Biography
Marc LLari, known to the chess community as LLariMarc, is a dedicated competitor and a proud FIDE Master. With a blade-sharp intuition for tactical melees and a calm hand in the clock's teeth, Marc has built a reputation as a formidable blitz player who can turn a precarious position into a winning attack. A modern chess personality, he balances online battles with serious over-the-board aspirations, always ready to dive into a sharp line or a patient endgame depending on the moment. His style blends aggressive ideas with practical decisions, often choosing dynamic weaponry in fast time controls. In the coming years, Marc aims to continue growing his impact on the blitz scene and inspire other players with a blend of humor and stubborn resilience.
Titles and Focus
Marc LLari earned the title of FIDE Master from FIDE, a recognition that accompanies his ongoing pursuit of excellence across fast time controls. His preferred time control is Blitz, where he frequently tests ideas and pushes the pace of play. He remains an active participant in online and offline events, always looking for new challenges to sharpen his instincts and keep his repertoire vibrant.
Opening Repertoire Highlights
- Dory Defense — 24 games, 9 wins, 13 losses, 2 draws (WinRate 37.5%)
- Amazon Attack: Siberian Attack — 21 games, 12 wins, 8 losses, 1 draw (WinRate 57.14%)
- Queen's Pawn Game: Torre Attack — 16 games, 8 wins, 6 losses, 2 draws (WinRate 50%)
- Caro-Kann Defense — 15 games, 8 wins, 6 losses, 1 draw (WinRate 53.33%)
- Amar Gambit — 14 games, 7 wins, 5 losses, 2 draws (WinRate 50%)
Streaks and Endgame Tenacity
Marc has demonstrated notable resilience in his competitive journey. His longest winning streak reached six games, while his longest losing streak stretched to seven—testaments to his grit and willingness to learn from tough stretches. He frequently transposes into complex endgames, with an endgame frequency around 87% of his blitz games, and his come-back potential remains high, with a comeback rate near 84%.
Player Links and Profile
- Profile: LLariMarc
- Peak Blitz Rating: 2594 (2024-08-06)
- Recent Activity Snapshot:
Recent blitz loss: key takeaways
Your latest blitz loss highlighted how quickly a sharp attack can unfold when king safety and coordinate pieces aren’t protected. The game featured heavy pressure on your king and a back‑rank mating idea from Black. In blitz, it’s easy for openings to lead to double threats if you overextend or misplace the king, so the focus should be on solid development, prophylaxis, and simple defensive plans.
What went well in the game
- You played a dynamic opening setup that creates active chances and tries to seize the initiative rather than settling into a passive position.
- Your middlegame piece activity showed you can coordinate queen and minor pieces when you have momentum.
- You kept trying to press though the position remained tense, which is good in blitz when your opponent makes mistakes under time pressure.
What to improve for the next games
- Strengthen king safety: ensure your king has a solid pawn shield and avoid early queen incursions that invite aggressive counterplay. If needed, prioritize rapid development and a timely castling to keep the king safer.
- Adopt a simple, repeatable plan in the early middlegame: develop pieces, connect the rooks, and decide on a clear middlegame idea (control of central squares, target a specific weakness, or create a clear pawn break) before launching tactics.
- Guard against back‑rank weaknesses: verify that you have at least one defensive resource (a rook on a safe file, a knight covering critical squares, or a timely king move) to guard against back‑rank threats.
- Time management in blitz: if you sense a tactical melee developing, consider trading into a simpler position or making a safe consolidating move instead of chasing a sharp line you may not fully calculate under time pressure.
Strengths to build on
- Comfort with sharp, dynamic ideas when you have initiative, which helps you seize chances against less precise play.
- Good pressure application when your pieces work together, especially when the opponent’s king is under activity.
- Solid openness to trying different systems, which gives you flexibility in blitz against a range of opponents.
Practical improvements for the coming sessions
- Polish king safety with a quick sanity check: after developing, ask if there is any immediate tactic against your king. If yes, choose a safer continuation or a simple exchange to reduce risk.
- Build a two-opening repertoire with clear middlegame plans that you can execute quickly in blitz. Based on your openings data, you do well with aggressive lines like the Amazon Attack and solid choices like the East Indian Defense; consider making these your core defaults and practice their typical middlegame ideas until they feel routine.
- In blitz, practice prophylaxis patterns: before making a move, scan for your opponent’s threats and consider a defensive move that neutralizes them rather than hoping for a quick counterattack.
- Strengthen endgame readiness: when you reach simplified positions, have a basic plan for converting small advantages (king centralization, rook activity, and pawn structure) to avoid risky chasing of material.
Opening performance and suggested focus
Your openings data shows several strong options. Lean into the lines with higher win rates and familiar middlegame plans, and gradually phase out the lines that consistently underperform for you in blitz. If you’d like, I can propose a compact two-opening repertoire tailored to your style with quick, practical middlegame ideas.
