Alberto David: The Grandmaster with a Dash of Flair
Meet Alberto David, a chess Grandmaster who doesn’t just play the game—he orchestrates it like a maestro conducting a symphony. With a FIDE title of Grandmaster, Alberto has mastered the art of turning 64 squares into a battlefield where strategy and psychology collide.
From Humble Rapid Beginnings to Blitz Brilliance
Back in 2018, Alberto's Rapid rating hovered around a modest 1700—barely enough to scare a casual Sunday player. But fast-forward to 2020 and 2021, and he skyrocketed to a peak rapid rating of 2687, proving that even the slowest starters can have the quickest minds.
His blitz performance is equally dazzling. Alberto blitzed his way to a max rating nearing 2700, boasting an impressive over 62% win rate in blitz games. With over 400 wins out of 685 blitz games, he’s clearly more than just fast fingers—he's a tactical rocket blasting through opponents' defenses.
Tactical Genius & Comeback King
What truly sets Alberto apart is his uncanny tactical awareness. When he loses a piece, most players panic—but not Alberto. He converts those tricky moments into triumphs with a 100% win rate after losing a piece. And with a comeback rate north of 93%, he’s the human embodiment of “never say die.” His psychological tilt factor is impressively low, which means if frustration were a chess piece, he'd resign it immediately.
Known Rivals & Favorite Battle Times
Alberto’s most frequent opponent is zalouche, whom he has bested nearly 60% of the time across 228 intense battles. He’s also got an excellent track record against players like akshayraj_kore and mikheev1976, with win rates soaring above 70%. As for timing, Alberto likes to do his tactical magic mostly on Mondays and Sundays, hitting a win rate of almost 69% and 67% respectively—clearly, he spends his weekends recharging to dethrone opponents come Monday.
Playing Style & Quirks
Alberto’s games are long and rich, averaging about 75 moves per result, showing that he enjoys a good tussle rather than quick knockouts. His endgame prowess is notable, featuring in over 82% of his matches. With white pieces, he wins nearly 64% of the time, while with black he’s just slightly more modest but still commanding.
In short, Alberto David is a Grandmaster seamlessly blending speed, cunning, and resilience—occasionally throwing in a cheeky opening or unexpected twist to keep his opponents guessing. A chess player who makes losing a piece seem almost like a minor inconvenience, and winning look like an art form.
Stay wary if you ever face him: the “Top Secret” openings might just unlock your defeat!
Hi Alberto, here is some tailored feedback based on your recent rapid games
What you are already doing well
- Dynamic opening choices. With Black you steer the game toward Sicilian structures (B45, B48) and the Symmetrical English, scoring solid results. Your willingness to meet 1.e4 with both …e5 and the Sicilian keeps opponents guessing.
- Tactical alertness. In your win against Zalouche (B45) you spotted the …Nd5–f4 resource and later converted an exchange-up ending smoothly. Your eye for tactics is a consistent strength.
- Active rook play. Many victories feature doubled rooks on open files or the 7th rank (e.g. 28…Ra2, 31…Raa2). You clearly value piece activity and coordinate heavy pieces well.
- Fighting spirit in worse positions. Even when down material you keep posing problems and often swindle back (see the …c5 break vs. Nd English). This competitive resilience is a hallmark of strong practical play.
Key areas to improve
- Prophylactic awareness in the English. Your most recent loss arose after 11.a3 Nd4 12.b4 Nb3 13…Nxa1. The pawn thrust b2-b4 created weak squares before you had fully controlled d4 and b3. Train yourself to ask “what does my move allow?” before committing. A quick mental checklist of opposing knight jumps would have saved an exchange here.
prophylaxis - Early pawn storms vs. fianchetto setups. Against 1…g6 you often launch h- and g-pawns (e.g. 13.h4/h5 vs. …c6 lines). This is fine, but only if you have enough pieces ready to join the attack. Review model games by Adams and Kramnik in the English to see how they prepare h4-h5 with central play first.
- Time management. In several wins you were under one minute while still in middlegame complications. Try the “30-30 rule”: keep ≥30 seconds at move 30 in 5-minute games. Practising with an incrementless 3+0 session once a week can sharpen your instinctive play.
- Technical conversion. You usually finish won endings, but sometimes choose the scenic route (e.g. repeating with 48.Rg8+ Kb7 49.Rg7+ …). Add a daily dose of rook-ending drills to convert more cleanly.
Opening snapshot to study
The diagram below shows the critical moment from your English loss. Try setting it up and forcing yourself to pause for 30 seconds before every pawn move in similar structures.
