Manu Prasad — The Chess.com Warrior
Also known in the virtual chess battlefields as manusutha, Manu Prasad is a force to be reckoned with across blitz, bullet, and rapid chess. His dazzling peak blitz rating of 2596 (achieved in April 2025) places him among the swiftest minds and quickest fingers on the board.
Rise of a Speedster
Starting with humble beginnings around 2016 with modest rapid ratings, Manu quickly upgraded his chess gear and leapt into serious blitz and bullet arenas. From rating jitters at around 1400 to crushing the 2400+ blitz mark in mere years, his journey is anything but boring. True to his username manusutha, he blends creativity and speed, often converting blitz battles into thrilling victories.
Playing Style & Quirks
- Early Resignation Rate: About 82%. Either he sees the checkmate train coming early, or he's just too polite to drag a lost game.
- Average Moves per Win: 14.2 moves — he doesn't waste time before delivering a knockout punch.
- Win Rate When Playing White: 53.76%, and respectfully holding 51.65% playing Black. Pretty balanced, so he’s no one-trick pony!
- Tilt Factor: 26 — which means even when the bad luck cloud hovers, he keeps his cool better than your average club player.
- Comeback Rate: About 20% — a true fighter, turning near disasters into glory on occasion.
Favorite Openings & Strategies
Manu’s weaponry includes some top-secret moves that no opponent truly knows about (or they pretend not to). His top openings range from the Nimzowitsch Defense with a respectable ~52% win rate, to spirited adventures with the French Defense Knight Variation and the Indian Game, where he boasts over 60% success.
Record & Rivalries
With over 34,000 blitz games logged, Manu has secured an impressive 18,000 wins, enduring the loss arrows only about 16,500 times and drawing a handful. His most frequent nemeses include totalnutter, 111michael, and hopefulwin, with hundreds of duels each — talk about some heated rivalries!
Most Recent Battles
His latest victories, often sealed by fierce tactical strikes or sneaky time wins, showcase a player who understands both the art and the clock. For instance, on May 26, 2025, in a blitz game against NoOpenings_CheaposONLY, Manu snagged a win on time after a battle in the English Opening Agincourt Defense.
Fun Facts
- Manu tends to shine brightest around 2 PM, when his win rate peaks thanks to his prime playing mojo.
- His bullet win rate is a speedy 57% — a deadly combination of brain and clicks.
- Strangely enough, the majority of games end with resignation — maybe he's just too intimidating on the board!
In Summary
Manu “manusutha” Prasad isn’t just a regular chess player; he's a chess gladiator in the fast-paced online arenas. Whether it’s blitzing past your defenses, bullet firing with precision, or rapidly setting traps, Manu's games are always a mix of brilliance and glimpses of speed-fueled madness. If you’re lucky enough to face him, better bring your best mouse hand and a good opening repertoiré... or prepare to rage resign early!
Quick summary for Manu Prasad
Nice volume and fight in your recent blitz — you keep creating chances, especially with tricky opening choices and sharp tactics. The main things costing you points are hanging pieces in chaotic positions, avoidable time trouble, and some overambitious sacrifices that aren’t fully calculated. Below are concrete, mobile-friendly steps to convert more of your chances into wins.
What you're doing well
- Sharp, practical openings — you score particularly well with surprise and gambit lines (these put opponents under pressure early). See examples like Blackburne Shilling Gambit and Amar Gambit.
- Good pattern recognition in tactics — many wins come from forcing combinations rather than long manoeuvres.
- High volume practice — your rapid play keeps you battle-hardened for typical blitz motifs.
Key mistakes to fix (high priority)
- Loose pieces / hanging pieces: you give away material in messy positions. Put a mental tick before each move to ask “Is any piece undefended?” (Loose Piece)
- Time trouble / poor clock management (Zeitnot): many losses come in the final minute. Simplify and avoid complex long lines when low on time.
- Speculative sacrifices without full calculation: don’t sac unless you see a forced continuation or practical compensation.
- Post-tactical tunnel vision: after you win material, you sometimes miss simple defensive replies or allow counterplay. Double-check opponent’s threats before simplifying.
Practical blitz checklist (use during games)
- 3-second safety check before every move: King safety, undefended pieces, immediate tactics.
- If under 1 minute think: avoid long-forcing variations; choose the most practical safe move.
- When you win material, trade down to a simpler winning endgame unless there’s concrete danger.