Optional review: quick replay of the loss
If you want, we can review the loss step by step to pinpoint exact decision points to adjust in future games. Here is a compact replay placeholder you can use to visualize the key moves and turning points:
[[Pgn|1. g3 1... e5 2. Bg2 2... d5 3. c4 3... c6 4. d3 4... Nf6 5. cxd5 cxd5 6. Nf3 Nc6 7. O-O Be7 8. Nc3 O-O 9. e4 d4 10. Ne2 Nd7 11. Nd2 f6 12. f4 Nc5 13. Nb3 Be6 14. Nxc5 Bxc5 15. f5 Bf7 16. Bd2 Qb6 17. Qb1 a5 18. Rc1 Rfc8 19. Rc2 Bb4 20. a3 Bb3 21. axb4 Bxc2 22. Qxc2 Nxb4 23. Qb3+ Kh8 24. Nc1 Qd6 25. Bf3 Nc2 26. Ra4 Ne3 27. Kf2 b5 28. Qxb5 Rab8 29. Qxa5 Rxb2 30. Ra2 Rxa2 31. Qxa2 h6 32. Ke2 Qb8 33. Qb3 Qc7 34. Bh5 Rb8 35. Qf7 Qc2 36. Bg6 Qd1+ 37. Kf2 Qf1#],orientation|white|autoplay|true]
🆚 Opponent Insights
| Most Played Opponents | ||
|---|---|---|
| Volen Dyulgerov | 5W / 6L / 0D | View Games |
| Daniel Gutiérrez Olivares | 4W / 3L / 2D | View Games |
| Gianmarco Leiva | 2W / 5L / 0D | View Games |
| Laurin Jahnz | 4W / 1L / 2D | View Games |
| Medina Paz Miguel 1968 | 3W / 2L / 1D | View Games |
Rating
| Year | Bullet | Blitz | Rapid | Daily |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 2708 | 1508 | ||
| 2024 | 2574 | 2581 | 2164 | |
| 2023 | 2277 |
Stats by Year
| Year | White | Black | Moves |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 110W / 105L / 34D | 94W / 127L / 22D | 90.3 |
| 2024 | 61W / 63L / 10D | 67W / 58L / 15D | 100.7 |
| 2023 | 11W / 11L / 4D | 7W / 18L / 3D | 99.7 |
Openings: Most Played
| Blitz Opening | Games | Wins | Losses | Draws | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Döry Defense | 24 | 9 | 13 | 2 | 37.5% |
| Amazon Attack: Siberian Attack | 21 | 12 | 8 | 1 | 57.1% |
| London System: Poisoned Pawn Variation | 20 | 5 | 11 | 4 | 25.0% |
| Queen's Pawn Game: Torre Attack | 16 | 8 | 6 | 2 | 50.0% |
| Caro-Kann Defense | 15 | 8 | 6 | 1 | 53.3% |
| Amar Gambit | 14 | 7 | 5 | 2 | 50.0% |
| Dutch Defense | 12 | 6 | 5 | 1 | 50.0% |
| East Indian Defense | 12 | 7 | 5 | 0 | 58.3% |
| Colle System: Rhamphorhynchus Variation | 10 | 4 | 6 | 0 | 40.0% |
| Unknown | 10 | 7 | 3 | 0 | 70.0% |
| Bullet Opening | Games | Wins | Losses | Draws | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Colle System: Rhamphorhynchus Variation | 61 | 21 | 35 | 5 | 34.4% |
| Amar Gambit | 44 | 21 | 16 | 7 | 47.7% |
| Czech Defense | 36 | 19 | 14 | 3 | 52.8% |
| King's Indian Attack | 32 | 15 | 13 | 4 | 46.9% |
| Australian Defense | 25 | 9 | 13 | 3 | 36.0% |
| Hungarian Opening: Wiedenhagen-Beta Gambit | 23 | 13 | 8 | 2 | 56.5% |
| Caro-Kann Defense | 21 | 7 | 11 | 3 | 33.3% |
| Nimzo-Larsen Attack: Classical Variation | 21 | 10 | 7 | 4 | 47.6% |
| Nimzo-Larsen Attack | 21 | 4 | 15 | 2 | 19.1% |
| Philidor Defense | 12 | 3 | 8 | 1 | 25.0% |
| Rapid Opening | Games | Wins | Losses | Draws | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| London System: Poisoned Pawn Variation | 2 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 50.0% |
| Caro-Kann Defense: Two Knights Attack, Mindeno Variation | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0.0% |
| English Defense: Blumenfeld-Hiva Gambit | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| Gruenfeld: Classical Exchange, 10.Be3 Bg4 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| Unknown | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| Caro-Kann Defense | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| Gruenfeld: 5.Bf4 O-O 6.e3 c5 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0.0% |
| Amazon Attack: Siberian Attack | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0.0% |
| Dutch Defense | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
🔥 Streaks
| Streak | Longest | Current |
|---|---|---|
| Winning | 6 | 1 |
| Losing | 7 | 0 |