Chess Player Profile: Maharlika_dot_com
Maharlika_dot_com is a dynamic force in the chess world, a player whose journey through the exciting arena of 2023 has been marked by rapid-fire decisions, deep tactical insight, and a resilient fighting spirit. Balancing a wide spectrum of time controls—from blistering bullet games to more leisurely daily battles—this player’s ratings reflect both speed and strategic depth. In bullet chess, where quick calculation is paramount, Maharlika_dot_com has reached a peak of 1592 and consistently finishes close to 1483, while his blitz performance hovers around the 1087 mark. Even in daily games, his steady approach earns him a respectable rating near 989.
Known for a disciplined style, Maharlika_dot_com’s performance is defined by thoughtful decision-making and a keen sense for moment-to-moment evaluation. His average winning game lasts over 74 moves, a reflection of enduring strategic planning, while losses tend to be wrapped up more swiftly at around 42 moves—a clear indicator of his ability to recognize when a position is beyond recovery. An early resignation rate of 16.42% further underscores his mature judgment in avoiding battles that are unwinnable, conserving energy for the next challenge.
Time performance analysis paints an intriguing picture: Maharlika_dot_com shines during specific hours of the day, achieving peak win rates late in the evening and strong performances during key afternoon slots. Whether it’s the focused intensity at 22:00 or the invigorating play seen around 17:00 to 18:00, his calendar reveals both adaptability and an inherent understanding of his own rhythm.
Perhaps one of the most impressive hallmarks of his play is his tactical awareness. With a comeback rate surpassing 91% and an astonishing ability to turn the tables even when materially disadvantaged, Maharlika_dot_com demonstrates a level of resilience and ingenuity that fuels his competitive edge. His psychological approach, tempered by a measured tilt factor and a modest win difference between rated and casual contests, reveals a steady mindset under pressure.
Overall, Maharlika_dot_com is a testament to versatility and determination in the modern chess landscape. His ability to navigate complex positions, blend speed with strategy, and rally from setbacks makes him a formidable opponent and an inspiring figure for chess enthusiasts everywhere.
Hi Jomz Santos – Personalised Chess Feedback
1. What you already do well
- Flexible opening repertoire. You comfortably switch between the Modern (…g6 Bg7) as Black and the Larsen/Nimzo-Larsen (1 b3) or Queen’s-pawn systems as White. This variety makes you hard to prepare for.
- Fianchetto expertise. You understand typical plans after a kingside fianchetto: delaying …e5/…d5 until the centre clarifies, and rerouting knights to e5/f6.
- Conversion technique when ahead. In several 60-second games you showed good composure converting extra pieces or pawns, even with seconds on the clock (e.g. vs maxi-boom).
2. Main growth areas
-
Time management.
• 4 of the 6 recent losses were on time while the position was playable.
• You frequently enter critical positions with <5 s, forcing “hope chess” moves.
➜ Action: Mix in 5 | 5 or 10 | 0 games each week. Quick thinking still matters, but you’ll get enough time to calculate one extra move deep. -
Early queen adventures.
Loss vs igagankalra (move 5 Qh5⁺) shows that an early queen sortie can backfire once pawns (…f6 …g5) gain tempo.
➜ Action: Before moving your queen in the opening, ask “Can any minor piece hit it on the next move?” If yes, reconsider. -
Pawn-storm discipline.
Pushing g- and h-pawns without full development left your king airy (see loss vs thereisnomeaning – 31 g4? and 38 g5?).
➜ Action: Rehearse three classical attacking models (Greek gift, minority attack, kingside pawn storm). Recognising standard cues helps you decide when pawn pushes are truly justified. -
End-game fundamentals.
In the lost K + P ending vs thereisnomeaning you missed the drawing plan of bringing the king in front of your passed pawn sooner.
➜ Action: Play 5 “King & pawn vs king” studies every session; then graduate to “rook vs rook + pawn” endings.
