Grandmaster Yago De Moura Santiago (aka Kira170)
Meet Yago De Moura Santiago, a chess virtuoso who has earned the prestigious title of Grandmaster from FIDE. Known in the chess world as Kira170, Yago is not just a player but a relentless strategist and an unstoppable force across the chessboard.
A Journey Through the Ranks
Yago’s rise in the chess universe has been nothing short of spectacular. Blitz is where their lightning-fast tactics truly shine, boasting a peak rating of 2855 achieved on a chilly January day in 2024. Bullet play is no less impressive with a top rating of 2770. Even the more ponderous Daily games and Rapid formats have seen Yago reach lofty heights, peaking at 2026 and 2498 respectively.
Playing Style & Stamina
Yago’s strategy combines endurance and explosiveness. Averaging over 80 moves per win means this Grandmaster is no fan of quickies — patience and precision are their allies. They are known for a stellar 90.42% comeback rate, almost like a chess phoenix rising from the ashes after losing a piece. Resignation is surprisingly rare for Yago as they always keep the fight alive until the very end.
Opening Secrets
While Yago experiments with an intriguing array of openings, the Top Secret opening (okay, maybe not so secret anymore) has brought them slightly above 50% wins in blitz and bullet games. The King's Fianchetto Opening and its Slav variation have also proven to be a part of their tactical repertoire — after all, who doesn’t want to castle into victory? Yago does occasionally dabble in the French Defense and the occasional Sicilian for spice.
Fun Fact
This Grandmaster has a love-hate relationship with their clock — their play peaks around morning hours like 8 AM and shows an uncanny ability to play well even when the clock is ticking down aggressively. But beware: their tilt factor is only about a humble 12%, proving that Yago can keep cool when the heat is on.
Recently on the Board
In a recent blitz encounter, Kira170 dazzled with the King's Fianchetto Opening, gracefully weaving positional finesse to force their opponent’s resignation in just 25 moves. Against aravbaid3105, this game was a textbook example of calculated pressure, patience, and positional prowess.
Not every battle is a victory though — a recent tussle against mmmflatbread saw Yago on the losing end due to a well-timed sneak attack in the Sicilian Defense's Nimzowitsch Variation. But even in defeat, the games highlight their fighting spirit and deep understanding of the game’s complexities.
Rivals & Allies
Among Yago’s fiercest rivals are evandro_barbosa (over 185 games played!) and gmkrikor, both presenting stern challenges. Yet for every tough matchup, Yago has recorded wins with strategic precision, making each encounter a learning experience.
Summary
With a career rich in battle-tested skill, resilience, and a pinch of mystery, Yago De Moura Santiago continues to impress, inspire, and entertain the chess community worldwide. Whether blitzing through opponents or plotting masterful endgames, Kira170 keeps one eye on the clock and the other on glory!
Recent Game Strengths
You have demonstrated strong positional understanding and solid play in your recent blitz games. The strategic use of fianchetto structures and central pawn control stood out, particularly in games where you fought with the King's Indian Defense and Modern Defense structures. You effectively leveraged your openings, maintaining pressure and creating opportunities with well-timed pawn breaks and piece activations.
- Your implementation of the fianchetto setups was consistently reliable under time pressure.
- Good execution in converting advantages in the middlegame, especially when creating passed pawns and advancing them in winning positions.
- Active piece play and dynamic responses to opponent threats improved your control during sharp tactical sequences.
Improvement Opportunities
While your games show a strong foundation, several areas could benefit from focused improvement to raise your blitz results further:
- Handling tactical complications: In losses, some decisive turning points came from allowing tactical shots or missing defensive resources. Practicing combinational calculations and defensive puzzles can help reduce these errors.
- Time management: In rapid simplicity, there were moments where time trouble influenced the quality of moves. Work on faster evaluation techniques during the opening and early middlegame to conserve time for critical moments.
- Opening diversity: Although you have a good record in openings like the Amazon Attack and French Defense, consider broadening your repertoire or deepening your theory knowledge, especially for replies to less common systems your opponents use, to avoid matched unfavorable positions early on.
- Endgame technique: Some close endings slipped away potentially due to small inaccuracies. Additional focused endgame drills in rook and pawn endings, as well as minor piece endings, can solidify your conversion skills.
Performance Trends and Stats
Your recent rating trend is positive, with a healthy upward trajectory over 3 to 12 months, reflecting your consistent effort and improvement:
- Strength Adjusted Win Rate: approximately 49.8%, indicating competitive performance at your level.
- Recent Rating Change: Minor dip of 10 points over the last month, but positive slope suggests the trend is still upward.
- Increase over past 6 months by 64 points shows solid progress — keep building on this.
Your preferred openings show you perform well in positions requiring strategic finesse, particularly with the Amazon Attack, French Defense: Tarrasch Variation, and Czech Defense. Your win rates above 50% in these lines verify good preparation and understanding.
Next Steps for Improvement
To continue your progression, consider these targeted steps:
- Deepen Tactical Training: Incorporate daily puzzle solving focusing on middle game tactics involving forks, pins, skewers, and discovered attacks.
- Optimize Opening Preparation: Review your main openings against current master-level theory to refine plans and avoid known pitfalls.
- Play Regular Longer Games: Occasionally playing longer time controls will improve your calculation and strategic planning capacity.
- Endgame Study: Spend time on theoretical endgames, which are often the difference in blitz deciding positions.
