Anna Goldsmith: The Chessboard Biologist
Meet Anna Goldsmith, a grandmaster of the 64 squares who’s spent over a decade evolving her game like a true chess organism. From rapid skirmishes to lightning blitz duels, Anna’s career is a fascinating species thriving in the wild ecosystem of competitive chess.
Career Evolution
Anna hatched her chess career around 2010 with a promising Rapid rating near 1488 and a Blitz peak of 1565. Over the years, she’s adapted through wins and losses, her rating DNA showing fluctuations but an unmistakable resilience. Her longest winning streak once stretched 10 moves long — a true mating dance of strategic triumph!
Playing Style & Strategy
Anna's playing style could be described as a delicate balance of patience and ferocity. With an endgame frequency of nearly 68%, she’s not one to just shuffle the pawns and wait; she’s built to survive the long haul. Her average moves per win and loss sit closely around 66-67, suggesting she’s equally comfortable in drawn-out cerebral battles as in quick tactical skirmishes.
Her White win rate is slightly superior at 48.76% compared to 46.13% with Black, suggesting she loves starting the evolutionary race with the first move advantage. When life (or chess) tosses her a lost piece, she bounces back with an impressive 100% win rate after such setbacks — a true example of “survival of the fittest” on the board.
Tactical and Psychological Backbone
Anna is no mere pawn in psychologically grueling games. With a 12% tilt factor, she maintains her cool when faced with pressure. Her opening repertoire remains a guarded secret (appropriately dubbed "Top Secret") with nearly 1200 games logged and a near 48.5% win rate in rapid formats — clearly she knows which openings foster growth in her garden of tactics.
When it comes to comebacks, Anna shines, boasting a 77% comeback rate. She doesn’t just wilt under pressure; she thrives, turning near-deaths on the board into rebirths of victory.
Opponent Ecosystem
Anna’s opponent interactions are a fascinating study in competitive biology. She’s faced a diversity of challengers, ranging from “cheesietown” (whom she shut out with 100% success) to “taumana231,” who seems to be a tough predator with a 0% win rate for Anna. This diversity showcases her ability to adapt her gameplay to different opponent "species."
Fun Facts
- Nicknamed “The Chessboard Biologist” for her methodical study and adaptation to opponents.
- Enjoys a higher success rate playing in the twilight hours around midnight (22:00 - 0:00) — maybe her chess mind is nocturnal!
- Maintains a low early resignation rate of just 0.81%, proving she’s a tenacious species refusing to forfeit without a fight.
From her early pawns to her queen’s gambits, Anna Goldsmith’s journey is a living, breathing study in survival, adaptation, and triumph within the complex ecosystem of chess. Whether in a rapid dash or a blitz showdown, she’s always ready to make the next evolutionary move.
🆚 Opponent Insights
| Recent Opponents | ||
|---|---|---|
| neezer95 | 1W / 0L / 0D | |
| minions_time | 1W / 0L / 0D | |
| ohphara | 0W / 1L / 0D | |
| jgustavo1 | 0W / 1L / 0D | |
| ezekialking | 0W / 1L / 0D | |
| Most Played Opponents | ||
|---|---|---|
| shyam limbu | 1W / 4L / 0D | |
| bloobeerd | 4W / 0L / 0D | |
| guru prasad | 1W / 3L / 0D | |
| paulta | 1W / 3L / 0D | |
| celticriddle | 3W / 0L / 0D | |
Rating
| Year | Bullet | Blitz | Rapid | Daily |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 859 | |||
| 2024 | 991 | |||
| 2022 | 1051 | |||
| 2020 | 1125 | 1270 | ||
| 2016 | 1371 | |||
| 2015 | 1396 | |||
| 2014 | 1380 | |||
| 2013 | 906 | 1321 | 1299 | |
| 2010 | 1059 | 1352 | 1488 |
Stats by Year
| Year | White | Black | Moves |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 123W / 130L / 12D | 124W / 137L / 6D | 69.9 |
| 2024 | 18W / 22L / 1D | 18W / 20L / 1D | 61.1 |
| 2022 | 0W / 3L / 0D | 1W / 3L / 0D | 57.0 |
| 2020 | 139W / 139L / 16D | 135W / 151L / 22D | 68.0 |
| 2016 | 8W / 12L / 0D | 15W / 11L / 0D | 64.6 |
| 2015 | 21W / 14L / 0D | 12W / 18L / 5D | 64.2 |
| 2014 | 33W / 36L / 6D | 43W / 34L / 2D | 69.5 |
| 2013 | 142W / 111L / 10D | 126W / 131L / 9D | 71.1 |
| 2010 | 5W / 8L / 0D | 7W / 7L / 1D | 70.2 |
Openings: Most Played
| Rapid Opening | Games | Wins | Losses | Draws | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Top Secret | 1262 | 609 | 608 | 45 | 48.3% |
| Sicilian Defense | 24 | 13 | 11 | 0 | 54.2% |
| Kings Gambit Accepted Kings Knight Gambit | 16 | 8 | 8 | 0 | 50.0% |
| Kings Gambit | 14 | 8 | 6 | 0 | 57.1% |
| Indian Game | 12 | 5 | 7 | 0 | 41.7% |
| Scandinavian Defense Mieses Kotrc Variation | 7 | 5 | 1 | 1 | 71.4% |
| Sicilian Defense Bowdler Attack | 6 | 5 | 1 | 0 | 83.3% |
| Kings Gambit Accepted Schallopp Defense | 6 | 1 | 5 | 0 | 16.7% |
| Kings Gambit Declined Queens Knight Defense | 5 | 2 | 3 | 0 | 40.0% |
| Van t Kruijs Opening | 5 | 2 | 3 | 0 | 40.0% |
| Blitz Opening | Games | Wins | Losses | Draws | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Top Secret | 596 | 271 | 285 | 40 | 45.5% |
| Bullet Opening | Games | Wins | Losses | Draws | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Top Secret | 2 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0.0% |
🔥 Streaks
| Streak | Longest | Current |
|---|---|---|
| Winning | 10 | 2 |
| Losing | 12 | 0 |