Kassa Korley: The Chess Maverick aka "kassablanca"
Meet Kassa Korley, an International Master by title and a blitz beast by reputation. Known online as kassablanca, Kassa commands the chessboard with a style as dynamic and unpredictable as their ever-evolving rating.
Kassa's chess journey started humbly in the early 2010s with blitz ratings barely scraping 1377, but persistence pays off — by 2023, Kassa blitzed their way up to a smashing peak rating of 2828. Bullet fans might recognize them from their lightning-fast games, boasting a personal best bullet rating north of 2600, demonstrating nerves of steel and thumbs to match.
With an impressive longest winning streak of 17 games and an uncanny ability to come back after setbacks (a comeback rate of over 91%), Kassa has shown resilience equal parts chess genius and a stubborn refusal to admit defeat. Oh, and did we mention Kassa has a 100% win rate after losing a piece? Talk about making lemonade out of pawns!
Known for grinding out lengthy fights—with average wins and losses hovering around 79 moves—this player thrives in complex, tactical endgames, reflecting an expertise in outmaneuvering opponents when it matters most. White or black, Kassa’s win rates hold steady, proving versatility is their middle name.
Off the board, Kassa’s psychological statistics reveal a modest tilt factor (19), which, for a fast-paced blitz and bullet player, means they maintain their cool better than most. They’re a strategic thinker who’s clearly learned to balance the thrill of the game with a cool head.
Beyond the numbers, Kassa loves embracing the mystery of the “Top Secret” openings — maybe because secret strategies keep the opponents guessing and Kassa smiling. Add in an array of opponents—from chess titans to casual surprise challengers—and you’ve got someone who truly plays to win, and to entertain.
Whether it's a quick bullet skirmish or a marathon blitz battle, Kassa Korley keeps proving that chess is not just a game but a battleground for brilliance, nerve, and a little bit of fun. So next time you see "kassablanca" online, get ready — the game might just get delightfully unpredictable.
Quick summary
Nice session — you’re finding active piece play and exploitation of loose queenside structures in your wins, but a few recurring tactical and time-management issues are costing you in blitz. Below are focused, practical steps to turn the positives into a steadier score.
What you did well (concrete examples)
- You attacked quickly on the queenside and used open files effectively — rooks on the b‑file and a timely rook on the c6 square in your recent win created decisive pressure. (See the short replay below.)
- Good sense for simplification when ahead: you traded into a winning endgame instead of forcing complicated tactics that could give counterplay.
- Opening choices suit blitz: you play solid, reliable systems (for example Caro-Kann Defense and the English structures) that give you clear plans and fewer early surprises.
Recurring weaknesses to fix
- Tactical hygiene: a pattern of missing a short combination around the b5/c5 squares — you allowed opponents to win material after a knight/queen tactic in a recent loss. Slow down by one tempo when the board becomes unbalanced.
- Time management under 30 seconds: several games show you drifting very low on the clock in the middlegame. When your clock falls below ~20–30s you start making mechanical recaptures that don’t always work.
- Overcommitting pawns on the flank: a couple of games had premature pawn pushes (a‑ and b‑pawns) that created targets and open files for the opponent’s rooks. Fight the urge to grab space if it weakens squares or leaves pieces undefended.
Concrete tactical and positional drills (daily blitz routine)
- 15 minutes: Tactics trainer — focus on motifs: forks, back-rank, knight forks, and X‑ray/skewer patterns around b5/c6 squares.
- 10 minutes: 3‑minute mini‑sessions vs engine or a training partner — practice keeping 30–40 seconds as a “safety threshold” (stop and spend time if you drop below it).
- 10 minutes: Endgame fundamentals — rook + pawn endgames and basic rook activity on the 7th rank. Convert +1 rook or pawn advantages cleanly.
- Weekly: One longer rapid game (15+10) where you practice converting slight advantages without time panic.
Blitz-specific game plan (in-game checklist)
- Opening: play the first 8–12 moves by plan, not calculating new variations — use your well‑known setups (Caro-Kann Defense etc.) to save clock.