- Analyze Losses: Continue reviewing lost games to identify recurring weaknesses in both tactical and positional play.
With your solid foundation and steady progress trend, adopting consistent training routines targeting these areas will likely yield noticeable improvement in your blitz results.
🆚 Opponent Insights
| Most Played Opponents | ||
|---|---|---|
| Evandro Amorim Barbosa | 117W / 62L / 6D | View Games |
| Krikor Sevag Mekhitarian | 23W / 41L / 5D | View Games |
| leobispo83 | 39W / 15L / 2D | View Games |
| Renato Quintiliano | 23W / 28L / 4D | View Games |
| Ivan Mesquita V. Gonçalves | 18W / 15L / 10D | View Games |
Rating
| Year | Bullet | Blitz | Rapid | Daily |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 2638 | 2773 | 2368 | |
| 2024 | 2654 | 2709 | 2368 | |
| 2023 | 2628 | 2729 | 2316 | |
| 2022 | 2609 | 2498 | ||
| 2021 | 2722 | 2637 | 1528 | |
| 2020 | 2481 | 2635 | 2479 | 1865 |
| 2019 | 2477 | 2720 | 2400 | |
| 2018 | 2446 | 2639 | ||
| 2017 | 2394 | 2516 |
Stats by Year
| Year | White | Black | Moves |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 12W / 5L / 3D | 12W / 10L / 0D | 87.7 |
| 2024 | 143W / 116L / 17D | 133W / 108L / 33D | 89.9 |
| 2023 | 67W / 47L / 6D | 56W / 50L / 8D | 82.6 |
| 2022 | 13W / 11L / 3D | 18W / 10L / 1D | 77.1 |
| 2021 | 263W / 184L / 30D | 268W / 185L / 30D | 78.9 |
| 2020 | 334W / 265L / 60D | 312W / 285L / 68D | 88.5 |
| 2019 | 626W / 562L / 111D | 563W / 636L / 104D | 82.6 |
| 2018 | 252W / 188L / 35D | 206W / 228L / 40D | 85.5 |
| 2017 | 70W / 50L / 6D | 64W / 48L / 13D | 81.0 |
Openings: Most Played
| Blitz Opening | Games | Wins | Losses | Draws | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Amazon Attack | 550 | 284 | 218 | 48 | 51.6% |
| Australian Defense | 269 | 123 | 124 | 22 | 45.7% |
| French Defense | 191 | 90 | 85 | 16 | 47.1% |
| Amazon Attack: Siberian Attack | 190 | 98 | 76 | 16 | 51.6% |
| French Defense: Burn Variation | 185 | 95 | 76 | 14 | 51.4% |
| French Defense: Tarrasch Variation, Guimard Defense, Main Line | 149 | 81 | 48 | 20 | 54.4% |
| Dutch Defense | 149 | 63 | 67 | 19 | 42.3% |
| Czech Defense | 136 | 75 | 49 | 12 | 55.1% |
| Modern | 124 | 66 | 52 | 6 | 53.2% |
| Sicilian Defense | 121 | 58 | 55 | 8 | 47.9% |
| Bullet Opening | Games | Wins | Losses | Draws | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Hungarian Opening: Wiedenhagen-Beta Gambit | 54 | 28 | 23 | 3 | 51.9% |
| Colle System: Rhamphorhynchus Variation | 51 | 30 | 19 | 2 | 58.8% |
| Australian Defense | 47 | 28 | 17 | 2 | 59.6% |
| Amazon Attack | 43 | 23 | 19 | 1 | 53.5% |
| French Defense | 32 | 20 | 11 | 1 | 62.5% |
| King's Indian Attack | 31 | 17 | 11 | 3 | 54.8% |
| Amazon Attack: Siberian Attack | 30 | 23 | 6 | 1 | 76.7% |
| Modern | 25 | 13 | 11 | 1 | 52.0% |
| Amar Gambit | 23 | 12 | 9 | 2 | 52.2% |
| East Indian Defense | 19 | 11 | 6 | 2 | 57.9% |
| Rapid Opening | Games | Wins | Losses | Draws | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Amazon Attack | 4 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 50.0% |
| French Defense: Advance Variation | 2 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 50.0% |
| Blackburne Shilling Gambit | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| French Defense: Tarrasch Variation, Botvinnik Variation | 2 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 50.0% |
| Slav Defense: Alekhine Variation | 2 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 50.0% |
| Australian Defense | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| Nimzo-Indian Defense | 2 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 50.0% |
| French Defense: Burn Variation | 2 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% |
| QGD: Ragozin | 2 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0.0% |
| Nimzo-Indian Defense: Normal Variation, Classical Defense | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| Daily Opening | Games | Wins | Losses | Draws | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sicilian Defense: Closed | 2 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 50.0% |
| Czech Defense | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| Sicilian Defense: Chekhover Variation | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0.0% |
| English Opening: Symmetrical Variation, Botvinnik System | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0.0% |
| Sicilian Defense: Boleslavsky Variation | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| English Defense: Blumenfeld-Hiva Gambit | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0.0% |
| Scotch Game | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0.0% |
| Sicilian Defense: Najdorf Variation | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0.0% |
| Ruy Lopez: Berlin Defense, Closed Bernstein Variation | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| QGD: 3.Nc3 Nf6 4.e3 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0.0% |
🔥 Streaks
| Streak | Longest | Current |
|---|---|---|
| Winning | 13 | 0 |
| Losing | 12 | 1 |