Marc Paraguya: The Chess Adventurer
Marc Paraguya, known in the digital chess arenas simply as marc_paraguya, is a player whose rating graph looks like a thrilling rollercoaster – but one with a steadily climbing track! Starting modestly in 2015 with rapid ratings under 1400, Marc quickly catapulted to near 2500 in rapid chess by 2024, proving that persistence (and maybe a healthy obsession with puzzles) pays off.
A blitz enthusiast to the core, Marc’s speed and sharp instincts have amassed over 5,000 wins in fast-paced battles. His blitz rating peaked at a whopping 2515 in 2022, a testament to lightning-fast calculations and a knack for surviving the chaos of time trouble. Bullet chess isn’t left out either – with quick reflexes, he's earned a solid average rating north of 2000, flashing tactical awareness that can make even grandmasters blink.
Daily chess shows a different side of Marc: a strategist who savors long, thoughtful games, maintaining respectable ratings while juggling hundreds of games. Despite some ups and downs, he approaches each move as if there’s a story to be told – right until the bitter endgame phase, where he truly shines, indulging in long battles averaging over 75 moves per win!
Known for his impressive comeback rate of nearly 88%, Marc seldom surrenders to despair. In fact, his ability to win after losing material taps into the legendary fighting spirit – almost 100% of the time, a lost piece doesn’t mean a lost game on his watch. His psychological resilience is legendary; although his tilt factor is 138 (because who hasn’t thrown a rook occasionally?), he quickly dusts himself off and returns to dominate the board.
Marc’s opening secrets are closely guarded, but with over 11,000 rapid and blitz games using “Top Secret” openings and over 50% win rates, one thing is clear: his opponents never quite know what’s coming, adding to the aura of mystery around his game.
Off the board, Marc's knowledge of his most frequent opponents reads like a chess soap opera. He's shared hundreds of battles with rivals like “123oblivion1231” and “anaguasoft,” building fierce rivalries worthy of Shakespearean drama – or at least some fiery post-game chats.
Whether blitzing a bullet game in just seconds or grinding out an epic daily match, Marc Paraguya’s chess journey is a mix of grit, wit, and a dash of humor sprinkled over 10+ years of passionate play. Watch out for his next move – it might just be his best yet!
Recent blitz performance — what to focus on
You’re showing willingness to enter sharp, tactical waters in blitz, which often leads to exciting wins. In your losses, you faced well-prepared opponents who exploited dynamic positions, and in draws there were missed finishing chances or opportunities to simplify toward a favourable endgame. Treat these games as a short, intense study session: identify the turning points and translate them into concrete improvements for your next sessions.
What you did well
- Found aggressive ideas that put pressure on the opponent’s king. Your wins often came from initiating forcing lines that created practical problems for your opponents to solve under time pressure.
- Maintained activity and piece coordination in middlegame skirmishes, keeping lines open and creating chances to win material or convert with active pieces.
- Handled rapid tactical sequences with composure in several games, converting initiative into decisive advantages when the opponent overextended.
- Opened lines for your rooks and improved piece activity in the early to middlegame phase, which helped you regain momentum after exchanges.
Areas to improve
- Opening discipline: lock in a compact, reliable plan for 1-2 openings you enjoy. This will help you reach solid middlegames more consistently and reduce time spent on early decision-making.
- Plan before tactic: when you start tactical sequences, pause to confirm a clear follow-up plan. Avoid diving into complex combinations unless you’re sure the resulting position aligns with your long-term aims.
- Time management: practice allocating your initial time to identify the main plans and key candidate moves, then use rapid checking for concrete calculations. This helps prevent late-game time pressure and improves conversion in tight positions.
- Endgame conversion: in blitz, focus on converting advantages into a win rather than chasing additional tactical gains. Work on simple rook endings and king activity to seal games that go long.
- Pattern recognition: strengthen your familiarity with common middlegame ideas from your preferred openings so you can recognize when to push for a plan and when to simplify.
Opening performance snapshot
Your openings show a mix of solid and dynamic choices. Some lines lead to practical positions with good chances, while others drift into sharp, risky waters. A focused plan could be to lean into a small repertoire and deepen understanding of typical middlegame plans from those lines. For example, the English Opening Symmetrical Variation and related English setups are promising when you want a flexible, solid start. Consider studying a couple of your go-to openings to build quicker, clearer middlegame plans. If you want to review specific opponents’ ideas, you can check their profiles here: cm_ulaneom, Igor Khmelnitsky, FastFaun, Kritin. Additionally, you can explore opening references such as English Opening Symmetrical Variation and Trompowsky Attack to broaden your toolkit.
