Overview
David Balogh (also known online as Mistheoretical) is a titled chess player — a FIDE Candidate Master — best known for a fast, creative approach to the game and a soft spot for the Amazon Attack. A veteran of thousands of online encounters, David favors rapid time controls and brings a tactician’s flair to blitz and bullet arenas as well.
Career highlights
From humble d4 openings to jaw-dropping tactical finishes, David’s career is a patchwork of streaks, comebacks and relentless practice. Highlights include long winning runs and multiple appearances near the top of blitz leaderboards.
- Earned the Candidate Master title — a testament to consistent high-level performance.
- Known for epic streaks: a longest winning streak of 62 games and the resilience to recover from long downswings.
- Regularly active across Bullet, Blitz, Rapid and Daily formats with a strong preference for Rapid play.
- Frequent peak performances in blitz events and numerous tactical masterpieces online.
Playing style & openings
David combines aggressive opening choices with deep middlegame intuition and surprisingly patient endgame technique. He often steers games into unbalanced positions where his tactical awareness and comeback instincts pay off.
- Favorite weapons: Amazon Attack (including the Siberian Attack), the French Defense: Exchange Variation and the Amar Gambit — all played with an attacking mindset.
- Stylish tendencies: high endgame frequency and long decisive games (average decisive length is above many peers).
- Tactical strengths: strong ComebackRate and a solid WinRateAfterLosingPiece — someone who fights on rather than resigning at the first sign of trouble.
Sample opening repertoire you might see from David:
- Amazon Attack / Siberian Attack — versatile and aggressive.
- French Defense lines — especially the Exchange and classical Svenonius ideas.
- Occasional Amar Gambit — for fun, chaos, and practical chances.
Rivalries & notable opponents
David has built memorable rivalries with a few online foes. These long-running matchups have produced both tactical fireworks and grinding positional battles.
- Most-played opponent: Kincső Tóth — a rivalry with well over a hundred games.
- Other frequent opponents: luciiddream and m-e-m-e-n-t-o — matches that often settle into prepared opening lines and psychological duels.
Numbers that tell a story
Raw stats don’t capture the whole player, but they do show consistency and adaptability: huge blitz volume, impressive win totals, and strong results in Rapid — David’s preferred time control.
- Massive experience in blitz and bullet with thousands of games logged and an ability to perform under extreme time pressure.
- Remarkable tactical resilience: high ComebackRate and a tendency to win complex, decisive battles rather than quiet draws.
- Streaks: longest winning streak 62; longest losing streak 22; currently on a short winning run.
Visualize David’s Rapid trend:
Peak highlights: 2601 (2024-03-02) (peek into his top blitz form).
Notable game (example)
A short illustrative sequence — David loves positions like these. Play it back in the viewer below:
Personality, quirks & trivia
David mixes seriousness with a wink: he’ll spend time preparing a deep French line, then provoke chaos with an Amar Gambit when the mood strikes. Known to play best around 13:00 (peak time of day), he also has a measurable "tilt factor" — meaning a cup of tea between sessions is recommended.
- Best time of day: around 13:00 — expect sharp play.
- Psychology: TiltFactor suggests he’s human; he bounces back better than most.
- Early resignations are rare for serious games; he prefers to fight — average decisive game length and comeback stats back that up.
Where to find him online
Look for Mistheoretical on chess platforms and tune into blitz/rapid events if you want to see him at his most dangerous. Challenge politely — and be prepared for an Amazon Attack if you let him control the center.
Quick summary
Nice streak — your recent rapid games show a strong attacking instinct, reliable conversion, and very good opening results in your favorite systems. You win more than you lose, create practical chances, and finish games decisively. Below I highlight the concrete strengths to keep and the recurring weaknesses to target with short drills.
Recent game to review (clickable)
Here’s the most recent win I reviewed — Black checkmated on move 29 using aggressive rook activity and a back‑rank motif. You can replay it below or open your opponent’s profile: gezukak.
- Opening shown: Bishops Opening
- Replay the game:
What you’re doing well
- Finisher instinct — you convert advantages cleanly and often find the finishing blow (back‑rank / mating nets show up repeatedly).
- Active rooks and major‑piece play — you use rook lifts, swings to the 7th/2nd and doubling effectively to create decisive threats.
- Opening mastery in your chosen lines — your results show deep practical knowledge in lines like the Amazon Attack and several French variations (high win rates).
- Tactical alertness — you spot combinations and remove defenders quickly, turning small imbalances into wins.
- Consistency — your overall W/L/D record is excellent; you keep pressure in most games instead of going passive.
Recurring weaknesses to target
- Pawn over‑pushes and holes — in a few games you push pawns too quickly (or without preparation) and create weak squares near your king or in the center. Work on timing pawn breaks and preparing them with piece play.
- Occasional rush to mate patterns without checking counterplay — the mate comes fast, but sometimes you miss defensive resources (intermezzos) when the position gets sharp. Slow down one extra half step in complications and check opponent replies carefully.
