Mees van Osch - FIDE Master Extraordinaire
Meet Mees van Osch, a chess virtuoso whose brain probably hums with Sicilian Defense variations during downtime. With the prestigious title of FIDE Master in hand, Mees has carved out an impressive niche in the chess community, dazzling opponents with rapid calculations, snappy bullet blitzes, and a general aura of checkmate inevitability.
Rating Highlights & Style
Mees’s peak bullet rating is a staggering 2670 (achieved October 2024), proving lightning-fast moves are their specialty. Over in blitz, their best peak was around 2519, and for rapid games, they reached an admirable 2306. Even their daily chess skills shine at a perfect 2000 rating, because who says pawns need a break?
Mees is known for longevity on the board, with an average game lasting about 78 moves—clearly not one to give up early. Their psychological resilience is top-notch, boasting an impressive 85.7% comeback rate when facing material disadvantage (take that, pawns lost too soon!). Yet, watch out if things start going south: their tilt factor is 11, which means sometimes losing three games in a row might cause a minor meltdown. But hey, who doesn’t get a little salty over pawns?
Playing Strength & Tactics
Despite their solid rating, Mees’s win rates tell a story of a fierce competitor:
- Bullet: 54.5% win rate over an astounding 3,345 games (Top Secret openings mostly... shhh!)
- Rapid: An eye-popping 81.25% win rate—rapid fire with no mercy.
- Blitz: Strong at 56.2%, mixing speed and sharp tactics.
Character & Quirks
Beyond numbers and titles, Mees’s style is a blend of resilience and strategy. Whether it's squeezing opponents in long endgames—ending with a flourish after nearly 80 moves on average—or capitalizing after losing a piece (winning 53.3% of those times), Mees knows how to keep suspense alive until the bitter end.
When the clock's ticking down, Mees shines brightest—a perfect storm of genius and nerves of steel led to recent quick wins, including a classic resignation victory and an elegant checkmate in their March 2025 games. Though not immune to the occasional time trouble loss (hey, even FIDE Masters aren’t time lords), Mees van Osch remains a formidable presence on and off the board.
Opponent Highlights
Mees has tangled repeatedly with rivals like bad_left_hook and timgrutter03, and while some opponents barely stand a chance (looking at you, bugmonster and willc-h99 with perfect defeat records), others have managed to test Mees’s mettle. It’s a rich tapestry of fierce battles, blunders, and glorious victories.
Fun Fact
Mees’s best time to play? Midnight (00:00), apparently the witching hour for checkmates and sneaky wins. So if you’re challenging Mees, maybe avoid late-night games unless you’re ready for a mental marathon.
In summary, Mees van Osch isn’t just a master of chess moves but also a master storyteller on the 64 squares, weaving tales of speed, strategy, and just the right touch of mystery. Keep an eye on this one—you might catch a glimpse of a game for the ages.
Hi Mees!
Great job keeping your Blitz rating above 2519 (2021-06-13) and scoring a healthy number of wins against strong opposition such as Sandro Tskitishvili. Below is a short review of recent trends and some concrete ideas to sharpen your play further.
1. What you are already doing well
- Dynamic piece play. Your wins often feature rapid development and active piece coordination. In the miniature below you used fast-paced central tactics to win material and force resignation:
- Flexible openings. You switch comfortably between 1.e4, 1.d4 and flank openings such as 1.g3. This makes preparation against you tricky.
- Conversion of extra material. Several endgame wins show good technique, e.g. the rook endgame vs. Sandro Tskitishvili where you calmly created a passed a-pawn and forced resignation.
2. Patterns behind recent losses
- Time-pressure decisions. Four of your last five losses were on time while you were still objectively better or equal. Good clock handling will give an instant rating gain.
- King safety in the Sicilian/French systems. In the loss to blunderingmyself you castled short and then allowed
Qg4–h4–g3, leaving dark squares weak. A single prophylactic move (…h6 or …g6) would have neutralised the attack. - Endgame pawn-races. The marathon vs. Sandro Tskitishvili (see diagram) shows a missed drawing fortress once both sides queened. Work on king activity and outside passed pawn themes.
3. Opening map
Your best results arise from structures you understand deeply:
- King’s Fianchetto (1.g3). You score above 70 % when you obtain the d4–e4 centre. Continue refining setups against …d6/…c6.
- French-Sicilian hybrid (…e6 & …c5). As Black you reach comfortable middlegames, but watch the d5/f5 holes that appear after …f6/f5.
4. Middlegame focus areas
- Exchange sacs on the 7th/8th rank. Consider thematic ideas like
Rxe6!orRxf8+when the opponent’s back rank is weak. Reviewing classic games by Tal will sharpen your eye. - Centralisation in opposite-side castling. Some attacks stall because minor pieces stay on their original files. Look for Zwischenzug tactics (Zwischenzug) that bring a knight to e6/d6 or f5 earlier.
5. Endgame checklist
- Convert an outside passed pawn by cutting off the enemy king with your rook first – then push.
- When both sides queen, safety checks are key: force perpetuals immediately if down material.
- Refresh essential rook endings (Lucena, Philidor). Ten minutes of spaced-repetition each day pays huge dividends.
6. Time-management drill
The quickest rating gain for you:
- Adopt a 30-20-10 rule: by move 10 you should still have ≥ 30 s, by move 20 ≥ 20 s, by move 30 ≥ 10 s.
- Use the opponent’s think time to decide on candidate moves and blunder-check.
