Profile Summary: Анатолий Кор (lheufy2011)
Once a humble pawn on the chessboard, Анатолий Кор, also known by the username lheufy2011, has blossomed into a tactical maestro renowned for his resilience and strategic prowess. His blitz career reads like an epic saga filled with thrilling victories and hard-fought battles—over 41,000 blitz games with a near-even win-loss record, refusing to concede defeat without a fight.
Анатолий’s favorite openings could fill a book. Whether it’s the Old Benoni Defense or the English Opening Symmetrical Variation, he boasts solid win rates that saturate the board with surprises. His bullet games show a fearless spirit, consistently handling the chaotic pace with crisp moves and a calm mind—maxing out his rating near 2000 at speed that would make most grandmasters blink twice.
With a peak blitz rating soaring above 2100 in 2025, Анатолий combines aggressive play with thoughtful endgames (engaging in endgames in almost 83% of matches) and an enviable comeback rate north of 86%. His psychological game? Let's just say he knows how to keep his cool better than most, with a tilt factor low enough to encourage even the calmest of yogis.
When did he shine brightest? The midnight hours seem to be his chess galaxy, where focus sharpens and wins pile up. Whether it’s morning coffee or the wee hours, Анатолий’s moves dance on the board like a well-rehearsed ballet of knights and bishops.
Noteworthy Matches
In a recent dazzling victory, he showcased his mastery over the Sicilian Defense, guiding his pieces with precision until his opponent resigned around move 19—proof that sometimes the best move is just knowing when to say “checkmate soon, friend.” Another thrilling win came via a slick checkmate in a complicated Queen’s Pawn Opening, where Анатолий’s calm handling of pressure left his opponent reeling.
Sure, losses happen, but every defeat is a lesson in disguise. Even when bested, Анатолий often finds himself in complex positions battling well into the endgame, emphasizing his never-say-die attitude.
Playing Style & Personality
- Early Resignation Rate: Almost a saint at 1%, Анатолий prefers to fight every inch of the way.
- Endgame Specialist: With an 83% frequency in endgames, he’s a patient strategist who loves the long haul.
- Average Moves per Win: An impressive 72 moves, proving he's meticulous and calculated.
- Comeback King: An 86% comeback rate makes him the comeback kid of the chess world.
- Win Rate with White: 52.44% - a slight but persistent edge!
- Humor: Анатолий might occasionally sacrifice a pawn or two, but he's never sacrificial with his good humor and love for the game!
Fun Fact
Despite thousands of games blitzed in lightning speed, Анатолий’s peak bullet rating dropped sharply in 2024's mid-year—perhaps an epic battle with a caffeine shortage? Nonetheless, he powered back, underscoring the eternal spirit of a chess warrior.
In the grand chess tournament of life, Анатолий Кор is certainly a player who plays not just to win, but to enjoy every twist, turn, and glorious checkmate!
What’s going well in your blitz play
You show a willingness to take the initiative and you’re comfortable navigating sharp, tactical moments. In several recent games you created pressure early, opened lines for your pieces, and kept your opponent on the defensive. Your openness to tactical ideas can be a strong weapon in blitz when you see concrete forcing sequences and you’re ready to capitalize on overextensions.
- Alert to attacking chances: you don’t shy away from sharp lines and you’re quick to seize tactical opportunities when the position allows.
- Practical piece activity: your minor pieces often get active quickly, pressing on critical squares and eyeing weak points in the opponent’s camp.
- Endgame resourcefulness under pressure: when pieces are strained, you maintain practical chances and look for forcing moves that simplify toward a win.
Key improvement areas to make your blitz results more consistent
- Time management under blitz pressure: some games show you spending a lot of time in the middlegame and then needing to rush later. Develop a simple time-check habit—pause after big tactical decisions and confirm your main plan before committing to a long line.
