Profile Summary: Kamen (aka kinkikonki)
Meet Kamen, a chess warrior navigating the endless battlefield of pawns, knights, and highly strategic knights versus bishops battles. Known in the chess realm by the alias kinkikonki, Kamen’s rating journey reads like an epic saga sprinkled with heroic comebacks and thrilling battles.
Starting modestly in 2015 with a bullet rating around 1300 (rookie days, don’t ask), Kamen has steadily hustled through the ranks, cracking the 2100 mark by late 2024! Not too shabby for someone who must have developed at least partial immunity to the infamous bullet blunder bug.
This player’s modus operandi in bullet chess involves aggressive use of favorite openings like the Sicilian Defense Najdorf and the King’s Indian Attack, with win rates flirting comfortably above 50% in these fierce arenas. In blitz and rapid games, Kamen doesn’t shy from spicy lines either, often cooking up some Alapin Sicilian Defense or unleashing the French Defense for opponents' nightmares.
Kamen's style is a balanced mix of resilience and patience – boasting a comeback rate of nearly 86%, which means surrendering is rarely an option (except maybe after a coffee spill mid-game). Games tend to run deep, with an average of over 70 moves per win, demonstrating Kamen’s love for the long, tactical grind rather than quick-fix sacrifices.
A quirky psychological tidbit: Kamen’s best chess hours are those eerie 1 AM sessions, when lesser mortals are asleep, and true strategists plot their victories. Early resignation rate is low (1.26%), so don't expect Kamen to pack up just because things get spicy.
Notable recent achievements include a slick victory using the French Defense Tarrasch Closed line, where kinkikonki pulled off a neat checkmate in under 40 moves, and a dramatic bullet win by resignation against an opponent ranked close to 1900.
Off the board, Kamen is probably plotting the next great opening buffet, or is contemplating whether the knight's tricky hops are a metaphor for life. Watch out for this player – a cunning tactician who's all about “To blunder or not to blunder?” and usually opts for the latter! 🏆♟️
What went well in your recent rapid games
You’re clearly comfortable playing aggressive, unbalanced positions and keeping the opponent under pressure. In several of your Sicilian-influenced games, you generated practical chances by activating rooks and knights and by creating threats that forced your opponent to find defensive resources. Your willingness to engage in sharp middlegames helps you seize initiative rather than passively defending.
- You often choose dynamic openings that lead to lively, tactical middlegames where you can outmaneuver slower setups.
- Your piece activity is a strength—knights and rooks frequently reach central or open-file squares with practical attacking potential.
- You show resilience in complex positions and can press when your opponent makes inaccuracies or structural concessions.
Key improvement areas
- Conversion of advantages: In several games you reach promising middlegame chances but then struggle to convert them into a tangible material or positional edge. Focus on identifying a clear plan in the first phase of the middlegame and sticking to it rather than trading into simpler positions too soon.
- Endgame technique: When the game simplifies, a targeted endgame practice will help you translate pressure into a win. Work on common rook- and minor-piece endgames and learn the typical pawn structures that arise after your chosen openings.
- Tactical discipline: Your games feature many tactical moments. Improve readiness to spot forced lines and check candidates with a quick cross-check (every move should have a concrete purpose). Regular tactic drills focusing on forks, pins, skewers, and overloading can reduce missed opportunities.
- Time management in complex positions: In some long, sharp middlegames you spend extra time calculating, which can lead to time trouble later. Develop a routine to allocate a fixed calculation window in critical positions and keep a simple fallback plan if no clear line appears.
Opening choices and midgame plans
Your results show strength in aggressive Sicilian-type lines and other dynamic openings. That suits a combat-oriented style, but having a consistent plan in each opening will help you convert more games. Consider these practical ideas:
- In the Sicilian and similar sharp openings, aim to control central squares and prepare a clear second-phase plan (for example, target the center with timely pawn breaks, coordinate rooks on open files, and seek active piece trades only when they improve your structure).
