Lapitch: A Chess Prodigy’s Journey
Lapitch’s rise in the world of chess is nothing short of remarkable. From an early start in 2010 with a promising blitz rating of 2280, he quickly evolved into a determined competitor known for both his tactical awareness and resilient playing style. Over the years, Lapitch has battled in various time controls—blitz, bullet, rapid, and daily—establishing himself as a well-rounded player.
In the fast-paced realm of bullet chess, Lapitch demonstrated exceptional speed and precision, often attaining ratings near 2900 and winning hundreds of high-intensity games. His blitz performances, which reached new heights in 2021 with an impressive rating of 2803, reflect his strategic depth and adaptability. Not only has he mastered quick calculation, but his rapid and daily games also reveal a player who is meticulous, comfortable in long endgames, and unafraid of complex positions.
Lapitch’s opening repertoire is vast and diverse. He has explored everything from the popular Saints such as the Sicilian and the Queens Gambit to numerous less conventional lines. This flexibility is evident in his strong performance with openings like the Grunfeld Defense’s Exchange Variation and the Nimzowitsch Larsen Attack, where his win rates often soar, sometimes reaching perfection. These choices underscore his willingness to experiment and his appetite for creative, dynamic play.
Beyond individual games, Lapitch has shown remarkable consistency across his career. With a longest winning streak of 49 games and a current streak of two solid wins, his record is punctuated by moments of brilliance, especially during his best days on the board. His playing style is characterized by an aggressive drive in the early game combined with a high endgame frequency, averaging over 76 moves in victories. Furthermore, his ability to bounce back from challenging positions—with a comeback rate nearing 90% and a perfect win rate when trailing material—demonstrates his tactical maturity.
Lapitch is not just a tactician; he also understands the psychological dimension of chess. With a low tilt factor and an impressive difference favoring rated play, his mental resilience has been key to his success against many of his most frequent opponents. His performance metrics, ranging from a win rate above 70% on several days of the week to peak performance during late night hours, reveal a player who adapts his strategy to rhythm and time of day.
Whether facing formidable adversaries or testing new ideas in unconventional openings, Lapitch’s career is defined by his continuous improvement, passion for the game, and the hunger to excel even when the stakes are high. His story is one of dedication, strategic innovation, and the relentless pursuit of chess mastery—a journey that inspires both fans and aspiring players alike.
🆚 Opponent Insights
| Most Played Opponents | ||
|---|---|---|
| Tryfon Gavriel | 144W / 43L / 4D | |
| Rogelio Jr Antonio | 51W / 35L / 6D | |
| SomePatzer | 34W / 44L / 11D | |
| Dragan Skrobic | 43W / 34L / 4D | |
| qweertyt | 57W / 7L / 2D | |
Rating
| Year | Bullet | Blitz | Rapid | Daily |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 2523 | |||
| 2023 | 2795 | 2796 | ||
| 2022 | 2800 | |||
| 2021 | 2779 | 2803 | 2521 | |
| 2020 | 2854 | 2643 | ||
| 2019 | 2618 | |||
| 2018 | 2611 | |||
| 2017 | 2530 | 2633 | ||
| 2016 | 2530 | 2583 | 2275 | |
| 2015 | 2588 | 2519 | ||
| 2014 | 2567 | 2477 | ||
| 2013 | 2426 | |||
| 2012 | 2459 | 2402 | 2056 | |
| 2011 | 2831 | 2436 | 2195 | |
| 2010 | 2905 | 2280 | 1989 | 2054 |
Stats by Year
| Year | White | Black | Moves |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 1W / 0L / 0D | 1W / 0L / 0D | 56.0 |
| 2023 | 23W / 11L / 2D | 23W / 8L / 2D | 87.6 |
| 2022 | 2W / 0L / 1D | 0W / 1L / 1D | 66.2 |
| 2021 | 8W / 2L / 0D | 9W / 0L / 2D | 81.2 |
| 2020 | 20W / 3L / 1D | 16W / 2L / 5D | 88.5 |
