About Matheus Garcett
Matheus Garcett, often known online as mgssantos, is a rising star in the world of chess who wears two crowns: a National Master title and a thriving streaming persona. He represents the blend of serious on‑board play with lighthearted online presence, proving that study and fun can share the same board. As a recognized titled player, he embodies the drive to improve while inviting others to learn along the way.
His work as a streamer has brought a broad audience to chess, where quick thinking meets quick banter. On streams, he explains ideas clearly, breaks down tricky positions, and occasionally breaks into friendly banter with viewers. A natural connector between offline tournaments and the online world, Matheus makes chess accessible without losing the competitive edge.
Chess Career
Matheus earned the National Master title from the National Chess Federation, a milestone that marks him as one of the strongest players in his circuit. He balances competitive play with content creation, showing up in Bullet and other fast formats with a fearless, energetic style. His career blends school-teacher patience in explanations with a competitor’s impatience for a good tactical shot.
- National Master title from the National Chess Federation
- Active presence in Bullet and online blitz environments
- Prolific streaming schedule that pairs game analysis with viewer interaction
Streaming and Online Presence
Beyond the board, Matheus is a streamer who shares openings, ideas, and the thrill of a clean finish. He welcomes questions, dissects critical moments, and plays fast, entertaining games that draw in both new players and veteran fans. His channel is a classroom filled with energy, where mistakes become learning moments and victories become shared celebrations. mgssantos also appears in community events and collaborative streams with fellow players, keeping the chess scene lively and welcoming. Matheus Santos
Playing Style and Openings
Known for a tactical, combative mindset, Matheus embraces sharp positions and dynamic openings. His blitz and rapid games often feature aggressive setups and practical decisions under time pressure. Repertoire highlights include familiar battlegrounds like the Sicilian and other provocative defenses, which he uses to unbalance opponents and create the kinds of problems that spark fights in the chat. Viewers enjoy seeing a fearless approach to the clock and a willingness to go for the win in every game.
Recent performance overview
You’ve been playing with aggressive intent in bullet, often reaching sharp middlegame muddles where tactics decide the outcome. That’s a strength when you spot tactical resources quickly, but it also means small inaccuracies can turn into quick losses under time pressure. Focus on two main ideas: keep your king safer when you’re intent on attack, and look for simpler, solid plans when the position becomes open or unsettled.
- In the latest high-activity game, the middlegame spiraled into a tactical melee that culminated in a mating net for your opponent. The lesson: in highly tactical moments, prioritize safe king positioning and avoid overextending on opposite sides when your pieces are still developing.
- In recent battles where you faced aggressive king-side play, your rooks and queens generated pressure, but there were moments where piece coordination and defensive resources could have held the position together longer.
- Across the set, you often begin with principled development, but you can improve how you convert early advantages into clear, practical plans (e.g., trade into favorable endgames when the position is open and the opponent’s counterplay is active).
Key patterns to adjust
- Time and safety balance: bullet rewards quick, accurate decisions, but don’t sacrifice king safety for a fleeting tactical edge. Build in a quick safety check before initiating forcing lines.
- Stay connected in the center: when the center is open or under pressure, look for solid moves that maintain central control and coordination between rooks and minor pieces.
- Manage risk when trading into open files: avoid exchanges that leave your king exposed or open files that your opponent can exploit with heavy pieces.
- Watch back-rank and diagonals: some losses came from back-rank vulnerabilities or diagonal threats against the king. Practice defensive setups and typical counterplay patterns for common openings you face.
Opening study: where to focus
Your opening choices show you’re comfortable in several dynamic setups. To gain consistency in bullet, deepen a concise, reliable repertoire around a couple of lines you enjoy. For example:
- French Defense: Classical Variation, Svenonius Variation — you’ve shown strong results here; drill the main middlegame plans and key break ideas so the position stays comfortable when the opponent presses. French Defense: Classical Variation, Svenonius Variation
- Nimzowitsch-Larsen Attack family (on White’s side) — this line can lead to flexible, dynamic positions if you’re comfortable with typical pawn structures and piece placement. Nimzowitsch-Larsen Attack: Classical Variation
- Scotch Game and related gambits — continue to refine the move orders that keep you ahead in development while avoiding tactical oversights. Scotch Game family
Practice plan and drills
- Daily tactical set: 15 minutes of focused puzzles emphasizing patterns that occur after early development and a quick check for mating nets on the board.