- Practise bullet “one-touch” input for pre-moving safe recaptures.
7. Suggested weekly plan (total ≈ 3 h)
- 30 min: solve 12-15 mixed tactics at 2400-2600 level.
- 20 min: review one blitz loss with an engine, focusing on the first critical mistake.
- 10 min: rehearse one theoretical line you find uncomfortable (e.g. 6.Bg5 in Najdorf).
- 15 min: play a 15 + 10 training game vs. a human, annotate without engine.
- Repeat x3 per week.
8. Motivation corner
Your hourly win rate has been steadily climbing – keep the momentum!
See you at the next training session. Good luck and enjoy the journey!
🆚 Opponent Insights
| Most Played Opponents | ||
|---|---|---|
| Nikoloz Kumsiashvili | 31W / 36L / 6D | View Games |
| Tim Grutter | 28W / 25L / 4D | View Games |
| scientificmouse | 25W / 19L / 6D | View Games |
| PoGgErS1 | 31W / 13L / 4D | View Games |
| Alek | 17W / 20L / 1D | View Games |
Rating
| Year | Bullet | Blitz | Rapid | Daily |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 2574 | 2510 | ||
| 2024 | 2670 | 2447 | 2306 | 2000 |
| 2023 | 2435 | 2393 | 2221 | |
| 2022 | 2464 | 2398 | 2221 | |
| 2021 | 2553 | 2407 | 2162 | |
| 2020 | 2444 | 2275 | ||
| 2019 | 2313 | 2368 | ||
| 2018 | 2346 | 2321 | ||
| 2017 | 2172 | 2252 | 1800 |
Stats by Year
| Year | White | Black | Moves |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 22W / 22L / 3D | 21W / 23L / 3D | 86.7 |
| 2024 | 157W / 101L / 16D | 151W / 109L / 19D | 83.8 |
| 2023 | 109W / 84L / 16D | 117W / 75L / 16D | 82.7 |
| 2022 | 269W / 131L / 21D | 222W / 178L / 24D | 79.4 |
| 2021 | 428W / 286L / 50D | 410W / 311L / 51D | 78.4 |
| 2020 | 219W / 128L / 27D | 221W / 135L / 23D | 80.4 |
| 2019 | 147W / 110L / 24D | 150W / 113L / 21D | 85.2 |
| 2018 | 203W / 123L / 16D | 180W / 157L / 16D | 81.4 |
| 2017 | 34W / 27L / 4D | 36W / 28L / 3D | 82.9 |
Openings: Most Played
| Bullet Opening | Games | Wins | Losses | Draws | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Amar Gambit | 718 | 409 | 261 | 48 | 57.0% |
| Nimzo-Larsen Attack | 141 | 78 | 52 | 11 | 55.3% |
| Sicilian Defense: Closed | 121 | 68 | 41 | 12 | 56.2% |
| French Defense | 116 | 71 | 41 | 4 | 61.2% |
| Caro-Kann Defense | 113 | 60 | 47 | 6 | 53.1% |
| Colle System: Rhamphorhynchus Variation | 109 | 57 | 45 | 7 | 52.3% |
| Scandinavian Defense | 106 | 66 | 36 | 4 | 62.3% |
| Modern | 105 | 63 | 35 | 7 | 60.0% |
| Benoni Defense: Benoni Gambit Accepted | 105 | 60 | 42 | 3 | 57.1% |
| Czech Defense | 99 | 51 | 45 | 3 | 51.5% |
| Rapid Opening | Games | Wins | Losses | Draws | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sicilian Defense: Taimanov Variation, American Attack | 5 | 3 | 0 | 2 | 60.0% |
| Sicilian Defense: Alapin Variation | 4 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| Sicilian Defense: Alapin Variation, Sherzer Variation | 3 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 66.7% |
| French Defense | 3 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| Ruy Lopez: Brix Variation | 3 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| Sicilian Defense: Dragon Variation, Yugoslav Attack | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| Sicilian Defense: Four Knights Variation, Cobra Variation | 2 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 50.0% |
| Four Knights Game | 2 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 50.0% |
| Modern Defense | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| Amazon Attack: Siberian Attack | 2 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 50.0% |
| Blitz Opening | Games | Wins | Losses | Draws | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Caro-Kann Defense | 92 | 57 | 28 | 7 | 62.0% |
| Unknown | 89 | 47 | 40 | 2 | 52.8% |
| Sicilian Defense: Closed | 76 | 34 | 32 | 10 | 44.7% |
| Czech Defense | 72 | 44 | 22 | 6 | 61.1% |
| Sicilian Defense: Alapin Variation | 68 | 41 | 21 | 6 | 60.3% |
| Sicilian Defense: Najdorf Variation | 64 | 37 | 22 | 5 | 57.8% |
| Modern Defense | 59 | 30 | 20 | 9 | 50.9% |
| Sicilian Defense: Alapin Variation, Sherzer Variation | 52 | 31 | 17 | 4 | 59.6% |
| Nimzo-Larsen Attack | 50 | 32 | 15 | 3 | 64.0% |
| Amazon Attack: Siberian Attack | 49 | 29 | 18 | 2 | 59.2% |
| Daily Opening | Games | Wins | Losses | Draws | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Amar Gambit | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0.0% |
| Czech Defense | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
🔥 Streaks
| Streak | Longest | Current |
|---|---|---|
| Winning | 32 | 0 |
| Losing | 11 | 2 |