Biography of krumnonesymotStaraZagora: The Chessboard Biologist
In the grand petri dish of the chess world, krumnonesymotStaraZagora is a fascinating organism, evolving move by move since 2017. With an impressive tactical genome that includes a 77.88% comeback rate and a near-perfect 96.68% win rate after losing a piece, this player is truly a cellular automaton of resilience and strategy.
Starting with modest ratings in Bullet and Blitz, their rating environment mutated over the years, reaching impressive peaks:
- Bullet rating: rising to 2115 in 2024
- Blitz rating: blossoming to 2126 at the highest point
- Rapid rating: peaking at 2115 and maintaining a strong 2013 in 2024
Their favorite openings are as diverse as a DNA library: the Van ’t Kruijs Opening shows a robust win rate of 76%, while the Scandinavian Defense Mieses Kotrc Variation dazzles opponents with a shockingly high 100% success in Rapid format. With a playful touch, they also employ the Englund Gambit, winning 70% of times, proving an affinity for evolutionary gambits.
Playing style? Picture a cell that refuses to undergo apoptosis early — an early resignation rate of just 8.28% and a penchant for endgames (played in 66% of games) mean krumnonesymotStaraZagora endures to the bitter end. Their average game length hovers around 67 moves, ensuring that every pawn and bishop participates in this biological symphony of chess.
With a tendency to thrive under pressure (high comeback rates!) yet susceptible to the occasional tilt factor of 18%, this player’s psychological chemistry keeps the game both exciting and unpredictable — much like the delicate balance inside a living cell.
Whether it’s blitzing through rapid mitosis of the clock’s countdown or taking time to germinate slow daily games, krumnonesymotStaraZagora’s moves always tell a story of growth, adaptation, and strategic survival. A true grandmaster in the ecosystem of online chess, they remind us all that in the game of kings, even the smallest pawn can evolve into a queen.
Personalized Feedback for krumnonesymotStaraZagora
1. Quick Snapshot
- Current strength: solid 2050-2100 range in 3 | 2 and 60 | 1 games.
- Consistency: noticeably higher win-rate in late evening sessions—see .
- Peak performance so far: 2126 (2023-06-22).
2. What You’re Doing Well
- Robust Black Repertoire: Regularly scoring with the French (C02/C11) and Caro-Kann (B12). Your pawn‐chain handling and thematic …c5 breaks are on point.
- Tactical Eye: You spot resourceful shots such as 27.Nxd5! and intermezzi (see miniature below) that swing the initiative in practical time controls.
- Fighting Spirit: Games rarely drift into bland equality—you actively push for imbalances, which is ideal for faster formats.
3. Main Improvement Targets
-
Time Management
• Two recent losses (vs. Beljavski3 and Anfield_Road) were essentially flag-outs before move 20.
• Adopt a “+20 sec rule”: if your clock dips below the increment × 20 (e.g., 20 s in 60 | 1), force yourself to make a move and rely on the increment to calculate on the opponent’s time.
• Use a visible time marker—many players improve simply by activating the “move-timer” sound cue. -
King Safety vs. Counterplay
• Your attacking style occasionally ignores back-rank or dark-square weaknesses (see 41…Rb2+ in the Torre loss).
• Drill the theme “[[$|term|Back-Rank Weakness]]” for 15 minutes daily; tactical repetition will make defensive resources intuitive. -
Handling Off-beat Openings as White
• Losses vs. Alekhine (B05) and Reti/Torre setups show hesitation once out of mainline theory.
• Pick one universal system (e.g., 1.e4 cede space? Play 2.Nc3 French 2.Nc3 vs e6; vs. 1…Nf6 keep 3.Nc3 & 4.Bg5) and memorize typical pawn structures rather than move orders. -
Endgame Conversion
• In your July 18 French win you needed 60+ moves to convert an extra rook.
• Solve two practical rook-endgame studies per week; recommend “Blitz Endgame Drills — R vs. R&P” set on Chess.com.
4. Opening Benchmarks
French Defense – keep expanding the 3…c5 Advance repertoire; consider adding 6…f6 (Steinitz gambit) for surprise value.
Caro-Kann Short Advance – you reach pleasant IQP endings; review the plan …f6 & …e5 breaks to finish games earlier.
White vs. Alekhine – your 11.dxc5? allowed …Qxd1+. Instead adopt 11.c3 and meet …c5 with Be3, Qg4 and long castling for a thematic space bind.
5. Training Plan (4-Week)
- Week 1–2: 30 min/day tactics with rating > 2700, focus on Zwischenzug and back-rank motifs.
- Week 2–3: Analyse every loss for 15 min, annotate three critical moments, and store in a personal “red-flag” PGN.
- Week 3–4: Play 10 rapid games (10 | 5). During each game verbalize at least two candidate moves before choosing.
- Continuous: One endgame study every breakfast. Small habit, big rating gain.
6. Motivation Corner
Your rating graph already shows a clear upward trend on weekends
. Keep that momentum: deliberate practice > sheer volume. Hit the “review” button after wins as well—future you will thank present you!See you at the board, and good luck in your next encounter with Dragan Stojanovic—revenge games are the sweetest training!