- Middlegame: if a position becomes tactically unclear, simplify (exchange minor pieces) and keep the clock above 25s — trade down rather than guess in time trouble.
- Tactics pause: before every capture or queen move, do a two-second “safety scan” for enemy forks, discovered checks, and pins.
- Endgame: when ahead, aim for active rook(s) and passed pawns — if behind, trade to reduce opponent’s imbalances and play for swindles only when safe on the clock.
Short training plan (2–4 week focus)
- Week 1: Tactic motifs around forks and knight jumps — 50 puzzles/day, pattern recognition only.
- Week 2: Rook endgames and activity — 20 minutes/day of endgame drills plus 3 rapid games practicing conversion.
- Week 3: Time management drills — play 20 blitz games with the explicit rule: stop and spend extra time if under 25s once per game; review three lost-on-time or time-trouble games.
- Week 4: Opening tuning — pick your top 3 blitz openings (from your Openings Performance) and create 1-page plans for typical middlegames and typical pawn breaks.
Practical tweaks to implement immediately
- Before each game: 10–15 seconds to choose an opening line and a simple plan for move 8 and move 15 — this prevents early time bleed.
- Use the “safety scan” on every capture or piece that moves to an attacked square (2–3 seconds).
- Avoid automatic pre-moves when material is imbalanced — pre‑moves are fine in equal, dry positions but dangerous when tactics exist.
- Review one lost game per day — annotate why you lost material or the thread of tactics that you missed.
Replays — quick study
Win vs yuxiliang — focus: queenside rook invasion and simplification into winning endgame.
Loss vs Zdenko Kozul — focus: tactical sequence around b5/c5; check for knight forks and queen tactics before recapturing.
Next steps — quick checklist
- Today: 30 minutes of tactics + 10 blitz games (3|0), apply the 2s safety scan before captures.
- This week: annotate 3 losses and 3 wins — write down the single turning moment in each game.
- Report back next week with one annotated game and I’ll give a focused follow-up plan.
Small motivational note
You have strong opening foundations and the ability to convert — tightening tactical checks and a slight change to time habits will raise your blitz consistency a lot. Keep the momentum and focus one small habit at a time.
🆚 Opponent Insights
| Recent Opponents | ||
|---|---|---|
| adam657 | 9W / 6L / 1D | |
| Zdenko Kozul | 0W / 1L / 0D | |
| Феликс Тульчинский | 1W / 1L / 0D | |
| Julian Antonio Rojas Alarcon | 2W / 0L / 0D | |
| Lucas Cumpe | 2W / 0L / 0D | |
| Aron Pasti | 1W / 0L / 1D | |
| Vitaliy Bernadskiy | 0W / 1L / 0D | |
| Vitezslav Rasik | 0W / 0L / 1D | |
| Ян Дьомін | 1W / 0L / 0D | |
| yuxiliang | 4W / 5L / 0D | |
| Most Played Opponents | ||
|---|---|---|
| MasterLeif | 74W / 95L / 11D | |
| Cemil Aghamaliyev | 17W / 14L / 2D | |
| Tamaz Mgeladze | 12W / 16L / 3D | |
| zakaryan_david | 14W / 10L / 0D | |
| Zoran Avramovic | 17W / 5L / 1D | |
Rating
| Year | Bullet | Blitz | Rapid | Daily |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 2872 | |||
| 2024 | 2604 | 2693 | 865 | |
| 2023 | 2784 | 2357 | ||
| 2022 | 2743 | |||
| 2021 | 2353 | |||
| 2020 | 2589 | |||
| 2019 | 2563 | |||
| 2018 | 2525 | |||
| 2017 | 2487 | 2452 | 738 | |
| 2016 | 1738 | 2025 | ||
| 2015 | 2081 | 1679 | ||
| 2014 | 2025 | 1916 | ||