- Endgame basics: two rook endings and rook plus minor piece endings, 2 sessions per week, to improve technique in open positions.
- Opening consolidation: pick two openings you enjoy (one for White, one for Black) and study 3-4 model lines deeply per week, focusing on the typical middlegame plans and common tactical motifs.
- Game review habit: after each bullet game, write a 3-point recap: (a) the best move you played, (b) a critical mistake or missed plan, (c) one concrete improvement for the next game.
Next steps
- Choose two openings to own more deeply and prepare a short “checklist” of ideas you want to implement in the first 15 moves.
- Go through one recent loss and one recent win with a coach-friendly lens: identify the turning points and the safe alternative plans you could have chosen.
- In training, simulate quick-bullet sessions with a fixed 1–2 seconds increment to simulate real-time pressure, then analyze with a longer review to internalize better decision-making under time pressure.
Sample study aids
You can explore structured references to openings and patterns as quick study aids, for example:
- Opening study placeholder: French Defense: Classical Variation, Svenonius Variation
- Opening study placeholder: Nimzowitsch-Larsen Attack
- Opening study placeholder: Scotch Game
🆚 Opponent Insights
| Recent Opponents | ||
|---|---|---|
| palalaw123 | 0W / 1L / 0D | View |
| osirisxadres | 0W / 1L / 0D | View |
| 4le42 | 1W / 0L / 0D | View |
| l3wsti3 | 0W / 1L / 0D | View |
| colabone | 1W / 0L / 0D | View |
| dmoonchess | 1W / 1L / 0D | View |
| vevenciojr | 0W / 1L / 0D | View |
| trendb0l | 0W / 1L / 0D | View |
| leo_sampa | 0W / 1L / 0D | View |
| minotaurus-2013 | 0W / 1L / 0D | View |
| Most Played Opponents | ||
|---|---|---|
| gui070708 | 30W / 2L / 1D | View Games |
| jamp201 | 30W / 1L / 0D | View Games |
| matamnsms | 14W / 10L / 5D | View Games |
| Glaucio Cella | 11W / 6L / 6D | View Games |
| jb233555 | 23W / 0L / 0D | View Games |
Rating
| Year | Bullet | Blitz | Rapid | Daily |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 1957 | 2122 | 2020 | 2020 |
| 2024 | 1986 | 2245 | 1998 | 1599 |
| 2023 | 1931 | 2087 | 2002 | 1599 |
| 2022 | 1934 | 2074 | 2077 | 1627 |
| 2021 | 2017 | 2154 | 2077 | 1741 |
| 2020 | 1850 | 2096 | 2059 | 1750 |
| 2019 | 1788 | 1907 | ||
| 2018 | 1829 | |||
| 2017 | 1657 | |||
| 2016 | 1500 | 1589 | ||
| 2015 | 1633 | |||
| 2014 | 1430 | 1654 | ||
| 2013 | 1394 | 1488 |
Stats by Year
| Year | White | Black | Moves |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 229W / 243L / 25D | 197W / 272L / 38D | 76.2 |
| 2024 | 123W / 123L / 10D | 106W / 125L / 13D | 71.5 |
| 2023 | 126W / 60L / 7D | 103W / 79L / 10D | 67.3 |
| 2022 | 74W / 64L / 6D | 62W / 80L / 7D | 71.5 |
| 2021 | 365W / 291L / 31D | 328W / 333L / 28D | 71.6 |
| 2020 | 972W / 861L / 101D | 947W / 912L / 94D | 73.1 |
| 2019 | 70W / 54L / 5D | 68W / 67L / 5D | 69.3 |
| 2018 | 11W / 3L / 1D | 7W / 10L / 1D | 85.7 |
| 2017 | 2W / 0L / 0D | 0W / 0L / 0D | 35.5 |
| 2016 | 3W / 1L / 0D | 2W / 2L / 0D | 40.2 |
| 2015 | 3W / 3L / 0D | 1W / 1L / 0D | 46.0 |
| 2014 | 47W / 36L / 2D | 46W / 45L / 1D | 67.0 |