- For openings with symmetrical or solid setups, have a simple, repeatable plan (e.g., develop pieces to natural squares, castle safely, and seek a pawn break or a tactical escalation if the opponent overextends).
- Continue with the openings that seem to suit your style (the data shows solid results in several dynamic lines). Pair them with a concrete middlegame plan to turn activity into material or positional gains.
Practice and study plan
- Daily tactic focus: 15–20 minutes of puzzles targeting common motifs (forks, pins, skewers, and overloading). This reinforces the calculation discipline you need in sharp middlegames.
- Weekly game review: Pick your 1–2 most challenging recent games. Identify the first turning point where a plan was unclear or a tactical shot swung the result, and write down the correct plan you should have followed.
- Endgame drills: Practice rook endings and basic pawn endings (e.g., king and rook vs king, rook endings with pawns on opposite wings). This will improve your conversion in tighter games.
- Opening consolidation: Choose 2–3 main lines for your White repertoire and 2–3 for Black. Learn the typical middlegame plans and common pawn structures in each, so you can execute a plan rather than just following moves.
Suggested next steps
- Schedule a short review after each rapid game: note the first critical decision point and the best alternative line you could have played.
- Integrate a 2-week cycle focusing on tactics, endgames, and one or two openings that fit your style. After two weeks, reassess your strength-adjusted win rate indicators by noting which areas improved most.
- If you’d like, I can tailor a personalized study outline around your preferred openings and typical middlegame plans. kamen
🆚 Opponent Insights
| Recent Opponents | ||
|---|---|---|
| halasijozsef | 0W / 1L / 0D | View |
| lossocitos | 0W / 1L / 0D | View |
| swankygoat247 | 1W / 0L / 0D | View |
| man_iwantapple | 0W / 1L / 0D | View |
| kamimoto1 | 1W / 0L / 0D | View |
| ferdjinio | 1W / 1L / 0D | View |
| niclasottenklev | 1W / 0L / 0D | View |
| mohammad moghadas jafari | 0W / 1L / 0D | View |
| 2framos | 1W / 0L / 0D | View |
| mario-1002 | 0W / 1L / 0D | View |
| Most Played Opponents | ||
|---|---|---|
| ministrebakistanais | 14W / 27L / 0D | View Games |
| nnissimus | 23W / 17L / 1D | View Games |
| pkv | 15W / 16L / 2D | View Games |
| p_champ | 13W / 16L / 1D | View Games |
| viktor516 | 11W / 19L / 0D | View Games |
Rating
| Year | Bullet | Blitz | Rapid | Daily |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 2081 | 2062 | ||
| 2024 | 2065 | 1993 | ||
| 2023 | 1943 | 1897 | ||
| 2022 | 1958 | 1900 | ||
| 2021 | 1847 | 1894 | 2006 | |
| 2020 | 1935 | 1969 | 1795 | 2025 |
| 2019 | 1766 | 1799 | 2121 | |
| 2018 | 1750 | 1820 | 2105 | |
| 2017 | 1825 | 1816 | 1915 | 2077 |
| 2016 | 1604 | 1843 | 1781 | 2116 |
| 2015 | 1515 | 1755 | 1744 | 1440 |
Stats by Year
| Year | White | Black | Moves |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 762W / 763L / 89D | 676W / 853L / 72D | 78.4 |
| 2024 | 468W / 547L / 85D | 487W / 549L / 59D | 78.0 |
| 2023 | 525W / 468L / 53D | 482W / 521L / 46D | 78.7 |
| 2022 | 247W / 242L / 37D | 225W / 261L / 30D | 77.2 |
| 2021 | 881W / 814L / 64D | 876W / 846L / 74D | 74.7 |
| 2020 | 758W / 706L / 74D | 752W / 730L / 73D | 75.5 |
| 2019 | 764W / 774L / 79D | 812W / 747L / 73D | 73.0 |
| 2018 | 885W / 868L / 93D | 865W / 907L / 68D | 74.4 |
| 2017 | 345W / 346L / 40D | 341W / 360L / 30D | 72.9 |
| 2016 | 34W / 20L / 11D | 42W / 13L / 2D | 73.6 |
