JustinMatthieu: A Chess Odyssey
Meet JustinMatthieu, a chess enthusiast whose journey across the 64 squares is as intricate as the dance of biology in a microscopic universe. While the chess board may seem like a simple grid to some, for JustinMatthieu, it is an ecosystem bustling with strategy, evolution, and the occasional genetic twist of fate.
In the world of chess, every move is like a cell dividing – sometimes it leads to exponential growth, while other times it simply paves the way for a gradual transformation. Known for his exploratory spirit and a penchant for making unexpected maneuvers, JustinMatthieu approaches every match as if he were unraveling the mysteries of DNA. Even though his current streaks are as calm as a well-balanced biological system, he remains ever eager to evolve his gameplay.
With an opening repertoire that might leave his opponents watching in suspense, and an endgame that is as methodical as cellular repair, JustinMatthieu is on a quest to master not only the chessboard but also the delicate interplay of tactics and psychology. While his statistics might look like a quiet lab experiment, his heart beats with the daring spirit of a visionary scientist – always seeking to adapt and overcome challenges.
Whether you're a fellow strategist or merely a curious observer in the grand ecosystem of competitive chess, JustinMatthieu is a reminder that every move on the board is a living, breathing experiment. Keep an eye on him, as with every game, he might just split his way into a fascinating new chapter of his career.
After all, in the world of chess biology, evolution is merely a move away!
Executive snapshot
Your recent blitz play shows a healthy willingness to dive into sharp positions and calculate quickly under pressure. You’ve demonstrated the ability to convert complex middlegame chances into wins, and you also faced some sharp challenges in losses and a drawn game that stayed dynamic. Over the longer term, your rating trend is positive, suggesting steady improvement with continued practice and review.
What you do well
- You actively seek complications when you have the initiative, which can unbalance opponents and create winning chances in blitz.
- Your calculation in tactical melees is strong enough to spot forcing lines and to follow through with concrete sequences.
- You show good piece activity and king safety in middlegames when you’re pressed for time, keeping pressure on your opponent.
- Your openings lean toward sharp, aggressive setups (for example, when you employ aggressive lines you’re comfortable with), which can yield quick wins if your follow‑up stays precise.
Areas to improve
- Time management under blitz. A few games indicate you expend too much time on a promising tactical idea and then run low on time for the rest of the move sequence. Build a simple time budget: quick checks on threats early, reserve deeper calculation for only the most forcing lines.
- Endgame conversion. In longer blitz themes, you sometimes enter murky endgames. Practice standard rook endings, king activity in rook endings, and straightforward pawn endings to convert advantages more reliably.
- Blunder avoidance and pattern recognition. Review games to catch recurring blunders in the opening and middlegame, especially when you’re balancing tactical pressure with material decisions.
- Opening resilience. While your aggressive choices work, add a few solid, quieter responses to common defenses so you’re not forced into overly sharp lines every game.
Opening focus and plan
Your openings indicate a comfort with tactical, head‑line play. That’s a strength, but pairing it with a compact, reliable secondary repertoire can reduce risk when you’re low on time. Consider the following:
- Choose 1–2 reliable replies to the most common defenses in your main openings and study their typical middlegame plans.
- Develop a simple endgame transition plan for your preferred openings so you can convert a middlegame edge into a win more smoothly.
- In blitz, prefer a straightforward plan over improvising too deeply in the opening unless you’re confident in the resulting middlegame structure.
Progress and trends
Your rating gains over 1 month, 3 months, 6 months, and 12 months reflect positive momentum. Maintain this by keeping a regular review routine and implementing small, measurable improvements after each session.
Recommended practice plan (2 weeks)
- Daily tactical puzzles (10–15 minutes) focused on common blitz motifs and mating nets you’ve encountered recently.
- Two opening study sessions per week: drill your main aggressive openings against common defenses, then practice a safer, solid alternative to balance risk.
- Endgame practice (3–4 sessions per week): rook endings, king and pawn endings, and basic minor‑piece endgames.
- Post‑game reviews: analyze one win and one loss/draw each session to identify at least one blunder to avoid and one strategic improvement to apply.
- Time‑management drills: play a 15+2 blitz with a focus on keeping a steady pace, then review how time was spent on critical moves.
