Michał Kanarkiewicz: The Streaming Grandmaster of Blitz
Meet Michał Kanarkiewicz, a Polish chess streamer whose Blitz chess journey reads like an epic novel peppered with knights, pawns, and occasional knightmare moments!
A Blitz Buff with a Sharp Rise
Starting in 2019 with a modest blitz rating around 1800, Michał didn't waste time warming up. By April 2020, he rocketed past 2100 and kept climbing with multiple peaks above 2400, reaching a peak blitz rating of an impressive 2467 by early 2025.
Master of the Sicilian
If chess openings were a mixtape, Michał’s playlist would be heavy on the Sicilian Defense, especially the Smith-Morra Gambit Accepted—where he's kept a pristine 100% win record over 42 games in blitz! Other Sicilian flavors like the Najdorf Variation and English Attack also sparkle with over 60% win rates. Clearly, when he chooses to enter the Sicilian kitchen, he brings all the culinary flair of a top chef.
Bullet and Rapid Play: Quick on the Draw
Not just a blitz specialist, Michał shines in bullet too, with a peak rating of 2406, and a rapid peak over 2100. However, his tactical genius truly lights up at blitz speed, where he has amassed a jaw-dropping 1530 wins against only 598 losses, plus a handful of draws.
Winning Streaks and Comebacks
His longest winning streak? A legendary 74 consecutive wins! And after losing a piece, his comeback rate is a phenomenal 81%. It’s as if losing a rook just fuels his determination to checkmate with style and sass.
Playing Style & Psychological Insights
Michał averages 67 moves per win, savoring the endgame like a fine wine. His 8% tilt factor suggests even he gets a bit grumpy occasionally, but hey, who doesn’t when they lose to the Smith-Morra? Most victorious when playing with the white pieces (about 70% win rate) and just as deadly with black, he resigns early in less than 0.5% of his games—not a quitter, but a fighter!
Streamer Extraordinaire
Beyond the 64 squares, Michał is a streamer who brings his audience along on thrilling tactical adventures, combining sharp chess insights with entertaining commentary. Whether it’s an elegant checkmate or a nail-biting defensive save, viewers get to see chess played at semi-GM levels peppered with personality and fun.
Memorable Battles
His most recent win was a brilliant checkmate victory over leonidas3282 in a Sicilian Delayed Alapin Variation – check out the game for a masterclass in technique and flair. And even in defeat, Michał showcases resilience, learning from losses against higher-rated opponents, always aiming for that next thrilling comeback.
Final Thoughts
With a blend of precision, speed, and streaming charm, Michał Kanarkiewicz is not just a chess player but a chess experience. Whether plotting Sicilian assaults or navigating chaotic bullet matches, he proves that chess isn’t just a game — it’s an art, a performance, and sometimes, an exhilarating rollercoaster ride.
Well-played, Michał!
Your most recent win (see the PGN below) shows why you are already a strong attacking player: you steered a complicated Sicilian – Delayed Alapin into an endgame up a full exchange and then converted cleanly.
Key Strengths
- Opening Initiative. In both classical and odds games you seize space early with
e4/e5or the f-pawn (e.g. your Fantasy Caro-Kann). When you play dynamically you often dictate the middlegame tone before move 10. - Tactical Vision. Your successes against lower-rated opponents come from spotting combinations such as
Rxe6+,Nxg7, and long forcing sequences – typical of an IM-strength attacker. - Confidence in Complications. The recent mating attack after 40…
gxh5shows you trust your pieces even when the position is messy. - Peak Performance. 2467 (2025-02-28) demonstrates that you are edging toward the 2500-blitz mark – a milestone worth celebrating!
Recurring Pain-Points
- Time Management. Four of your last six losses ended by flag in technically drawable or even favorable positions (vs.
ianishere2,Short-Attack, etc.). You are spending ~55 % of your clock in the first 12 moves according to . Reserve at least 40 s for the final 10 moves of a 3-minute game. - Premature Pawn Thrusts. Games vs.
SolSA70(Alekhine) andchessnasium2017(Caro-Kann Fantasy) show that earlyf3/f4andg4leave dark-square weaknesses. Before playing a wing pawn ask, “Can my opponent hit the center immediately?” (see pawn-break). - Defensive Accuracy. In the Najdorf loss to hekaderonda you declined the thematic …
h6/g5transition but then left d6 and g5 loose. Train “side-to-side” rook lifts and exchange-down defences. - Endgame Technique. You resigned vs.
chessnasium2017in a rook + pawn ending that still held drawing chances. Incorporate 15 minutes of rook-and-pawn endings per day; see Lucena position.
Action Plan for the Next 4 Weeks
| Focus Area | Daily Exercise | Success Metric |
|---|---|---|
| Clock Discipline | Play two 3 + 2 games forcing yourself to have ≥40 s on move 30. | Average time left on clock ≥20 s when game ends. |
| Solid Structure | Review 10 positions where you played early f/g-pawns; annotate alternatives. |
<2 “speculative” pawn pushes per game. |
| Defensive Drills | 30 puzzles/day tagged “defence” & “avoid mate”. | Raise puzzle accuracy from 78 % → 85 %. |
| Endgames | Play-out 5 rook-and-pawn bot endings vs. 2400 engine. | Score ≥3/5. |
Illustrative Snippet
The conversion technique from your latest win is textbook; study and repeat:
Progress Tracker
Use the interactive graphs below to monitor streaks and detect tilt hours.
