Lazar Ivanovic (lazar23)
Meet Lazar Ivanovic, a chess virtuoso whose online board battles span over a decade, casually cruising through openings like the Sicilian Defense and Queen's Gambit with the ease of a grandmaster in training – or at least someone who really enjoys winning! His blitz peak rating soared to an impressive 2167 in December 2020, proving that when the clock ticks fast, Lazar's tactics tick faster.
His bullet chess flair peaked most recently at 1906, showing he’s no stranger to the adrenaline-pumping world of ultra-fast moves. Rapid chess might be less traveled by Lazar, but even there, he maintains a solid presence with a perfect win in his limited recorded games.
Lazar’s playing style is as engaging as it is resilient. Endgames feature prominently in his play (about 75% of the time), often stretching into deep battles averaging over 67 moves for wins — a testament that he doesn’t just blitz through but carefully maneuvers his way to victory. His comeback rate is an astonishing 82%, indicating that giving up is simply not in his vocabulary. Early resignations? Only 0.28% — basically, Lazar fights until the bitter end, or at least until his opponent throws in the towel.
When it comes to opening choices, the Sicilian Defense variations dominate his repertoire, with a particularly strong showing in the Accelerated Dragon Modern Variation, boasting a win rate around 61%. He’s also fond of the Queen’s Gambit Declined Exchange Line and the McDonnell Attack, showing a penchant for classic, strategically rich battles.
Lazar's psychological game is intriguing: he thrives best in the early hours around 2 AM, a perfect time for strategic brilliance or perhaps for a midnight snack and a sharp move. His tilt factor stands at a reasonable 8, meaning a few losses might sting, but he soon recalibrates and blitzes back.
Recent Highlights
In a recent thrilling clash on May 28, 2025, Lazar outmaneuvered opponent "krewetkakrabbe" using a solid Grunfeld Defense Exchange, winning by resignation after a grueling 40-move tango. Just days earlier, on May 25, he secured another resignation victory against "kinglouisse," demonstrating his knack for breaking down defenses and sealing the deal without a checkmate frenzy.
Fun Fact
Lazar’s current winning streak stands at 2 games, but his longest winning streak was a jaw-dropping 22 games. Imagine him walking into a virtual chess arena, eyes gleaming, knowing he might just be on his way to an epic run. And let’s not forget his rare moments of defeat — with a longest losing streak of 8, proving even chess warlords have to recalibrate sometimes.
Opponents beware: Lazar boasts a quirky 100% win rate against some, and equally amusingly zero percent against a handful of others. Cue the chess gods chuckling at these favorite rivalries!
Whether weaving through tactical skirmishes or engaging in slow-burning positional wars, Lazar Ivanovic (lazar23) is a name to watch on the digital chess battlefield. Just don’t be surprised if he greets you with a cheeky smile before checkmating you in under 30 moves.
Overall impression from your recent blitz games
You play with sharp, tactical intent and aren’t shy about seizing complications. Your wins show you can calculate aggressively and convert dynamic positions when your opponent overextends. At the same time, blitz can amplify small planning gaps, and there are some patterns in your games where a safer, clearer plan would have saved time and avoided risky trades. The goal is to keep your aggression where it wins, while tightening the consistency of your decisions under time pressure.
What you’re doing well
- Sharp fight for initiative: you frequently enter active, tactical lines that force your opponent to react. This often creates practical chances to seize the game early or complicate the position.
- Endgame conversion when the position remains dynamic: in several wins you capitalized on rooks and major pieces coordinating well to press for an advantage or finish the game decisively.
- Resilience in defense when facing pressure: you’ve shown the ability to hold difficult middlegame positions and steer toward practical chances, especially in the presence of strong attacking ideas from your opponents.
- Opening choice variety: you’re willing to explore offbeat or sharp lines, which can be a practical strength in blitz if you’re comfortable handling the resulting tactics and imbalances.
Key improvement areas
- Time management in complex lines: in heavy-tactical blitz, consider a quick, disciplined first pass to identify forcing moves (checks, captures, and threats) and avoid over-calculating deep sequences when the clock is running low.
- Calculation discipline and verification: in long tactical swings, pause to confirm forced sequences and check for hidden resources for both sides. A simple habit is to look for at least one defensive resource for your opponent before committing to a line.
- Endgame technique under time pressure: work on common rook endgames, king activity, and pawn endgames so you can convert advantages more reliably when the board simplifies late in a blitz game.
- Consistency with safe plan when ahead or in equal positions: develop a small set of dependable plan choices (control of open files, piece activity, king safety) so you don’t drift into too-clean, risky exchanges in the heat of the clock.
Opening notes and practical guidance
Your recent games show you’re exploring aggressive systems and sharp defenses. A balanced approach can help reduce risk in blitz. Consider these practical tweaks:
- When you choose aggressive lines, have a quick “fallback plan” if the opponent handles your initial attack well. This reduces time spent on uncertain continuations.
- Complement your tactical repertoire with a few solid, time-tested middlegame plans for each opening you use. For example, for typical Sicilian and related lines you can rely on clear development and king safety plans, even if the precise tactical line isn’t winning on the spot.
- Spend a few minutes reviewing a couple of your most challenging blitz games (the ones where you lost or drifted into unclear positions) to identify one or two recurring decision points you want to improve.
Targeted training plan (short, mobile-friendly)
To build steady improvement without overwhelming your schedule, use a compact weekly routine:
- Daily tactics sprint (10–15 minutes): focus on common tactical motifs that appear in your openings (forks, pins, discovered attacks, and queen-king coordination).