Practice plan and drills
- Blitz tactic drills: 5-10 minutes of quick puzzles focused on forks, pins, skewers, and mating nets to sharpen pattern recognition.
- Opening reinforcement: pick 1-2 openings you played recently and create a concise 15-20 move outline with typical middlegame plans and standard pawn breaks.
- Endgame practice: drill rook endings and simple king-and-pawn endgames to improve conversion in shorter games.
- Time management routine: in each session, set a timer for the first 15 moves and aim to decide your plan within the first 5-6 moves.
- Post-game review: after each session, identify the 2-3 critical moments and write down a better alternative plan for similar positions.
Next steps
In your upcoming sessions, aim to solidify a compact opening repertoire and pair it with clear middlegame plans. I can tailor a 2-week plan focused on your preferred openings, including short tactical sets and a lightweight study schedule to reinforce patterns you tend to miss in blitz. If you’d like, I can also annotate a couple of your recent games to highlight exact decision points and suggested alternatives.
Opponent references
Reviewing ideas against specific opponents can help you see recurring themes. Consider checking profiles of recent foes for additional context: CM_UlaneoM, IgorKhmelnitsky, FastFaun, ChesseroniPizza18. cm_ulaneom, Igor Khmelnitsky, FastFaun, Kritin
🆚 Opponent Insights
| Recent Opponents | ||
|---|---|---|
| christohahaha | 1W / 0L / 0D | View |
| musiciankid | 1W / 0L / 0D | View |
| mmm19999 | 0W / 0L / 1D | View |
| mustafabey21 | 1W / 1L / 0D | View |
| ezizena | 0W / 1L / 0D | View |
| karmnik1892 | 1W / 0L / 0D | View |
| criticalchessyt | 1W / 0L / 0D | View |
| laillaaaaaa | 1W / 0L / 0D | View |
| bluegloomy | 1W / 0L / 0D | View |
| declan-smith | 0W / 2L / 0D | View |
| Most Played Opponents | ||
|---|---|---|
| 123oblivion1231 | 119W / 151L / 15D | View Games |
| Master Shifu | 63W / 33L / 8D | View Games |
| Kevin_Arquero | 16W / 70L / 9D | View Games |
| Narquingden Reyes | 12W / 50L / 5D | View Games |
| 2011KING | 28W / 29L / 1D | View Games |
Rating
| Year | Bullet | Blitz | Rapid | Daily |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 2559 | 2345 | 1844 | |
| 2024 | 2010 | 2355 | 2325 | 1857 |
| 2023 | 2372 | 2300 | 1880 | |
| 2022 | 2051 | 2410 | 2252 | 1681 |
| 2021 | 2105 | 2321 | 2182 | 1454 |
| 2020 | 2117 | 2265 | 2260 | 1263 |
| 2019 | 1868 | 2289 | 2011 | |
| 2018 | 1889 | 2303 | 1903 | |
| 2017 | 2031 | 2211 | ||
| 2016 | 1834 | 2251 | ||
| 2015 | 1545 | 2149 | 1136 | 1681 |
| 2014 | 1675 | 1932 | ||
| 2013 | 1582 | 1940 | 1588 | |
| 2012 | 1652 | 1679 | ||
| 2011 | 1828 | |||
| 2010 | 1913 | |||
| 2009 | 2111 |
Stats by Year
| Year | White | Black | Moves |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 426W / 422L / 95D | 375W / 464L / 101D | 84.4 |
| 2024 | 93W / 86L / 23D | 80W / 101L / 20D | 83.8 |
| 2023 | 69W / 68L / 17D | 78W / 71L / 13D | 76.9 |
| 2022 | 416W / 338L / 76D | 365W / 395L / 78D | 80.8 |
| 2021 | 468W / 454L / 78D | 455W / 480L / 89D | 80.8 |
| 2020 | 314W / 296L / 29D | 297W / 310L / 43D | 54.8 |
| 2019 | 78W / 55L / 18D | 61W / 79L / 10D | 77.4 |