| 2015 | 102W / 81L / 5D | 100W / 73L / 8D | 73.1 |
Openings: Most Played
| Bullet Opening | Games | Wins | Losses | Draws | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sicilian Defense | 1201 | 572 | 586 | 43 | 47.6% |
| Colle System: Rhamphorhynchus Variation | 979 | 489 | 447 | 43 | 50.0% |
| Amar Gambit | 862 | 424 | 384 | 54 | 49.2% |
| Hungarian Opening: Wiedenhagen-Beta Gambit | 742 | 365 | 332 | 45 | 49.2% |
| Sicilian Defense: Najdorf Variation | 588 | 318 | 247 | 23 | 54.1% |
| Amazon Attack: Siberian Attack | 575 | 269 | 286 | 20 | 46.8% |
| Scandinavian Defense | 519 | 220 | 273 | 26 | 42.4% |
| Sicilian Defense: Closed | 482 | 216 | 243 | 23 | 44.8% |
| Döry Defense | 477 | 217 | 230 | 30 | 45.5% |
| English Opening: Agincourt Defense | 390 | 194 | 180 | 16 | 49.7% |
| Daily Opening | Games | Wins | Losses | Draws | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sicilian Defense: Najdorf Variation | 10 | 5 | 3 | 2 | 50.0% |
| Ruy Lopez: Closed | 7 | 6 | 1 | 0 | 85.7% |
| Sicilian Defense | 5 | 1 | 3 | 1 | 20.0% |
| Sicilian Defense: Dragon Variation, Accelerated Dragon | 4 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 50.0% |
| Barnes Defense | 4 | 0 | 4 | 0 | 0.0% |
| Caro-Kann Defense: Classical Variation | 4 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 25.0% |
| Philidor Defense | 3 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 33.3% |
| French Defense: Tarrasch Variation, Chistyakov Defense | 3 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 66.7% |
| Ruy Lopez | 3 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 33.3% |
| Sicilian Defense: Four Knights Variation, Cobra Variation | 3 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 33.3% |
| Blitz Opening | Games | Wins | Losses | Draws | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sicilian Defense | 474 | 224 | 229 | 21 | 47.3% |
| Sicilian Defense: Najdorf Variation | 452 | 211 | 228 | 13 | 46.7% |
| Scandinavian Defense | 244 | 110 | 122 | 12 | 45.1% |
| Amazon Attack: Siberian Attack | 219 | 93 | 113 | 13 | 42.5% |
| Sicilian Defense: Alapin Variation | 182 | 81 | 89 | 12 | 44.5% |
| Caro-Kann Defense | 160 | 74 | 73 | 13 | 46.2% |
| Sicilian Defense: Closed | 155 | 76 | 68 | 11 | 49.0% |
| Barnes Defense | 136 | 76 | 53 | 7 | 55.9% |
| Bird Opening: Dutch Variation, Batavo Gambit | 121 | 73 | 47 | 1 | 60.3% |
| Alekhine Defense | 120 | 40 | 75 | 5 | 33.3% |
| Rapid Opening | Games | Wins | Losses | Draws | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sicilian Defense: Najdorf Variation, Main Line | 3 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 33.3% |
| Barnes Defense | 3 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 33.3% |
| Bird Opening: Dutch Variation, Batavo Gambit | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| Philidor Defense | 2 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 50.0% |
| Sicilian Defense | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| Sicilian Defense: Closed | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| Catalan Opening | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0.0% |
| French Defense: Tarrasch Variation, Closed Variation, Main Line | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0.0% |
| Ruy Lopez: Bird's Defense Deferred | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0.0% |
| QGD: Exchange, 5.Bg5 c6 6.Qc2 g6 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
🔥 Streaks
| Streak | Longest | Current |
|---|---|---|
| Winning | 13 | 0 |
| Losing | 13 | 2 |