Lennon Hart Salgados (LHS29)
Once a humble contender stepping onto the virtual battlefield in 2012 with a bullet rating just north of 1350, Lennon Hart Salgados has since rocketed through the ranks to become a formidable force in the online chess world. Known by the username LHS29, his chess journey reads like an epic saga of resilience, brilliance, and a sprinkling of digital magic.
Career Highlights & Style
- Bullet Champion: Achieved a peak bullet rating of an impressive 2678 in November 2024, proving lightning-fast moves and nerves of steel.
- Blitz Master: Broke into the elite 2800+ club with a peak blitz rating of 2865, showcasing a dazzling tactical eye and rapid strategic thinking.
- Rapid Competitor: Although less frequent in this format, Lennon still managed a peak rapid rating above 2200, balancing speed and precision.
Stats that Tell the Story
With over 2500 bullet games in their arsenal, Lennon sports a gritty 44.4% win rate against a relentless tide of opponents. Their style often embraces the enigmatic "Top Secret" openings, possibly revealing a fine blend of creativity and unpredictability that keeps adversaries guessing. When it comes to blitz, LHS29 isn’t shy to mix up defenses and openings, weaving a complex web from classical gambits to modern variations.
Moments of Glory & Grit
LHS29’s longest winning streak hits a stunning 22-game run, a testament to their dominance, and the current losing streak at a mere 3 games shows a fighter who's always ready to bounce back. Their games are marathon affairs, averaging over 80 moves per win, meaning resilience and patience keep opponents exhausted and outmaneuvered. The player’s psychological toughness is notable: an incredible 86% comeback rate after setbacks and a very low tilt factor, suggesting cold nerves under fire (or maybe a secret stash of coffee).
Chess Battle-Tested
Whether it's the fierce Pirc Defense or the quirky Nimzowitsch Larsen Attack, Lennon’s repertoire is vast and adventurous. LHS29’s most recent crushing victories include forcing resignations with spectacular plays in critical endgames—perhaps using a secret chess potion reserved only for the boldest crusaders of the board.
The Human Behind the Legend
More than just raw numbers and stats, Lennon’s chess narrative is one of constant growth and adaptation. Facing grandmasters and relentless opponents repeatedly (with rivals like gmjoey1 and xasid81 filling their scorebook), LHS29’s willingness to learn and evolve shines through. From early rapid climbs to the recent battles at the pinnacle of competitive online chess, Lennon is more than a chess player—they are a chess phenomenon in the making.
Fun fact: LHS29 once toyed with the idea of revealing their "Top Secret" openings... but decided some mysteries are better preserved for the battleground.
In the end, Lennon Hart Salgados is that rare blend of tactician, strategist, and entertainer who turns the 64 squares into a stage for unforgettable clashes, inspiring both awe and occasional exasperation in friends and foes alike.
Overview of your recent bullet games
Your latestBullet play shows a strong willingness to fight for initiative and to convert sharp tactical chances when they arise. You’ve demonstrated the ability to coordinate pieces on active files and to pressure the opponent's king in middlegame skirmishes. At times you finish with clear, decisive sequences, which is a great strength in fast time controls. There are also moments where you got caught in tactical clashes or let the pace of the game push you into risky decisions. This is common in bullet, and with targeted practice you can turn these into reliable strengths.
What you did well
- Focused on rapid development and keeping your pieces active, which helped you maintain pressure in the middlegame.
- Showed willingness to enter tactical lines and seek concrete chances, which led to decisive outcomes in several games.
- Maintained good king safety and kept lines open for rooks and the queen to operate in the more dynamic portions of the games.
Key areas to improve for bullet
- Time management: develop a quick pre-move and evaluation routine to decide on solid, forcing moves early, so you don’t drift into complex positions when the clock is tight.
- Decision discipline in tactics: in fast games, double-check for immediate threats against your king and look for forcing moves first to avoid getting mated or losing material in chaotic positions.
- Endgame awareness: many bullet games reach simplified endgames quickly; practice rook endings and pawn endgames to convert holds and small advantages into wins.