| 2018 | 269W / 237L / 53D | 216W / 298L / 43D | 81.5 |
| 2017 | 672W / 539L / 73D | 583W / 618L / 82D | 81.9 |
| 2016 | 479W / 367L / 63D | 409W / 439L / 49D | 82.4 |
| 2015 | 401W / 341L / 56D | 373W / 380L / 43D | 78.4 |
| 2014 | 3W / 1L / 0D | 1W / 1L / 0D | 50.0 |
| 2013 | 83W / 84L / 8D | 61W / 95L / 10D | 69.7 |
| 2012 | 2W / 12L / 0D | 2W / 10L / 0D | 34.0 |
| 2011 | 19W / 32L / 3D | 15W / 46L / 3D | 46.5 |
| 2010 | 15W / 37L / 3D | 14W / 50L / 2D | 41.8 |
| 2009 | 13W / 0L / 0D | 11W / 0L / 0D | 40.5 |
Openings: Most Played
| Rapid Opening | Games | Wins | Losses | Draws | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Amazon Attack: Siberian Attack | 86 | 42 | 32 | 12 | 48.8% |
| Caro-Kann Defense | 59 | 32 | 17 | 10 | 54.2% |
| London System: Poisoned Pawn Variation | 49 | 28 | 14 | 7 | 57.1% |
| Amazon Attack | 37 | 14 | 20 | 3 | 37.8% |
| Modern | 37 | 20 | 11 | 6 | 54.0% |
| Australian Defense | 32 | 19 | 6 | 7 | 59.4% |
| East Indian Defense | 27 | 14 | 8 | 5 | 51.9% |
| Caro-Kann Defense: Classical Variation | 25 | 10 | 11 | 4 | 40.0% |
| Caro-Kann Defense: Exchange Variation | 21 | 9 | 9 | 3 | 42.9% |
| Döry Defense | 21 | 16 | 4 | 1 | 76.2% |
| Blitz Opening | Games | Wins | Losses | Draws | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Caro-Kann Defense | 1068 | 463 | 531 | 74 | 43.4% |
| London System: Poisoned Pawn Variation | 925 | 469 | 382 | 74 | 50.7% |
| Amazon Attack: Siberian Attack | 773 | 365 | 343 | 65 | 47.2% |
| East Indian Defense | 477 | 231 | 195 | 51 | 48.4% |
| Australian Defense | 477 | 263 | 198 | 16 | 55.1% |
| Caro-Kann Defense: Classical Variation | 415 | 176 | 199 | 40 | 42.4% |
| Amazon Attack | 381 | 179 | 170 | 32 | 47.0% |
| Caro-Kann Defense: Exchange Variation | 360 | 159 | 177 | 24 | 44.2% |
| Döry Defense | 344 | 163 | 165 | 16 | 47.4% |
| Slav Defense: Alekhine Variation | 294 | 125 | 149 | 20 | 42.5% |
| Daily Opening | Games | Wins | Losses | Draws | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 98 | 27 | 71 | 0 | 27.6% |
| Amazon Attack: Siberian Attack | 49 | 26 | 20 | 3 | 53.1% |
| Diemer-Duhm Gambit (DDG): 4...f5 | 44 | 23 | 21 | 0 | 52.3% |
| Barnes Defense | 41 | 9 | 32 | 0 | 21.9% |
| London System: Poisoned Pawn Variation | 40 | 22 | 18 | 0 | 55.0% |
| Australian Defense | 35 | 14 | 20 | 1 | 40.0% |
| Modern | 33 | 20 | 11 | 2 | 60.6% |
| Caro-Kann Defense | 33 | 17 | 15 | 1 | 51.5% |
| French Defense | 30 | 14 | 15 | 1 | 46.7% |
| Amazon Attack | 27 | 16 | 11 | 0 | 59.3% |
| Bullet Opening | Games | Wins | Losses | Draws | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Caro-Kann Defense | 24 | 11 | 13 | 0 | 45.8% |
| London System: Poisoned Pawn Variation | 16 | 6 | 9 | 1 | 37.5% |
| Amazon Attack | 15 | 6 | 8 | 1 | 40.0% |
| Scandinavian Defense | 14 | 7 | 6 | 1 | 50.0% |
| Caro-Kann Defense: Exchange Variation | 11 | 6 | 5 | 0 | 54.5% |
| Amar Gambit | 11 | 5 | 6 | 0 | 45.5% |
| Australian Defense | 10 | 4 | 6 | 0 | 40.0% |
| Barnes Defense | 10 | 5 | 5 | 0 | 50.0% |
| Czech Defense | 8 | 5 | 3 | 0 | 62.5% |
| Alekhine Defense | 7 | 6 | 1 | 0 | 85.7% |
🔥 Streaks
| Streak | Longest | Current |
|---|---|---|
| Winning | 36 | 2 |
| Losing | 138 | 0 |