Clement Cristian Daianu - The FIDE Master with a Tactical Flair
Meet Clement Cristian Daianu, a chess virtuoso who proudly holds the respected title of FIDE Master. Known across the board as kasparicy, Clement has been crafting checkmate masterpieces since the early 2010s, steadily climbing the ranks with a blend of strategic patience and daring bullet-fire precision.
A Journey Through the Ratings
Starting humbly with a bullet rating just over 1300 in 2012, Clement's dedication quickly became apparent. By 2017, he was regularly pushing past the 2000-rating barrier in blitz, and his peak blitz rating soared to a jaw-dropping 2509 in April 2024. His bullet peak of 2244 came shortly afterward, showcasing his lightning-fast play style. Not to be outdone, his rapid peak rating peaked above 2500 in 2019, proving his prowess isn't confined to just quick moves. The daily chess arena also witnessed his rise with a peak just shy of 2270 in 2025.
Playing Style & Personality
Clement combines a patient endgame approach—spending an average of over 66 moves in victorious battles—with a penchant for dramatic comebacks that would make a Hollywood screenwriter jealous. With a White win rate above 56%, he clearly knows how to take the initiative, but he’s no slouch with the black pieces, maintaining almost a 50% win rate.
Not one to waste time, his early resignation rate is delightfully low (just 2.14%), and his psychological fortitude shines with a comeback rate upwards of 88%. This means when life knocks a piece off the board, Clement pulls off moves that scream, "Plot twist!"
Favorite Openings and Fun Facts
While his repertoire features some top-secret moves (literally named “Top Secret” in databases), Clement has explored classical and dynamic systems such as the Grunfeld Defense Exchange and the Sicilian Defense Delayed Alapin Variation. He's particularly sneaky when playing the Grunfeld Defense Petrosian System, scoring 100% wins in his limited forays there.
Despite such serious chess credentials, Clement has a playful side—his usernames and win rates against countless opponents hint that over the board, he’s a friend and fierce competitor rolled into one. And rumor has it, his opponents have learned never to underestimate the mysterious kasparicy.
Recent Gladiator Battles
In a recent triumph dated June 4, 2025, Clement achieved a checkmate victory against a 2540-rated opponent in a blistering bullet match—ending with a knight's final flourish in the Grunfeld Defense. Checkmate at dawn? Well, it was more like checkmate at 1 AM according to his "best time of day to play."
Of course, even the best stumble, and Clement's recent losses show that time management can be tricky—some games ended on time losses rather than tactical blunders. After all, even FIDE Masters occasionally forget the clock and end up in a race against it!
In Summary
Clement Cristian Daianu is more than a chess player—he’s a strategic artist, a comeback marvel, and a beloved figure in the community of titled players. Whether blitz, bullet, rapid, or daily, his games reveal the heart of a chess warrior who’s here to check, mate, and entertain.
Keep an eye on kasparicy—his next game might just be the move that changes everything!
Strengths in Your Recent Blitz Games
Clement, your recent results demonstrate good tactical awareness and strong opening preparation. Here are some key positives:
- Opening Repertoire: Your familiarity with popular openings, especially the Sicilian Defense and Italian Game, yields above 50% win rates, showing solid theoretical knowledge.
- Pressure in the Midgame: You consistently create threats and leverage piece activity, as seen in your victories where you pushed e5 and f4 to challenge your opponent's coordination.
- Endgame Technique: In games that reach pawn and minor piece endgames, you maintain composure and convert advantages well, frequently winning or pressing your opponents.
- Time Management: You win some games on time, suggesting you continue to play quickly and put pressure on opponents in blitz situations.
Areas to Improve for Better Results
Your recent losses and rating trends indicate opportunities for growth. Consider focusing on these aspects:
- Handling the Gruenfeld Exchange Variation: Your win rate here is just over 30%. It might be worthwhile to deepen your understanding or choose alternative systems to improve results with this opening.
