Chess Player Profile: miso2211
Miso2211 is a seasoned chess competitor with more than a decade of experience across multiple time controls. Starting his journey in 2010 with a promising blitz rating of 1928, he has steadily honed his skills and evolved into a dynamic and resourceful player. His rating history shows a remarkable progression, with his blitz performance reaching an eye‐catching 2491 in 2025. Equally adept in bullet and rapid formats, miso2211’s career is characterized by consistency and constant improvement.
Known for his aggressive yet calculated style, miso2211 is not only a tactical force on the board but also a resilient strategist. His impressive win–loss–draw records in blitz, bullet, and rapid formats underscore his ability to outmaneuver opponents even under intense time pressure. His performance in critical moments is evident from high comeback rates and an exceptional win percentage even after facing material deficits, proving his tactical awareness and fighting spirit.
The depth of miso2211’s preparation is further revealed by his expansive opening repertoire. With a familiarity that spans from classical systems like the Ruy Lopez and Scandinavian Defense to the subtleties of the Caro-Kann and various Slav lines, he deeply understands the interplay of opening theory and middlegame dynamism. This versatility gives him an edge over opponents, enabling him to steer games into positions that suit his endgame prowess and strategic mindset.
His playing style is complemented by a commitment to thorough endgame technique – with an endgame frequency of almost 86%, miso2211 demonstrates that he fights until the very last move. His average move counts in wins and losses speak to a measured approach, balancing patience with creativity. Notably, his early resignation rate is remarkably low, illustrating a persistent and enduring competitive drive.
Miso2211’s performance is not only defined by his in-game achievements but also by his consistency over time. Analysis of his win rates by day and hour reveals that he is equally formidable whether playing in the heat of the evening or during quieter hours, with only slight variations in percentages. His psychological strength is underscored by a tilt factor of 14 and a modest difference between rated and casual game outcomes – evidence of a player who remains composed even under pressure.
In summary, miso2211 embodies the modern chess professional: continuously evolving, technically sound, tactically alert, and psychologically resilient. With a career built on consistent performance across formats, an extensive repertoire, and a passion for deep endgame battles, he continues to push his limits and inspires fellow players to strive for excellence on and off the board.
What you’re doing well
Your opening choices show flexibility and the ability to steer the game into positions you are comfortable with. In particular, you have solid results in several sound openings, and you often emerge with a favorable middlegame plan. Your strength-adjusted win rate is around 0.66, which indicates you convert advantages at a solid rate relative to the level of competition. The rating trend data also suggest a steady upward trajectory over different time windows, which is a good sign of consistent improvement.
- Two of your top short lists are performing very well: the Slav Defense with the Alekhine Variation and the Ruy Lopez with the Exchange Variation both show clean results in the sample set.
- Several classical openings—Caro-Kann Exchange, KGA: Fischer, 4.Bc4, and Scandinavian variants—also show strong win counts, suggesting you understand the typical middlegame plans in these lines.
- Multiple openings give you chances to press for an early initiative, which can lead to practical winning chances in faster time controls.
Opportunities to improve
Some openings in your mix have room to tighten, especially when the sample size is larger enough to show patterns. For example, the Sicilian Closed line looks healthy but would benefit from a deeper understanding of the typical pawn structures and common tactical motifs that arise after the early middlegame. A couple of other lines have small sample sizes; treat them as experiments and confirm them against expected plans before relying on them in critical games.
Opening repertoire: where to focus
Based on the openings data you’ve been using, you can anchor your study on a focused subset and still keep a flexible toolkit for opponents’ novelties. Consider strengthening these areas first, then gradually expand:
- Slav Defense: Alekhine Variation — strong results in the current sample. Build a concise plan for typical middlegame ideas and common pawn structures that arise after the early exchanges.
- Ruy Lopez: Exchange Variation — again, excellent performance in small samples. Deepen understanding of the pawn structure and typical endgames emanating from this line.
- Caro-Kann Defense: Exchange Variation — solid results; develop a reliable set of middlegame plans and a few tactical motifs to watch for in the middle game.
- KGA: Fischer, 4.Bc4 and Scandinavian-related lines — good performance. Use these as practical, simpler routes when you want solid development with clear plans.