- Opening consolidation: choose a small, reliable repertoire for bullet and practice the typical middlegame plans that arise from those lines, rather than pursuing deep theoretical lines under pressure.
- Avoid over-ambitious trades: when time is short, prefer solid exchanges and keep a clear plan rather than trading into uncertain positions that reduce practical winning chances.
Opening performance snapshot
You’ve been experimenting with several openings. Here are quick takeaways to guide future practice:
- Czech Defense and Nimzo-Larsen Attack show you can handle standard structures; reinforce typical development, central control, and safe king placement to sustain activity.
- Modern Defense and English-type setups offer flexible plans; focus on consistent piece development and clear middlegame ideas (targeted pawn breaks, piece coordination).
- Pick 2–3 openings you feel most comfortable with and build a lightweight, practical plan for each so you can execute quickly in bullet games.
Two-week practical plan for faster improvement
- Daily 10 minutes of tactical puzzles focused on checks, forcing sequences, and quick material decisions; after each puzzle, note the key idea and how you spotted it quickly.
- Opening focus: choose two openings from your current set (for example, Nimzo-Larsen Attack and Modern Defense) and work through the main lines against standard replies, writing down 3 typical middlegame plans for each.
- Post-game review: after each bullet game, identify 2 turning points and write one alternative plan you would try next time in a similar position.
- Endgame micro-drills: 5 minutes daily on rook endings and king activity to improve conversion in shortened games.
Optional practice ideas and resources
These placeholders can be replaced with your own notes or linked resources as you prefer. They’re here to help you structure study time without overwhelming your schedule.
- Practice puzzle sets: focus on checks and mates in 1–2 moves.
- Short opening summaries: write a one-page guide for each of your two chosen openings with typical plans.
- After-action notes: maintain a small “2-point” log after every game (turning point and next-step plan).
🆚 Opponent Insights
| Recent Opponents | ||
|---|---|---|
| Joe Assaad | 0W / 2L / 1D | View |
| Lalarttu86 | 4W / 1L / 0D | View |
| Omer Akkara | 0W / 0L / 1D | View |
| JohnWick2011 | 0W / 1L / 0D | View |
| Martinezzz2002 | 2W / 2L / 0D | View |
| Alexander Krastev | 1W / 0L / 0D | View |
| Clément Candelot | 0W / 1L / 0D | View |
| Aku Salonen | 0W / 1L / 0D | View |
| Ruslan Soltanici | 1W / 0L / 0D | View |
| kleim0 | 2W / 0L / 0D | View |
| Most Played Opponents | ||
|---|---|---|
| Rogelio Jr Antonio | 25W / 35L / 4D | View Games |
| Yuri Zhizmer | 17W / 39L / 3D | View Games |
| Luffe Magdalaga | 20W / 19L / 5D | View Games |
| stopinsky | 11W / 29L / 1D | View Games |
| TaeKwondoKing | 11W / 23L / 1D | View Games |
Rating
| Year | Bullet | Blitz | Rapid | Daily |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 2643 | 2773 | 2199 | |
| 2024 | 2640 | 2618 | 2199 | |
| 2023 | 2386 | 2626 | 2179 | |
| 2022 | 2516 | 2667 | 2185 | |
| 2021 | 2659 | 2711 | 2100 | |
| 2020 | 2439 | |||
| 2019 | 2339 | 2020 | ||