🆚 Opponent Insights
| Most Played Opponents | ||
|---|---|---|
| OrganicChemist23849 | 47W / 39L / 4D | |
| minev40 | 52W / 2L / 2D | |
| friedrichwnietzsche1844 | 7W / 15L / 2D | |
| PacoBG00 | 15W / 4L / 2D | |
| giesbi | 7W / 10L / 2D | |
Rating
| Year | Bullet | Blitz | Rapid | Daily |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 2069 | 2078 | 2013 | 1278 |
| 2023 | 2007 | 1956 | 1882 | 1357 |
| 2022 | 1979 | 1890 | 2036 | |
| 2021 | 1379 | 1828 | 1859 | |
| 2020 | 1717 | 1579 | 1804 | 1213 |
| 2019 | 1566 | 1288 | 1615 | 1219 |
| 2018 | 1676 | 1242 | ||
| 2017 | 1387 | 1347 | 1177 |
Stats by Year
| Year | White | Black | Moves |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 112W / 76L / 13D | 114W / 89L / 11D | 74.6 |
| 2023 | 336W / 165L / 21D | 337W / 153L / 25D | 67.9 |
| 2022 | 68W / 32L / 5D | 57W / 51L / 7D | 70.6 |
| 2021 | 41W / 31L / 4D | 41W / 30L / 6D | 76.6 |
| 2020 | 71W / 53L / 15D | 67W / 50L / 10D | 76.0 |
| 2019 | 179W / 161L / 17D | 167W / 164L / 17D | 66.6 |
| 2018 | 12W / 10L / 1D | 14W / 9L / 0D | 69.4 |
| 2017 | 18W / 18L / 5D | 25W / 19L / 1D | 69.0 |
Openings: Most Played
| Bullet Opening | Games | Wins | Losses | Draws | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Amar Gambit | 65 | 44 | 21 | 0 | 67.7% |
| French Defense | 64 | 39 | 22 | 3 | 60.9% |
| Australian Defense | 62 | 42 | 19 | 1 | 67.7% |
| Scandinavian Defense | 47 | 28 | 17 | 2 | 59.6% |
| French Defense: Exchange Variation | 44 | 22 | 17 | 5 | 50.0% |
| Modern | 39 | 24 | 12 | 3 | 61.5% |
| Caro-Kann Defense | 33 | 18 | 14 | 1 | 54.5% |
| Blackburne Shilling Gambit | 28 | 19 | 9 | 0 | 67.9% |
| French Defense: Classical Variation, Svenonius Variation | 26 | 9 | 16 | 1 | 34.6% |
| Colle System: Rhamphorhynchus Variation | 25 | 14 | 10 | 1 | 56.0% |
| Blitz Opening | Games | Wins | Losses | Draws | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 120 | 57 | 63 | 0 | 47.5% |
| French Defense | 63 | 34 | 23 | 6 | 54.0% |
| French Defense: Classical Variation, Svenonius Variation | 54 | 26 | 24 | 4 | 48.1% |
| Scandinavian Defense | 51 | 22 | 22 | 7 | 43.1% |
| Australian Defense | 49 | 27 | 16 | 6 | 55.1% |
| Blackburne Shilling Gambit | 48 | 26 | 20 | 2 | 54.2% |
| Caro-Kann Defense | 44 | 27 | 13 | 4 | 61.4% |
| French Defense: Advance Variation | 37 | 18 | 17 | 2 | 48.6% |
| French Defense: Exchange Variation | 37 | 19 | 14 | 4 | 51.4% |
| Sicilian Defense: Alapin Variation | 33 | 13 | 19 | 1 | 39.4% |
| Rapid Opening | Games | Wins | Losses | Draws | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Petrov's Defense | 20 | 14 | 5 | 1 | 70.0% |
| Scandinavian Defense | 18 | 13 | 5 | 0 | 72.2% |
| French Defense | 17 | 7 | 7 | 3 | 41.2% |
| Blackburne Shilling Gambit | 16 | 10 | 4 | 2 | 62.5% |
| Amar Gambit | 15 | 11 | 2 | 2 | 73.3% |
| Australian Defense | 14 | 10 | 3 | 1 | 71.4% |
| Barnes Opening: Walkerling | 10 | 5 | 2 | 3 | 50.0% |
| Dresden Opening: The Goblin | 10 | 7 | 2 | 1 | 70.0% |
| Amazon Attack: Siberian Attack | 9 | 7 | 1 | 1 | 77.8% |
| Italian Game: Two Knights Defense | 8 | 2 | 4 | 2 | 25.0% |
| Daily Opening | Games | Wins | Losses | Draws | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| French Defense | 5 | 1 | 4 | 0 | 20.0% |
| Philidor Defense | 4 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| Australian Defense | 2 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0.0% |
| Petrov's Defense | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| King's Indian Attack | 2 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 50.0% |
| Sicilian Defense | 2 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 50.0% |
| Elephant Gambit | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| Unknown | 2 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0.0% |
| French Defense: Exchange Variation | 2 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0.0% |
| London System: Poisoned Pawn Variation | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0.0% |
🔥 Streaks
| Streak | Longest | Current |
|---|---|---|
| Winning | 13 | 0 |
| Losing | 18 | 3 |