- Other strong performers: Italian Two Knights, Czech Defense, and Slav lines show competitive results; treat them as backup options and study a couple of key ideas for each to avoid overextension.
Recommended training plan (4 weeks)
- Week 1: Lock in two main openings as your anchors — Slav Defense: Alekhine Variation and Ruy Lopez: Exchange Variation. For each, learn 3-4 recurring middlegame plans and 2 tactical motifs that often arise in these lines. Practice 20 short puzzles per week focused on the typical tactics in these structures.
- Week 2: Add Caro-Kann: Exchange Variation and KGA: Fischer, 4.Bc4 to your study list. Review common endgames that arise from these lines and create a small set of decision rules for when to simplify or keep pieces on the board.
- Week 3: Start a targeted endgame and technique block — pay attention to king activity, pawn structures, and converting minor advantage into a win. Include 15 minutes per session of practical rook endgames and minor piece endings.
- Week 4: Apply in practice — play rapid games with a focus on applying the anchored openings and the learned middlegame plans. After each game, do a quick post-mortem focusing on where the plan did or did not work and what you would change next time.
Actionable habits to adopt
- Prepare a compact opening notebook for your anchor lines (Slav Alekhine and Ruy Lopez Exchange). Include typical middlegame ideas, common pawn structures, and a few target lines to avoid being surprised by a novelty.
- Build a quick-check routine for the first 15 moves of each opening you play: ask what the main plans are, what the typical endgames look like, and what your biggest middlegame goals should be.
- Improve time management under rapid time controls by incorporating a consistent pre-move or pre-plan where you decide your strategy before turning to the computer board. This reduces time pressure and helps you avoid rushed decisions in critical middlegames.
- Integrate short, focused tactical training: 10–15 minutes of tactics daily aimed at recognizing common motifs that appear in your anchor openings (pins, skewers, discovered attacks, and typical pawn lever ideas).
Quick check-in plan
If you’d like, I can tailor a 2-week check-in plan based on your current practice rhythm and preferred time per day. We can set specific targets (e.g., number of games, opening study hours, and tactical puzzles) and review a sample game to reinforce the plans you’ve chosen.
🆚 Opponent Insights
| Recent Opponents | ||
|---|---|---|
| aalanouri_chess | 4W / 5L / 0D | View |
| volcaine007 | 1W / 0L / 1D | View |
| alvarorodriguezavila | 3W / 0L / 0D | View |
| qafarovniyazi | 0W / 2L / 0D | View |
| kdarsh | 1W / 2L / 0D | View |
| Sam Copeland | 2W / 4L / 1D | View |
| ultimate_capybara22 | 0W / 1L / 0D | View |
| sottorks | 4W / 1L / 0D | View |
| chessaholic_1 | 1W / 0L / 0D | View |
| realjinglai | 2W / 1L / 1D | View |
| Most Played Opponents | ||
|---|---|---|
| Jason Shi | 34W / 55L / 6D | View Games |
| oleg322 | 30W / 46L / 17D | View Games |
| Pepe | 39W / 47L / 5D | View Games |
| Norberto Vela | 51W / 34L / 5D | View Games |
| Chesstrueno | 41W / 43L / 5D | View Games |
Rating
| Year | Bullet | Blitz | Rapid | Daily |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 2433 | 1463 | ||
| 2024 | 2304 | 2410 | 2407 | |
| 2023 | 2310 | 2312 | 2399 | |
| 2022 | 2457 | 2326 | ||
| 2021 | 2209 | 2277 | 2165 | |
| 2020 | 2150 | |||
| 2018 | 1896 | |||
| 2016 | 2044 | |||
| 2015 | 1923 | |||
| 2014 | 2031 | |||
| 2013 | 2054 | |||