| 2012 | 2018 | 1362 |
Stats by Year
| Year | White | Black | Moves |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 61W / 43L / 16D | 68W / 37L / 12D | 83.4 |
| 2024 | 53W / 17L / 3D | 48W / 13L / 5D | 83.1 |
| 2023 | 2W / 1L / 0D | 2W / 0L / 0D | 58.2 |
| 2022 | 1W / 0L / 0D | 2W / 0L / 0D | 79.0 |
| 2021 | 1W / 1L / 0D | 2W / 0L / 0D | 103.8 |
| 2020 | 24W / 25L / 4D | 25W / 24L / 4D | 88.2 |
| 2019 | 12W / 10L / 1D | 11W / 11L / 2D | 80.3 |
| 2018 | 18W / 19L / 4D | 17W / 21L / 3D | 81.9 |
| 2017 | 166W / 136L / 21D | 151W / 152L / 16D | 82.0 |
| 2016 | 4W / 0L / 0D | 1W / 2L / 0D | 67.1 |
| 2015 | 6W / 4L / 2D | 9W / 3L / 0D | 61.1 |
| 2014 | 10W / 5L / 1D | 6W / 8L / 2D | 76.1 |
| 2012 | 20W / 6L / 0D | 17W / 8L / 1D | 69.9 |
Openings: Most Played
| Blitz Opening | Games | Wins | Losses | Draws | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Caro-Kann Defense | 97 | 50 | 39 | 8 | 51.5% |
| Amar Gambit | 49 | 24 | 23 | 2 | 49.0% |
| London System: Poisoned Pawn Variation | 34 | 18 | 14 | 2 | 52.9% |
| Amazon Attack | 32 | 21 | 10 | 1 | 65.6% |
| Hungarian Opening: Wiedenhagen-Beta Gambit | 29 | 15 | 11 | 3 | 51.7% |
| Amazon Attack: Siberian Attack | 25 | 11 | 13 | 1 | 44.0% |
| Colle System: Rhamphorhynchus Variation | 22 | 13 | 8 | 1 | 59.1% |
| Döry Defense | 21 | 10 | 8 | 3 | 47.6% |
| English Opening: Agincourt Defense | 19 | 8 | 9 | 2 | 42.1% |
| Sicilian Defense | 14 | 9 | 3 | 2 | 64.3% |
| Bullet Opening | Games | Wins | Losses | Draws | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nimzo-Larsen Attack | 31 | 15 | 16 | 0 | 48.4% |
| Colle System: Rhamphorhynchus Variation | 23 | 11 | 12 | 0 | 47.8% |
| Caro-Kann Defense | 21 | 12 | 9 | 0 | 57.1% |
| Amar Gambit | 15 | 11 | 4 | 0 | 73.3% |
| London System: Poisoned Pawn Variation | 12 | 3 | 8 | 1 | 25.0% |
| Amazon Attack | 10 | 5 | 4 | 1 | 50.0% |
| Slav Defense: Alekhine Variation | 9 | 4 | 5 | 0 | 44.4% |
| Scandinavian Defense | 8 | 5 | 3 | 0 | 62.5% |
| Blackburne Shilling Gambit | 8 | 4 | 3 | 1 | 50.0% |
| Czech Defense | 8 | 4 | 4 | 0 | 50.0% |
| Daily Opening | Games | Wins | Losses | Draws | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| King's Indian Attack: French Variation | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| English Opening: King's English Variation | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0.0% |
| Rapid Opening | Games | Wins | Losses | Draws | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Barnes Defense | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| QGD: 3.Nc3 Bb4 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| Catalan Opening | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0.0% |
| QGD: Exchange, 5.Bg5 c6 6.Qc2 g6 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| Neo-Gruenfeld, 6.O-O c6 7.b3 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| Petrov's Defense | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| Sicilian Defense: Najdorf Variation | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0.0% |
| Caro-Kann Defense | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| Benoni Defense | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0.0% |
| Diemer-Duhm Gambit (DDG): 4...f5 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
🔥 Streaks
| Streak | Longest | Current |
|---|---|---|
| Winning | 17 | 0 |
| Losing | 10 | 2 |