- Two quick endgame sessions per week (15–20 minutes each): rook endings, opposition and king activity, and pawn endgames with simplified material.
- Opening study (2–3 sessions per week, 20–30 minutes each): reinforce one solid line per opening you use regularly, plus a sharp alternative for surprise value in blitz.
- Post-game reflection (after 1–2 games): note one good decision and one mistake, plus one change you will try next time.
Practical next steps I can tailor for you
If you’d like, I can craft a 2–3 week micro-plan focused on your top three openings, plus a set of 10–15 targeted tactical puzzles aligned to those lines. I can also annotate one of your recent blitz games to highlight move-by-move decision points and safer alternatives under time pressure.
Would you like me to generate a short, personalized study plan or annotate a specific recent game for you? If so, tell me which opening you want me to prioritize and whether you want more focus on attack or defense in blitz.
🆚 Opponent Insights
| Recent Opponents | ||
|---|---|---|
| minu2004 | 1W / 0L / 0D | View |
| mustafinho1 | 1W / 0L / 0D | View |
| capablanqino | 0W / 1L / 0D | View |
| theoretician | 1W / 0L / 0D | View |
| sjakkmagi | 1W / 0L / 0D | View |
| pccat | 1W / 2L / 0D | View |
| whatthisiscrazy | 0W / 1L / 0D | View |
| tiger5580 | 0W / 1L / 0D | View |
| garyoliver1964 | 0W / 1L / 1D | View |
| beljavski3 | 1W / 2L / 0D | View |
| Most Played Opponents | ||
|---|---|---|
| joksim23 | 47W / 41L / 15D | View Games |
| boskovelicanin | 64W / 24L / 11D | View Games |
| pajevic radisa | 60W / 19L / 12D | View Games |
| zorosvetnik1 | 26W / 23L / 33D | View Games |
| profivancirakovic | 20W / 25L / 14D | View Games |
Rating
| Year | Bullet | Blitz | Rapid | Daily |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 1956 | 2106 | ||
| 2024 | 1890 | 2047 | ||
| 2023 | 1951 | |||
| 2022 | 2031 | |||
| 2021 | 2045 | |||
| 2020 | 1841 | 2085 | 1371 | |
| 2015 | 1631 | |||
| 2014 | 1598 | 1670 | ||
| 2013 | 1580 |
Stats by Year
| Year | White | Black | Moves |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 191W / 127L / 22D | 146W / 168L / 19D | 72.4 |
| 2024 | 259W / 180L / 21D | 217W / 216L / 26D | 72.4 |
| 2023 | 3W / 7L / 1D | 5W / 3L / 0D | 69.2 |
| 2022 | 12W / 13L / 1D | 14W / 13L / 0D | 73.4 |
| 2021 | 135W / 109L / 14D | 127W / 107L / 21D | 69.9 |
| 2020 | 531W / 361L / 75D | 552W / 330L / 94D | 71.0 |
| 2015 | 2W / 0L / 0D | 2W / 0L / 0D | 55.0 |
| 2014 | 51W / 36L / 3D | 42W / 45L / 3D | 69.2 |
| 2013 | 4W / 2L / 0D | 5W / 2L / 0D | 75.2 |
Openings: Most Played
| Blitz Opening | Games | Wins | Losses | Draws | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Modern Defense: Pterodactyl Variation | 163 | 85 | 62 | 16 | 52.1% |
| Sicilian Defense: O'Kelly Variation | 152 | 68 | 69 | 15 | 44.7% |
| Sicilian Defense: Closed | 149 | 72 | 63 | 14 | 48.3% |
| Döry Defense | 131 | 70 | 55 | 6 | 53.4% |
| QGD: 3.Nc3 Nf6 4.e3 | 124 | 76 | 41 | 7 | 61.3% |
| Bird Opening: Dutch Variation, Batavo Gambit | 113 | 59 | 46 | 8 | 52.2% |
| Sicilian Defense | 94 | 53 | 36 | 5 | 56.4% |
| QGD: 3.Nc3 Bb4 | 86 | 41 | 37 | 8 | 47.7% |
| London System: Poisoned Pawn Variation | 83 | 38 | 38 | 7 | 45.8% |
| Australian Defense | 77 | 48 | 28 | 1 | 62.3% |
| Bullet Opening | Games | Wins | Losses | Draws | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Australian Defense | 54 | 30 | 21 | 3 | 55.6% |
| Modern Defense: Pterodactyl Variation | 45 | 22 | 21 | 2 | 48.9% |
| Amar Gambit | 31 | 24 | 7 | 0 | 77.4% |
| Sicilian Defense | 31 | 24 | 6 | 1 | 77.4% |
| London System: Poisoned Pawn Variation | 30 | 17 | 13 | 0 | 56.7% |
| Colle System: Rhamphorhynchus Variation | 30 | 23 | 7 | 0 | 76.7% |
| Amazon Attack: Siberian Attack | 27 | 19 | 8 | 0 | 70.4% |
| Döry Defense | 26 | 15 | 11 | 0 | 57.7% |
| Sicilian Defense: Closed | 24 | 16 | 8 | 0 | 66.7% |
| Bird Opening: Dutch Variation, Batavo Gambit | 20 | 13 | 5 | 2 | 65.0% |
| Rapid Opening | Games | Wins | Losses | Draws | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| English Opening: Carls-Bremen System | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
🔥 Streaks
| Streak | Longest | Current |
|---|---|---|
| Winning | 22 | 2 |
| Losing | 10 | 0 |