- Maintaining Consistency: While you have strong games, occasional big rating drops over 6-12 months suggest inconsistency. Analyze losses to identify recurring tactical oversights or strategic errors.
- Time Pressure Tactics: You occasionally lose on time despite solid positions. Practicing faster calculation and decision-making under time constraints will help avoid these losses.
- Expand Endgame Knowledge: Continue sharpening your endgame skills as this often decides blitz games. Studying technique in rook and minor piece endgames can increase conversion rates.
Practical Improvement Tips
To make tangible progress in blitz, you may want to try the following:
- Review Key Losses: Go over recent losses especially against strong opponents like GM_Donatello or similarly rated players to find critical mistakes.
- Diversify Opening Preparation: Strengthen weaker openings or consider sideline variations that can surprise opponents.
- Blitz-Specific Training: Practice tactical puzzles with short time limits to improve speed and accuracy.
- Endgame Drills: Spend 10-15 minutes daily reviewing basic theoretical endgames to build confidence in final positions.
- Manage Time Better: Work on intuitive moves in familiar positions to reduce clock pressure in critical moments.
Summary
Your recent rating improvements reflect your hard work and strong skill foundation. Continued focus on consistency, time management, and targeted opening study will help maintain and elevate your performance in blitz. Keep leveraging your tactical sharpness and endgame skills, and enjoy your games!
🆚 Opponent Insights
| Recent Opponents | ||
|---|---|---|
| Gasan Guliev | 1W / 3L / 0D | |
| Mahdi Gholami Orimi | 0W / 1L / 0D | |
| Antoni Kozak | 0W / 1L / 0D | |
| Pranav V | 0W / 1L / 1D | |
| imnot_him1 | 0W / 1L / 0D | |
| whatt189 | 1W / 0L / 0D | |
| akadir60 | 0W / 1L / 0D | |
| anoxiccial_gm | 1W / 0L / 0D | |
| taanish_0277 | 1W / 0L / 0D | |
| robertoruiizz | 1W / 0L / 0D | |
| Most Played Opponents | ||
|---|---|---|
| masina89 | 76W / 127L / 17D | |
| morozevich99 | 11W / 22L / 1D | |
| Slave Trajkoski | 11W / 5L / 3D | |
| Daniel Barria | 1W / 17L / 0D | |
| stoleriu | 4W / 11L / 3D | |
Rating
| Year | Bullet | Blitz | Rapid | Daily |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 1983 | 2538 | 2231 | 1860 |
| 2024 | 1882 | 2485 | ||
| 2023 | 2241 | 2488 | ||
| 2022 | 2030 | 2370 | 2224 | 2267 |
| 2021 | 2143 | 2338 | 2253 | 2178 |
| 2020 | 2152 | 2368 | 2377 | 2264 |
| 2019 | 2060 | 2272 | 2017 | |
| 2018 | 1975 | 2328 | ||
| 2017 | 1925 | 2217 | 1350 | |
| 2016 | 1781 | 1984 | ||
| 2014 | 1608 | 1376 | ||
| 2012 | 1416 |
Stats by Year
| Year | White | Black | Moves |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 95W / 57L / 7D | 89W / 60L / 4D | 68.7 |
| 2024 | 33W / 19L / 4D | 32W / 21L / 2D | 62.3 |
| 2023 | 38W / 12L / 2D | 35W / 19L / 2D | 69.7 |
| 2022 | 135W / 46L / 5D | 127W / 46L / 11D | 70.1 |
| 2021 | 92W / 53L / 14D | 81W / 64L / 14D | 70.9 |
| 2020 | 984W / 639L / 115D | 849W / 740L / 153D | 71.0 |
| 2019 | 260W / 191L / 44D | 225W / 239L / 30D | 67.4 |
| 2018 | 146W / 119L / 12D | 125W / 133L / 20D | 70.6 |
| 2017 | 453W / 361L / 17D | 415W / 405L / 23D | 66.7 |