| 2013 | 42W / 36L / 5D | 37W / 39L / 3D | 70.6 |
Openings: Most Played
| Rapid Opening | Games | Wins | Losses | Draws | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Italian Game: Two Knights Defense | 11 | 10 | 1 | 0 | 90.9% |
| Sicilian Defense: Najdorf Variation | 8 | 7 | 1 | 0 | 87.5% |
| French Defense: Classical Variation, Svenonius Variation | 6 | 6 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| Sicilian Defense | 6 | 3 | 3 | 0 | 50.0% |
| Amazon Attack | 5 | 5 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| Alekhine Defense | 5 | 4 | 0 | 1 | 80.0% |
| Barnes Defense | 4 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 50.0% |
| Amazon Attack: Siberian Attack | 4 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| East Indian Defense | 4 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 75.0% |
| Ruy Lopez: Closed | 4 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 50.0% |
| Blitz Opening | Games | Wins | Losses | Draws | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sicilian Defense: Najdorf Variation | 431 | 218 | 198 | 15 | 50.6% |
| Sicilian Defense | 327 | 166 | 143 | 18 | 50.8% |
| Scandinavian Defense | 244 | 127 | 109 | 8 | 52.0% |
| Caro-Kann Defense | 195 | 95 | 93 | 7 | 48.7% |
| Amazon Attack: Siberian Attack | 183 | 83 | 94 | 6 | 45.4% |
| Sicilian Defense: Closed | 167 | 78 | 82 | 7 | 46.7% |
| Sicilian Defense: Sozin Attack | 139 | 65 | 64 | 10 | 46.8% |
| French Defense: Burn Variation | 135 | 76 | 53 | 6 | 56.3% |
| East Indian Defense | 133 | 62 | 65 | 6 | 46.6% |
| Amar Gambit | 117 | 59 | 48 | 10 | 50.4% |
| Bullet Opening | Games | Wins | Losses | Draws | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sicilian Defense | 34 | 19 | 15 | 0 | 55.9% |
| Amar Gambit | 31 | 15 | 16 | 0 | 48.4% |
| Sicilian Defense: Najdorf Variation | 19 | 10 | 7 | 2 | 52.6% |
| Scandinavian Defense | 17 | 7 | 9 | 1 | 41.2% |
| Amazon Attack: Siberian Attack | 14 | 7 | 7 | 0 | 50.0% |
| Modern | 13 | 2 | 11 | 0 | 15.4% |
| French Defense: Classical Variation, Svenonius Variation | 13 | 10 | 3 | 0 | 76.9% |
| East Indian Defense | 12 | 5 | 5 | 2 | 41.7% |
| Barnes Defense | 12 | 6 | 6 | 0 | 50.0% |
| Alekhine Defense | 11 | 7 | 2 | 2 | 63.6% |
| Daily Opening | Games | Wins | Losses | Draws | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 8 | 1 | 7 | 0 | 12.5% |
| Barnes Defense | 7 | 0 | 7 | 0 | 0.0% |
| Vienna Gambit, with Max Lange Defense | 2 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 50.0% |
| Sicilian Defense: Closed | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| English Defense: Blumenfeld-Hiva Gambit | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| Caro-Kann Defense | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| King's Indian Attack | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0.0% |
| English Opening: Agincourt Defense | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| Barnes Opening: Walkerling | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0.0% |
| Blackburne Shilling Gambit | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0.0% |
🔥 Streaks
| Streak | Longest | Current |
|---|---|---|
| Winning | 22 | 0 |
| Losing | 14 | 2 |