- Minor piece coordination in closed moments — when the position becomes closed or simplified, your knights/bishops occasionally lack good squares; improve maneuver plans and prophylaxis in those structures.
- Reliance on opponents’ inaccuracies — many wins come from opponents blundering into tactics. Aim to create positions where opponents must make precise defensive moves rather than just wait for mistakes.
Concrete practice plan (next 2–6 weeks)
- Daily tactics: 10–20 minutes solving mixed tactics (focus: back‑rank mates, discovered checks, rook/queen batteries). Target 8–12 solved problems per day with quality (not speed) for two weeks.
- Endgame drill: 3 simple endgames twice a week — king+rook vs king, basic rook endgames, and Lucena position. These consolidate your conversion technique when ahead.
- Opening refinement: for your top systems (Amazon Attack, French Exchange/Advance, Slav) build one short notebook per opening:
- Three typical pawn structures and the correct plan for each.
- One trap to avoid and one trap to aim for.
- Checklists in complex positions: before making a critical move, run a 4‑point check: (1) immediate captures for both sides, (2) checks, (3) opponent threats, (4) your worst–case reply. This slows down tactical misses.
- Weekly slow game: play one 30|5 rapid or 45|10 game focused on technique (no brainless aggression). Use this to practice patience and prophylaxis.
Targeted drills and study resources
- Tactics set: pick puzzles labeled “Back‑rank”, “Rook lifts”, and “Decoy/deflection” — 3 of each per session.
- Game study: take two of your wins and two of your close calls (loss or narrow win) and annotate them — explain the plan for both sides in plain English, then check with an engine.
- Model games: watch/annotate one master game in the Amazon Attack and one in the French Exchange each week — focus on pawn breaks and where the minor pieces go.
Opening notes (based on your performance)
Your opening win rates are excellent in several systems (Amazon Attack, French Exchange, Slav). Keep what’s working, but:
- Don’t try too many new sidelines before you understand the typical middlegame plans — master the pawn structures of 2–3 openings deeply rather than 10 superficially.
- Prepare short anti‑system responses for common sidelines your opponents play (one central reply and one plan if they deviate).
- If you want, I can give a 1‑page “cheat sheet” (key plans + common traps) for each opening you listed — tell me which two you want first.
Time management and psychological tips
- You tend to keep reasonable clock times — keep the habit of spending a little more time (10–20 seconds extra) on critical branching points.
- Use simple heuristics in time trouble: prioritize king safety and tactical forcing moves; avoid long quiet maneuvers unless you’re sure.
- When you convert a small edge, switch to a checklist: decrease counterplay, centralize king, trade off active enemy pieces that can create threats.
Follow‑up
If you’d like I can:
- Annotate one specific game (pick any from your recent wins or the loss you want to fix).
- Make a one‑page opening cheat sheet for two systems you play most.
- Send a 2‑week tactical workout tailored to back‑rank and rook tactics.
Tell me which option you prefer and I’ll prepare it. If you want a deep dive on the recent game I embedded above, say “Analyze the Gezukak game” and I’ll annotate move‑by‑move.
🆚 Opponent Insights
| Recent Opponents | ||
|---|---|---|
| teh000 | 1W / 0L / 0D | View |
| geniusnickster | 1W / 0L / 0D | View |
| BOZZOCHESS123 | 0W / 1L / 0D | View |
| solocle | 1W / 0L / 0D | View |
| nomeansnoyou | 0W / 1L / 0D | View |
| Zoar Prodhan | 1W / 0L / 0D | View |
| scatter_x3 | 0W / 1L / 0D | View |
| chromenos_47 | 1W / 1L / 0D | View |
| icdats | 0W / 1L / 0D | View |
| slava_ukr | 1W / 0L / 0D | View |
| Most Played Opponents | ||
|---|---|---|
| Kincső Tóth | 153W / 16L / 6D | View Games |
| luciiddream | 77W / 93L / 3D | View Games |
| m-e-m-e-n-t-o | 81W / 6L / 5D | View Games |
| schieberspieler | 24W / 39L / 12D | View Games |
| sportyspice | 29W / 35L / 0D | View Games |
Rating