3. Concrete training plan (4-week sample)
| Day | Focus | Suggested Tool |
|---|---|---|
| Mon / Thu | 30 min tactic rush (pattern speed) | Chess-dot-com puzzles |
| Tue / Fri | One 10 | 0 game – annotate the critical moment | Self-analysis |
| Wed | End-game drill (king & pawn + rook basics) | “Silman’s Endgame Course” |
| Weekend | Study one grand-master game in your opening | Pick a model game with the Modern or Larsen |
4. Quick opening tips tailored to you
- Larsen Attack (1 b3): After 1…e5 you can transpose into a reversed Nimzo-Indian with 2 Bb2 Nc6 3 e3 d5 4 Bb5, aiming for light-square pressure.
- Modern Defence: If White closes the centre with e4-e5, strike back with …c5 quickly. The …c5 …d6 …Nc6 setup scores well in master practice.
- Queen’s-Gambit structures: When you play 5 e5 (space-gain line) remember the manoeuvre Nbd7-b6-c4 to eject White’s strong d5-knight.
5. Useful metrics to watch
Peak Blitz rating: 1218 (2023-01-24)
Performance rhythm:
6. Motivational end-note
Your tactical eye and willingness to play dynamically are big assets. Combine them with steadier clock usage and disciplined pawn play, and you’ll be knocking on the 1600-blitz door soon. Happy training!
🆚 Opponent Insights
| Most Played Opponents | ||
|---|---|---|
| Imil | 46W / 100L / 5D | View Games |
| perito1980 | 68W / 59L / 9D | View Games |
| EmoKidsBoy | 63W / 40L / 5D | View Games |
| Hertha Berlin | 70W / 17L / 2D | View Games |
| ivannikol | 69W / 15L / 3D | View Games |
Rating
| Year | Bullet | Blitz | Rapid | Daily |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2023 | 1483 | 1087 | 989 |
Stats by Year
| Year | White | Black | Moves |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023 | 2526W / 2195L / 103D | 2390W / 2276L / 127D | 60.0 |
Openings: Most Played
| Daily Opening | Games | Wins | Losses | Draws | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Australian Defense | 3 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 0.0% |
| Modern | 2 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 50.0% |
| Colle System: Rhamphorhynchus Variation | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0.0% |
| Nimzo-Larsen Attack | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| East Indian Defense | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| Scandinavian Defense | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0.0% |
| English Defense: Blumenfeld-Hiva Gambit | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0.0% |
| Modern Defense | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0.0% |
| Bullet Opening | Games | Wins | Losses | Draws | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Amar Gambit | 1168 | 253 | 901 | 14 | 21.7% |
| Australian Defense | 1142 | 587 | 528 | 27 | 51.4% |
| Scandinavian Defense | 1082 | 649 | 403 | 30 | 60.0% |
| Modern | 566 | 344 | 216 | 6 | 60.8% |
| QGD: 2...Bf5 3.cxd5 | 386 | 260 | 119 | 7 | 67.4% |
| Diemer-Duhm Gambit (DDG): 4...f5 | 313 | 201 | 105 | 7 | 64.2% |
| Czech Defense | 274 | 13 | 259 | 2 | 4.7% |
| Amazon Attack | 267 | 125 | 137 | 5 | 46.8% |
| Benoni Defense: Benoni Gambit Accepted | 232 | 140 | 85 | 7 | 60.3% |
| Modern Defense | 213 | 73 | 138 | 2 | 34.3% |
| Blitz Opening | Games | Wins | Losses | Draws | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Scandinavian Defense | 99 | 65 | 31 | 3 | 65.7% |
| Australian Defense | 66 | 43 | 22 | 1 | 65.2% |
| Modern | 37 | 27 | 9 | 1 | 73.0% |
| QGA: 3.e3 c5 | 33 | 27 | 6 | 0 | 81.8% |
| Unknown | 26 | 4 | 21 | 1 | 15.4% |
| QGD: 2...Bf5 3.cxd5 | 26 | 20 | 5 | 1 | 76.9% |
| Diemer-Duhm Gambit (DDG): 4...f5 | 22 | 17 | 5 | 0 | 77.3% |
| Amar Gambit | 21 | 5 | 16 | 0 | 23.8% |
| Amazon Attack | 16 | 10 | 6 | 0 | 62.5% |
| London System: Poisoned Pawn Variation | 15 | 9 | 5 | 1 | 60.0% |
🔥 Streaks
| Streak | Longest | Current |
|---|---|---|
| Winning | 22 | 0 |
| Losing | 30 | 1 |