| 2016 | 14W / 2L / 0D | 11W / 4L / 0D | 66.3 |
| 2014 | 3W / 0L / 0D | 4W / 1L / 0D | 59.5 |
| 2012 | 1W / 0L / 0D | 1W / 0L / 0D | 45.5 |
Openings: Most Played
| Bullet Opening | Games | Wins | Losses | Draws | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Czech Defense | 162 | 97 | 59 | 6 | 59.9% |
| Sicilian Defense | 155 | 104 | 46 | 5 | 67.1% |
| Scandinavian Defense | 150 | 90 | 57 | 3 | 60.0% |
| Caro-Kann Defense | 140 | 93 | 44 | 3 | 66.4% |
| Sicilian Defense: Najdorf Variation | 112 | 66 | 43 | 3 | 58.9% |
| Italian Game: Two Knights Defense | 103 | 69 | 27 | 7 | 67.0% |
| Amar Gambit | 101 | 62 | 35 | 4 | 61.4% |
| East Indian Defense | 97 | 29 | 62 | 6 | 29.9% |
| Barnes Defense | 91 | 61 | 27 | 3 | 67.0% |
| Modern | 71 | 36 | 34 | 1 | 50.7% |
| Blitz Opening | Games | Wins | Losses | Draws | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sicilian Defense: Najdorf Variation | 354 | 191 | 147 | 16 | 54.0% |
| Italian Game: Two Knights Defense | 235 | 132 | 85 | 18 | 56.2% |
| Caro-Kann Defense | 210 | 106 | 90 | 14 | 50.5% |
| Sicilian Defense | 191 | 93 | 87 | 11 | 48.7% |
| Gruenfeld: Exchange Variation | 142 | 44 | 79 | 19 | 31.0% |
| Sicilian Defense: Scheveningen Variation | 120 | 56 | 58 | 6 | 46.7% |
| Czech Defense | 118 | 60 | 46 | 12 | 50.9% |
| French Defense: Tarrasch Variation, Botvinnik Variation | 112 | 63 | 39 | 10 | 56.2% |
| Scandinavian Defense | 111 | 59 | 39 | 13 | 53.1% |
| Sicilian Defense: Closed | 107 | 41 | 56 | 10 | 38.3% |
| Daily Opening | Games | Wins | Losses | Draws | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sicilian Defense: Najdorf Variation | 8 | 8 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| Sicilian Defense: Scheveningen Variation | 6 | 5 | 0 | 1 | 83.3% |
| Barnes Defense | 6 | 6 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| Italian Game: Two Knights Defense | 4 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 50.0% |
| Caro-Kann Defense | 4 | 3 | 0 | 1 | 75.0% |
| Unknown | 4 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| Sicilian Defense: Dragon Variation | 3 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 33.3% |
| Sicilian Defense: Sozin Attack | 3 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 33.3% |
| Amazon Attack | 3 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 66.7% |
| Dutch Defense: Classical Variation | 2 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 50.0% |
| Rapid Opening | Games | Wins | Losses | Draws | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Caro-Kann Defense | 13 | 8 | 3 | 2 | 61.5% |
| Sicilian Defense: Najdorf Variation | 10 | 7 | 2 | 1 | 70.0% |
| Italian Game: Two Knights Defense | 9 | 7 | 2 | 0 | 77.8% |
| Amar Gambit | 9 | 5 | 2 | 2 | 55.6% |
| Czech Defense | 7 | 6 | 1 | 0 | 85.7% |
| French Defense: Tarrasch Variation, Botvinnik Variation | 6 | 3 | 2 | 1 | 50.0% |
| Gruenfeld: Exchange Variation | 5 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 40.0% |
| Sicilian Defense: Kan Variation | 5 | 4 | 1 | 0 | 80.0% |
| Scandinavian Defense | 5 | 3 | 0 | 2 | 60.0% |
| East Indian Defense | 5 | 3 | 0 | 2 | 60.0% |
🔥 Streaks
| Streak | Longest | Current |
|---|---|---|
| Winning | 27 | 0 |
| Losing | 12 | 1 |