| 2012 | 2058 | |||
| 2011 | 2117 | |||
| 2010 | 1405 | 1928 |
Stats by Year
| Year | White | Black | Moves |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 2227W / 1865L / 423D | 1952W / 2107L / 455D | 89.3 |
| 2024 | 1810W / 1508L / 301D | 1639W / 1677L / 301D | 88.2 |
| 2023 | 797W / 658L / 127D | 692W / 736L / 130D | 86.7 |
| 2022 | 1259W / 1079L / 224D | 1155W / 1200L / 192D | 85.4 |
| 2021 | 2232W / 1913L / 486D | 2037W / 2118L / 512D | 87.0 |
| 2020 | 115W / 89L / 7D | 99W / 98L / 14D | 87.7 |
| 2018 | 11W / 12L / 1D | 9W / 15L / 0D | 89.2 |
| 2016 | 151W / 95L / 17D | 143W / 104L / 18D | 83.0 |
| 2015 | 64W / 58L / 6D | 61W / 58L / 8D | 75.6 |
| 2014 | 696W / 500L / 90D | 633W / 532L / 92D | 86.7 |
| 2013 | 0W / 1L / 0D | 0W / 0L / 0D | 90.0 |
| 2012 | 64W / 64L / 6D | 60W / 59L / 8D | 82.0 |
| 2011 | 207W / 157L / 30D | 190W / 172L / 27D | 86.1 |
| 2010 | 34W / 29L / 3D | 30W / 37L / 1D | 74.5 |
Openings: Most Played
| Bullet Opening | Games | Wins | Losses | Draws | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sicilian Defense: Closed | 249 | 138 | 98 | 13 | 55.4% |
| Scandinavian Defense | 103 | 46 | 50 | 7 | 44.7% |
| KGD: Classical, 3.Bc4 | 73 | 32 | 38 | 3 | 43.8% |
| Italian Game: Two Knights Defense | 69 | 26 | 39 | 4 | 37.7% |
| Amar Gambit | 63 | 29 | 27 | 7 | 46.0% |
| Barnes Defense | 58 | 34 | 24 | 0 | 58.6% |
| Amazon Attack | 56 | 27 | 25 | 4 | 48.2% |
| French Defense | 55 | 25 | 28 | 2 | 45.5% |
| London System: Poisoned Pawn Variation | 53 | 26 | 26 | 1 | 49.1% |
| Caro-Kann Defense | 53 | 26 | 27 | 0 | 49.1% |
| Blitz Opening | Games | Wins | Losses | Draws | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sicilian Defense: Closed | 6684 | 3462 | 2589 | 633 | 51.8% |
| Italian Game: Two Knights Defense | 1840 | 844 | 840 | 156 | 45.9% |
| KGD: Classical, 3.Bc4 | 1633 | 840 | 678 | 115 | 51.4% |
| Slav Defense | 1164 | 504 | 546 | 114 | 43.3% |
| Scandinavian Defense | 1163 | 543 | 517 | 103 | 46.7% |
| London System: Poisoned Pawn Variation | 1048 | 470 | 457 | 121 | 44.9% |
| Caro-Kann Defense: Exchange Variation | 872 | 387 | 412 | 73 | 44.4% |
| Amazon Attack | 840 | 387 | 367 | 86 | 46.1% |
| Caro-Kann Defense: Panov Attack | 813 | 371 | 361 | 81 | 45.6% |
| KGA: Scandinavian, 4.exd5 Bd6 | 795 | 394 | 346 | 55 | 49.6% |
| Rapid Opening | Games | Wins | Losses | Draws | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sicilian Defense: Closed | 15 | 11 | 4 | 0 | 73.3% |
| Italian Game: Two Knights Defense | 7 | 4 | 3 | 0 | 57.1% |
| Caro-Kann Defense: Exchange Variation | 4 | 3 | 0 | 1 | 75.0% |
| KGA: Fischer, 4.Bc4 | 4 | 3 | 0 | 1 | 75.0% |
| Amazon Attack | 3 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 66.7% |
| Czech Defense | 3 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 66.7% |
| Slav Defense: Alekhine Variation | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| KGD: Classical, 3.Bc4 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| Amar Gambit | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| Ruy Lopez: Exchange Variation | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| Daily Opening | Games | Wins | Losses | Draws | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ruy Lopez: Exchange Variation | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| KGA: Fischer, 4.Bc4 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| Ruy Lopez: Closed | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
🔥 Streaks
| Streak | Longest | Current |
|---|---|---|
| Winning | 18 | 0 |
| Losing | 14 | 1 |