- Opening consistency and repertoire: your openings performance suggests solid results in several systems, but you’re exploring a wide range. Consider anchoring 1-2 openings that fit your style (for example, a robust English variation and a solid Slav setup) to reduce early decision fatigue and improve familiarity with typical middlegame plans.
- Endgame conversion: when material becomes imbalanced, aim for practical simplifications or concrete plans that give you clear routes to conversion or hold. Work on a few endgame patterns (opposite-colored pawns, basic rook endings, king activity) to finish games more reliably.
- Pattern recognition and threat awareness: some losses come from missing hidden threats or a quick tactical shot your opponent had prepared. Build a quick-check habit for forcing lines and a “count the threats” step before making nonforcing moves.
Opening choices to optimize your blitz results
Your openings performance shows several promising options. Two that stand out for solid win rates are:
- English Opening: King’s English Variation — tends to lead to solid, maneuver-based positions where you can outplay in the middlegame.
- Slav Defense — offers sturdy, semi-closed structures with clear plans for central breaks and piece activity.
Recommendation: adopt a compact 1-2 opening repertoire centered on these styles, with a few go-to continuations in each that you know cold. This reduces decision time and helps you execute your plans more consistently in blitz.
Practical plan for the next week
- Choose 2 openings to focus on (for example, English King’s English Variation and Slav Defense) and study 2-3 main lines in each, including typical middle-game ideas and common tactical motifs.
- Do 3 focused blitz practice sessions: 1) tactical pattern drills (spot tactics up to 2-3 moves), 2) opening exploration (build familiarity with chosen lines), 3) endgame basics (rook endings, pawn endings, technique drills).
- After each blitz game, spend 3–5 minutes reviewing with a focus on: where you found the plan, where you missed a threat, and where you could have simplified to avoid time trouble.
- Keep a tiny “clock discipline” note: at move 10, 20, and 30, quickly estimate remaining time and whether you still have a clear plan. If not, switch to a simpler approach.
Quick tips to apply in your next games
- Prioritize a clear plan in the first 10 moves of the middlegame; avoid overcomplicating positions when you’re short on time.
- Lean on your selected openings to steer the game into familiar types of positions where you know typical plans and piece maneuvers.
- In tactical moments, count two forcing ideas ahead: first, is there a check, capture, or threat that forces a reply? second, what is your opponent’s best counterplay?
- After a win or a loss, write down one specific takeaway: a) one thing you did well, b) one concrete improvement for the next game.
Encouragement
Your data shows both progress and volatility across time. With a tighter opening plan, improved clock management, and focused endgame practice, you should see more consistent improvements in your blitz results. Keep leveraging your tactical intuition, but balance it with disciplined planning and time awareness to convert more opportunities into wins.
🆚 Opponent Insights
| Recent Opponents | ||
|---|---|---|
| vaisakh_rp1 | 0W / 1L / 0D | View |
| metallicat-rus | 0W / 1L / 0D | View |
| dexerruajabonillo | 1W / 0L / 0D | View |
| shockwayvz | 1W / 0L / 0D | View |
| mateekayoo | 6W / 5L / 0D | View |
| ciko54 | 10W / 19L / 2D | View |
