Meet limjerry: The Blitz Bandit
In the fast-paced battlefield of the 64 squares, limjerry prowls like a cunning fox hunting for pawns and preys alike. With a peak blitz rating soaring at an impressive 1795 back in November 2019, this chess enthusiast has since become a true blitz aficionado, wielding the clock as skillfully as their knights and bishops.
Known for their love of the Van’t Kruijs Opening — which boasts a sizzling 90.46% win rate in blitz — limjerry has a penchant for starting games with style and flair. Whether it's the robust French Defense or the sneaky Nimzowitsch Defense's French Connection Variation, their opening repertoire is a masterclass in strategic diversity.
Bullet games? Oh, they've conquered those too, peaking at a fiery 1787. With a cool 2,500+ wins in blitz and over 4,800 bullet victories under their belt, limjerry's opponents better stay sharp or risk being #CheckmatedInRecordTime.
Playing Style & Personality
They average about 43 moves per win, proving patience isn't just a virtue, it's a necessity. When losing a piece, their win rate after such misfortune remains an astounding 74.69% — a true test of resilience or sheer stubbornness!
Ever the tricky tactician, limjerry has a comeback rate of an enviable 71.03%. But watch out: with a tilt factor of 12, even the hardest steel can bend... just enough to keep games interesting.
Notable Feats
- Longest winning streak: 58 (yeah, that’s not a typo!)
- Peak rapid rating arrived fashionably late in 2024, hitting 1586.
- Master of the Van Geet Opening with an eye-watering 93.02% win rate in blitz games.
Known Rivals & Allies
Some opponents love to face limjerry; others might prefer less firepower. For instance, nxnguyennt has tasted defeat 83.2% of the times they've met, but jagdish37 and cleverchessplay have so far always been outfoxed (100% loss rate against limjerry).
Whether it's a first blood win or a last-minute time out, limjerry knows how to seal both with panache. Their recent matches have ended in victories by checkmate and by running down the clock — because who says speed doesn't checkmate?
Fun Facts
- Preferred time control is blitz — because slow is just a setting on the microwave.
- White and Black win rates hug the high 70%s, proving no color gets an unfair advantage during their play.
- All that's missing is a flashy signature move — but who needs a signature when you've got a Van't Kruijs opening spellbook!?
Recent Thrills & Spills
Just recently, limjerry decimated cleverchessplay by checkmate and outlasted jagdish37 on time in blistering blitz duels, showcasing precise timing and fierce determination.
But even champions face challenges — mirasek2 handed them a hard-fought resignation loss in a tough battle of wits and nerves.
Want to dive deeper into limjerry's kingdom of checkmates? Remember, slow and steady may win the race, but fast and fearless wins the blitz!
Your blitz performance snapshot
You’ve shown solid long‑term progress with a positive rating trend over 3, 6, and 12 months. In the most recent month, there was a small dip, but the overall trajectory over the longer term remains encouraging. Your strength-adjusted win rate sits in a strong range, which means your general decisions and timing are pointing in the right direction. The data also suggests you do best when you stick to deliberate, consistent ideas rather than chasing every tactical spark in every game.
What you’re doing well
- You play with ambition in blitz, often creating practical chances through active piece play and sharp substitutions in the early middle game.
- Your opening choices that you rely on tend to generate favorable positions, especially when you maintain pressure and avoid over‑complicating too early.
- You respond well under time pressure when you have a clear plan and a few forcing ideas to fall back on.
Areas to focus on improving
- Time management in the last month: spare attention to avoid rushing crucial decisions when the clock gets tight.
- Prophylaxis and king safety: in sharp blitz lines, double‑check for hidden threats against your king and avoid leaving back‑rank or loose pieces undefended.
- Selective aggression: while attacking is a strength, be wary of over‑extensions in games where the position is still curving toward equal chances.
- Opening reliability: some less tested lines have yielded mixed results. Favor 2–3 solid, well-practiced openings and study their common plans so you can navigate rough lines more calmly.
Training plan to implement this week
- Daily 15–20 minute tactic sessions focused on quick calculation of forced sequences and common check ideas in three‑check themes.
- Practice 2–3 main blitz openings you know well (for example, the Amar Gambit and Australian Defense variants you’ve used) to deepen familiarity and reduce decision fatigue.
- End‑game drill: identify a simple endgame pattern you frequently reach and lock in a reliable plan to convert small advantages under time pressure.
- Post‑game review: after every blitz session, glance through the last 2–3 games to spot where time pressure changed your decisions or where prophylaxis was missed.
Opening suggestions you can lean on
- Amar Gambit — strong results with initiatory pressure; stick to it when the opponent is unprepared, but know the typical defensive resources to avoid getting overwhelmed.
- Australian Defense — another solid option that tends to lead to clear plans and less chaos in the early phase.
- Avoid over‑relying on the Unknown category; its results are mixed, so reserve it for surprise moments or through deeper preparation.
- Consider pairing these with a simple, repeatable follow‑up plan so you can play quicker in blitz without sacrificing structure.
Practical drills you can start today
- Blitz safety checklist before each move: (a) is my king safe? (b) do I have a forced move or tactic? (c) what is my opponent threatening in the next move?
- Two‑minute “quick win” tactic drill: look for forks, skewers, and discovered attacks, aiming to spot a forcing line within two moves.
