Profile Summary: mathnerd55
Meet mathnerd55, a grandmaster in the chaotic biology of blitz and bullet chess ecosystems. Starting as a fledgling pawn in 2020 with a modest blitz rating of 1010, mathnerd55 has undergone an evolutionary process worthy of Darwin himself, culminating in an impressive 2520 bullet rating by 2025. From crawling on all fours at a blitz rating of 809 to king of the jungle with a peak rating soaring over 2600 in bullet, this player is truly a queen of adaptation.
With a comeback rate of 91.16%, and a perfect 100% win rate after losing a piece, mathnerd55 exhibits resilience rivaling the toughest tardigrades, making survival (and victories) against impossible odds look like a walk in the biome park. Their playstyle resembles a complex DNA helix, weaving tactical awareness with strategic patience — the average moves per win hover near 81, proving that sometimes slow and steady does win the gene pool.
Known for an early resignation rate of less than 1%, mathnerd55 rarely throws in the towel, embodying the thriving spirit of a true chess organism evolving to the top of the food chain. With a strong affinity for openings like the Englund Gambit and the Scandinavian Defense, they deploy biological weapons that make opponents’ neurons short circuit faster than a startled electric eel.
When it comes to psychological tendencies, this player has a mild tilt factor of 14 — just enough to remind us all that even brilliant minds can occasionally mutate under stress. Interestingly, mathnerd55 performs slightly better as White, with a 50.32% win rate, versus 48.58% with Black, balancing the gametes of the chess chromosome.
Whether it’s blitz, bullet, rapid, or daily games, mathnerd55's rating evolution is a testament to natural selection in fast-moving tournaments. From early career openings to late-stage endgames executed with 81% frequency, their play is a symphony of strategic biology and calculated risk— a true virtuoso in the study of the game’s living cells.
Keep an eye on mathnerd55 — a player who proves that in the intricate biosphere of chess, evolution never sleeps, and every move is a chance for a checkmate mutation!
What you’re doing well
You show solid progress in handling dynamic positions and you frequently generate active piece play from the opening. In your rapid games, your pieces often coordinate well, creating pressure in the center and on the kingside when opportunities arise.
- You adapt to different openings and keep your king safe while prioritizing development and activity.
- Your ability to create practical threats and keep tension in the middlegame helps you convert advantages when your opponent overextends.
- You maintain composure under time pressure in many games, which is essential in rapid formats and supports consistent decision-making.
Key improvement areas
- Endgame conversion: work on turning small advantages into winning endgames, especially when pawns become passed or material simplifies.
- Opening breadth: while you have strong results in several lines, adding 1–2 additional White openings can reduce predictability and improve your readiness against a wider pool of Black responses.
- Pattern recognition: strengthen awareness of common tactical motifs in the middlegame to reduce missed threats or non-forcing moves that allow counterplay.
- Post-game analysis: after each rapid game, jot down the critical turning points and your alternative plans to reinforce learning from your own games.
Openings spotlight
Some openings in your repertoire are yielding reliable, comfortable positions, while others are more demanding. Notably, you’ve shown strong results in certain Scandinavian and Ruy Lopez structures, indicating you’re comfortable coordinating pieces in these families of positions. Consider continuing to refine key plans in these lines and pair them with a couple of flexible options to handle offbeat responses.
- Scandinavian Defense: strong performance when you’re playing with Black and guiding the middlegame from solid, active development. Scandinavian Defense
- Ruy Lopez: Morphy Defense, Anderssen Variation: solid, strategic lines that reward careful piece play. Ruy Lopez: Morphy Defense, Anderssen Variation
- Other top performers include closed or semi-closed systems where you maintain initiative. Sicilian Defense: Closed, Anti-Sveshnikov Variation, Kharlov-Kramnik Line
Endgame and conversion focus
Some rapid games reach simplified endings where precise king activity and pawn endgames decide. Improving in these final stages will help you convert more favorable middlegames into wins. Practice short, practical endgames (king and pawns vs king, rook endgames, and bishop vs knight endgames) to build automatic recognition under time pressure.
Practice plan for the next two weeks
- Daily tactical training: 15–20 minutes focusing on middlegame motifs and common tactics you’ve encountered.
- Two opening experiments per week: pick one White line to deepen and one Black reply to broaden your repertoire. Review key middlegame plans from those games.
- Endgame drills: 3 sessions per week with short king-and-pawn endings and rook endgames to build pattern recognition.
- Post-game analysis: after every rapid game, write a 5-minute note on turning points and alternative plans you could have pursued.
Next steps and quick wins
Implement a concise post-game routine and a scalable opening plan. Focus on identifying at least one clear middlegame plan in each main opening you play this week, and practice translating that plan into concrete moves with consistent piece development.
Want a quick reference to target openings? You can explore the following, which align with your recent performance patterns: Scandinavian Defense, Ruy Lopez: Morphy Defense, Anderssen Variation, and Sicilian Defense: Closed, Anti-Sveshnikov Variation, Kharlov-Kramnik Line
Progress notes
Your overall trajectory shows steady improvement in the last months. Keep a consistent practice rhythm, maintain a balanced repertoire, and sharpen your endgame technique to maximize your gains from the middlegame battles.