| sonofgod45 | 0W / 2L / 0D | View |
| lalbeiseia | 1W / 0L / 0D | View |
| hieufish | 1W / 1L / 0D | View |
| charldegoal | 0W / 1L / 0D | View |
| Most Played Opponents | ||
|---|---|---|
| whattimeisit | 57W / 30L / 3D | View Games |
| eddie123g | 27W / 44L / 3D | View Games |
| junaxjunax | 35W / 32L / 6D | View Games |
| hennearby | 27W / 36L / 1D | View Games |
| rhoycobs2010 | 32W / 28L / 1D | View Games |
Rating
| Year | Bullet | Blitz | Rapid | Daily |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 2032 | |||
| 2024 | 1153 | 1951 | ||
| 2023 | 2000 | |||
| 2022 | 1899 | 1887 | ||
| 2021 | 2004 | 1365 | ||
| 2020 | 2059 | |||
| 2019 | 2029 | |||
| 2018 | 1663 | 2089 | 800 | |
| 2017 | 1647 | 1834 | ||
| 2016 | 1672 | 1786 | ||
| 2015 | 1620 | 1659 | 1200 |
Stats by Year
| Year | White | Black | Moves |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 874W / 800L / 64D | 805W / 859L / 73D | 77.0 |
| 2024 | 1673W / 1396L / 106D | 1491W / 1573L / 110D | 76.9 |
| 2023 | 1225W / 1071L / 76D | 1161W / 1166L / 76D | 77.5 |
| 2022 | 1537W / 1298L / 125D | 1431W / 1480L / 121D | 78.4 |
| 2021 | 1552W / 1360L / 139D | 1444W / 1472L / 152D | 78.1 |
| 2020 | 1294W / 1292L / 111D | 1159W / 1433L / 123D | 76.7 |
| 2019 | 902W / 821L / 83D | 816W / 937L / 70D | 77.6 |
| 2018 | 1169W / 967L / 40D | 1055W / 1129L / 51D | 72.0 |
| 2017 | 1740W / 1402L / 61D | 1567W / 1569L / 57D | 70.1 |
| 2016 | 1501W / 1121L / 65D | 1327W / 1323L / 59D | 73.0 |
| 2015 | 1461W / 1138L / 46D | 1339W / 1296L / 37D | 70.1 |
Openings: Most Played
| Blitz Opening | Games | Wins | Losses | Draws | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Australian Defense | 2727 | 1360 | 1248 | 119 | 49.9% |
| Benoni Defense: Benoni Gambit Accepted | 2127 | 1030 | 1008 | 89 | 48.4% |
| Barnes Defense | 1933 | 892 | 988 | 53 | 46.1% |
| London System: Poisoned Pawn Variation | 1798 | 869 | 845 | 84 | 48.3% |
| Modern | 1684 | 776 | 843 | 65 | 46.1% |
| Caro-Kann Defense | 1378 | 637 | 694 | 47 | 46.2% |
| Sicilian Defense | 1306 | 651 | 609 | 46 | 49.9% |
| English Opening: King's English Variation | 1293 | 691 | 551 | 51 | 53.4% |
| English Opening: Carls-Bremen System | 1110 | 554 | 519 | 37 | 49.9% |
| Slav Defense | 968 | 509 | 417 | 42 | 52.6% |
| Bullet Opening | Games | Wins | Losses | Draws | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Modern | 1079 | 522 | 542 | 15 | 48.4% |
| Australian Defense | 814 | 467 | 331 | 16 | 57.4% |
| London System: Poisoned Pawn Variation | 646 | 348 | 292 | 6 | 53.9% |
| Czech Defense | 537 | 264 | 265 | 8 | 49.2% |
| Benoni Defense: Benoni Gambit Accepted | 521 | 274 | 237 | 10 | 52.6% |
| Alekhine Defense | 466 | 221 | 245 | 0 | 47.4% |
| Barnes Defense | 306 | 132 | 174 | 0 | 43.1% |
| Scandinavian Defense | 287 | 111 | 171 | 5 | 38.7% |
| Colle: 3...e6 4.Bd3 c5 | 284 | 149 | 130 | 5 | 52.5% |
| Slav Defense | 269 | 149 | 118 | 2 | 55.4% |
| Rapid Opening | Games | Wins | Losses | Draws | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Benoni Defense: Benoni Gambit Accepted | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| Daily Opening | Games | Wins | Losses | Draws | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 5 | 2 | 3 | 0 | 40.0% |
| Barnes Defense | 2 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0.0% |
| Scandinavian Defense | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0.0% |
| Australian Defense | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0.0% |
🔥 Streaks
| Streak | Longest | Current |
|---|---|---|
| Winning | 14 | 0 |
| Losing | 13 | 2 |