically and you create real threats — tidy up the clock and endgame handling and you’ll convert more of those attacks into stable rating gains. If you want, send 2–3 of your recent games (losses you found unpleasant) and I’ll mark the exact turning moves and give 2–3 tailored lines to practice from your opening repertoire.



🆚 Opponent Insights

Recent Opponents
piggyoinker 0W / 2L / 0D View
toozeerhard 1W / 0L / 0D View
jblindado12 0W / 1L / 0D View
fikus-13 2W / 2L / 1D View
Orlando Husbands 1W / 0L / 0D View
jarmax 1W / 0L / 0D View
Jayson Gonzales 0W / 1L / 0D View
vahemendelyan 2W / 0L / 0D View
thekingwolf_1 1W / 0L / 0D View
semiplayer1 1W / 0L / 0D View
Most Played Opponents
unagiandrice 229W / 577L / 75D View Games
underzero17 180W / 102L / 28D View Games
ruibae18 68W / 40L / 3D View Games
mentos23 17W / 75L / 3D View Games
vchesskid 66W / 13L / 1D View Games

Rating

Year Bullet Blitz Rapid Daily
2025 2337 2413 2428
2024 2527 2428 1889
2023 2337 2467 2428 1889
2022 2329 2443 2367 1849
2021 2329 2423 2323 1901
2020 2306 2328 2209 1802
2019 1740 1860 1746 1703
2018 1700 1691 1626 1511
2017 1075 1321 1537 1395
2016 871 1155 1578
2015 1157 1229 1093
Rating by Year201520162017201820192020202120222023202420252527871YearRatingBulletBlitzRapidDaily

Stats by Year

Year White Black Moves
2025 484W / 502L / 61D 421W / 551L / 72D 76.7
2024 640W / 696L / 108D 577W / 760L / 108D 79.0
2023 637W / 732L / 106D 571W / 748L / 125D 79.9
2022 591W / 621L / 94D 527W / 671L / 103D 76.1
2021 547W / 472L / 113D 527W / 507L / 112D 82.1
2020 1073W / 815L / 154D 907W / 926L / 157D 76.8
2019 567W / 593L / 58D 497W / 618L / 76D 63.9
2018 707W / 765L / 66D 616W / 853L / 49D 54.9
2017 550W / 658L / 28D 506W / 711L / 31D 51.5
2016 86W / 83L / 3D 76W / 83L / 4D 60.5
2015 9W / 5L / 1D 3W / 12L / 1D 66.6

Openings: Most Played

Blitz Opening Games Wins Losses Draws Win Rate
QGD: 3.Nc3 Bb4 1189 544 567 78 45.8%
Slav Defense 902 454 382 66 50.3%
French Defense 835 348 431 56 41.7%
Australian Defense 574 253 291 30 44.1%
French Defense: Exchange Variation 542 222 257 63 41.0%
QGD: 3.Nc3 Nf6 4.e3 494 212 256 26 42.9%
Nimzo-Indian Defense 467 205 231 31 43.9%
French Defense: Winawer Variation, Advance Variation 460 206 227 27 44.8%
London System: Poisoned Pawn Variation 451 184 227 40 40.8%
King's Indian Defense: Exchange Variation 423 226 173 24 53.4%
Rapid Opening Games Wins Losses Draws Win Rate
QGD: 3.Nc3 Bb4 77 40 29 8 52.0%
Slav Defense 53 23 20 10 43.4%
French Defense 40 23 14 3 57.5%
French Defense: Exchange Variation 38 12 19 7 31.6%
King's Indian Defense: Exchange Variation 36 16 19 1 44.4%
French Defense: Tarrasch Variation, Chistyakov Defense 34 14 18 2 41.2%
QGD: 3.Nc3 Nf6 4.e3 32 19 9 4 59.4%
Slav Defense: Bonet Gambit 26 9 11 6 34.6%
French Defense: Winawer Variation, Advance Variation 26 11 14 1 42.3%
French Defense: Advance Variation 26 10 11 5 38.5%
Bullet Opening Games Wins Losses Draws Win Rate
Amar Gambit 246 123 116 7 50.0%
French Defense 217 110 97 10 50.7%
Australian Defense 171 88 77 6 51.5%
Nimzo-Larsen Attack 131 66 62 3 50.4%
Colle System: Rhamphorhynchus Variation 110 57 50 3 51.8%
French Defense: Exchange Variation 107 46 59 2 43.0%
Barnes Defense 106 52 53 1 49.1%
London System: Poisoned Pawn Variation 80 38 38 4 47.5%
Scandinavian Defense 76 35 39 2 46.0%
Czech Defense 72 30 41 1 41.7%
Daily Opening Games Wins Losses Draws Win Rate
QGD: 3.Nc3 Bb4 9 7 2 0 77.8%
French Defense: Advance Variation 8 6 2 0 75.0%
QGD: 2...Bf5 3.cxd5 6 4 1 1 66.7%
Slav Defense 6 4 1 1 66.7%
French Defense: Exchange Variation 6 1 3 2 16.7%
English Opening: Agincourt Defense 5 2 2 1 40.0%
London System: Poisoned Pawn Variation 5 3 2 0 60.0%
Amazon Attack 5 3 2 0 60.0%
French Defense: Winawer Variation, Advance Variation 5 2 2 1 40.0%
Philidor Defense 4 3 1 0 75.0%

🔥 Streaks

Streak Longest Current
Winning 17 0
Losing 22 1
🐞 Report a Problem