| 2019 | 1W / 0L / 1D | 0W / 0L / 1D | 63.3 |
| 2018 | 3W / 0L / 0D | 1W / 0L / 1D | 77.2 |
| 2017 | 3W / 0L / 0D | 2W / 1L / 1D | 82.0 |
| 2016 | 39W / 18L / 2D | 37W / 20L / 0D | 80.3 |
| 2015 | 4W / 2L / 0D | 4W / 2L / 0D | 75.6 |
| 2014 | 82W / 56L / 21D | 79W / 68L / 12D | 83.5 |
| 2013 | 7W / 10L / 3D | 7W / 12L / 0D | 73.9 |
| 2012 | 43W / 31L / 9D | 50W / 26L / 9D | 83.0 |
| 2011 | 386W / 84L / 17D | 397W / 78L / 15D | 75.5 |
| 2010 | 333W / 149L / 20D | 335W / 146L / 19D | 83.2 |
Openings: Most Played
| Daily Opening | Games | Wins | Losses | Draws | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sicilian Defense: Bowdler Attack | 3 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 66.7% |
| Unknown | 3 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 33.3% |
| Smith-Morra Gambit | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| Queen's Pawn: 2.Nf3 Bf5 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 50.0% |
| Neo-King's Indian: London System | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| Gruenfeld: Modern Exchange, 8.Rb1 O-O 9.Be2 b6 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0.0% |
| Sicilian: Rossolimo, 3...e6 4.Bxc6 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| King's Indian: 6.Be2 Nbd7 7.O-O | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| Hungarian Opening | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| Sicilian Defense: Classical Variation, Anti-Sozin Variation | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| Bullet Opening | Games | Wins | Losses | Draws | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nimzo-Larsen Attack | 277 | 196 | 70 | 11 | 70.8% |
| Nimzowitsch-Larsen: 1...d5 2.Bb2 | 136 | 105 | 21 | 10 | 77.2% |
| Modern Defense | 128 | 96 | 24 | 8 | 75.0% |
| Queen's Pawn: Modern | 84 | 56 | 24 | 4 | 66.7% |
| Van't Kruijs Opening | 68 | 58 | 6 | 4 | 85.3% |
| Queen's Pawn Game: Modern Defense | 64 | 44 | 19 | 1 | 68.8% |
| Nimzowitsch-Larsen: Indian Variation | 63 | 39 | 16 | 8 | 61.9% |
| Modern Defense: Kotov Variation | 58 | 30 | 26 | 2 | 51.7% |
| Nimzo-Larsen Attack: Modern Variation | 57 | 39 | 17 | 1 | 68.4% |
| Nimzo-Larsen Attack: Indian Variation | 55 | 35 | 16 | 4 | 63.6% |
| Blitz Opening | Games | Wins | Losses | Draws | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Classical Sicilian Richter Rauser variation | 18 | 14 | 4 | 0 | 77.8% |
| Reti: KIA | 17 | 12 | 4 | 1 | 70.6% |
| King's Indian Defense: Normal Variation, King's Knight Variation | 11 | 9 | 2 | 0 | 81.8% |
| Queen's Pawn Game | 9 | 6 | 3 | 0 | 66.7% |
| Indian Defence with e6, Nf3 | 8 | 5 | 3 | 0 | 62.5% |
| Sicilian | 8 | 6 | 2 | 0 | 75.0% |
| Réti Opening | 5 | 3 | 1 | 1 | 60.0% |
| Queen's Pawn: Modern | 5 | 5 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| Benoni Defense: Benoni-Indian Defense | 5 | 1 | 4 | 0 | 20.0% |
| Neo-King's Indian | 5 | 3 | 1 | 1 | 60.0% |
| Rapid Opening | Games | Wins | Losses | Draws | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| QGD: 3.Nf3 Nf6 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| Queen's Pawn Game | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| Queen's Pawn: 1...e6 2.c4 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| Semi-Slav Defense | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| Pirc Defense: Austrian Attack, Weiss Variation | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| Queen's Indian: Petrosian, Kasparov, 7...c5 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0.0% |
| Sicilian Defense, classical | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| Grünfeld Defense | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0.0% |
| King's Indian: 6.Be2 e5 Queenswap, 9.Bg5 Re8 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| Zukertort Opening | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
🔥 Streaks
| Streak | Longest | Current |
|---|---|---|
| Winning | 49 | 2 |
| Losing | 8 | 0 |