- Three‑check mindset drill: practice recognizing when you can create a check that also improves your position or gains material, and when to step back to avoid unnecessary risks.
Next steps
If you’d like, I can tailor a short, private practice plan based on your latest games. You can also share your current preferred time controls and I’ll adjust the drills accordingly. See your profile for a quick reference to your recent activity: limjerry.
🆚 Opponent Insights
| Recent Opponents | ||
|---|---|---|
| ghorbanijavid | 0W / 1L / 0D | View |
| joyo-nakamura | 1W / 0L / 0D | View |
| faiz07he | 1W / 0L / 0D | View |
| oceannelson | 0W / 0L / 1D | View |
| g3rsrd0 | 1W / 0L / 0D | View |
| light3525 | 1W / 0L / 0D | View |
| palcazu | 0W / 1L / 0D | View |
| midare6 | 0W / 1L / 0D | View |
| plsdontmovelikethat | 0W / 1L / 0D | View |
| edgarhdezglez | 1W / 0L / 0D | View |
| Most Played Opponents | ||
|---|---|---|
| nxnguyennt | 108W / 23L / 0D | View Games |
| mauroghetti | 92W / 5L / 0D | View Games |
| alaves71 | 67W / 24L / 0D | View Games |
| ladybird2690 | 77W / 5L / 0D | View Games |
| wb06 | 70W / 8L / 0D | View Games |
Rating
| Year | Bullet | Blitz | Rapid | Daily |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 1052 | 1435 | ||
| 2024 | 1362 | 1341 | 1325 | |
| 2023 | 1552 | 1347 | 1321 | |
| 2022 | 1485 | 1363 | 1437 | |
| 2021 | 1586 | 1409 | 1362 | |
| 2020 | 1408 | 1646 | ||
| 2019 | 1722 | 1784 |
Stats by Year
| Year | White | Black | Moves |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 1393W / 497L / 32D | 1396W / 505L / 35D | 50.0 |
| 2024 | 2172W / 542L / 40D | 2215W / 495L / 32D | 44.7 |
| 2023 | 3968W / 1261L / 84D | 4056W / 1222L / 74D | 49.6 |
| 2022 | 413W / 220L / 13D | 398W / 221L / 13D | 51.3 |
| 2021 | 615W / 210L / 10D | 598W / 217L / 11D | 43.6 |
| 2020 | 1538W / 275L / 9D | 1557W / 249L / 6D | 41.6 |
| 2019 | 751W / 131L / 6D | 712W / 137L / 7D | 40.7 |
Openings: Most Played
| Bullet Opening | Games | Wins | Losses | Draws | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Amar Gambit | 1544 | 1348 | 195 | 1 | 87.3% |
| Australian Defense | 1095 | 898 | 194 | 3 | 82.0% |
| French Defense | 911 | 793 | 114 | 4 | 87.0% |
| Barnes Defense | 368 | 308 | 56 | 4 | 83.7% |
| Sicilian Defense: Alapin Variation, Sherzer Variation | 359 | 282 | 76 | 1 | 78.5% |
| Amazon Attack: Siberian Attack | 238 | 163 | 75 | 0 | 68.5% |
| Sicilian Defense: Closed, Anti-Sveshnikov Variation, Kharlov-Kramnik Line | 171 | 132 | 39 | 0 | 77.2% |
| Colle System: Rhamphorhynchus Variation | 114 | 92 | 22 | 0 | 80.7% |
| Amazon Attack | 97 | 78 | 19 | 0 | 80.4% |
| Unknown | 94 | 41 | 53 | 0 | 43.6% |
| Blitz Opening | Games | Wins | Losses | Draws | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Amar Gambit | 4138 | 3676 | 447 | 15 | 88.8% |
| French Defense | 3352 | 2875 | 445 | 32 | 85.8% |
| Australian Defense | 2171 | 1915 | 240 | 16 | 88.2% |
| Barnes Defense | 1516 | 1221 | 287 | 8 | 80.5% |
| Sicilian Defense: Alapin Variation, Sherzer Variation | 1120 | 835 | 274 | 11 | 74.5% |
| Amazon Attack: Siberian Attack | 572 | 463 | 102 | 7 | 80.9% |
| French Defense: Exchange Variation | 561 | 279 | 258 | 24 | 49.7% |
| Sicilian Defense: Closed, Anti-Sveshnikov Variation, Kharlov-Kramnik Line | 550 | 373 | 167 | 10 | 67.8% |
| Unknown | 489 | 190 | 298 | 1 | 38.9% |
| Philidor Defense | 441 | 259 | 173 | 9 | 58.7% |
| Rapid Opening | Games | Wins | Losses | Draws | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Amar Gambit | 27 | 19 | 7 | 1 | 70.4% |
| Nimzo-Larsen Attack | 5 | 3 | 2 | 0 | 60.0% |
| Unknown | 5 | 4 | 1 | 0 | 80.0% |
| Australian Defense | 4 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| Philidor Defense | 4 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 75.0% |
| Unknown Opening* | 3 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 66.7% |
| Barnes Opening: Walkerling | 2 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0.0% |
| French Defense | 2 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 50.0% |
| Modern | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| Caro-Kann Defense | 2 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 50.0% |
🔥 Streaks
| Streak | Longest | Current |
|---|---|---|
| Winning | 58 | 0 |
| Losing | 12 | 1 |