| 2018 | 2396 | 2402 | ||
| 2017 | 2503 | 2267 | ||
| 2016 | 2456 | 2369 | ||
| 2015 | 2253 | 2364 | ||
| 2014 | 2342 | 2372 | ||
| 2013 | 2437 | 2231 | ||
| 2012 | 2316 | 1383 |
Stats by Year
| Year | White | Black | Moves |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 216W / 235L / 57D | 197W / 254L / 51D | 90.7 |
| 2024 | 265W / 300L / 54D | 263W / 312L / 47D | 88.7 |
| 2023 | 58W / 73L / 12D | 61W / 72L / 18D | 83.0 |
| 2022 | 234W / 221L / 54D | 206W / 260L / 43D | 86.5 |
| 2021 | 159W / 121L / 42D | 170W / 124L / 29D | 84.1 |
| 2020 | 10W / 10L / 2D | 13W / 8L / 1D | 82.2 |
| 2019 | 1W / 8L / 0D | 5W / 4L / 0D | 67.1 |
| 2018 | 15W / 16L / 0D | 15W / 10L / 2D | 79.5 |
| 2017 | 78W / 78L / 4D | 63W / 94L / 5D | 80.2 |
| 2016 | 76W / 76L / 13D | 55W / 97L / 7D | 87.5 |
| 2015 | 24W / 36L / 2D | 23W / 38L / 4D | 82.0 |
| 2014 | 139W / 136L / 21D | 137W / 143L / 14D | 89.6 |
| 2013 | 81W / 46L / 5D | 79W / 52L / 3D | 84.3 |
| 2012 | 18W / 1L / 1D | 20W / 0L / 0D | 78.8 |
Openings: Most Played
| Bullet Opening | Games | Wins | Losses | Draws | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Czech Defense | 420 | 173 | 231 | 16 | 41.2% |
| Modern Defense | 232 | 104 | 120 | 8 | 44.8% |
| Amar Gambit | 124 | 54 | 64 | 6 | 43.5% |
| Australian Defense | 123 | 52 | 68 | 3 | 42.3% |
| Colle System: Rhamphorhynchus Variation | 113 | 51 | 56 | 6 | 45.1% |
| Slav Defense: Bonet Gambit | 104 | 44 | 49 | 11 | 42.3% |
| Nimzo-Larsen Attack | 96 | 40 | 51 | 5 | 41.7% |
| English Opening | 69 | 29 | 37 | 3 | 42.0% |
| Alekhine Defense | 64 | 29 | 33 | 2 | 45.3% |
| Catalan Opening | 55 | 23 | 29 | 3 | 41.8% |
| Blitz Opening | Games | Wins | Losses | Draws | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Czech Defense | 621 | 281 | 287 | 53 | 45.2% |
| Modern Defense | 207 | 87 | 101 | 19 | 42.0% |
| Catalan Opening | 89 | 42 | 33 | 14 | 47.2% |
| Gruenfeld: 5.Bg5 c6 | 80 | 33 | 34 | 13 | 41.2% |
| Diemer-Duhm Gambit (DDG): 4...f5 | 75 | 26 | 37 | 12 | 34.7% |
| Bogo-Indian Defense | 74 | 32 | 35 | 7 | 43.2% |
| Slav Defense: Bonet Gambit | 71 | 32 | 32 | 7 | 45.1% |
| King's Indian Defense: Orthodox Variation, Aronin-Taimanov Defense | 68 | 37 | 27 | 4 | 54.4% |
| Döry Defense | 62 | 25 | 33 | 4 | 40.3% |
| Catalan Opening: Open Defense | 60 | 24 | 30 | 6 | 40.0% |
| Rapid Opening | Games | Wins | Losses | Draws | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Czech Defense | 19 | 12 | 5 | 2 | 63.2% |
| Modern Defense | 9 | 5 | 2 | 2 | 55.6% |
| Diemer-Duhm Gambit (DDG): 4...f5 | 8 | 3 | 3 | 2 | 37.5% |
| English Opening: Closed, Taimanov Variation | 8 | 3 | 5 | 0 | 37.5% |
| King's Indian Defense: Orthodox Variation, Aronin-Taimanov Defense | 7 | 4 | 2 | 1 | 57.1% |
| Slav Defense: Bonet Gambit | 7 | 5 | 2 | 0 | 71.4% |
| Benko Gambit | 6 | 3 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% |
| Sicilian Defense | 6 | 4 | 0 | 2 | 66.7% |
| Sicilian Defense: Najdorf Variation, Scheveningen Variation | 4 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 75.0% |
| Colle System: Rhamphorhynchus Variation | 4 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 50.0% |
🔥 Streaks
| Streak | Longest | Current |
|---|---|---|
| Winning | 22 | 0 |
| Losing | 11 | 1 |