- Avoid pre-moving in unclear positions — pre-moves are for pure captures or forced recaptures only.
- Flagging is fine, but don’t rely on it. If you’re in a flag race, aim to keep at least one blocking resource for checks and counterchecks (Flagging).
Concrete 4-week training plan (blitz-focused)
- Daily 20–30 min tactics: focus on forks, pins, skewers, and trapping loose pieces. Use short sets (5–10 puzzles) and review missed ones.
- 3 sessions/week — 20 games at 3+2: work on clock management and simplified techniques in time trouble.
- Two 30-minute sessions/week — endgame fundamentals: king + pawn vs king, basic rook endings, and Lucena basics so you confidently convert material edge.
- One weekly opening review: pick your top 2 blitz lines and learn 2-3 key plans/move orders (not huge theory) so you avoid early blunders.
- After each session: 10 minutes of targeted review. Tag 5 recent losses and write one recurring pattern per game (e.g., "left knight en prise").
Practical drills (short & effective)
- “Loose-piece hunt” drill — solve 20 tactical puzzles that reward winning an undefended piece. Mark ones you missed and replay the positions from the moment a piece could have been left en prise.
- Flag-scenario drill — play 5 games where you purposely start with 60 seconds and practice making safe, practical moves only (no long calculations).
- Counting drill — pick 10 positions and force yourself to count checks/captures/promotions to depth 3 before moving.
Opening guidance (keep what works, tighten where needed)
- Keep the surprise/gambit lines you do well with, but memorize the typical defensive resource and one safe decline line for when opponents know the trap (e.g., maintain a reliable fallback).
- Study one solid, low-theory system for when you want to avoid wild complications — this reduces losses from early chaos.
- Openings to reinforce: Scandinavian Defense (high win rate for you) and other aggressive but sound options. Practice 3 main responses from opponents so you don’t get thrown off in move 5–10.
Game review routine (5–10 minutes per game)
- Scan the final position and note the decisive moments. Ask “what changed the evaluation?”
- Identify 1–2 recurring errors (e.g., hanging pawns, missed forks). Add them to a short checklist.
- Save a model game (win or instructive loss) as a reference and revisit it weekly.
Mindset & in-game psychology
- After a loss, play one calming bullet or take a 5-minute break — avoid tilt-queueing.
- When ahead, trade into simpler positions; don’t chase flashy wins at the cost of safety (LPDO is what happens when you leave pieces loose).
Example follow-up (placeholders you can use)
- Replay a recent opponent: someopponentusername — focus on the moment you lost material.
- Study the term for your recurring mistake: Loose Piece.
- If you want, paste one of your recent games and I’ll give a short annotated checklist for that exact game.
Next steps (short checklist)
- Start the 4-week plan and do the “loose-piece hunt” every other day.
- Play 10 controlled 3+2 games this week and apply the 3-second safety check habit.
- Pick one opening to clean up with 15 minutes of study: learn typical pawn structures and one safe response for opponents’ best tries.
Want a custom micro-plan?
Send one game (PGN or link) where you felt you blundered or lost on time and I’ll return a focused 3-point improvement list for that game.
🆚 Opponent Insights
| Recent Opponents | ||
|---|---|---|
| seiferhartmann | 1W / 0L / 0D | View |
| dianosky | 1W / 2L / 0D | View |
| charizardpikachu | 0W / 1L / 0D | View |
| voyager1997 | 1W / 1L / 0D | View |
| Josh Yun | 0W / 1L / 0D | View |
| rseko | 1W / 0L / 0D | View |
| sharkyay | 0W / 1L / 0D | View |