Action plan for the next two weeks
- Play 20 blitz games starting the English but forbid yourself from pushing the b-pawn before move 15 unless the c-file is fully under your control.
- Solve 40 positions on knight forks and outposts to become more sensitive to opponent knight activity.
- Endgame drill: convert 10 “rook + 3 pawns vs. rook + 2 pawns” positions from both sides.
- Analyse your own games twice: once with an engine, once without. Focus on move-choice explanations rather than just evaluation swings.
Progress trackers
Keep an eye on your performance charts and peak rating stats:
- Overall consistency:
- When you tend to score best:
- Personal milestone: 2687 (2020-11-28)
Stay disciplined with this routine, and I’m confident you’ll tighten up the loose edges without losing your dynamic style. Good luck in your next events, Alberto!
🆚 Opponent Insights
| Most Played Opponents | ||
|---|---|---|
| zalouche | 136W / 68L / 24D | View Games |
| Timothe Razafindratsima | 76W / 44L / 14D | View Games |
| Euwe1234 | 89W / 22L / 18D | View Games |
| Elliot Papadiamandis | 68W / 27L / 17D | View Games |
| Kaspa1234 | 12W / 6L / 4D | View Games |
Rating
| Year | Bullet | Blitz | Rapid | Daily |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2021 | 2545 | 2418 | ||
| 2020 | 2648 | 2453 | 2452 | |
| 2019 | 1652 | 2571 | ||
| 2018 | 2260 | 1693 |
Stats by Year
| Year | White | Black | Moves |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021 | 60W / 18L / 9D | 45W / 32L / 14D | 84.2 |
| 2020 | 167W / 63L / 33D | 161W / 71L / 27D | 77.6 |
| 2019 | 23W / 17L / 2D | 29W / 7L / 7D | 72.5 |
| 2018 | 16W / 6L / 5D | 11W / 5L / 1D | 70.0 |
Openings: Most Played
| Rapid Opening | Games | Wins | Losses | Draws | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Scotch Game | 11 | 5 | 4 | 2 | 45.5% |
| Ruy Lopez: Brix Variation | 8 | 4 | 4 | 0 | 50.0% |
| English Opening: Anglo-Grünfeld Defense | 6 | 6 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| Queen's Gambit Declined: Hastings Variation | 5 | 4 | 0 | 1 | 80.0% |
| French Defense: Tarrasch Variation, Botvinnik Variation | 4 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 25.0% |
| Caro-Kann Defense | 4 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 75.0% |
| Sicilian Defense: Closed | 4 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 50.0% |
| Sicilian Defense: Four Knights Variation, Cobra Variation | 4 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| Modern | 3 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 66.7% |
| Nimzo-Indian Defense: Normal Variation, Classical Defense | 3 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| Blitz Opening | Games | Wins | Losses | Draws | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sicilian Defense: Najdorf Variation | 44 | 29 | 12 | 3 | 65.9% |
| Caro-Kann Defense | 31 | 20 | 7 | 4 | 64.5% |
| Ruy Lopez: Morphy Defense, Anderssen Variation | 29 | 13 | 11 | 5 | 44.8% |
| Ruy Lopez: Brix Variation | 26 | 12 | 9 | 5 | 46.1% |
| French Defense: Guimard Variation, Thunderbunny Variation | 25 | 16 | 6 | 3 | 64.0% |
| QGD: Ragozin | 20 | 14 | 4 | 2 | 70.0% |
| Sicilian Defense: Taimanov Variation, Bastrikov Variation, English Attack | 20 | 13 | 6 | 1 | 65.0% |
| Scotch Game | 19 | 10 | 8 | 1 | 52.6% |
| Sicilian Defense: Alapin Variation, Sherzer Variation | 18 | 12 | 4 | 2 | 66.7% |
| East Indian Defense | 17 | 9 | 4 | 4 | 52.9% |
| Bullet Opening | Games | Wins | Losses | Draws | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Czech Defense | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| QGA: Classical, 6...a6 7.a3 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0.0% |
| Caro-Kann Defense: Two Knights Attack, Mindeno Variation | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| Nimzo-Indian Defense: Normal Variation | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0.0% |
| Sicilian Defense: Alapin Variation, Sherzer Variation | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| Sicilian Defense: Najdorf Variation, Zagreb Variation | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0.0% |
🔥 Streaks
| Streak | Longest | Current |
|---|---|---|
| Winning | 18 | 2 |
| Losing | 5 | 0 |