| Year | Bullet | Blitz | Rapid | Daily |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 2474 | 2310 | ||
| 2024 | 2496 | 2601 | 2229 | |
| 2023 | 2107 | 2437 | 2310 | 2210 |
| 2022 | 2334 | 2443 | 2280 | 2244 |
| 2021 | 2236 | 2430 | 2042 | 2221 |
| 2020 | 2162 | 2347 | 2042 | 2338 |
| 2019 | 2291 | 2471 | 2458 | 2312 |
| 2018 | 2351 | 2299 | 1516 | 2115 |
| 2017 | 2225 | 2208 | ||
| 2016 | 2116 | 2182 | 1713 | |
| 2015 | 2077 | |||
| 2014 | 1958 |
Stats by Year
| Year | White | Black | Moves |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 8W / 12L / 1D | 15W / 10L / 0D | 79.4 |
| 2024 | 414W / 274L / 37D | 394W / 278L / 51D | 85.5 |
| 2023 | 598W / 280L / 58D | 521W / 353L / 55D | 83.4 |
| 2022 | 1167W / 738L / 101D | 1063W / 811L / 101D | 81.7 |
| 2021 | 543W / 320L / 46D | 491W / 354L / 63D | 82.0 |
| 2020 | 530W / 252L / 40D | 489W / 276L / 50D | 52.6 |
| 2019 | 491W / 265L / 39D | 405W / 334L / 50D | 65.4 |
| 2018 | 920W / 482L / 54D | 898W / 486L / 60D | 69.9 |
| 2017 | 1174W / 1017L / 24D | 1148W / 1040L / 30D | 22.6 |
| 2016 | 183W / 39L / 6D | 186W / 35L / 6D | 66.9 |
| 2015 | 45W / 7L / 1D | 43W / 12L / 1D | 78.4 |
| 2014 | 76W / 19L / 4D | 77W / 19L / 2D | 76.1 |
Openings: Most Played
| Bullet Opening | Games | Wins | Losses | Draws | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Amazon Attack: Siberian Attack | 317 | 193 | 110 | 14 | 60.9% |
| Amazon Attack | 191 | 125 | 58 | 8 | 65.5% |
| Amar Gambit | 167 | 93 | 68 | 6 | 55.7% |
| French Defense | 131 | 78 | 47 | 6 | 59.5% |
| Australian Defense | 124 | 77 | 46 | 1 | 62.1% |
| French Defense: Exchange Variation | 119 | 88 | 26 | 5 | 74.0% |
| French Defense: Classical Variation, Svenonius Variation | 115 | 82 | 28 | 5 | 71.3% |
| Modern | 110 | 58 | 48 | 4 | 52.7% |
| Benoni Defense: Benoni Gambit Accepted | 93 | 50 | 40 | 3 | 53.8% |
| Nimzo-Larsen Attack | 81 | 39 | 38 | 4 | 48.1% |
| Rapid Opening | Games | Wins | Losses | Draws | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Amazon Attack: Siberian Attack | 22 | 16 | 4 | 2 | 72.7% |
| Amazon Attack | 15 | 15 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| French Defense: Exchange Variation | 10 | 10 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| French Defense | 8 | 7 | 0 | 1 | 87.5% |
| French Defense: Advance Variation | 8 | 7 | 0 | 1 | 87.5% |
| Amar Gambit | 4 | 3 | 0 | 1 | 75.0% |
| English Defense: Blumenfeld-Hiva Gambit | 4 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 50.0% |
| Barnes Defense | 3 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 66.7% |
| Unknown | 3 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| Slav Defense | 3 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| Daily Opening | Games | Wins | Losses | Draws | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Amazon Attack: Siberian Attack | 45 | 28 | 6 | 11 | 62.2% |
| London System: Poisoned Pawn Variation | 39 | 26 | 5 | 8 | 66.7% |
| East Indian Defense | 32 | 19 | 4 | 9 | 59.4% |
| Caro-Kann Defense | 31 | 19 | 7 | 5 | 61.3% |
| Amazon Attack | 30 | 25 | 2 | 3 | 83.3% |
| Caro-Kann Defense: Classical Variation | 29 | 21 | 4 | 4 | 72.4% |
| Caro-Kann Defense: Exchange Variation | 19 | 14 | 1 | 4 | 73.7% |
| Australian Defense | 17 | 15 | 1 | 1 | 88.2% |
| Amar Gambit | 15 | 9 | 4 | 2 | 60.0% |
| Slav Defense | 14 | 10 | 2 | 2 | 71.4% |
| Blitz Opening | Games | Wins | Losses | Draws | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 4567 | 2426 | 2131 | 10 | 53.1% |
| Amazon Attack: Siberian Attack | 2715 | 1565 | 989 | 161 | 57.6% |
| Amazon Attack | 1325 | 814 | 452 | 59 | 61.4% |
| French Defense | 675 | 394 | 246 | 35 | 58.4% |
| French Defense: Exchange Variation | 558 | 351 | 170 | 37 | 62.9% |
| English Defense: Blumenfeld-Hiva Gambit | 450 | 254 | 170 | 26 | 56.4% |
| French Defense: Classical Variation, Svenonius Variation | 417 | 237 | 158 | 22 | 56.8% |
| French Defense: Winawer Variation, Advance Variation | 410 | 240 | 144 | 26 | 58.5% |
| French Defense: Advance Variation | 387 | 226 | 152 | 9 | 58.4% |
| Benoni Defense: Benoni Gambit Accepted | 336 | 215 | 106 | 15 | 64.0% |
🔥 Streaks
| Streak | Longest | Current |
|---|---|---|
| Winning | 62 | 2 |
| Losing | 22 | 0 |