| mehatbug | 61W / 45L / 0D | View |
| shadowsax | 53W / 50L / 2D | View |
| spelllingchamp | 18W / 6L / 1D | View |
| Most Played Opponents | ||
|---|---|---|
| Chase Philips | 616W / 452L / 6D | View Games |
| Vincent Baker | 355W / 570L / 5D | View Games |
| Eilia Zomorrodian | 449W / 453L / 5D | View Games |
| 111michael | 462W / 437L / 6D | View Games |
| Lars Oskar Hauge | 294W / 560L / 1D | View Games |
Rating
| Year | Bullet | Blitz | Rapid | Daily |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 2395 | 2396 | 1873 | |
| 2024 | 2283 | 2291 | 1769 | |
| 2023 | 2167 | 2205 | 1835 | |
| 2022 | 2000 | 2036 | 1782 | |
| 2021 | 1853 | 1793 | 1878 | 941 |
| 2020 | 1792 | 1741 | 1913 | |
| 2019 | 1750 | 1490 | 1207 | |
| 2018 | 1843 | 1833 | 1307 | |
| 2017 | 1474 | 1437 | 1263 | 1000 |
| 2016 | 1396 |
Stats by Year
| Year | White | Black | Moves |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 5378W / 4858L / 72D | 5151W / 4999L / 75D | 2.0 |
| 2024 | 4489W / 3681L / 58D | 4320W / 3681L / 54D | 2.3 |
| 2023 | 1848W / 2035L / 37D | 1688W / 2057L / 41D | 16.9 |
| 2022 | 253W / 176L / 15D | 261W / 188L / 12D | 49.7 |
| 2021 | 114W / 83L / 3D | 99W / 97L / 5D | 54.9 |
| 2020 | 348W / 223L / 9D | 331W / 228L / 13D | 40.5 |
| 2019 | 354W / 269L / 11D | 338W / 258L / 18D | 51.1 |
| 2018 | 669W / 477L / 16D | 617W / 546L / 11D | 29.3 |
| 2017 | 724W / 409L / 18D | 626W / 497L / 24D | 51.0 |
| 2016 | 3W / 2L / 0D | 3W / 0L / 1D | 47.9 |
Openings: Most Played
| Bullet Opening | Games | Wins | Losses | Draws | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Amar Gambit | 517 | 309 | 194 | 14 | 59.8% |
| Unknown | 372 | 184 | 183 | 5 | 49.5% |
| Barnes Defense | 338 | 195 | 135 | 8 | 57.7% |
| Scandinavian Defense | 291 | 191 | 90 | 10 | 65.6% |
| French Defense | 263 | 174 | 80 | 9 | 66.2% |
| Blackburne Shilling Gambit | 248 | 159 | 86 | 3 | 64.1% |
| Caro-Kann Defense | 183 | 100 | 69 | 14 | 54.6% |
| Colle System: Rhamphorhynchus Variation | 174 | 101 | 69 | 4 | 58.0% |
| Australian Defense | 161 | 86 | 69 | 6 | 53.4% |
| Sicilian Defense | 149 | 85 | 56 | 8 | 57.0% |
| Blitz Opening | Games | Wins | Losses | Draws | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 42774 | 21731 | 20848 | 195 | 50.8% |
| Blackburne Shilling Gambit | 295 | 185 | 107 | 3 | 62.7% |
| Barnes Defense | 248 | 150 | 95 | 3 | 60.5% |
| Amar Gambit | 180 | 122 | 54 | 4 | 67.8% |
| Scandinavian Defense | 148 | 104 | 40 | 4 | 70.3% |
| Czech Defense | 117 | 71 | 43 | 3 | 60.7% |
| French Defense | 103 | 70 | 33 | 0 | 68.0% |
| Sicilian Defense | 89 | 61 | 27 | 1 | 68.5% |
| Colle System: Rhamphorhynchus Variation | 87 | 54 | 30 | 3 | 62.1% |
| Alekhine Defense | 87 | 54 | 33 | 0 | 62.1% |
| Rapid Opening | Games | Wins | Losses | Draws | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Hungarian Opening: Wiedenhagen-Beta Gambit | 37 | 29 | 8 | 0 | 78.4% |
| Modern | 34 | 14 | 19 | 1 | 41.2% |
| Colle System: Rhamphorhynchus Variation | 33 | 18 | 14 | 1 | 54.5% |
| Czech Defense | 28 | 15 | 12 | 1 | 53.6% |
| King's Indian Attack | 26 | 13 | 13 | 0 | 50.0% |
| Barnes Defense | 25 | 15 | 9 | 1 | 60.0% |
| Amar Gambit | 24 | 12 | 11 | 1 | 50.0% |
| Caro-Kann Defense | 19 | 7 | 10 | 2 | 36.8% |
| Sicilian Defense | 17 | 8 | 9 | 0 | 47.1% |
| Dutch Defense | 15 | 12 | 1 | 2 | 80.0% |
| Daily Opening | Games | Wins | Losses | Draws | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sicilian Defense: Taimanov Variation, American Attack | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0.0% |
| Amar Gambit | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0.0% |
🔥 Streaks
| Streak | Longest | Current |
|---|---|---|
| Winning | 58 | 1 |
| Losing | 26 | 0 |