🆚 Opponent Insights
| Recent Opponents | ||
|---|---|---|
| technician97 | 0W / 1L / 0D | View |
| esperidion | 1W / 0L / 0D | View |
| trikster_108 | 0W / 1L / 0D | View |
| almoathen1 | 1W / 0L / 0D | View |
| kingvon89 | 1W / 0L / 0D | View |
| abdurhman133646820 | 0W / 1L / 0D | View |
| scalemen | 0W / 1L / 0D | View |
| deltachess | 3W / 8L / 1D | View |
| dlee47 | 1W / 0L / 0D | View |
| bauyrzhankhamitov | 1W / 0L / 0D | View |
| Most Played Opponents | ||
|---|---|---|
| craigio | 192W / 70L / 8D | View Games |
| gemab29 | 115W / 2L / 0D | View Games |
| pocketpower | 27W / 49L / 3D | View Games |
| risingomega | 27W / 15L / 1D | View Games |
| lacroxi | 33W / 5L / 2D | View Games |
Rating
| Year | Bullet | Blitz | Rapid | Daily |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 1303 | 1421 | 1042 | 1120 |
| 2024 | 1272 | 1362 | 968 | 1068 |
| 2023 | 1292 | 1088 | ||
| 2022 | 1374 | 1300 | 1048 | 1073 |
| 2021 | 1372 | 1328 | 1255 | 1127 |
| 2020 | 1365 | 1478 | 1621 | 1233 |
| 2019 | 954 | 1425 | 1521 | 1261 |
| 2018 | 1102 | 1351 | 1270 | |
| 2017 | 1392 | 1357 | 1441 | 1367 |
| 2016 | 1321 | 1439 | ||
| 2015 | 1471 | 1273 | 1391 | |
| 2014 | 1471 | 1271 | 1357 | 1422 |
| 2013 | 1401 | 1268 | 1354 | 1402 |
| 2012 | 1374 | 1311 | 1285 | 1278 |
| 2011 | 1114 | 1150 | 1171 |
Stats by Year
| Year | White | Black | Moves |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 650W / 560L / 37D | 584W / 623L / 35D | 69.6 |
| 2024 | 535W / 410L / 32D | 448W / 485L / 38D | 70.7 |
| 2023 | 610W / 467L / 38D | 514W / 510L / 43D | 72.4 |
| 2022 | 836W / 693L / 67D | 766W / 717L / 57D | 73.4 |
| 2021 | 571W / 509L / 67D | 525W / 564L / 49D | 73.3 |
| 2020 | 656W / 537L / 58D | 580W / 640L / 55D | 73.1 |
| 2019 | 653W / 540L / 51D | 553W / 627L / 51D | 73.5 |
| 2018 | 132W / 104L / 7D | 101W / 139L / 12D | 72.4 |
| 2017 | 513W / 433L / 36D | 441W / 524L / 25D | 73.3 |
| 2016 | 271W / 216L / 13D | 250W / 235L / 24D | 69.5 |
| 2015 | 327W / 286L / 14D | 309W / 303L / 21D | 73.5 |
| 2014 | 526W / 434L / 25D | 500W / 491L / 16D | 70.2 |
| 2013 | 712W / 767L / 54D | 669W / 831L / 41D | 71.1 |
| 2012 | 1593W / 1674L / 87D | 1516W / 1795L / 104D | 68.6 |
| 2011 | 426W / 407L / 37D | 411W / 426L / 35D | 63.2 |
Openings: Most Played
| Blitz Opening | Games | Wins | Losses | Draws | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Amazon Attack | 5297 | 2695 | 2369 | 233 | 50.9% |
| Australian Defense | 1410 | 723 | 632 | 55 | 51.3% |
| Blackburne Shilling Gambit | 1188 | 540 | 610 | 38 | 45.5% |
| Barnes Opening: Walkerling | 891 | 432 | 419 | 40 | 48.5% |
| London System: Poisoned Pawn Variation | 766 | 361 | 363 | 42 | 47.1% |
| Amar Gambit | 736 | 370 | 335 | 31 | 50.3% |
| Scotch Game | 684 | 309 | 348 | 27 | 45.2% |
| Amazon Attack: Siberian Attack | 624 | 295 | 301 | 28 | 47.3% |
| Ruy Lopez | 569 | 275 | 269 | 25 | 48.3% |
| Barnes Defense | 498 | 231 | 254 | 13 | 46.4% |
| Daily Opening | Games | Wins | Losses | Draws | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Amazon Attack | 1782 | 994 | 738 | 50 | 55.8% |
| Blackburne Shilling Gambit | 344 | 142 | 193 | 9 | 41.3% |
| Australian Defense | 344 | 209 | 125 | 10 | 60.8% |
| Amar Gambit | 301 | 190 | 104 | 7 | 63.1% |
| Barnes Opening: Walkerling | 298 | 172 | 121 | 5 | 57.7% |
| Ruy Lopez | 258 | 104 | 146 | 8 | 40.3% |
| London System: Poisoned Pawn Variation | 229 | 115 | 107 | 7 | 50.2% |
| Amazon Attack: Siberian Attack | 187 | 100 | 84 | 3 | 53.5% |
| Scotch Game | 181 | 76 | 101 | 4 | 42.0% |
| Four Knights Game | 112 | 48 | 58 | 6 | 42.9% |
| Rapid Opening | Games | Wins | Losses | Draws | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Barnes Opening: Walkerling | 126 | 52 | 72 | 2 | 41.3% |
| Amazon Attack | 76 | 34 | 41 | 1 | 44.7% |
| Elephant Gambit | 53 | 19 | 31 | 3 | 35.9% |
| Amar Gambit | 46 | 28 | 16 | 2 | 60.9% |
| Philidor Defense | 45 | 21 | 23 | 1 | 46.7% |
| Australian Defense | 44 | 21 | 22 | 1 | 47.7% |
| Barnes Defense | 43 | 23 | 18 | 2 | 53.5% |
| Scandinavian Defense | 39 | 20 | 19 | 0 | 51.3% |
| Scotch Game | 32 | 14 | 16 | 2 | 43.8% |
| Dresden Opening: The Goblin | 27 | 14 | 12 | 1 | 51.9% |
| Bullet Opening | Games | Wins | Losses | Draws | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Amar Gambit | 993 | 462 | 506 | 25 | 46.5% |
| Amazon Attack | 605 | 312 | 281 | 12 | 51.6% |
| Australian Defense | 516 | 250 | 249 | 17 | 48.5% |
| Barnes Opening: Walkerling | 472 | 248 | 212 | 12 | 52.5% |
| Modern | 357 | 155 | 191 | 11 | 43.4% |
| French Defense | 302 | 161 | 136 | 5 | 53.3% |
| Scandinavian Defense | 282 | 147 | 132 | 3 | 52.1% |
| Barnes Defense | 260 | 131 | 123 | 6 | 50.4% |
| Philidor Defense | 201 | 90 | 109 | 2 | 44.8% |
| Czech Defense | 179 | 88 | 89 | 2 | 49.2% |
🔥 Streaks
| Streak | Longest | Current |
|---|---|---|
| Winning | 14 | 0 |
| Losing | 13 | 1 |