Final Thoughts
You already possess the attacking flair of a titled player. Plug the defensive holes and refine your time usage and you will cross 2500 soon. I’m excited to watch your next games – especially rematches against SolSA70 and hekaderonda. Good luck and enjoy the journey!
🆚 Opponent Insights
| Most Played Opponents | ||
|---|---|---|
| xwitekx02 | 58W / 4L / 0D | |
| echoarc | 30W / 1L / 0D | |
| sapponaro | 24W / 2L / 0D | |
| janiety | 20W / 0L / 2D | |
| Wojciech Reza | 13W / 6L / 3D | |
Rating
| Year | Bullet | Blitz | Rapid | Daily |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 2501 | 2163 | ||
| 2024 | 2215 | 2410 | 2167 | |
| 2023 | 2229 | 2374 | 2134 | |
| 2022 | 2406 | |||
| 2021 | 2410 | 2160 | ||
| 2020 | 2330 | 1800 | ||
| 2019 | 1804 |
Stats by Year
| Year | White | Black | Moves |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 30W / 22L / 5D | 28W / 26L / 6D | 86.7 |
| 2024 | 213W / 37L / 11D | 206W / 43L / 8D | 69.9 |
| 2023 | 359W / 64L / 14D | 394W / 64L / 16D | 66.4 |
| 2022 | 13W / 13L / 3D | 14W / 16L / 3D | 77.8 |
| 2021 | 73W / 4L / 4D | 85W / 4L / 5D | 65.8 |
| 2020 | 228W / 196L / 36D | 219W / 185L / 49D | 78.5 |
| 2019 | 2W / 0L / 0D | 2W / 0L / 0D | 28.5 |
Openings: Most Played
| Blitz Opening | Games | Wins | Losses | Draws | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sicilian Defense | 207 | 148 | 48 | 11 | 71.5% |
| Sicilian Defense: Najdorf Variation | 178 | 111 | 57 | 10 | 62.4% |
| Bird Opening: Dutch Variation, Batavo Gambit | 118 | 97 | 21 | 0 | 82.2% |
| Scandinavian Defense | 67 | 42 | 20 | 5 | 62.7% |
| Caro-Kann Defense | 52 | 36 | 12 | 4 | 69.2% |
| East Indian Defense | 49 | 26 | 12 | 11 | 53.1% |
| Sicilian Defense: Alapin Variation | 49 | 33 | 14 | 2 | 67.3% |
| Czech Defense | 44 | 33 | 9 | 2 | 75.0% |
| Sicilian Defense: Closed | 42 | 31 | 10 | 1 | 73.8% |
| Amar Gambit | 42 | 32 | 8 | 2 | 76.2% |
| Rapid Opening | Games | Wins | Losses | Draws | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sicilian Defense | 20 | 17 | 1 | 2 | 85.0% |
| Sicilian Defense: Najdorf Variation | 14 | 12 | 0 | 2 | 85.7% |
| Blackburne Shilling Gambit | 11 | 10 | 0 | 1 | 90.9% |
| Sicilian Defense: Najdorf Variation, Opocensky Variation | 9 | 9 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| Bird Opening: Dutch Variation, Batavo Gambit | 7 | 5 | 1 | 1 | 71.4% |
| Caro-Kann Defense | 6 | 6 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| French Defense: Winawer Variation, Advance Variation | 6 | 6 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| Scandinavian Defense | 5 | 5 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| Sicilian Defense: Alapin Variation | 4 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| Sicilian Defense: Sozin Attack | 4 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 75.0% |
| Bullet Opening | Games | Wins | Losses | Draws | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sicilian Defense | 21 | 19 | 2 | 0 | 90.5% |
| Sicilian Defense: Najdorf Variation | 16 | 15 | 1 | 0 | 93.8% |
| Caro-Kann Defense | 8 | 7 | 1 | 0 | 87.5% |
| Australian Defense | 8 | 6 | 2 | 0 | 75.0% |
| Bird Opening: Dutch Variation, Batavo Gambit | 8 | 6 | 1 | 1 | 75.0% |
| Blackburne Shilling Gambit | 6 | 6 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| Scandinavian Defense | 6 | 5 | 1 | 0 | 83.3% |
| Sicilian Defense: Moscow Variation, Haag Gambit | 5 | 4 | 1 | 0 | 80.0% |
| Sicilian Defense: Alapin Variation | 5 | 2 | 3 | 0 | 40.0% |
| Modern Defense: Pterodactyl Variation | 5 | 4 | 1 | 0 | 80.0% |
🔥 Streaks
| Streak | Longest | Current |
|---|---|---|
| Winning | 74 | 3 |
| Losing | 8 | 0 |