🆚 Opponent Insights
| Recent Opponents | ||
|---|---|---|
| Gary Leschinsky | 1W / 1L / 0D | |
| Sasandu Upeksha Dissanayake | 9W / 8L / 0D | |
| kolver | 5W / 7L / 3D | |
| grug-eren | 3W / 2L / 1D | |
| stevenbullets | 2W / 3L / 0D | |
| mohit-maringanti | 8W / 15L / 1D | |
| yousselov | 1W / 0L / 0D | |
| kmvh | 17W / 15L / 1D | |
| rebirth050824 | 1W / 0L / 0D | |
| last8pawns | 17W / 33L / 7D | |
| Most Played Opponents | ||
|---|---|---|
| Martinezzz2002 | 98W / 69L / 6D | |
| bedazzle99 | 64W / 51L / 6D | |
| Vladimir Danilov | 43W / 54L / 9D | |
| Kr V B | 51W / 37L / 11D | |
| trollingg | 41W / 49L / 4D | |
Rating
| Year | Bullet | Blitz | Rapid | Daily |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 2652 | 2492 | 2306 | 1644 |
| 2024 | 2643 | 2392 | 2178 | 1525 |
| 2023 | 2421 | 2128 | 2013 | 1377 |
| 2022 | 2254 | 1883 | 1636 | 1167 |
| 2021 | 1962 | 1685 | 1391 | 1002 |
| 2020 | 1185 | 1010 | 974 |
Stats by Year
| Year | White | Black | Moves |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 3713W / 2949L / 590D | 3494W / 3211L / 564D | 95.5 |
| 2024 | 4112W / 3767L / 773D | 3931W / 3976L / 707D | 90.9 |
| 2023 | 4630W / 3692L / 463D | 4478W / 3824L / 459D | 78.5 |
| 2022 | 4423W / 3874L / 400D | 4346W / 3875L / 415D | 73.5 |
| 2021 | 3246W / 2805L / 387D | 3095W / 3011L / 317D | 78.4 |
| 2020 | 434W / 369L / 38D | 382W / 430L / 28D | 67.2 |
Openings: Most Played
| Bullet Opening | Games | Wins | Losses | Draws | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Australian Defense | 8431 | 4369 | 3504 | 558 | 51.8% |
| Scandinavian Defense | 3877 | 1883 | 1735 | 259 | 48.6% |
| French Defense | 3752 | 1928 | 1559 | 265 | 51.4% |
| Caro-Kann Defense | 3744 | 1900 | 1603 | 241 | 50.8% |
| Amar Gambit | 3354 | 1691 | 1501 | 162 | 50.4% |
| Scotch Game | 3066 | 1484 | 1365 | 217 | 48.4% |
| Colle System: Rhamphorhynchus Variation | 2982 | 1441 | 1374 | 167 | 48.3% |
| Blackburne Shilling Gambit | 2770 | 1428 | 1173 | 169 | 51.5% |
| Barnes Defense | 2617 | 1306 | 1187 | 124 | 49.9% |
| Four Knights Game: Spanish Variation | 1860 | 1019 | 709 | 132 | 54.8% |
| Rapid Opening | Games | Wins | Losses | Draws | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Australian Defense | 59 | 35 | 19 | 5 | 59.3% |
| Blackburne Shilling Gambit | 48 | 28 | 19 | 1 | 58.3% |
| Scotch Game | 38 | 22 | 15 | 1 | 57.9% |
| Caro-Kann Defense | 37 | 21 | 8 | 8 | 56.8% |
| Scandinavian Defense | 28 | 24 | 2 | 2 | 85.7% |
| French Defense | 22 | 10 | 6 | 6 | 45.5% |
| Sicilian Defense: Closed, Anti-Sveshnikov Variation, Kharlov-Kramnik Line | 20 | 13 | 6 | 1 | 65.0% |
| Ruy Lopez: Morphy Defense, Anderssen Variation | 20 | 13 | 4 | 3 | 65.0% |
| Ruy Lopez: Closed | 19 | 5 | 11 | 3 | 26.3% |
| French Defense: Advance Variation | 18 | 10 | 7 | 1 | 55.6% |
| Blitz Opening | Games | Wins | Losses | Draws | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Australian Defense | 590 | 279 | 250 | 61 | 47.3% |
| Blackburne Shilling Gambit | 357 | 194 | 137 | 26 | 54.3% |
| Scotch Game | 265 | 121 | 120 | 24 | 45.7% |
| Caro-Kann Defense | 249 | 125 | 90 | 34 | 50.2% |
| French Defense | 228 | 102 | 99 | 27 | 44.7% |
| Scandinavian Defense | 215 | 116 | 86 | 13 | 54.0% |
| Barnes Defense | 174 | 85 | 79 | 10 | 48.9% |
| Amar Gambit | 158 | 85 | 62 | 11 | 53.8% |
| Colle System: Rhamphorhynchus Variation | 139 | 79 | 50 | 10 | 56.8% |
| Four Knights Game: Spanish Variation | 121 | 60 | 41 | 20 | 49.6% |
| Daily Opening | Games | Wins | Losses | Draws | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Blackburne Shilling Gambit | 12 | 5 | 6 | 1 | 41.7% |
| Scotch Game | 8 | 6 | 2 | 0 | 75.0% |
| Caro-Kann Defense | 8 | 3 | 4 | 1 | 37.5% |
| French Defense: Advance Variation | 8 | 4 | 3 | 1 | 50.0% |
| Sicilian Defense | 8 | 3 | 5 | 0 | 37.5% |
| Ruy Lopez: Morphy Defense, Anderssen Variation | 7 | 6 | 0 | 1 | 85.7% |
| Amazon Attack | 7 | 7 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| Ruy Lopez | 6 | 4 | 1 | 1 | 66.7% |
| Amazon Attack: Siberian Attack | 5 | 4 | 1 | 0 | 80.0% |
| Four Knights Game | 5 | 4 | 1 | 0 | 80.0% |
🔥 Streaks
| Streak | Longest | Current |
|---|---|---|
| Winning | 52 | 2 |
| Losing | 14 | 0 |